reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There's concern about the lack of good data on vaccine adverse effects. The CDC's surveillance system captures less than 1% of vaccine injuries, which is inexcusable. Congress and the Institute of Medicine have repeatedly ordered the CDC to improve it. Now, with Kennedy sworn in, there's a new commission and a congressional caucus to address these issues, targeting big agriculture, pharma, and food. The HHS Secretary is announcing a new, more accurate vaccine injury reporting system designed to be more transparent than the old one and release secret studies. The goal is to revamp the system to reveal the real picture of vaccine injuries and encourage doctors to report them. This approach aims to strategically show the data and address problems rather than outright banning anything, similar to discrediting fraudulent systems. We're coming for the globalists' assets.

The US government has paid over $5.22 billion to vaccine victims via the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). As of June 28, 2024, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reported 48,101 deaths and over 2.6 million adverse events. These figures are verifiable facts, accessible through government links.

Over 1.6 million adverse event reports have been filed to VAERS for COVID-19 vaccines, with a significant increase in 2021. The underreporting factor is estimated to be around 31 for severe events like hospitalizations and death. The speaker believes the mRNA platform was used to gather data for future gene therapy applications.

The presentation examines the pattern of deployment of toxic vaccine batches using the VAERS dataset. It notes that the Covid vaccine was deployed in batches or lots, each with a number, and the batches are listed in VAERS in the order they were created, with adverse reactions recorded for each batch. A graph was produced with adverse reactions on the vertical axis and the sequence of batches in time on the horizontal axis, showing patterns of deployment in 2021. Each dot represents a batch, and the speaker highlights that about 95% of batches lie close to the x-axis, forming a thick line, with 80% of all batches generating only one or two adverse reaction reports and thus considered harmless. In contrast, the “clouds” and spikes above the x-axis represent toxic batches, with all such dots categorized as toxic. The breakdown given is: - 5% of all batches belong to these clouds and spikes. - The truly toxic batches generate 1,000 to 5,000 adverse reaction reports and are found above a red line, causing harm across every state in the USA where deployed. - These very toxic batches comprise about 0.65% of all batches (roughly one in 200). Total batches deployed in 2021 and recorded in VAERS: 28,330. Eighty percent are harmless (1–2 reports) within the x-axis line; the remaining 20% are more toxic, with the most extreme range up to 5,000 reports. Lesson two asks: “Who did it?” It identifies three companies appearing in VAERS: Moderna, Pfizer, and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson). By filtering VAERS data in Excel, the speaker presents the contributions of each company to the toxic-batch deployment. In the full picture, Moderna accounts for every batch in the first half of the chart except two spikes pre- and post- Moderna, which are attributed to Janssen. Pfizer’s results (from their batches) match the latter half of the chart exactly, suggesting Pfizer appeared to have taken over supply for every USA batch in the latter portion. The deployment is described as carefully compartmentalized, with phases where Janssen, then Moderna, then Janssen again, and then Pfizer dominate in sequence, followed by Moderna exiting and Pfizer continuing. Lesson three describes the purpose behind Moderna’s deployment of toxic batches: Moderna appears to randomly distribute toxic batches, with the intention of harm, possibly to induce fear of a pandemic and justify stronger policies. Janssen’s initial spike is interpreted as a test before Moderna’s deployment. Pfizer is described as carrying out rigorous dosage testing, deploying the most lethal batches systematically and recording effects, and acting as the only company administering batches at that stage to avoid interference from others. Lesson four details the fine art of lethal dosage testing. Pfizer’s deployment is shown as highly clustered in time, forming distinct periods of toxic batches separated by intervals of harmless batches. Toxic batches cluster in discrete ranges (e.g., 3,000–2,500; 2,000–1,500; 1,500–1,000), with abrupt transitions between clusters and harmless periods. Toxicity ranges are not random but follow a stepwise, linear decline across clusters. The speaker concludes that Pfizer deployed highly toxic batches for discrete dosage testing across all states, implying thousands of hospitalizations, injuries, and deaths. The presentation ends by contrasting that 80% of batches are harmless, while a minority exhibit wide toxicity ranges, with claims of systematic, non-random deployment designed for testing, and notes an ironic statement about American exposure to what is described as German-led testing.

Dr. Umesh Adalja mentions a small segment may be harmed by any vaccine. However, recent statements from various sources suggest an attempt to downplay vaccine injuries as insignificant. Despite claims of minimal harm, data shows over 33 million Americans have been affected by the COVID-19 vaccine since 2021, with 1.1 million deaths, 4 million disabilities, and 28.6 million injuries leading to chronic illness.

There are 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe fatal and nonfatal vaccine injury syndromes. These vaccines cause real side effects in four major categories: cardiovascular issues like heart inflammation and cardiac arrest, neurologic problems such as stroke and neuropathy, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to usual treatments, and immune system abnormalities.

You need to know the risk profile for products like the COVID vaccine. Many discuss adverse effects, but we lack sufficient data, which is unacceptable. Our surveillance system doesn't work. In 2010, the CDC had the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, meant to detect injuries. However, a CDC study revealed it captures less than 1% of vaccine injuries. This is inexcusable. Congress, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Academy of Sciences have repeatedly directed the CDC to develop a better vaccine surveillance system. We will require it and address it immediately.

The government tracked vaccine side effects using VAERS and v safe systems. V safe required all Americans to report any adverse events after vaccination. 10 million Americans signed up, with 7.7% seeking medical care within the first 6 months post-vaccination. Most visits were for emergency care or hospitalization.

There are over 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe fatal and non-fatal vaccine injury syndromes. These vaccines have real side effects in four major categories: cardiovascular issues like heart inflammation and cardiac arrest, neurologic problems such as stroke and neuropathy, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to usual treatments, and immune system abnormalities.

There have been unprecedented injuries, disabilities, and deaths from COVID-19 vaccines. By January 22, 2021, 182 deaths were reported to the US vaccine adverse event reporting system. The FDA and CDC, who co-administer the program, lack experience in vaccine campaigns. Pfizer knew about 1,223 deaths within 90 days of their vaccine but kept it confidential. Moderna has not released their data. There are over 34,100 peer-reviewed papers on vaccine injuries, disabilities, and deaths.

The government tracked vaccine side effects through the VAERS system and the new v safe system for COVID-19 vaccines. V safe required all Americans to sign up and report any adverse events after vaccination. Around 7.7% of the 10 million participants sought medical care within the first 6 months, with over 70% needing emergency or urgent care. The CDC published 40 studies based on this data.

Everything regarding vaccine policy will change due to better information. No vaccines given in the first six months of life have been tested, except for the DTP vaccine. According to the Institute of Medicine, the one study done on DTP found a link, but it was thrown out because it was based on the CDC's surveillance system, which they deemed no good. The speaker questions why the CDC lacks a functional surveillance system, especially since vaccines are exempt from prelicensing safety testing. The CDC's system captures fewer than one percent of vaccine injuries, rendering it worthless. The speaker pledges to fix the system and follow the science, including publishing all data sets, replicating studies, and publishing peer reviews, which the CDC has never done. This will provide the public with real answers for the first time.

According to the CDC VAERS data, around 18,000 Americans have died after receiving the vaccine. Out of these cases, 1,100 people died on the same day they got the shot. However, the CDC denies any connection between the vaccine and these deaths, considering them to be coincidences. The CDC also acknowledges that the VAERS numbers are significantly underreported, with estimates ranging from 30 to 40 times. Taking the lower estimate, this would mean that nearly 600,000 Americans have died with the vaccine.

The speaker states that vaccine policy will change due to better information. They claim that none of the vaccines given in the first six months of life have been tested, except for the DTP vaccine, which a study linked to issues, but was dismissed due to problems with the CDC's surveillance system. The speaker asserts the CDC lacks a functional surveillance system to capture vaccine injuries, with their own study showing it captures less than 1% of injuries. They plan to fix this by implementing a functional surveillance system, using data management, and providing answers to the public. The speaker promises to follow the science, use gold standard science, publish all datasets, replicate studies, and publish peer reviews, which they claim the CDC has never done, to provide real answers.

An analysis of clinical trial data showed that for every eight hundred people vaccinated, one suffers a serious adverse event. The goal is to end the silence for the one in eight hundred. It is time to stop politicizing vaccine injuries and start building meaningful recognition, research, competent care, and fair and just compensation.

The CDC funded a machine counting system designed to analyze vaccine injuries through cluster analysis. Led by Lazarus, the team tested the system at Harvard Pilgrim HMO, comparing its findings to VAERS data. The study revealed that VAERS captured less than 1% of vaccine injuries, while their system captured over 95%. The data indicated injuries in approximately 2.7% of all vaccines, roughly one out of every 37. Despite the system's accuracy, the CDC allegedly shelved it in 2010. The speaker claims that for 22 years the CDC has continued to use VAERS, a system they know doesn't work. The speaker advocates for changing VAERS or creating a supplementary system that accurately tracks vaccine injuries.

David Ketzer and others have stated the current vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) does not work and needs replacement. VAERS is voluntary, and doctors face disincentives to report vaccine injuries, including time constraints, uncertainty about causality, and emotional reluctance. In 2010, the CDC designed a machine counting system using cluster analysis to identify unique injury patterns associated with specific vaccines. This system, developed by a team led by Lazarus, was tested at Harvard Pilgrim HMO. The results indicated that VAERS captured fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries, while the new system captured over 95%. The data revealed injuries in approximately 2.7% of all vaccines, or about one in every 37 vaccines. Despite the system's accuracy, the CDC shelved it in 2010 and continues to use VAERS, even though it is known to be ineffective.

The CDC planned to analyze VAERS data for COVID-19 vaccine safety signals using Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), where a score above two would trigger further inquiry. ICANN requested the PRR results via FOIA and found "incredibly concerning results," with some harms having PRRs of 30, 50, or 100. The CDC then switched to Empirical Bayesian (EB) analysis by the FDA. ICANN requested this data via FOIA, leading to two federal lawsuits before the data was released. This data was also "very concerning." Both the PRR analysis and the EB data are available on the ICANN website. The speaker encourages independent scientists to analyze and publish on the data, which confirms "incredibly concerning reports of harm from the COVID-19 vaccine." The speaker claims federal health officials hid this data from the public.

The speaker discusses the reliability of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which is used by the CDC to test vaccine safety. They explain that VAERS is a poor system because it relies on voluntary reporting from doctors, who often do not see the connection between a vaccine and adverse events. The speaker suggests that a machine counting system would be more effective. Despite its limitations, VAERS has reported more deaths and injuries from vaccines since 1986 than any other vaccine in history, making it the most dangerous vaccine according to CDC's measure.

Pfizer's claim of 96% efficacy for their vaccine was questioned. The study and data were not independently verified, and Pfizer wanted to keep the data hidden for 75 years. The true effectiveness of the vaccine, based on absolute risk reduction, is less than 1%. More people died and were harmed in their trials compared to the placebo group. The vaccine's safety was questionable from the start, and it is not effective. Additionally, appropriate studies were not conducted for new variants.

As of February 2024, the number of reports for COVID-19 vaccines in VAERS is significantly higher than all other vaccines combined since 1990. The government was not fully prepared for this overwhelming influx of reports. They had to quickly reassign people and hold numerous meetings to increase their capacity to review these reports.

The Institute of Medicine, part of the National Academy of Sciences, stated that the CDC's system for studying vaccine injury is so poor that any studies done with it are invalid. Former Surgeon General David Kessler and others have also criticized the VAERS system and called for a new one. The VAERS system is voluntary, requiring doctors to report vaccine injuries, but there is no penalty for not reporting. Doctors may not recognize vaccine injuries, especially if they occur months or years later, and there is no vaccine injury education in medical school. Doctors also have an emotional incentive not to report, as they may be reluctant to admit a vaccine they recommended caused harm.

The CDC funded a machine counting system designed to identify unique injury clusters related to vaccines. This system, developed by a team led by Lazarus, was tested at Harvard Pilgrim HMO. The machine counting system's data on vaccine injuries was compared to VAERS data from the same period at Harvard Pilgrim. The study found that VAERS captured less than one percent of vaccine injuries, while the new system captured over ninety-five percent. Data showed injuries in about two point seven percent of all vaccines, approximately one out of every thirty-seven. The CDC then shelved the system in 2010 and continues to use VAERS, a system they know doesn't work. The speaker advocates for changing VAERS or creating a supplementary system that actually works.

There are over 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe fatal and nonfatal vaccine injury syndromes. These vaccines cause real side effects in four major categories: cardiovascular issues like heart inflammation and cardiac arrest, neurologic problems such as stroke and neuropathy, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to usual treatments, and abnormalities in the immune system.

The speaker claims the current vaccine injury surveillance system, VAERS, captures less than one percent of vaccine injuries, according to a 2010 CDC study. They state that the CDC had a machine counting system to roll out to HMOs but shelved it. The speaker intends to improve surveillance, gather data sets, and create data-sharing agreements with scientists worldwide. They aim to investigate the contribution of vaccines, mold, EMF, food, and other exposures that began in the late 1980s to health issues.