reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the Trump administration’s approach to foreign policy and its global impact. - Unpredictability as a negotiation asset: Speaker 0 notes that Trump’s rhetoric is out of the norm and concerning, citing statements about Greenland, Iran, Venezuela, and Gaza. Speaker 1 counters that Trump starts with a very tough position and then moderates it as a negotiation tactic, arguing that unpredictability has value but erodes credibility because “what he says this week will not be what he might do next week or the week after.” - Gaza, Venezuela, and Iran as case studies: Gaza is described as having no peace, only ongoing uncertainty. In Venezuela, Speaker 0 sees a new regime leader working with the old regime, making regime change unlikely; Speaker 1 cautions that Rodriguez would have to dismantle the army and paramilitaries to improve Venezuela, implying changes may be blocked by corruption and drug trafficking networks. In Iran, despite expectations of a strike, Trump did not strike, which Speaker 1 attributes to calculated restraint and the need to avoid provoking Iranian retaliation; Speaker 0 asks why, and Speaker 1 emphasizes the complexity and the risk of escalation. - Domestic and diplomatic capacity under Trump: Speaker 1 argues the administration relies on nontraditional figures (e.g., Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff) rather than professional diplomats, contributing to a lack of sustained policy execution. He notes the Pentagon, State Department, and National Security Council have been stripped of expertise, with many positions unfilled. He describes diplomacy as being conducted by envoy, with trusted associates who lack deep diplomatic experience. - Global power shifts and alliances: Speaker 1 says unpredictability can undermine US credibility; however, there is a real shift as the US appears to retreat from international engagement. He asserts that Russia and China have lost clients due to various internal and regional dynamics, while the US withdrawal from international organizations has allowed China to gain influence, including within the UN. He predicts that the US could become weaker in the long run relative to its previous position, even if economically stronger domestically. - Regional dynamics and potential alliances: The conversation touches on the theoretical possibility of an Islamic or Middle Eastern NATO-like alliance, led by Pakistan and Saudi Arabia with potential Turkish involvement. Speaker 1 argues that such an alliance would not resemble NATO but that regional powers are likely to form bilateral and regional arrangements to counterbalance major powers like the US, Russia, and China. In the Middle East, Israel is cast as an influential actor shaping regional alignments, with Gulf states wary of Iranian retaliation and crisis spillover. - The Iran crisis and military posture: Speaker 1 explains why Gulf states and Israel did not want an immediate strike on Iran due to the risk of massive retaliation and limited US regional presence at the time. He notes the Abraham Lincoln and George H.W. Bush carrier groups' movements suggest potential future force projection, but states that any strike would likely be small if undertaken given current hardware positioning. He suggests the crisis will continue, with Iran’s internal repression and external deterrence shaping the dynamics. He also points to the 2000 missiles and the IRGC’s scale as factors in regional calculations. - Reflection on impact and timing: The discussion notes the potential for longer-term consequences in US credibility and global influence once Trumpism passes, with the possibility of the US reemerging weaker on the world stage despite possible internal economic strength. Speaker 0 closes with appreciation for the discussion; Speaker 1 agrees.

President Trump knows how to pick talent. He wanted people who were good salespeople and communicators, not only good administrators. As a member of the transition team, the speaker observed Trump's selection process. For each position, Trump wanted to see three clips of the candidates performing on TV. He was conscious that these people would be selling his program to the public.

Many people wonder why Trump was popular, but I understand because I hear it daily. He's loved in Ohio for being different. In the first debate, he stood out by calling the system rigged, while Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama disagreed. When asked for evidence, Trump admitted to using the system himself. When Clinton criticized his taxes, he cleverly responded that it made him smart and pointed out flaws in the tax code. This moment marked the rise of a new political figure. Translation: Trump's popularity in Ohio stems from his unique approach in debates, where he criticized the system and defended his tax practices against Clinton's attacks. This set him apart as a new political force.

I wanted someone smart to work with me on important country matters. This person is a good businessman, and he understands the challenge with executive orders. You write one, think it's done, but it often doesn't get implemented. He gets it done. He's a leader. He has brilliant young people working for him, and he takes my executive orders to them. They then go to the relevant agency and push to get things done. They ask questions like: When are you doing it? Get it done! Suddenly, even those who were hesitant start signing. He doesn't want to be bothered, he just wants it done.

The speaker stated that they think it's ridiculous to suggest President Trump is acting for his own benefit. They claim he left a life of luxury and a successful real estate empire for public service, not just once, but twice, and the American public reelected him because they trust he acts in the country's best interest. The speaker asserted that Trump has lost money being president. They don't recall similar questions being asked of the previous president, a career politician who was allegedly profiting off the office. The speaker maintains that President Trump does not do this, and the White House holds itself to the highest ethical standards.

Donald Trump has appointed a Fox News host as his secretary of defense, but it's important to recognize his qualifications. He is a 20-year veteran of the U.S. Army, served as an infantry officer in Iraq and Afghanistan, and received two Bronze Stars. Additionally, he graduated from Princeton and Harvard Business School. In contrast, Ash Carter, who served as Obama's secretary of defense from 2015 to 2017, had no military experience and was a physicist. This raises questions about qualifications, especially when comparing someone with extensive military service and education to someone without military background. If you're going to criticize, it's essential to understand the facts and context.

I have known him for almost 30 years. He projects a strength that is quintessentially Donald Trump, regardless of your political views.

I know a lot of business people, the good, the bad, the smart, and the lucky. This person is brilliant, with tremendous and scientific imagination, far beyond just a technologist. He's also a genuinely good person who wants the best for the country. I know many great business people who aren't necessarily good people, some who would even take advantage of situations. But this person truly cares for the country, which I recognized early on. He's a different kind of character, and that's why smart, patriotic young people admire him.

Unyielding pursuit of America first agenda. Let's make America great again. Welcome our hometown hero, President Donald John Trump, the 45th, 46th, and 47th president of the United States.

Okay, so the richest guy in the world is on our team. I know that's a tough pill to swallow if you are competitive, but it's true. I tried to find someone smarter than him, believe me, I searched everywhere, but I couldn't do it. For the good of the country, we settled on the best person for the job. Thanks for having me.

Trump's strategic approach to negotiations is impressive. He plays the long game, never making a deal he isn't willing to walk away from. Many misunderstand his tactics, focusing on sensational news rather than the underlying economics. For instance, his dealings with North Korea and tariffs on Colombia and Mexico were calculated moves to leverage better agreements. Countries quickly adjusted their stances when faced with potential consequences, like tariffs or border control issues. Trump’s methods reveal a deep understanding of negotiation dynamics, aiming for mutual benefits without compromising national security. The key is to look beyond the headlines and understand the real implications of his strategies.

Donald Trump's presidency and rise to power will be remembered in American history. He had a keen understanding of the country's direction even before others did. Trump's ability to surprise people is not over yet. Some used to believe he understood the spirit of the nation, but now it's clear that he embodies it. Trump's fame was widespread, and his catchphrase "You're fired" became iconic. Despite facing criticism, he remains resilient and is considered a survivor.

President Trump was softened by a very nice note he received just before his inauguration.

Speaker 0 expresses utmost respect for the president, noting he has given many people hope to beat the bad guys and to do it with head held high and integrity intact. He shares that the president is from Queens, New York, like him, and that the president has shown that even in the worst times you can come back from it. The speaker says the president has been through publicly having to constantly be lied on, and that it’s not funny. He emphasizes that unless you are in that person’s shoes you’ll never understand what it feels like, as the person is a human being with a family who has to read those lies. He states that this administration is full of people with heart and soul, and they make him proud. The vice president is praised as well; the speaker loves both of them. They are described as powerful, smart, and strong, with an uncanny ability to relate to people. They haven’t lost touch with the world and remain connected to what’s happening with younger and older people, with the richer and the not-so-rich. They have the ability to stay real and make us feel proud to be American.

Strength is crucial for leadership. Weak leaders lead to disaster. Trump showed undeniable strength when faced with danger, earning praise. His actions were real and unscripted, proving his ability to lead. Watching the video makes it clear that strong leadership is needed to prevent further destruction.

The new press secretary is described as being very prepared. It is asserted that it's ridiculous to suggest President Trump is doing anything for his own benefit. He supposedly left a life of luxury and a successful real estate empire for public service, not just once but twice, and the American public reelected him because they trust he acts in the best interest of the country and puts the American public first. It is claimed that this president has actually lost money for being president. The speaker doesn't remember these types of questions being asked of the previous president, described as a career politician who was clearly profiting.

According to Speaker 1, Donald Trump is the best salesman he's ever met. He recounts watching Trump sell land on the Hudson River to a group interested in buying the Plaza Hotel. Although they wanted the hotel, Trump convinced them to buy the land instead, even though he needed the money from the hotel sale to avoid bankruptcy. Speaker 1 attributes Trump's sales ability to his genius at identifying and exploiting people's vulnerabilities. He claims Trump can sense a person's weakness and then play into it. While not necessarily a positive trait, Speaker 1 considers it a unique gift.

President Trump's strategy was to hit back very hard. The media predicted civilization would melt down. However, half the countries in the world decided to lower trade barriers and make a deal with the president. They needed access to US markets and determined it was in their best interest. These countries came to the table because of President Trump's actions. Some may not want to admit it, but it is the truth. Deal-making is an art, and President Trump has mastered it.

I want to introduce a friend who is serious and committed to success, despite his deceptive social style. He supported the Wall Street project and was inclusive. He attended my business meeting in New York and is a builder for the people. Donald Trump spoke about the high percentage of black and minority workers in construction, thanking them for their great work. He looks forward to questions and jokes about leaving the building.

I believe this may have been the most effective speech. If there was any doubt that Donald Trump is the political colossus of our time, this night and speech should put that to rest. The Democrats seem to be falling into trap after trap. He recognized and celebrated people, pointing to them in the gallery and sharing their stories, while the Democrats sat glumly. It was a terrible look for them, and Al Green's attempt to disrupt the speech was also a bad look. Politically speaking, this was powerful stuff, as powerful as I can recall hearing.

In 2016, it was stated that only the best and most serious people would be hired, which led to the best economy ever. However, multiple former high-ranking officials are now not supporting a potential presidential run. These include former Vice President Mike Pence, former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, and former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Former National Security Advisor John Bolton and former Attorney General Bill Barr, who called the person a "consummate narcissist," also do not offer support. The person in question has used disparaging terms to describe many of these former staff members, including calling Barr a "gutless pig," former White House Chief of Staff John Kelly "weak and ineffective," and former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson "dumb as a rock." Others were labeled "born loser," "milquetoast," and "China-loving." The question is posed: why were these people hired in the first place?

Speaker 0 argues that describing Davos as protecting liberal democracy is laughable, and similarly calling Trump a dictator is absurd. He then provides substantive points in response to a question, focusing on the power of elites and the gap between elite messaging and the reality experienced by ordinary people. Key claims and points: - The very reason he is at Davos is to explain to many people in the room—and those watching—that political elites tell the average people on three or four or five issues that reality is x, when in fact reality is y. - Immigration: elites tell us open borders and even illegal immigration are okay, but the average American says these policies rob them of the American way of life; President Trump will take that on behalf of the average American. - Public safety: elites claim public safety isn’t a problem in big American cities; the average person experiences lack of public safety as damaging to their life, and President Trump will address that. - Climate change: the claim is that there is an existential crisis and climate alarmism is a major driver of mental health crises; the average person believes the proposed solutions are far worse and more harmful, costing more human lives, especially in Europe where heating is needed. - China: China is identified as the number one adversary—not just to the United States but to free people globally; Davos is criticized for giving the Chinese Communist Party a platform, and President Trump would end that. - World Health Organization: the organization is discussed as attempting to foist gender ideology upon the global South; Northern European countries are reviewing or rejecting these practices. - A return to science and biology: the new president, Trump, will “trust the science,” understand the basic biological reality of manhood and womanhood, not due to retribution or dictatorship, but because he has the power of the American people behind him. - Legislative trajectory: the popular will should inform both the House and Senate in 2025 to pass laws on these issues and more, as noted by Senator Portman. - Inspirational leadership view: President Trump, if elected, will be inspired by the words of Javier Milei, who said that he was in power not to guide sheep, but to awaken lions; this sentiment reflects what the average American and the average free person on Earth want from leaders. Additional context: - The speaker reiterates that the popular will and the vitality of the American people should guide policy, asserting that the next conservative president will confront elite narratives on immigration, public safety, climate policy, China, and global institutions.

Donald Trump told the speaker that during his first term, he "had no idea how to govern" and was influenced by donors and corporate individuals to appoint certain people, resulting in "a lot of bad people" in positions like NSA, CIA, and EPA. Trump stated he won't repeat this mistake. He claimed a donor influenced him to appoint John Bolton, who he now considers "a really bad guy." Trump is starting his transition team three months early, funded by private donors, and has appointed 20 people, including the speaker and Tulsi. The speaker claims this transition team is unique because it contains no corporate lobbyists, unlike previous transition teams, which were "100% corporate lobbyists." This gives the speaker hope that Trump's next government will be different.

If you believe what the media says, you've gained a valuable ally who essentially works for you without charge. I want to be clear, I admire President Trump. I genuinely believe he's a good person. There's something admirable about him. The president has faced relentless and unfair attacks in the media, which is truly outrageous. In my experience, having spent considerable time with him, I have never once witnessed him acting in a mean, cruel, or unethical manner.