reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Before entering politics, my net worth was $316,000. Just four years later, it jumped to $46 million. How did this happen? I bought an island vacation home on a whim and now commute via private jet from my island to Washington D.C. It appears some politicians are using insider information for stock trading, and because I'm in politics, I might have access to similar information.

Tim Cook reportedly warned Nancy Pelosi about Congress's antitrust bills. This raises questions about the influence of lobbyists and powerful CEOs making personal calls. Additionally, a Fortune.com article highlights that Pelosi's husband made a significant stock trade worth $6 million just before Congress was poised to act on big tech regulations, resulting in a profit of $5.3 million.

Trump removed many tariffs, causing market disruption and raising concerns about potential insider trading within the administration. Following Trump's tweet suggesting it was a good time to buy, questions arise about who knew in advance about the tariff reductions and whether they profited by trading stocks. The speaker notes Trump's involvement with meme coins, his children's cryptocurrency activities, and Elon Musk's alleged self-dealing, suggesting a pattern of corruption. The speaker is writing to the White House to demand answers, but acknowledges the need for congressional oversight due to the White House's unlikelihood of being forthcoming. Despite Republican unwillingness, the speaker highlights the importance of whistleblowers and invites them to come forward with information. The goal is to determine if individuals profited from insider information while the public suffered financial losses.

I started a Pelosi stock tracker after seeing politicians' questionable trades during COVID. Richard Burr's insider trading was the last straw. Unusual Whales on X deserves credit for exposing this. I built an app, Autopilot, to let people invest alongside politicians. Pelosi's up 87% since we started tracking her. I'm not political but this corruption needs to stop. Last year, she outperformed hedge funds by 20%. She bought Tesla leaps before Biden's infrastructure bill, then NVIDIA before the CHIPS Act. She made millions. Dan Crenshaw bought Meta then pushed to ban TikTok. They shouldn't be allowed to trade! I want trust back in our institutions.

The conversation centers on allegations surrounding Nancy Pelosi and potential insider trading. Speaker 1 states that Nancy Pelosi should be investigated because “what she has the highest return of anybody practically in the history of Wall Street,” claiming she knows exactly what will be announced, buys stock, and then the stock goes up after the announcements. Speaker 0 notes Pelosi heard the news and ran to CNN with a busted hip, while Tapper treated her like Biden on debate night. Speaker 2 asserts that Pelosi “became rich,” and Speaker 3 is interrupted about the sixtieth anniversary of Medicaid, but wants to respond to the insider trading allegation. Speaker 2 asks Pelosi for a response to the accusation, and Speaker 3 responds that the allegation is ridiculous. Pelosi states she “very much support the stop the trading of members of congress,” clarifying that she does not think anybody is doing anything wrong, but if they are, they are prosecuted and go to jail, because “confidence instills in the American people.” Pelosi adds that she has no concern about the obvious investments that had been made over time, and that “I’m not into it. My husband is.” This points to her assertion that her husband handles the investments, not herself. The discussion continues with a provocative line about Polly P in Napa, described as a Wall Street whiz kid, and reiterates that Pelosi’s wife knows nothing about it. The segment then shifts to the broader political action in the Senate, noting that the Senate is “suiting up,” having “advanced an anti stock trading bill for congress,” while Trump is not pleased. Throughout, the dialogue juxtaposes accusations of insider trading with Pelosi’s claimed support for prohibiting trading by members of Congress, her denial of personal involvement in the investments, and the implication that her husband handles the investments. There is a consistent focus on the tension between allegations of insider trading and calls for restrictions on congressional stock activities, framed against a broader political backdrop involving Medicaid’s sixtieth anniversary and reactions from political figures such as Trump.

Tim Cook reportedly warned Pelosi about Congress's antitrust bills. This raises questions about the influence of lobbyists and powerful CEOs making personal calls. Additionally, a Fortune.com article reveals that Speaker Pelosi's husband made a significant stock trade worth $6 million, resulting in a profit of $5.3 million just as Congress was preparing to take action against big tech.

A member of the Ways and Means Committee is allegedly insider trading based on her disclosures. It is claimed that proving this is easy by examining her trading activity and communications following classified briefings. The speaker questions how she became a member of the committee and then executed trades on NYCB just before Signature Bank collapsed, resulting in an 80% stock increase. The speaker dismisses the idea that this was a lucky trade, asserting it was a well-informed trade.

Having a spouse that's good at insider trading, like Paul Pelosi, is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to how some people acquire wealth. Talking about the other methods is risky, and frankly, it's not lengthening my life expectancy to discuss this. I was supposed to go back to DC, but how am I going to survive? These people are going to kill me for sure. I actually have to be careful that I don't push too hard on the corruption stuff because it's going to get me killed.

BlackRock is under investigation for investing $429 million into the Chinese military. The US government has initiated a full-scale investigation, but allegedly knew about BlackRock's business dealings prior to informing the public. Nine out of ten congresspeople trading BlackRock stock were reportedly selling it. Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna allegedly sold $130,000 worth of this stock months before the investigation.

Speaker 0 argues that there is insider information at play, noting that people inside the administration are making huge stock bets ahead of President Trump’s announcements on oil, with tens of millions of dollars in Brent crude futures short bets placed twenty minutes before the news breaks, and questions why there is no investigation. They assert that somebody has insider information and imply it should be illegal. Speaker 1 discusses potential legal and regulatory issues surrounding prediction markets, distinguishing them from traditional gambling. They explain that in Texas they cannot gamble on sports via apps, but in Missouri those apps work, and prediction markets are not considered gambling. They reference a Trump administration stance that effectively signaled insiders within the administration should stop gambling in prediction markets, suggesting awareness that people inside the administration were making plays on these markets. Speaker 1 notes uncertainty about whether the big players are inside or outside the administration, but emphasizes that the insider trading angle during the administration hasn’t received much attention. They recount following the topic sinceTrump’s election, noting early claims that Trump would crash the stock market, which Speaker 1 says did not happen and, in fact, the market rose for those who invested then. They describe the market as fluctuating with corrections, and remark that Pam Bondi stated the market was hovering around 49,000–50,000, implying continued manipulation. Speaker 1 asserts that Trump often makes declarations on Fridays right before the stock market closes, attributing this pattern to market manipulation. They claim to have bet against the narrative that the stock market would collapse under Trump, and that those bets performed well. The speaker says they feel a bit guilty about profiting, noting that friends who run stock brokerages look at them as if from the future, and claims that the White House is effectively running an insider trading operation. They state that knowing someone is coming to the White House or that a person from a big tech company is arriving allows one to get ahead of the news and secure about a 5% stock bump, or a 5% gain by investing before the news becomes public. Speaker 0 adds that with a Trump tweet, markets swing drastically—either ending civilization or extending a ceasefire—implying that market movement is driven by Trump’s statements.

I hate drama. I hate influencer drama. I hate Internet drama. I hate the theatrics of it. And so I want to tell you something. The only reason that I'm going up against Crenshaw is I am sick and tired of watching government officials and people in high places try to silence and bully regular American citizens. I'm sick of saying it. Somebody's gotta stand up to this shit. It might as well be me. It might as well be me. On 12/09/2025, I received a legal demand letter from lawyers representing congressman Dan Crenshaw. They are threatening to sue me for defamation because of comments I made on my podcast about a message that he sent me. So this all transpired from a conversation that I had with Tulsi Gabbard. And I was concerned... Although I didn't mention his name in the interview... I wanted to know how a newer congressman can afford to hire a mainstream DJ, Steve Aoki, to spin at his fortieth birthday party. I didn't just make this up. Somebody sent me the invitation that he had sent out to everybody for his fortieth birthday. And so that's where I got this from. Anyways, here's the clip with Tulsi. Is there any direct money? I mean, know, you see all these people you see all these people show up in Congress, the Senate, the cabinet, whatever, and, you know, not wealthy. Yeah. Speaker 1: I don't have firsthand experience in this. I have often questioned the same thing. I know a big factor is the insider trading that goes on in Congress. And again, some people will say, well, like, hey, I didn't know anything about this. I'm just making investments for my family or my wife or my husband is making investments. I don't know anything about what's going on. Maybe they're being honest, maybe they're not. But the reality is you're in a position where you're making decisions, either in committee or on the House floor, that influence our markets, that influence the outcomes of certain industries, either causing some to tank or others to skyrocket. And the mere perception of insider trading shouldn't exist. This is legislation, again, I introduced in Congress years ago. No member of Congress should be allowed to do any trading of any stocks, neither should their spouse, neither should their senior staff. Period. These are the people who have access to proprietary private information that's not open to everybody in the public, or certainly before it becomes public. And the possibility of the abuse of power in trading on that information should not exist. It's interesting because as we're seeing there are some members of Congress who say that share my view on that, but who are continuing to trade stocks themselves. The Senate just passed, I think out of committee, first step legislation that would reflect similar to banning members and their spouses. We'll see where it goes. In the Senate we've heard a lot of talk coming from leaders from both parties, but no action has been taken. That to me is the most obvious way that people are going from being elected and having no money and you make, what, dollars $160 a year or whatever the salary is now to literally becoming multimillionaires. That is the most obvious way. There are kind of stringent requirements of financial reporting that every member has to do certainly at least once a year, more often if you are actively trading in stocks. But it I think it would be a little hard, not impossible, but a little hard if somebody's just coming and bringing you a sack of cash. Speaker 0: So after the conversation with Tulsi, that's when I got the text or the message on Instagram from congressman Crenshaw that I find threatening, telling me he spoke with his boys at six. Here's a screenshot. Hey, Sean. You have the ability to contact your fellow team guy if you've got a problem with me or have questions about how I'm getting rich. Some of my boys at six told me about your indirect swipe at me. Some of my beliefs are based on trendy narratives instead of facts. And just so you know, I mean, Dan does have a history of threatening people. Once again, here is Dan threatening to kill Tucker Carlson. And then, again, he reaffirms that he's not joking. Speaker 2: Have you ever met Tucker? Speaker 0: We've talked a lot. He's the worst person. Okay. So I get the message. I take it is extremely threatening. It is a tier one unit, the best, most effective tier one unit in the world, deadliest unit. But I don't do anything. I move on. And then a little over a year later, I'm interviewing, oh, a member from SEAL Team six. Maybe he's one of Dan's boys at six. So he brought up the fact that he had asked a congressman with an eye patch, didn't wanna mention his name, to help him with his book debacle. He received no aid. I filled in the blank. I said, oh, you must be talking about congressman Crenshaw. Let me share my experience with you, my interactions with congressman Crenshaw. So I shared him. I told him about the Instagram message, and I told him that I found that threatening. And then I asked Matt if he was one of Dan's boys at six, Maybe he was here to come beat me up. Matt assured me he wasn't. Here's the clip. Speaker 2: I'll give you another example. In the height of my my issues, I contacted a former SEAL. I won't name names, but he has an eye patch, And he's a congressman out of a state You Speaker 0: mean Dan Crenshaw? Speaker 2: I'm not naming names. Speaker 0: Another one of my Speaker 2: favorite Sir, here's my situation. You know, Dan? Speaker 0: Dan actually sent me a message. I should fucking read this to you. But, basically, he tells me I brought something up about him, and I never even met I gave him the courtesy of not even mentioning his fucking name. It was about his birthday party where he hired Steve Aoki to to DJ his birthday. I mean, that can't be fucking cheap. Right? Especially on a congressman's salary. And I brought that up. And Dan sends me a message that says his boys over at six are really upset with me that I brought that up, and they're gonna they might come beat me up. Speaker 2: Boys at six. Speaker 0: His boys over at six. Speaker 2: Well, to infer he's got I don't know why congressman would be Speaker 0: threatening me with seal team six, but I'm still fucking waiting. This is actually a couple years This Speaker 2: is threatened quite a Speaker 0: have not had my ass kicked by a couple of guys over at six. But Dan Crunchy he fits with all these fucking people you're talking about. Speaker 2: So I called him. Right? He's a sitting congressman. He's a former officer. And drum roll, please, he was getting ready to release his book. So I call him up. I get a conversation with him. I said, sir, here's my situation. I hired an attorney. The attorney gave me bad advice. Book was published. I've given up attorney client privilege, cooperated everything I can to to fix this. They've still come after me. We can get into all the the other stuff that I'm dealing with. I said, sir, can you help me out with this? He's like, well, you know, I'm I'm about ready to publish my book, and I'm I'm not getting it reviewed. I'm like, well, sir, same same letter of the law that they came after me for failure to seek prepublication review. I didn't get prepublication review because my lawyer told me I didn't have to, and he could do it. Like, in your case, you know you have to get reviewed. I'm here telling you, confirming you have to get reviewed or the government's gonna come after you. He's like, yeah. No. But I'm not gonna write anything classified in my book. I'm like, there's nothing classified in my book. They they said there was. They went through it. They said, nope. There's nothing classified in it. You just failed to seek review. I'm like, so if I only thing I failed to do was seek review, you're willingly going around that obligation, and you don't give a shit. He's like, yeah. But I'm not gonna write about anything classified in my book. That was his answer. Never talked to him again. So he published his book. No review. Nothing's happened. He's kept his money. He's a sitting congressman. I got a payment plan. So so to say I've been alone So Speaker 0: I guess I guess you're not one of Dan's boys over at six. Speaker 2: That's kinda Definitely not Dave Boys at six. That's a pretty ridiculous statement if I've ever heard one.

I wasn't always a Trump supporter, but a turning point came in Butler, Pennsylvania. The day before, an investment group tied to the Bushes and Cheneys sold all their DJT stock, then claimed it was a clerical error. This struck me as suspicious, especially since their only other similar move was selling American Airlines stock before September 11. It made me realize we're being deceived. Trump, knowing too much and being unpredictable, threatened the establishment. He potentially knows about advanced technology, like zero-point energy, and healing devices, that would disrupt the oil and pharmaceutical industries. Countries are blackmailing us, leading to vast sums leaving our country. Many voted for Trump hoping he'd expose corruption. Don't blindly trust the media, do your research and don't let them scare you.

Congresswoman Dianne Feinstein passed away recently. She owned a $5 million condo in Hawaii and a $55 million private jet. Accusations of financial crimes include benefiting her husband's companies with $100 million in government funds. Feinstein served as a congresswoman for 32 years with an annual salary of $174,000. Speculation suggests she may have used insider trading to profit from the stock market, potentially outperforming Barack Obama. To copy politicians' trades, comment "Boris" below. Translation: The congresswoman passed away, owning a condo and private jet. Accusations of financial crimes include benefiting her husband's companies. She served for 32 years with a modest salary. Speculation suggests she may have used insider trading to profit from the stock market. To copy politicians' trades, comment "Boris" below.

In the late 1980s, there was a treasury scandal where no one faced punishment. Warren Buffett was brought in to clean up the mess while the culprits escaped. Some of them now hold powerful positions. The current chair of the Federal Reserve, Jerome H. Powell, oversaw the scandal settlement, which is shocking.

Speaker 1 is concerned about potential insider trading within the White House related to market fluctuations caused by the president's tariff flip-flops. Speaker 1 is writing to the White House to demand transparency about who knew in advance about the tariff changes and whether anyone profited from this information. While acknowledging the likelihood of the administration stonewalling, Speaker 1 believes that evidence of insider trading will eventually surface through scrutiny of individuals' financial transactions. Speaker 1 cites the administration's involvement with meme coins and alleged self-interested dealings with Elon, as well as dodging oversight agencies, as reasons to suspect the worst and to investigate further. Speaker 1 suggests Congress should investigate, but they will demand answers from the administration.

Unusual Whales on X started calling out politicians, including Richard Burr, who is a major player as the head of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. On February 7th, 2020, Burr co-wrote an op-ed downplaying COVID-19 while simultaneously receiving private briefings about its true severity as chair of the senate intelligence committee. Tasked with preparing a response, Burr knew the severity of COVID-19 more than the average American. Then, on February 13th, Burr sold $1,650,000 from his retirement account. Selling off a retirement account to that degree is an extreme move, especially for someone in his position.

I started tracking politicians' stock trades after seeing unusual activity, especially during COVID. The Richard Burr case, where he sold off stocks based on private COVID briefings, was a key example. I built a Pelosi stock tracker, highlighting her significant trading volume and gains, like her profitable Tesla and NVIDIA trades. Politicians shouldn't be allowed to trade stocks due to conflicts of interest and access to insider information. Despite scrutiny, Pelosi's office hasn't reached out. Our app allows people to invest alongside politicians, exposing the hypocrisy. We need transparency and regulations to restore trust in our institutions.

The issue at hand is the disparity in asset ownership among members of Congress. Many Americans question how certain politicians achieve impressive investment returns, especially those involved in stock trades during the COVID pandemic. This isn't just a perception; it's a real problem. Congress members are trading based on information not available to the public. While insider trading is prohibited, members often receive information that, while not classified as insider information by securities laws, still provides them with a significant advantage. This situation raises concerns about fairness and transparency in financial dealings among lawmakers.

Politicians and billionaires are selling off stock. Senator Tupperville has been selling a lot of his portfolio, possibly due to his insight from various senate committees. Quiver Quantitative tracks these trades. Tupperville sold stock in various industries in February. Other billionaires like Bezos and Zuckerberg are also selling. There are concerns about a market bubble, with insiders selling assets. Media mentions of soft landings may indicate an upcoming collapse. Regional banks are in trouble, and emergency bailouts may be needed. The speaker advises caution in the market for 2024 and calls for awareness and action to prevent future bailouts.

There is a pervasive and well-funded evil force at play, willing to kill people like Kelly Loeffler's aide in Georgia who was blown up in his car. This happened while he was on his way to a rally for Loeffler, and he was dating Governor Kemp's daughter. Governor Kemp was considering a signature audit at that time. Additionally, the lead investigator from the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, who was looking into this, suddenly died within a week. The silence surrounding these incidents is concerning. The stakes involve trillions of dollars of global wealth.

I run a Pelosi stock tracker, which started unexpectedly after leaving finance and living in Bali. Seeing politicians, like Richard Burr, trade based on insider information during COVID was outrageous. I'm not particularly political but I saw the opportunity to expose corruption and highlight the hypocrisy of politicians trading stocks by building an app that allows people to invest alongside them. Pelosi's trades, particularly in Tesla and NVIDIA, raised eyebrows, especially with her family's net worth skyrocketing. Dan Crenshaw's also suspect as he voted against banning TikTok while owning stock in Meta. Despite the scrutiny, Pelosi's office hasn't reached out, and people have invested millions alongside her, profiting significantly.

Nancy Pelosi should be investigated for allegedly having the highest investment returns in Wall Street history, save a few individuals. This is purportedly due to her access to inside information about upcoming announcements. She allegedly buys stock before these announcements, leading to a subsequent increase in the stock's value.