reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the decline of the Met Gala, criticizing its recent themes and fashion choices. She describes this year's theme, "superfine tailoring black style," as a convoluted concept rooted in leftist jargon, which she believes serves to pander to Black culture while lacking substance. Kelly highlights various celebrity outfits, particularly criticizing Halle Berry's revealing dress and the overall lack of elegance at the event, likening it to a "Black Lives Matter" demonstration. Kelly and her guests, Stu Burguiere and Kevin Roberts, express disdain for the perceived elitism and hypocrisy of the attendees, who they feel are out of touch with everyday Americans. They note the exorbitant ticket prices and the presence of celebrities like the Kardashians, suggesting that their participation diminishes the event's seriousness. Burguiere remarks on the absurdity of the gala's fashion choices, emphasizing the bizarre and provocative nature of many outfits. The conversation shifts to the political implications of the gala, with Kelly criticizing the overt pandering to racial identity politics and the perceived hypocrisy of wealthy attendees discussing income inequality. They discuss the menu served at the gala, which they view as racially stereotypical and patronizing. Later, the discussion turns to the Biden administration, particularly Jen Psaki's comments about Biden's mental acuity. Kelly and Burguiere express skepticism about Psaki's claims of ignorance regarding Biden's cognitive decline, citing numerous public incidents that raised concerns about his mental fitness. The show concludes with a focus on the Heritage Foundation and its Project 2025, which aims to dismantle the administrative state and promote conservative policies. Roberts defends the project against leftist criticisms, asserting that it represents a necessary push for common sense governance. They discuss the ongoing issues of anti-Semitism on college campuses and the need for educational reform, particularly in elite institutions like Harvard, which they argue have become bastions of radical left ideology.

The episode centers on a high-drama blend of celebrity culture, legal drama, and media critique sparked by Blake Lively’s settlement with Justin Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios over It Ends With Us. The host frames the news as part of a broader pattern in which public figures face intensified scrutiny, with particular emphasis on how settlements and joint statements are portrayed and interpreted by the press and the public. The discussion then pivots to a comprehensive, blow-by-blow recap of Met Gala fashion, highlighting reactions to notable looks from Lena Dunham, Madonna, Nicole Kidman, Katy Perry, and several others. The hosts complicate the narrative by calling out perceived hypocritical or performative elements in fashion commentary, while offering sharp, often provocative takes on why certain outfits generate controversy, how gender and body image are policed, and what the event reveals about power and privilege in elite circles. Throughout, the conversation weaves in critiques of media narratives, the culture of online commentary, and a broader skepticism about celebrity storytelling, including questions about why some figures are invited or excluded from these events and what it signals about influence in Hollywood today. In parallel, the hosts advance a skeptical read of the Lively–Baldoni settlement, arguing that the press coverage and public reaction were shaped by reputational dynamics rather than the legal truth alone. They scrutinize the joint statement reported in coverage, suggest how legal strategy and PR considerations interact in high-profile cases, and speculate on the motivations behind public disputes, aiming to demystify how settlements are framed as victories or losses. The Red Scare guests add their own perspective on the JP Morgan–housing of controversy arc, touching on the broader media ecosystem, cultural critiques of elite institutions, and the shifting boundaries of what is considered permissible discussion in public forums. The episode closes with a forward look to the next topics, keeping the focus squarely on the interplay of law, media, celebrity, and online discourse without promoting any commercial content beyond the discussion itself.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the political fallout from the recent Oval Office meeting between President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky, emphasizing the unexpected twists in reactions, particularly from the left. She transitions to a lighter topic, the Academy Awards, critiquing Hollywood's current state and its adherence to wokeism, highlighting the absence of the biopic on Ronald Reagan from the nominations due to diversity quotas. Kelly invites influencers Lauren Chen and Christian Toto to discuss the Oscars, noting the tension between Oprah Winfrey and Whoopi Goldberg during a tribute to Quincy Jones. They comment on the self-centeredness of celebrities, with Chen criticizing their virtue signaling while ignoring real issues like homelessness. The conversation shifts to Selena Gomez's extravagant appearance at the Oscars, with Toto mocking her claims of solidarity with immigrants despite her wealth. The hosts critique the hypocrisy of celebrities like Julianne Hough, who previously wore blackface but now engages in land acknowledgments, and discuss the provocative outfits worn by attendees, questioning the lack of substance in their presentations. They express disappointment in the Oscars' focus on superficiality rather than meaningful art. The discussion turns to the documentary category, with Kelly criticizing the win for "No Other Land," which presents a one-sided view of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, contrasting it with the lack of attention given to anti-Semitism in Hollywood speeches. They lament the industry's failure to address pressing issues and the dilution of important topics into vague statements. Kelly and her guests analyze the recent Trump-Zelensky meeting, arguing that Zelensky's confrontational approach was misguided and likely influenced by Democratic senators who met with him beforehand. They suggest that the Democrats' attempts to frame the meeting as an ambush are disingenuous, as Zelensky's behavior was provocative and disrespectful. Andrew Klavan joins the discussion, asserting that the meeting was a significant moment reflecting the disconnect between Hollywood and the American public. He argues that Trump’s approach to foreign policy, particularly regarding China, is more strategic than the Democrats acknowledge. Klavan emphasizes the need for a shift in how the U.S. engages with global conflicts, advocating for a focus on cutting losses rather than endless military involvement. The conversation concludes with a critique of Andrew Cuomo's potential return to politics, highlighting his controversial past and the lack of support he would face. Kelly and Klavan express skepticism about his chances, suggesting that New Yorkers deserve better leadership.