reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker repeatedly pleads to be allowed to come, using the word "please" multiple times. They mention a "pre breed breedy" that they believe requires something, also using the word "please."

The speaker expresses concern about the heaviness of the situation, stating that it was not a natural disaster and accuses the state of wanting the land. Another speaker emphasizes the impact on people and families affected by the fire, arguing that it was not a natural disaster but a planned attack. They mention the CIA's alleged invention of the term "conspiracy theorist" and express a desire to protect the earth. The speaker also dismisses the existence of climate change and criticizes the agenda of the meeting. The conversation ends abruptly.

The speaker acknowledges the concern about Canada and offers to provide an explanation. They clarify that they are not trying to create controversy or trap anyone, but rather want to move on to their next point. They also mention that being a lawyer requires caution, while expressing respect for the lawyers present.

The speaker questions if the council agrees they must always seek the best knowledge and stop harmful policies. The meeting chair interrupts due to time constraints, leading to a discussion about fairness in enforcing rules. The speaker reiterates their question about the council's obligation.

The speaker is providing an update because people keep asking what's going on. They are rotated off and supposed to be asleep but can't sleep. They state that they are doing as they're told and doing the best they can. The speaker explains that they can't reach certain locations with Humvees due to mudslides, landslides, size constraints, and rubble. They are learning information and trying to relay it, but can't share everything. Approvals are needed before using alternative methods like animals or 4-wheelers. The speaker says they are giving out food and water and helping people, but there's a chain of command, limiting what they can do. If they are told "no," they have to comply. They understand the frustration, but there's nothing they can do. Civilians can do whatever they want, but those in uniform must answer to someone and can only do so much.

Speaker 0: Let's pray for the poor so they don't turn into thieves. Thank you very much, thank you very much, very kind. Speaker 1: I'm not sure if we're on air. Yes, yes, someone is listening. Sorry for the messiness.

Speaker 0 asks what bible verse the other person posted that led to criminal prosecution. Speaker 1 responds: it was from Romans chapter 1, verses 24 to 27. Speaker 0 asks why that passage was chosen. Speaker 1 explains that the apostle Paul teaches in these verses about marriage and same-sex relationships, and he defines them as sinful and shameful. Speaker 0 asks what message they were trying to convey. Speaker 1 says they wanted to make it clear that if the leadership of the church is supporting the pride event, it is in contradiction with the Bible. Speaker 0 notes that after posting the verse, the person was charged under Finland's war crimes and crimes against humanity law. Speaker 1 confirms that there is a law in that section about agitation against minorities. Speaker 0, speaking as a pastor with thirty-seven years of experience, expresses deep concern that someone can be criminally charged for posting a Bible verse in an EU and NATO country. The person notes the panel’s prior statements and offers a blessing to the speaker, expressing a prayer that it causes people to wake up to threats against the right to free expression.

The speaker was asked what office they were elected to and if they needed support. The speaker responded that they are not the one to ask and that the person should speak with a man. The speaker then stated that they speak to over a million people.

The speaker says that pretty bad people, including fake news, want to keep something like that going. They add that credible information should be allowed, and anything that's credible should be given or allowed.

Please pray for the poor so that they don't turn into thieves. Thank you very much, thank you very much, very kind. I don't know if we're live. Yes, yes, you're on the air, someone is listening. Sorry for the messiness.

We're not fighting or protesting. It takes time, not a miracle. Murder? Just kidding. They'll understand. That's the worst. Let me explain.

The speaker says, "That is a funny one for you. Yeah. It's control talk. I don't understand. Sorry, mate." The speaker then says, "Hold on. Hold on. See. I'm just doing something. I'm sorry," and "I'm waiting for."

The speaker questions why someone would want to discredit something. The speaker states they believe in the truth and its importance. The speaker then asks if the other person thinks the truth is important. The speaker tells the other person to read "grave error."

The speaker states they attempted to communicate something and acknowledges the other person's job. They claim to be looking out for everyone.

I believe it's part of the solar. Can we speak to you? Yes. That guy is one of the greatest optimists I've seen. How are you? Can I ask you a few questions? Yes. Someone threw a water balloon at us, and now a crowd is gathering to chase us away. They're not allowed to talk to anyone here.

The speaker is upset about someone entering a messy area. They are interrupted during an interview but continue talking. The speaker becomes agitated and threatens violence towards the interrupter.

The speaker discusses plans related to someone coming to help with the storm. The speaker asks if "Mister president" has spoken with former president Trump before, then tells former president Trump to "get a life" and help people. The speaker demands accountability and insists that "you know the truth." When asked if they plan to speak with former president Trump, the speaker answers, "No."

The speaker expresses their surprise at encountering an optimistic person and asks if they can ask some questions. They mention that there are people who want to chase them away and gather in large numbers. The speaker wonders if they are not allowed to talk to anyone in the country and feels unwelcome.

The speaker states it is difficult to work with serenity because they are attacked daily from every part of the landscape. The general press is aggressive, the health authorities are aggressive, and the government is not supportive. Despite these difficulties, the speaker insists that they must persevere because the issue is important. The speaker then transitions to asking about a return to Keel University.

I will not call on you if you yell, and you're wasting time because Dr. Fauci has to leave soon. I'm not engaging in a back-and-forth. It's not your turn. Don't look at me; it's your first question. You should call on people across the room. She has a valid question about the origin of COVID. I hear the question, but we're not proceeding as you wish. This is disrespectful. I'm done with this. Simon, I'm finished with you right now. Go ahead.

The speaker expresses a commitment to questioning what they see in the media and from public figures, stating they believe in asking questions about why they’re lied to “on a regular basis with the media and the Muppets and the politicians and everybody around us.” They mention a belief in flat earth, but frame it as part of a broader stance of skepticism toward widely reported truths. They list a series of purported deceptions: fake viruses, fake nukes, fake moon landings, and fake CGI of the Earth. They also claim videos of hurricanes are falsified, noting that newscasters seem to pretend to be blown around by storms when winds are only about 10 miles per hour. The speaker argues that people shouldn’t be discouraged from asking questions, criticizing “the Muppets and the NPCs” for pressuring conformity. They compare society to the Truman Show, saying we live in it and that “the Muppets come up to you and they’re like, oh, it’s a beautiful day.” They reiterate the call to disobey and to use common sense, referencing chemtrails as part of the surrounding discourse.

Speaker 0 asks if there is something coming or a natural disaster and whether the other person has heard of claims about something big coming, and if they know what it might be. Speaker 1 confirms they have heard of them and are aware of them, but says they are not able to have that conversation. They ask what might be imminent and state that time is not a luxury we can afford; the time has come. They emphasize that we need to start having the conversation collectively, noting that we should have started a while ago, but now we really need to start having the conversation.

The excerpt opens with a reference to a conference from many years ago, suggesting that the listener might have been in attendance. The exchange then shifts to a brief, awkward moment where someone apologizes and asks for permission to proceed, followed by a request for help. A responder states "No," and a separate remark introduces "the subpoena, for example," indicating a mention of a subpoena within the discussion. The conversation continues with an affirmative interjection—"Oh, good"—and a request: "Can you take off the stage?" The reactions include a startled "Wow" and a meta-comment noting the situation is starting in a dramatic way: "Getting off to a dramatic start already." The exchange ends with a clipped closing, simply "Well," signaling an unresolved or continuing moment in the dialogue. Overall, the passage captures a tense, performative moment at a conference, blending retrospective reference, administrative tension (subpoena), and a stage-direction style query, all underscored by a sense of escalating drama at the outset.

The speaker expresses frustration that the other person brought up the "Marine doubt article." They feel they are being attacked and that the other person is going to use information against them regarding state support, which they believe is not the norm. The speaker is hesitant to provide information because of this fear. They suggest scheduling a visit and talking with a therapist, as they do not want to continue arguing or make things worse.

Speaker 0 asks what you are here to talk about, says “Thank you very much,” and asks, “Any votes in the prime minister?”