reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Cancer is not a disease but a survival mechanism to house toxins. The tumor is created to protect the body by containing toxins. Biopsies are unnecessary as treatment remains the same whether the tumor is cancerous or not. People often die from cancer treatment rather than cancer itself. The healthcare system profits from sick individuals, leading to unnecessary procedures like biopsies that can worsen the situation.

There's no such thing as biopsy spreading cancer. They say that out loud, but they have not even one scientific study to show for that, whereas I have 50 to show that they do spread cancer. They just believe so strongly and so blindly what they were told, and they're afraid of the truth because it means that for years and years and years, doctors have been killing people through biopsies. Be very careful. Never do a prostate biopsy. Never do a breast biopsy. There are better ways. You don't need the mammogram with its own radiation. You don't need biopsy to tell you if it's cancer or not. You can be 99% sure just by doing an ultrasound with a technician who knows what she is doing.

A speaker asserts that colonoscopy has never been proven to reduce the mortality and morbidity of colorectal cancer in the population. They claim that society is spending many, many billions of dollars on a test that has never been proven to reduce the disease for which it is intended. They further state that, in reality, far greater numbers of people are suffering detrimental effects and adverse reactions to the colonoscopy procedure than the number of people who are actually diagnosed with colorectal cancer. The speaker emphasizes that, if about fifty five thousand are diagnosed every year as suffering from the condition, over seventy thousand are suffering from the horrific effects, adverse effects of the actual procedure called colonoscopy. In their view, society is paying a substantial amount for this situation. The speaker then presents a conclusion that there is an alternative to colonoscopy. They identify this alternative as being a test called M2PK. This assertion introduces an option they believe should be considered as an alternative to the conventional screening method discussed. The overall message conveyed is that the widely used screening method of colonoscopy has not demonstrated population-level mortality or morbidity benefits for colorectal cancer, accompanied by a large burden of adverse effects, and that the M2PK test represents another approach to address the issue.

Every early cancer detection is customer creation and fraud, with no proof that it cures anyone. The cancer industry is a $300,000,000,000 industry driven by money, with each patient bringing in between $3,000,000 and $7,000,000. If a patient doesn't have cancer, they may be given it. Cancer is not an illness but an accumulation of symptoms. Cancer rates have increased from seven percent in 1900 to fifty-six percent today, and including "the thing we cannot talk about," it's ninety-two percent. The speaker claims to have cured 66,000 cancer patients.

The speaker argues that there has been manipulation of science and a dangerous phenomenon called overdiagnosis that has affected millions of women, particularly in breast cancer, over the last thirty years. Citing a recent study in the New England Journal of Medicine, the speaker claims that over the past three decades in the United States, one point three million women were diagnosed with early stage breast cancer that would never have caused harm. This condition is described as ductal carcinoma in situ, or stage zero cancer, which the speaker asserts was equated with actual cancer. According to the speaker, these diagnoses led to standard treatments such as mastectomy or lumpectomy with radiation, with chemotherapy, and then follow-up hormone-suppressive therapies like tamoxifen and an aromatase inhibitor (arimidex). The speaker contends that many women were subjected to these interventions for cancers that would not have caused harm, and therefore experienced the associated physical, psychological, and social burdens. The speaker characterizes the consequence as a form of medical holocaust, asserting that women were diagnosed with a cancer they did not have, underwent treatment, and endured stigma and psychospiritual stress as a result. Additionally, it is claimed that the healthcare industry told these women that they were saved or that their lives were extended, but the speaker asserts the opposite outcome occurred. A further claim is that these women identify with the aggressor in a manner likened to Stockholm syndrome. The speaker notes that millions participate in breast cancer awareness marches, seemingly unaware that the events are funded by corporations that profit from the drugs used to treat breast cancer. In summary, the speaker presents a narrative in which overdiagnosis led to widespread unnecessary cancer treatments, causing harm to a large population of women, while the industry purportedly benefited financially from the drugs and treatments administered. The remarks connect the phenomenon to broader concerns about the motives of the pharmaceutical and medical industries and the messaging surrounding breast cancer awareness campaigns.

Chemotherapy drugs are prescribed by doctors because they profit directly from them. Doctors buy it for $5,000, sell it for $12,000 to patients, insurance pays $9,000, and doctors keep the $4,000 difference. Chemotherapy's success rate is only 3%, yet it's used for profit. The pharmaceutical industry controls us, diverting funds from breast cancer events to drugs and surgery, neglecting other research like nutrition, homeopathy, acupuncture, and naturopathy.

I want to address why I’ve chosen not to get a mammogram. In nursing school, I learned not to deeply palpate a mass due to the risk of spreading infection or causing a cancerous mass to rupture and metastasize. It doesn’t make sense to compress a lump between plates, as that could lead to further issues. Research shows that people often die from metastasis rather than the primary tumor, and cancer treatments can cause metastasis. Additionally, I’m concerned about the radiation exposure from mammograms, as breast tissue is sensitive. I prefer to live a toxic-free lifestyle and remain hopeful, despite the rising cancer rates and reports of aggressive cancers. I encourage everyone to do their own research on this topic.

In the United States, the medical industry is driven by doctors, leading to poor outcomes for cancer patients. Despite fundraising efforts like breast cancer runs, none of the money goes towards nutritional, homeopathic, acupuncture, traditional Chinese medicine, or naturopathic research. Instead, it all goes towards drugs and surgery, which are ineffective. If women focused on selenium intake, breast cancer could be reduced by 82% in one generation. However, the profit-driven nature of the medical industry prevents this from happening. Many people are unaware of this and blindly trust high-tech medicine directed by medical doctors.

Pediatricians may be incentivized to administer vaccines due to revenue structures. One article claims that 50% of pediatricians' revenue comes from vaccines. Insurance companies like Blue Cross allegedly pay bonuses to pediatricians who maintain a 95% vaccination rate among their clients. This bonus structure may disincentivize pediatricians from accommodating alternative vaccination schedules, potentially leading them to dismiss patients who request them. These incentives may prevent doctors from prioritizing patient care due to financial considerations. The speaker claims that twenty years ago, 20% of doctors worked for corporations, but now 80% do, and these corporations prioritize revenue over patient well-being.

- So for $4.99 you can get your comprehensive lab testing and comprehensive imaging and be able to actually make cancer a thing of the past, dying from cancer. - We can't get rid of cancer because it's gonna come because we live in such a toxic world. - But imagine a world where everybody gets screened every year. - Like, imagine if your grandfather was screened, you know, he would still maybe be here. I don't know. You never know, man.

Therapeutic drugs are the only drugs doctors profit directly from. Chemotherapy is used because it's profitable, not effective. The pharmaceutical industry controls us. Funds raised for breast cancer don't support alternative treatments, only drugs and surgery that don't work.

Cancer is a symptom and a tumor for example is nothing else in the approach of the body to keep us alive. We have so many toxins in our system that would kill us so the body builds a bubble, a bucket, a tumor, and collects all these poisons and basically keeps the poisons on one spot where they don't do harm. That's a tumor. So the cancer is basically your friend. The tumor is working on keeping you alive. This view warns that a needle biopsy can pinch into this tumor and release the toxins into the system and suddenly you have a very fast growing, very aggressive cancer that you didn't have before the needle biopsy. The same problem occurs with mammography. They put 50 pounds of pressure on the breast. If the lymph node is ready to burst, that cannot be a good thing. Usually it bursts and that's what causes cancer. Not just two percent; "mammography's can cause cancer just by the pressure that's applied."

Patients often struggle to understand medical information and may not ask questions due to feeling deferential. Normalizing confusion and encouraging questions can improve the informed consent process, which is currently lacking ethically.

Some people claim that vaccines are a way to poison us, but that doesn't make sense. Many cancer patients have been vaccinated, and if vaccines were poisonous, we would have noticed. Billions of people have been vaccinated and are healthy, so the idea that vaccines cause an unusually high number of cancers is unfounded.

Chemo drugs are the only ones doctors profit directly from. They buy it for $5,000, sell it to patients for $12,000, and insurance pays $9,000. Doctors keep $4,000. Chemotherapy is used because it makes money, not because it works (97% failure rate). The pharmaceutical industry controls us. Money raised for breast cancer doesn't go to alternative treatments or research, only drugs and surgery that don't work.

If you're a patient, it's important to know that your doctor, insurance company, and healthcare providers can financially benefit from labeling you as sicker. For example, clinics receive incentives for achieving vaccination targets, which can lead to significant payments based on the percentage of vaccinated patients. Additionally, if a patient is classified as diabetic based on an A1C reading of 6.8, even without treatment, the clinic can mark them as diabetic. This classification helps the clinic meet performance metrics, as they only need to keep the A1C below a certain threshold to receive credit. This creates a financial incentive for providers to label more patients as diabetic, regardless of actual treatment.

Mammograms can produce cancer because they involve squashing the breasts, which are very sensitive. This squashing causes pain, which indicates inflammation. Inflammation involves increased blood flow and leaking blood vessels to bring in white blood cells and oxygen. The signs of inflammation are that the area is red, hot, painful, and swollen. Mammograms irradiate inflamed, acutely injured tissue with ionizing radiation. This process is not done with prostates or testicles, only breasts. The speaker believes this is a male-dominated madness.

Mammograms as a screening practice are not recommended because they do terrible harm. The Cochrane Collaboration also advises against mammograms. The US Preventative Services Task Force suggests mammograms for women over 50 only after a thorough discussion of the benefits and risks, highlighting overdiagnosis as a risk. Screening 2,000 women with mammograms saves one life but diagnoses 5-50 women with breast cancer they would have never known they had or died from, turning them into cancer victims. It also causes 600-1000 of the 2,000 women to undergo further testing and treatment. Mammograms rarely save lives and always do harm, so they should not be done as a screening tool.

A tumor is a bubble the body builds to collect toxins and keep them in one spot, preventing harm. Cancer is a symptom, not an illness, and is essentially your friend. A needle biopsy can release toxins into the system, causing a fast-growing, aggressive cancer that wasn't present before. Similarly, mammography, which applies 50 pounds of pressure to the breast, can cause a lymph node full of toxins to burst, leading to cancer. Each mammography raises cancer risk by two percent and can directly cause cancer due to the applied pressure.

Biopsies spread cancer, and there are 50 scientific studies to prove it. Doctors have been killing people for years through biopsies, but they blame the cancer instead of the metastasis caused by the biopsy. Therefore, one should never do a prostate or breast biopsy. There are better ways to determine if it's cancer. Mammograms are unnecessary because of their radiation. An ultrasound with a skilled technician can provide 99% certainty.

Irritation over people sharing stories of loved ones dying from cancer. Some believe it's best to stay away from them due to bad luck. Medical professionals don't see such cases in their patients. Despite tweets about families being devastated, experts don't observe this.

Orthopedics is described as by far the most corrupt form of medicine, with oncology identified as next in line. The speaker claims that orthopedic consultants frequently work for device companies, and as a result, the choice of the implanted device in a patient’s body is often determined by the amount of money a company will pay them to select that device. The speaker emphasizes that patients should know the manufacturer of the device inside them because recalls occur, and many people later learn that their hip or other implant needed to be removed because their doctor did not inform them. The speaker asserts that listeners should understand this information, especially if someone they love goes to the hospital. The speaker argues for being proactive in hospital settings, stating that you should have someone at the gate and with you at all times, asking questions, because this is your health and you need someone fighting for it. They reference a favorite study in medicine that surveyed doctors about their patients, noting that the patients whom doctors and nurses liked the least were the ones with the highest survival numbers. From this, the speaker implies that interpersonal dynamics between healthcare providers and patients may influence outcomes, though the claim focuses on the correlation observed in the survey. Finally, the speaker advises that when you go to the hospital, you should not try to be friends with everybody; this is your health and you need to fight for it, and you need someone there who is fighting for you.

I urge everyone, especially black men, to get checked for their health, even if you're 45 or 455 like me. It's crucial to stay alive and vote in 2024. Let's take care of ourselves and each other.

Speaker 0 argues that medical procedures can cause death or spread disease: - A colonoscopy in elderly people (60–70, completely healthy and fit) can lead to death three days later because “they poke a hole in the colon, the bacteria goes in and they are dead.” - In mammography, when something is found, the medical profession proceeds with a needle biopsy, and “pokes into something that's there to save your life.” A tumor is described as there to save your life, yet the procedure is claimed to spread illness. - The body builds a bag to store toxins in its lymph nodes; “so now they come and poke into the lymph node and what will happen is they now spread the poison that the body is collecting for ten-twenty years in the entire body and twelve days later these women are dead.” - Mammography is described as applying “50 pounds of pressure on a woman's breast.” The analogy is made: if you have a lymph node or a pimple ready to burst, applying that pressure would “burst it to give the patient the cancer.”

There is a flood of research on what vitamin D can do for cancer, and it helps in many different ways. Research that shows vitamin D doesn't help is influenced by big pharma. Studies that don't show a favorable outcome use tiny amounts of vitamin D, which is why they don't create the desired effects.