reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 argues that the system is a scam, noting that retirees living on $2,000–$3,000 a month is impossible because money is spent as it comes in. He cites $35 trillion in debt and $2 trillion in American taxpayers’ credit card debt, warning of a looming run on the city and questioning why Social Security money is taxed again. He reflects on personal pension and union involvement and asserts that people will need to work longer. Speaker 1 counters by outlining the history and current state of Social Security. He notes that Social Security began as a 2% tax with a promise it would never exceed 6% of income, but now it takes 12.4%, with projections (CBO or Social Security trustees) suggesting 15.8% to 17.5% in the future. He states that originally promised tax caps were not maintained and that money taken from workers’ paychecks has been spent immediately to pay promised benefits for the past thirteen years. He argues that the system benefits higher earners disproportionately and imposes a larger burden on lower-income workers, who have less left to save for retirement, and highlights disparities in life expectancy, noting that one in four African American men may die between 45 and 64 after paying into the system. He asserts that lower-income and African American workers risk receiving little or nothing in return. Speaker 0 asks for a solution. Speaker 1 proposes shifting toward a universal benefit system, bending benefits for middle and upper income earners while increasing them for lower-income earners, indexing retirement age to life expectancy, and using a more accurate inflation index. He suggests workers should have an option to invest money in something that earns a positive return and cannot be spent by Congress. Speaker 0 shares a personal perspective about his two young sons paying into Social Security and questions whether they will receive any benefits. Speaker 1 responds that younger workers will likely see some benefits, but not what has been promised. Speaker 2 adds that pensions and Social Security both provide guaranteed income, and introduces protected retirement solutions with step-ups and lock-ins that address market volatility. He credits Secure Act 1.0 and 2.0 for enabling these options and advocates adding at least one of four types of plans—401(k), 457, 403(b)—to provide Americans with retirement options and assurances about what they will get in retirement. Speaker 0 notes that young people ask why they can’t invest in their own 401(k) instead of Social Security, and Speaker 2 responds positively, stating there is a place for Social Security, pensions, and 401(k) plans, and that the right questions about savings are being asked.

We need to protect Americans' privacy and Social Security. Social Security is the basis for retirement and retirement savings for 40% of all Americans. For 28 million Americans, Social Security is the only thing that they have. That's why we have to make sure that we are protecting it.

Employers incur significant costs, including matching CPP and EI contributions totaling $539 million annually. Operational expenses, such as office space and equipment, add another $720 million per year. Additionally, each employee is eligible for lifetime pension benefits averaging $32,800 after 20 years, which, when indexed for inflation, can exceed $61 billion over 15 years of retirement. Altogether, these expenses result in a taxpayer burden exceeding $250 billion over 20 years.

We found 10,000 people using the same Social Security number. They are brought in illegally and given a number to pay taxes. Companies hire them across various plants and factories, all using the same number. The IRS only checks if there's an employer linked to the number, validating it. This allows these individuals to obtain driver's licenses and potentially influence voter rolls. These workers don't pay taxes as it's deducted by the companies. The government has a $1.7 trillion slush fund, generating $100 million in interest monthly. This information reveals a corrupt system that benefits everyone involved, leading to attempts on the speaker's life.

We wake up early, work hard, and pay for a house and car we rarely use. The government takes a large portion of our wages, and even taxes our already taxed money through VAT. We save for a pension, but the government still takes a significant chunk of it. In old age, we struggle to afford basic necessities and have to wait until we're 80 to receive a state pension, which we can't pass down to our children if we die before that. It's a scam. We work long hours for nothing, giving our lives away to corporations and struggling to make ends meet.

The speaker claims to have discovered multiple bank accounts in their name, including one with $6,000,000 and another with $20,000,000 at Bank of America, which they never opened. They believe a zero can be added to their Social Security number to create a 10-digit bank account number, and their birth certificate number is their routing number. The speaker suggests Social Security is a system where individuals work for free and are paid fractions of money already in their accounts. They distinguish between operating as an indigenous individual in the private sector and operating as a corporation under the name given by their parents. They allege that obtaining a Social Security number and placing a sole print on the birth certificate constitutes selling oneself to the corporation called The United States of America, which they claim is a business, not a country.

In the exchange, Speaker 0 argues that a financial coup began policies that reduced health life expectancy, noting that to balance the budget without increasing retirement funding, one could extend retirement age or lower life expectancy, or both. Speaker 0 asserts that during the pandemic the operation was carried out by people who allegedly stole large sums of money, suggesting that the pandemic is connected to those alleged thefts. Speaker 1 responds, acknowledging the connection as “a great connection,” and the conversation continues to map how money moves through the U.S. financial system. Speaker 0 offers a simplified mechanism: every day, primary dealers working with the New York Federal Reserve borrow money by selling treasury bonds and bills to IRAs and pension funds. The pension funds buy treasury bonds, moving money into a Treasury account at the New York Fed, and then that money “disappears out the back door.” He references a 2017 study by Dr. Skidmore that documented 21 trillion dollars as missing, noting that at that moment the outstanding U.S. debt was 21 trillion. This leads to the question of whether the United States has too much debt or if there has been a large-scale bank robbery. Speaker 2 interjects that there is “Too much theft,” agreeing with the critical view of the system described. Speaker 0 reframes the issue by explaining that as a citizen, the pension fund you contributed to is not an asset but an IOU to yourself as a taxpayer, because the bonds have a call on all assets. He emphasizes that the bonds are an obligation tied to taxpayers, and questions what the Department of Defense would do if confronted with the disclosure that “we disappeared 20,000,000,000,000 of your money,” noting that the money disappeared from DOD accounts at the New York Fed and could have been sent to Basel, Switzerland, offshore, or elsewhere. The core argument centers on a sequence: the movement of funds from pension investments into Treasury securities, the apparent disappearance of those funds from the system, and the larger claim that a coordinated theft or misappropriation underpins national debt and policy decisions. Speaker 0 reiterates that, in this narrative, the DOD allegedly played a role in the disappearance of funds, framing the situation as one where money funded through pension accounts and Treasury bonds could be diverted or hidden, with the implication that such actions relate to the broader mechanisms of debt and national financial management.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the issue of retirement and government assistance. They express frustration with the current system, highlighting the disparity between those who have worked their whole lives and receive minimal pensions, and those who have never worked and receive similar benefits. They question the value of working if the financial benefits are minimal compared to the costs of childcare and other expenses. They argue that as long as the government continues to provide generous assistance, people will choose not to work. They also worry about the example this sets for future generations.

Social Security and Medicare, America's two major entitlement programs, are facing financial challenges. According to the Congressional Budget Office, Social Security is projected to run out in 10 years, while Medicare is expected to deplete its reserves in 8 years. This means that millions of Americans may lose their monthly benefits. Both programs rely on payroll taxes and have significant waste and fraudulent payments. Despite their popularity, these programs will require massive bailouts or tax hikes to sustain them. The government is likely to delay taking action and resort to printing more money and increasing deficits. Ultimately, a battle will ensue between preserving these programs and cutting wasteful government spending.

Big cuts to Social Security benefits may be coming for some Americans. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget projects that dual-income couples could see cuts of $18,000 per year, and single-earner couples could lose over $13,000. These potential cuts are due to a projected depletion of a Social Security trust fund. Once the fund is depleted, Social Security benefits will no longer be paid at the full rate, due to President Trump's budget law.

The speaker argues that a fifty year mortgage is a mathematical scam designed to normalize multigenerational debt because the system is broken. They state, “Fifty year mortgage is a mathematical scam. They are trying to normalize multigenerational debt because the system is broken. Do the math.” They illustrate with a standard example: “On a standard $400,000 loan at 7%, a fifty year term means you pay over $1,400,000 total. You pay three times the value of the house.” The speaker exposes what they call “the dirty secret they hide in the amortization schedule.” They claim, “For the first twenty five years, 90% of your monthly payment goes to interest. You build almost zero equity. You are a glorified renter paying the bank while you pay for the repairs.” They question the timing of promoting this scheme: “Why push this now?” The answer, according to the speaker, is that “if they don't, the bubble bursts.” They argue that “Institutional investors hold billions in inflated real estate,” and if prices drop to affordable levels, “the elites lose money.” The speaker contends that a tool was invented to “keep prices artificially high by enslaving you for half a century.” They attribute the push to “the official pushing this is an heir to a real estate dynasty.” The broadcast personifies the motive, stating, “This isn't public service. It is a bailout for his rich friends paid for by your life.”

Many people work hard to pay for a house they rarely spend time in and a car that mainly takes them to work. The government takes a significant portion of their wages, along with additional taxes like VAT. Saving for retirement is also challenging, as the government takes a large percentage of the pension. In old age, people often struggle financially, relying on cheap food like canned soup and bread. The state pension is only accessible at an advanced age, and if someone dies before receiving it, their children cannot inherit it. It's a frustrating situation, as people work long hours for little reward, feeling like they're being scammed by the system.

We need to protect Americans' privacy and Social Security. Social Security is crucial for many Americans; for 40% it's the foundation of their retirement savings, and for 28 million, it's their sole retirement income. We must ensure its protection. No one in the Republican-controlled House and Senate will challenge us on this.

The speaker asserts that Social Security payments are essential for some people's survival, such as their mother, who relies on the deposit to feed herself. They contrast this with Donald Trump, who they claim doesn't care if his Social Security check arrives. The speaker dismisses the idea that Donald Trump understands the needs of people who depend on Social Security.

Speaker 0 asserts that states are taking children and giving them to others for money from the federal government, describing it as a nationwide, government-subsidized child trafficking ring—the largest and most pervasive in history by money and numbers. Speaker 1 adds that children are seized unnecessarily from their families due to the federal Adoption and Safe Families Act, enacted in 1997 by Bill and Hillary Clinton, which, according to the speakers, “literally steals money from the Social Security Fund and gives this money to the states in order to incentivize them to kidnap babies.” Speaker 0 elaborates that in order to receive adoption incentives or bonuses, local CPS must have more children, i.e., more “merchandise to sell.” Speaker 1 and Speaker 0 together claim that each child, when totaled, is worth approximately $1,000,000 to the state, challenging the official figure of $60-80 billion per year as the size of the industry and claiming that the federal government takes about $80,000,000,000 annually and distributes it to all 50 states to “kidnap children.” Speaker 1 states that parents are victimized by a system that profits from holding children longer and offering bonuses for not returning children to their parents. Speaker 0 cites statistics alleging that eighty-three percent of all children taken by CPS are for unsubstantiated allegations, implying that many removals should not have happened in the first place. Speaker 1 notes that case workers and social workers are often guilty of fraud, with allegations that they withhold and destroy evidence.

We need to protect Americans' privacy and Social Security. Social Security is crucial for many Americans; for 40% it's the foundation of their retirement savings, and for 28 million, it's their sole retirement income. We must ensure its protection. No one in the Republican-controlled House and Senate will challenge us on this.

This system is flawed, especially for retirees relying on $2,000 to $3,000 monthly. With $35 trillion in debt and $2 trillion in taxpayer credit card debt, we face a crisis. Social Security, initially a 2% tax, now takes 12.4% of income, with projections suggesting it could rise to 17.5%. The funds have been spent immediately, leaving future generations in jeopardy. Lower-income workers, particularly African Americans, often receive little in return despite years of contributions. A solution involves shifting to a universal benefit system, reducing benefits for higher earners while increasing them for lower-income individuals. Additionally, workers should have options for investments that yield returns. Young people question why they can't manage their own retirement savings instead of relying on Social Security, highlighting the need for diverse savings options.

Social Security is a program Americans pay into during their working lives, with 73 million people depending on it for financial security in retirement. It is claimed that Elon Musk and Donald Trump are breaking the "sacred promise" of Social Security. While Congress created Social Security and only Congress can cut benefits, it is alleged that Republicans are attempting to cut Social Security through the "backdoor" by making it harder to correct errors, apply for benefits, or get help when checks don't arrive. Social Security offices are reportedly closing, requiring people to travel hours for assistance, and even then, they may not receive help due to understaffing. It is asserted that these actions impose misery on people so that Elon Musk and Donald Trump can pay for tax giveaways to billionaires and corporations. The speaker urges honoring Social Security promises and requiring billionaires and corporations to pay their fair share.

The speakers claim the Social Security system is a "scam" and the U.S. is "dead broke" with $35 trillion in debt. Taxpayers also have $2 trillion in credit card debt. One speaker says they could have invested their Social Security money in the market and it would be worth $8-10 million today. Social Security originally taxed 2% of income, with a promise to never exceed 6%, but now taxes 12.4%. It may need to increase to 15.8-17.5%. For the past 13 years, incoming money has immediately paid promised benefits. Lower-income and African American workers are most likely to get nothing back due to lower life expectancies. A shift to a universal benefit system is suggested, bending down benefits for middle and upper-income earners while increasing them for lower-income earners. Workers need an option for investments with positive returns that Congress cannot spend. Solutions have been developed that address guaranteed income and market volatility. Encouragement is given to add these solutions to 401k, 457, and 403b plans. Savings in any way is good. There is a place for Social Security, pensions, and 401k plans.

Speaker 0 presents a sequence of large-scale financial figures: - From 1998 to 2015, undocumentable adjustments at DOD and HUD amount to 21 trillion. - Bailouts between 2008 and 2012 amount to 29 trillion. - Adding 21 trillion and 29 trillion yields 50 trillion. - Going direct injections after the going direct reset began in 2019 during the pandemic amount to another 5 trillion, bringing the total to 55 trillion, not counting quantitative easing. - He concludes, “we don't have a financial problem. We have a bank robbery.” - He notes that in the annual wrap-up, a new chart was created and released on social media showing the numbers.

The speaker asserts that no one on the Republican side in the House and Senate, who control both chambers, will speak up to challenge them. The central priority highlighted is protecting Americans’ privacy and their Social Security. The speaker emphasizes the significance of Social Security in Americans’ lives by citing two specific statistics: for 40% of all Americans, Social Security is the basis for their retirement and their retirement savings, and for 28,000,000 Americans, Social Security is the only thing that they have. Because of these the speaker argues that it is essential to ensure the protection of Social Security. The speaker notes that the time for the discussion has ended for the moment, with “The gentleman's time has expired. In the letter that” beginning a concluding fragment, suggesting a transition to the next point or document in the debate.

Social Security needs a closer look. We're finding people listed as recipients who are 50 years old, but I don't know anyone that age receiving benefits. They'd be incredibly old, practically setting a world record. It seems likely many of these individuals have passed away, or they would be very well known. There's a clear problem with the accuracy of the records.

We've identified shocking incompetence and probable fraud in the Social Security program. Government databases list millions of Social Security members at impossible ages: 4.7 million from 100-109 years old, 3.6 million from 110-119 years old, 3.47 million from 120-129, 3.9 million from 130-139, and 3.5 million from 140-149. Money is being paid out to many of these individuals because the payments continue without proper oversight. This hurts Social Security and our country. The databases even list 1.3 million people from 150-159 years old and over 130,000 people over 160 years old. We are currently investigating this issue.

It's all a scam, with people retiring on $2-3,000, which is impossible. The country is $35 trillion in debt and broke. Taxpayers have $2 trillion in credit card debt, indicating huge trouble. There will soon be a run on the city with 50 million people demanding their money. Social Security money invested in the market for forty years could be worth $8-10 million today, but the federal government wasted it.