reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses a tactic called the "wrap up smear." This tactic involves smearing someone with false information, then publicizing it and having it reported in the press. By doing so, the smear gains validation and credibility. The speaker emphasizes that this tactic is self-evident and a common strategy.

Members and front organizations aim to discredit critics by labeling them as fascist or Nazi. By associating opponents with negative terms repeatedly, it becomes accepted as truth. The conspirators manipulate the American public to ignore warnings by ridiculing patriots as extremists, racists, and fearmongers, paving the way for mob violence. Translation: The group discredits critics by calling them fascist or Nazi, making the public believe it. They also ridicule patriots to silence warnings and incite mob violence.

We demonize and then use the wrap up smear tactic in politics. This involves smearing someone with falsehoods, getting it reported in the press, and then using that as validation. It's a tactic that is self-evident.

The speaker discusses a tactic called the "wrap up smear" in politics. This tactic involves smearing someone with false information, then publicizing it and using the press to validate the smear. It is a diversionary tactic used to demonize individuals or groups. The speaker believes this tactic is self-evident and worth considering.

Speaker 0: First of all, it's important to be consistent with my principles, values, and ideas. Secondly, as a socialist, communist, Marxist, I follow Lenin's recommendations. Speaker 1: Lenin's decalogue: corrupt the youth and promote sexual freedom. Infiltrate and control all mass media outlets. Divide the population into opposing groups, inciting discussions on social issues. Destroy people's trust in their leaders. Talk about democracy and the rule of law, but seize power without hesitation. Contribute to the misuse of public funds and discredit the country's image abroad. Create panic and unrest among the population. Promote illegal strikes in vital industries. Instigate disturbances and prevent authorities from addressing them. Undermine moral values, honesty, and belief in government promises. Our infiltrated parliamentarians in democratic parties must accuse non-communists, forcing them to vote only in the interest of our cause. Identify gun owners to confiscate their weapons when the time is right, ensuring no resistance to our cause. Speaker 0: I follow Lenin's recommendations.

The speaker claims that everything taught about McCarthyism is wrong and that Joseph McCarthy was right about communist infiltration of the U.S. government. This is supported by the Venona files, which revealed Soviet communications confirming that many Americans, including high-ranking officials like Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter White, were working for Soviet intelligence. The speaker argues that McCarthy did not want to "name names" publicly but was pressured by Democrats to do so. The speaker claims that the term "McCarthyism" and the narrative surrounding McCarthy were propaganda created by Democrats and the State Department to smear him. Senator Millard Tydings and the State Department colluded to discredit McCarthy, using tactics like threatening to play a non-existent recording of a speech. McCarthy obtained his information from a State Department memo flagging over 120 employees as security risks, which has since disappeared from public record. The speaker refutes claims that McCarthy was un-American, created the Hollywood blacklist, or was antisemitic. The speaker suggests that the term "McCarthyism" is used to discredit whistleblowers and protect historical allies of the left.

The speaker recalls how, in the Mossad, they dealt with a problem in the United States who was speaking out against Israel—specifically, a person who claimed Israel was bombing Lebanon with cluster bombs. They referred to this critic as “Pete McAfee,” and they also called him “Pete the cockroach” because he was noisy and hard to get rid of. The tactic described involved contacting a station in New York or Washington and telling the people at Bneighbred to label him. A campaign would then start, and before long, the critic would be labeled an anti-Semite, a stain that “you cannot wash.” The speaker then says it shames him as a Jew to tell you that, but that’s the fact, and those perpetrating it don’t really understand what they’re doing because they’re losing their own liberty.

In 1943, a directive from party headquarters advised labeling obstructive individuals as fascist, Nazi, or antisemitic to discredit them. The goal was to associate opponents with negative terms through repetition to sway public opinion.

Our job is to control what people think by undermining the messaging.

For 9 years, I was a Communist Party member working as an FBI agent. The Communist conspiracy planned a violent revolution in America, disguising it as a Civil Rights movement. They exploited racial differences to divide us, creating chaos and violence. Their goal was to sow discord and weaken our society.

In 1943, a directive was allegedly issued from party headquarters to communists in the U.S. It instructed them to label obstructionists as fascist, Nazi, or anti-Semitic after building them up, and to use anti-fascist organizations to discredit them. The directive stated that associating opponents with names that "already have a bad smell" would, after repetition, become fact in the public mind. The speaker claims this 1943 directive predicted what "the left does today." They add that in 1971, Saul Olensky wrote in "Rules for Radicals" that "he who controls the language controls the masses." The speaker concludes that this tactic is not new for the radical left, and it is "crazy" how much the 1943 directive resembles what is seen today in 2025.

In 1943, a directive was issued to all communists in the United States, instructing them to label obstructive individuals as fascist, Nazi, or antisemitic. The goal was to discredit them by associating them with negative terms and using the reputation of anti-fascist and tolerance organizations. Through constant repetition, this association would eventually be accepted as fact by the public.

The speaker describes a plan to trigger events that activate either right away or over time while avoiding anything “too obvious” that suddenly “a bunch of Americans get sick.” They say official news stories—such as “a flu outbreak”—would be used to frame the situation, indicating to them it would probably occur in winter, specifically the winter of 2020–21 based on what they read in documents. They claim the timeline in those documents is not specific, but that it points to that period. The speaker argues that doing a flu outbreak would make sense “in one turn” and would prevent people from questioning what is happening. They state the plan would involve eliminating many people, including “high value” targets, and that the scale would be so large that many people would “disappear,” prompting questions. To address that, they say the group has “stories” ready and has put them in place. The speaker contrasts what they claim could be done with fewer people versus what they believe is intended with much larger numbers. They say if it were “a few hundred thousand people,” it would be manageable, but they believe the goal is “millions and millions of Americans.” They estimate the figure as “fifteen million” based on numbers referenced in the documents, adding that it could be even more. They further claim that alongside eliminating large numbers of people, they want plans for a “world government” to move forward without opposition. They say the events would be “very, very radical,” including the dissolution of the United States of America. They describe expectations of world leaders and the media endorsing what they characterize as the dissolution of the United States and the end endorsement of a world government “seated in Israel.” Finally, they claim many Americans would not accept that, and that the elimination of people who would “call out what’s really going on” is necessary to prevent opposition.

After campaign work, corporations hire people to implement a playbook. The playbook begins with broad attacks questioning facts and claims of lying. If that doesn't work, they move to character assassination, digging up negative aspects of the target's past and leaking them to the press to cause embarrassment, hoping the target will quit. If the target persists, the next step is to label them a liar. If that fails, they are labeled an antisemite and a racist. "Crazy," "kook," "crank," or "nut job" are also used as a nuclear option to make everything the target says suspect. Examples of this tactic were shown in New York Magazine (1995, 2023), Vanity Fair (2006, 2023), and Rolling Stone (1992, 2023).

The directive from party headquarters instructs labeling opponents as fascist or Nazi to discredit them. Name-calling, like racist or anti-Semitic, is used to silence dissent. Communists aim to exploit racial differences to divide and weaken Americans, focusing on the revolutionary potential of the working-class Black population.

In 1943, a directive was issued to all communists in the United States, instructing them to label certain obstructionists as fascist, Nazi, or anti-Semitic. The goal was to discredit them by associating them with these negative terms and using the reputation of anti-fascist and tolerance organizations. The directive aimed to make the public believe that those who opposed the communists were indeed linked to these derogatory labels through constant repetition.

Powerful corporations and media partners have a strategy to discredit those who challenge them, especially when it threatens their profits. Initially, they launch broad attacks, questioning your facts. If that fails, they resort to character assassination, digging into your past to find anything that can embarrass you. They aim to make you feel the fight isn't worth the cost, hoping you'll quit. If you persist, they label you a liar or worse—an anti-Semite or a racist—trying to dismiss you as a "nut job." This tactic is effective because trusted media outlets often reinforce these narratives. Standing up to them comes at a significant personal cost, as relationships can be lost. Understanding this playbook helps you recognize their tactics. For more information, visit av24.org/playbook.

The civil rights movement is claimed to be part of a communist plot to enslave humanity. More evidence exists, but time limits discussion. Study further to understand the plan to subjugate the US. Avoid falling into the trap of division and work with others to save the country for future generations. Recommended reading includes "It's Very Simple, The True Story of Civil Rights" by Alan Stange and other materials available at American opinion libraries nationwide.

Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda minister, said that the bigger the lie, the faster it will spread. 'Well, somebody has fabricated a monstrous big lie that Israel had something to do with Charlie Kirk's horrific murder.' 'This is insane. It is false. It is outrageous.' The remarks use Goebbels' maxim to label the accusation as propaganda and assert that the claim about Israel's involvement in Charlie Kirk's murder is being spread as a deception. The speaker presents the allegation as sensational and warns against accepting it as truth. No other details are provided in this excerpt. The focus remains on labeling the claim as a lie.

"In 1943, the communists will use the word Nazis, fascist, and antisemitic in order to push the public mind to make them believe something by using repetition." "Germany was arresting all the bankers because they were charging so much interest that they were destroying the country." "60,000,000 Germans died." "after World War two, all these generals in America actually realized they fought the wrong enemy. The enemy is within." "Even general Patton said we should have fought with the fascist against the communist, otherwise, our country will degrade." "There's also another part that was left out of the story." "Yes."

To brainwash people, wrap a dark agenda in a trendy cause to manipulate the masses. By framing good people as bad through media manipulation, real debate on societal progression is hindered. This tactic keeps us stuck in easily swayed trends, preventing meaningful discussions on moving forward.

Speaker 0: You consider the Jewish people members of the white race? Yes. I do. Of course. Do you have any platform against them as Hitler did? Not all of them. Against those of them who are mixed up with communism or who are trying to subvert The United States for the purposes of Zionism and Israel. I I have something against them. What will be the topic of your talk tonight? Mainly the fact that the the fact that communism and race mixing are Jewish operations are suppressed in the press. You can't get that information out.

They use their influence to suppress books and ideas they don't like, controlling what you get to read and think. They stifle any opposing views, pushing only their narratives. I'm here to expose this and face the consequences for speaking out. In World War II, we were taught to hate the enemy to defeat them. Now, the enemy is communism, but they preach love to deceive us while they are winning. I've shown you how communists are often Jewish, not to condemn all Jews, but to point out the truth. Once you see this pattern, you can't unsee it. They are working to disarm and undermine the police, who are the only thing standing between you and this growing communist terrorism. The same people who said Mao and Castro were not communists are lying to you now.

The speaker claims the CIA popularized the term "conspiracy theorist" to discredit those questioning the JFK assassination. A leaked 1970s document, "Countering Criticisms of the Warren Report," allegedly detailed tactics to discredit truth speakers, including portraying them as obsessed conspiracists or linking them to communist propaganda. The speaker asserts these tactics are still used today, labeling people "foreign propagandists" and "conspiracy theorists" to discredit them. Negative labels like "racist," "xenophobic," and "antisemitic" are used to discourage association. The speaker says that "they" manufacture boogeymen and create caricatures, then associate people like Candace Owens and Ian Carroll with them to discredit them. The speaker concludes that these tactics were perfected after JFK's assassination and promotes Classicallearner.com, which helps parents teach their kids about information control, the history of fake news, the banking system, the corrupted food system, and morality.

I remember, when I was in the Messiah, there was a guy who gave us trouble in the U.S. He began speaking out, and he talked the way Pete did once, saying, "Israel is bombing Lebanon with cluster bombs." We asked, "Who's that guy?" We used to call him Pete the cockroach, because he makes a lot of noise and you can’t get rid of him. So you do this: you get in touch with a guy at the station in New York or the station in Washington, and you say, tell the guys at the neighborhood to label him. And of course the campaign starts, and before you know it, the guy’s labeled him. And he’s an anti-Semitic because that’s what we say he is. And that stain you cannot watch. Now it shames me as a Jew to tell you that, but that’s the fact, and it’s wrong.