reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, discusses the adverse effects of both the SARS-CoV-2 infection and the COVID-19 vaccines. He criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO) for its role in the cover-up of the virus's origins and its lack of support for early treatment protocols. Dr. McCullough highlights the dangers of the mRNA vaccines, including cardiovascular disease, neurologic issues, blood clots, and immunologic abnormalities. He urges people to reconsider taking any more shots and calls for the removal of the vaccines from the market. Dr. McCullough also suggests that major stakeholders should withdraw from the WHO.

A new peer-reviewed study calls for the immediate withdrawal of COVID-19 vaccines, citing significant harm and excess mortality. Authored by Nicholas Hoelscher, Mary Talley Bowden, and Peter McCullough, the study highlights that over 81,000 medical professionals and officials support this action. As of September 2024, the CDC has reported over 19,000 deaths linked to the vaccines, with estimates suggesting the true toll may exceed 580,000. The study points to negative efficacy, increased mortality, and DNA contamination as critical concerns. Historical comparisons show that the number of reported vaccine-related deaths far exceeds thresholds for product recalls. The lack of proven effectiveness in reducing severe outcomes further underscores the need for immediate removal of these vaccines from the market to prevent further loss of life and ensure accountability.

Speaker asserts that "the state, however you define that, the military, CDC, Tony Fauci, Ralph Barack at the University of North Carolina created a weaponized virus. Correct? Gain of function research. They contracted it out to China, and it caused a pandemic around the world once it was released. The government created a weaponized virus that then got out and caused a global pandemic." They ask, "When are we gonna have accountability for that?" They seek accountability for "the COVID era," and for "the CDC has known since 1999 that vaccines cause autism, and they've covered it up for twenty six years." They ask, "How do we begin to have accountability?" and conclude, "You want to call it something different? Truth Commissions, criminal trials? You're I would love to comparing"

A peer-reviewed study led by Nicholas Hulscher and others has found compelling evidence for the immediate withdrawal of COVID-19 vaccines. Over 81,000 medical professionals, 240 elected officials, and 17 organizations have called for this action due to significant safety concerns. The CDC has reported 19,028 vaccine-related deaths in the U.S., with global reports exceeding 37,500, far surpassing recall thresholds. Issues such as excess mortality, negative efficacy, DNA contamination, and a lack of proven reduction in transmission or hospitalization raise serious doubts about the vaccines' benefits. These findings highlight critical failures in data monitoring and risk management, emphasizing the urgent need for accountability and the removal of these vaccines to prevent further harm.

Dr. Mike Eden, a former vice president at Pfizer, claims that the design of the COVID-19 vaccines was intentionally harmful. He argues that there was no pandemic and that the PCR test was fraudulent. He believes that the vaccines contain toxic materials, including spike proteins that can cause immune system attacks and blood clotting. He also states that lipid nanoparticles in the vaccines can deposit in reproductive tissues. Dr. Eden asserts that millions of people have died as a result of these vaccines. He urges individuals to recognize the alleged crime and take action to stop it.

A study of 99 million COVID-vaccinated individuals revealed potential links to brain and heart issues. Cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough noted the risks were significantly elevated, with some in the two-to-three-fold increased range, which he considers "astronomical." He believes the data is truncated and underreported, and not age-stratified, potentially masking even higher risks for young men regarding myocarditis. Dr. McCullough referenced his study with Nathaniel Meade, which showed a 3.7-fold increased risk of serious cardiac adverse events with the Pfizer vaccine compared to placebo. He alleges pressure from the "vaccine lobby" to retract the Meade paper. He cited a Rasmussen survey indicating that 53% of Americans believe COVID vaccines are causing serious adverse events and deaths. He, along with other organizations, is calling for a global withdrawal of the vaccines, deeming them unsafe. Dr. McCullough also warned about the dangers of gain-of-function research in biolabs, considering it a major threat to humanity, potentially more so than nuclear war.

Dr. David E. Martin, Founder and Chairman of AMCHEM International, criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO) in his speech at the European Parliament. He accuses the WHO of being a criminal cartel driven by business interests rather than serving public health. He highlights the organization's history of fraud and manipulation, including the funding and planning of harmful medical experiments. Dr. Martin argues that the COVID-19 pandemic was orchestrated by the WHO and other entities for profit and control. He calls for the recognition of these crimes and the dismantling of the WHO as a criminal organization.

Dr. Mike Eden, a former vice president at Pfizer, claims that the design of the COVID-19 vaccines was intentionally harmful. He argues that there was no pandemic and that the PCR test used was inappropriate and fraudulent. Dr. Eden believes that the vaccines were rushed and that it is impossible to develop and launch a complex biomedical product in such a short time. He suggests that the materials used in the vaccines are intentionally toxic and can cause harm to the body. Dr. Eden warns that more injections are coming and urges individuals to take action to stop this alleged crime.

Dr. Peter McCullar, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, discusses the adverse effects of both the SARS-CoV-2 infection and the COVID-19 vaccines. He criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO) for its role in covering up the origins of the virus and for not supporting early treatment protocols. Dr. McCullar highlights the dangers of the mRNA vaccines, including cardiovascular disease, neurologic issues, blood clots, and immunologic abnormalities. He urges people to reconsider taking any more shots and calls for the removal of the vaccines from the market. Dr. McCullar suggests that major stakeholders should withdraw from the WHO and asserts that healthcare decisions should not be dictated by the organization.

The speaker claims the medical landscape is dominated by COVID vaccine injuries, disabilities, and deaths, and that they submit multiple entries daily to VAERS, facing scrutiny and potential penalties for falsification. They state they diagnosed an executive in her late thirties with Guillain Barre syndrome from COVID-19 vaccination. The speaker estimates that only 1% of manuscripts on COVID vaccine injuries are being published, suggesting a tremendous bias, and that there are about 4,000 papers on the vaccine debacle, which is about 1% of reality. They claim to have never seen myocarditis, heart failure, or blood clots from eating frosted flakes, but are seeing people devastated by the shots. The speaker advocates for removing COVID-19 vaccines from the market, a critical reevaluation of the vaccine schedule, dropping all vaccine mandates, and rescinding the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act.

We need to hold accountable individuals like Fauci, George Soros, Bill Gates, and Mark Zuckerberg for their roles in what is being called the greatest mass poisoning in history due to the COVID-19 vaccines. These vaccines are deemed unsafe and defective, with claims that they have harmed billions globally. The shots are described as toxic, and there is a call to stop their distribution worldwide. There are concerns about the potential introduction of harmful substances into our food supply. Immediate action is urged to arrest those responsible for promoting these vaccines.

Dr. Mike Eden, a former vice president at Pfizer, claims that the design of the COVID-19 vaccines was intentionally harmful. He argues that there was no pandemic and that the PCR test used was inappropriate and fraudulent. Dr. Eden believes that the vaccines were rushed and that it is impossible to develop and launch a complex biomedical product in such a short time. He suggests that the materials used in the vaccines are intentionally toxic and can cause harm to the body. Dr. Eden warns that more injections are coming and urges individuals to take action to stop this alleged crime.

The speaker claims COVID vaccines are not actually vaccines and have caused unbelievable problems and damage. They allege the virus escaped from a lab with six manipulated inserts and the vaccine was 80% homologous to humans, causing major side effects. The speaker states that governments were informed but ignored warnings. They further claim the vaccines' quality control was appalling, the manufacturing process changed, and they were full of contaminants that can integrate into the genome, leading to massive excess deaths and a rise in cancer. The speaker questions why the vaccines haven't been banned, given COVID's diminished threat. They criticize the vaccination of children and call the vaccines "horrible gene therapies" causing "turbo cancers." They advocate for trials for those involved and accuse medical officers and regulatory bodies like MHRA, TGA, and FDA of incompetence and negligence, likening the situation to the Nuremberg trials. They assert the vaccines were never effective or safe, citing Pfizer's initial submissions to the FDA.

I am Thomas Bintur, a doctor with 35 years of experience in respiratory infections. I believe there is a pandemic of severe illnesses and unexpected deaths from various causes. The modified RNA vaccine is a medical crime and a humanitarian disaster. It injects a foreign protein into the body without control over its production or duration. This vaccine should be banned immediately. The government is negotiating a pandemic treaty with the WHO, which would limit our freedom of choice. We need to stand up against the manufacturers, experts, government, and authorities who have failed us in the COVID scandal. It's not too late to take action for a better future for our children and grandchildren.

The speaker discusses their observations and analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic. They claim that the World Health Organization (WHO) has played an adverse role in both the virus's origins and the vaccine rollout. They believe that the WHO is part of a complex syndicate that includes various organizations and foundations. The speaker criticizes the WHO for not supporting early treatment protocols and claims that the vaccines have caused significant harm, including cardiovascular disease, neurologic issues, blood clots, and immunologic abnormalities. They argue that the vaccines should be removed from the market and urge the European Medicine Agency to take action. They also suggest that major stakeholders should withdraw from the WHO.

The speaker advocates banning all mRNA vaccines and reevaluating other vaccines, claiming the science behind lockdowns, masks, and distancing is "complete utter crap" with no scientific basis. They state that the justification for boosters was based on the false premise that antibodies should not naturally decline after infection or vaccination. The speaker claims they and other scientists were ignored by the cabinet, SAGE, Whitty, and Vallance, despite raising concerns. They support the World Council of Health in preventing similar measures from being inflicted on people again and call for a Nuremberg-type investigation. They advocate withdrawing from the WHO, alleging the organization seeks power to impose lockdowns based on minimal threats like a single case of bird flu, in order to push more vaccines.

I'm Nicholas Holcher, an epidemiologist with the McCullough Foundation, and I support Senate Bill 1036. There's abundant evidence for the immediate market withdrawal of COVID-19 vaccines. Over 81,000 physicians, scientists, and others, along with numerous organizations and studies, have called for this. VAERS data and twelve studies show increased mortality linked to mass COVID-19 vaccination. Worldwide, COVID-19 vaccine deaths may exceed seventeen million. Autopsies suggest a high likelihood of a causal link between these vaccines and death, with lipid nanoparticles spreading modified mRNA throughout the body, causing toxic spike protein production. COVID-19 vaccine deaths reported to VAERS far exceed past recall limits, and studies show vaccinated individuals have a higher infection risk. DNA contamination in these vaccines exceeds regulatory thresholds. Removing COVID-19 vaccines from the market is crucial to prevent further loss of life and ensure accountability.

Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, discusses the adverse effects of both the SARS-CoV-2 infection and the COVID-19 vaccines. He criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO) for its role in covering up the origins of the virus and for not supporting early treatment protocols. Dr. McCullough highlights the dangers of the mRNA vaccines, including cardiovascular disease, neurologic issues, blood clots, and immunologic abnormalities. He presents data showing that a significant percentage of people experience severe side effects from the vaccines. Dr. McCullough calls for the removal of all COVID-19 vaccines from the market and suggests that major stakeholders should withdraw from the WHO.

I believe the COVID-19 vaccines and future boosters are unsafe for human use. I urge the European Medicine Agency to pressure and urgently remove these vaccines from the market. In the United States, we will remove them state by state if the federal government doesn't act. This will happen worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) supports these vaccines, but they are more of a problem than a help to the European Union. I think the European Union, the United States, and other major stakeholders should withdraw from the WHO and let them focus on their own initiatives. The WHO will not have control over my healthcare decisions as a practitioner. I'm Dr. Peter McCullough. Thank you.

In this video, John Loughlin interviews Marcel de Graaf, Joachim Koos, and Willem Engel about their letter to the European Medical Agency (EMA) regarding the withdrawal of COVID vaccines. They discuss various arguments against the vaccines, including procedural violations, alleged confusion between test batches and actual batches, and the harmful nature of the vaccines. They highlight the dangers of the vaccines, such as myocarditis and pericarditis, and the potential corruption and illegality surrounding their approval. They also mention the suppression of text messages by Ursula von der Leyen and the erosion of sovereignty by the European Union. The speakers express their concerns and call for action against the vaccines.

Doctor Peter McCullough calls for all COVID-19 vaccines to be removed from the market and for all requirements and mandates for vaccination to be dropped. He states that the vaccines are not safe and they're ineffective. He asserts that the vaccines cause heart damage leading to cardiac arrest and heart failure, neurologic injury, stroke and hemorrhagic intracranial bleeding, small fiber neuropathy, blood clots, and autoimmune conditions. He adds that the vaccines alarmingly may increase the risk for certain cancers. He claims that the vast majority of people have had SARS-CoV-2 infection one or multiple times, giving them natural immunity, and that the risks of serious illness to the population at this point are negligible. He asserts that the COVID-19 vaccines did not save millions of lives, and that while initial studies indicated they could reduce case counts, no valid study has shown that the COVID-19 vaccines saved lives. He contends that they do not reduce hospitalization and death. At this point, he says, we can close the vaccine campaign and begin recovering from the wave of vaccine injuries and disabilities and hopefully avoid any more vaccine deaths by removing the COVID-19 vaccines from the market. He signs off as Doctor Peter McCullough, Dallas, Texas.

In Florida, there is a push to ban the mRNA COVID vaccines, which are referred to as "Franken shots" due to safety concerns. The speaker believes these vaccines are dangerous and should be removed from the market. They claim the technology behind the vaccines came from the Pentagon and point to adverse reactions and deaths as evidence. The speaker predicted early on that these vaccines would be harmful, as discussed in their book "Resisting Medical Tyranny." They warn of a looming humanitarian crisis due to the vaccines.

Dr. Joseph Sanson, a Florida psychotherapist and licensed mental health counselor who litigates pro se, contends that the COVID-19 mRNA injections are biological and technological weapons of mass destruction and argues Florida should stop facilitating these injections and related products. He frames his effort as part of a broader effort to stop what he calls a bioweapon program tied to the pandemic. Background and filings - Sanson began in May 2021, working about 18 months to pass a band of jab resolution at the county level declaring mRNA COVID injections to be biological and technological weapons of mass destruction and urging action by the governor and attorney general. He claims that he got these resolutions passed in about 10 Florida counties, in Idaho, and in Arizona, and that they influenced the Florida Surgeon General to call for a halt to injections in early 2024. - He notes that the Florida Department of Health has said these mRNA injections are unsafe for humans and a potential threat to the human genome. - On 04/01/2023, while advancing these resolutions, Sanson says he suffered congestive heart failure and later underwent a triple bypass on 04/10/2023. He says he tried to rely on unvaccinated blood for surgery and consulted Dr. Francis Boyle, who helped endorse his band-and-jab resolution. Boyle is described as the author of the U.S. domestic implementation legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention; Boyle died about two months after Sanson filed his December 2024 case, which Sanson says prejudiced his case. - Sanson’s first mandamus filing claimed the governor and attorney general were violating Florida statute 797.166 (as he asserts). The court found the writ of mandamus improper (ministerial duty limit) and he lost the appeal. Second case and remedies sought - On 12/01/2024 Sanson filed a second case seeking an injunction and declaratory relief, arguing that his April 2023 medical events and exposures were the result of involuntary environmental exposure through shedding of the technology in the injections. - He characterizes his hospital stay, the decision to obtain unvaccinated blood, and Boyle’s involvement as part of this exposure theory. He says the case includes an 80-page complaint with 50–64 pages of affidavits, including nine affidavits up front and two more recently. - One key affidavit is from Francis Boyle, whose affidavit is described as not only expert legal opinion but legislative intent, given Boyle’s role in crafting the U.S. domestic implementation legislation for the biological weapons conventions. - The World Council for Health in Florida endorsed Sanson’s bill, and a 2025 paper titled COVID-19 Harms and Damages (COVID-19 harms and damages, non-exhaustive conclusion) is cited as stating that both the virus and the vaccine violated the Biological Weapons Convention; the paper has 11 coauthors, including doctors Villa, Zivjic, McCullough, and Maverkakis. Evidence and theory of harm - Sanson cites studies and affidavits suggesting shedding of the mRNA technology, transmission to unvaccinated individuals (including women), and possible environmental exposure from intimate contact or proximity. He references an Israeli study showing transmission of mRNA components to unvaccinated women and notes reports of menstrual-cycle interference and other immune effects. - He argues that involuntary environmental exposure through shedding constitutes a dangerous threat warranting injunctive relief under Florida Health Freedom Act and Civil Rights Act, as well as constitutional protections. He contends the Florida Surgeon General’s statements and the 2025 paper support these positions. - He also argues that the vaccines are illegal gain-of-function products, with derivatives of the spike protein present in injections, demonstrating specific intent; he cites Boyle’s arguments on gain-of-function, dual-use technology, and knowingness. He invokes malice of forethought (reckless disregard for human life) and informed consent issues, arguing there was zero informed consent for a bioweapon. Legal strategy and procedural posture - Sanson says his strongest immediate legal avenue is the Health Freedom Act, along with Civil Rights Act and constitutional provisions, rather than relying on the Weapons of Mass Destruction statute alone, which he dropped in an amended complaint. He argues the illness and exposure could violate civil and constitutional rights and that discovery is needed to develop evidence. - He claims the defense has not adequately addressed the merits, focusing on procedural arguments. He asserts there are procedural errors and seeks a new judge and evidentiary development, including testimony from multiple experts (Villa, Zeviets, Mihalchia) and the Surgeon General Ladapo under oath. - He has sought to reassign the case to a different judge due to perceived bias and past rulings; he notes the prior judge’s decision in a related whistleblower case against the Surgeon General. The Netherlands case and cross-border dimension - Sanson is involved as a witness in the Netherlands case against Bill Gates and Albert Borla of Pfizer, coordinated by Sasha Ladopova. The Netherlands appellate court limited live testimony, but Sanson has provided written statements and affidavits. A trial hearing in The Netherlands was set for October 22 in the cited case. Next steps - Sanson is pursuing an oral-argument motion for live, livestreamed proceedings; a decision is pending, potentially in September. He hopes for evidentiary development and more cases to challenge the PREP Act and related immunities. - He emphasizes public engagement and urges others to seek cases in other states or countries to push discovery and accountability. Overall, Sanson presents a narrative linking the mRNA vaccines to environmental shedding and alleged bioweapon characteristics, backed by affidavits, peer papers, and testimonies, and seeks injunctive relief in Florida and collaborative proceedings in Europe to halt the use and distribution of the injections.

COVID-19 vaccines are deemed unsafe and should be removed from the market due to reported deaths and injuries. The spike protein found in patients who died after vaccination is believed to be extremely dangerous, causing blood clotting and affecting various organs. Pfizer allegedly concealed information about vaccine-related deaths, but external lawyers managed to make it public. The vaccines are considered emergency countermeasures, so standard safety rules are not followed. Only a small percentage of people are getting vaccinated, and there are concerns about cardiovascular damage, blood clots, and immunologic issues. Some batches of vaccines have severe side effects, but there is no system in place to recall them. The vaccines have failed to stop COVID-19 and are not medically necessary. The speaker recommends removing the vaccines from the market and implementing a moratorium on genetic vaccine research.

The speaker believes COVID vaccine programs should be stopped. They are astounded by the number of papers critical of the vaccine or showing negative effects. The speaker claims a group of researchers funded by Pfizer and the NIH bullies editors to retract papers with negative findings about the vaccine. They assert the number of retractions is appalling. According to the speaker, in one instance where an editor resisted, Nature Springer bought the journal and retracted the paper. The speaker states that this is what they have been dealing with.