reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In 2016, I was CFO for Hillary Clinton's campaign. I hired individuals with anti-Trump backgrounds at the SEC. The SEC's first action against a SPAC was in September 2021. I raised concerns about investigations targeting Trump-related companies. I questioned if the SEC was being used to silence political rivals. I asked if Gensler spoke to the White House about the Truth Social investigation. I warned that using the SEC for political purposes could lead to consequences. Thank you, Chairman Gensler.

President Trump stated that a corrupt group within the American government weaponized intelligence and law enforcement agencies. One speaker argues that one doesn't have to be a member of MAGA to acknowledge legitimate grievances regarding Peter Strzok, Lisa Page texts, FISA abuse, and the Alvin Bragg case. Another speaker asserts that Merrick Garland followed the facts and law, and grand juries in Florida and DC believed there was enough evidence to indict Donald Trump on 44 counts. Jack Smith believes he would have been successful in two cases if Trump had not been elected president. The speaker claims the charges were dropped only because he was president. The first speaker clarifies that the initial concerns were about the Russiagate investigation and the Alvin Bragg case, while the second speaker addressed the Jack Smith investigation.

Yesterday, we told you that new documents we got showed that Fonny Willis was recording was working secretly behind the scenes with the Biden justice department, the Biden White House, and the j six democrats to create a double jeopardy, double drain on Donald Trump's supporters by creating a similar indictment to Jack Smith, but in Georgia to move resources and lawyers and and attention span and divide it. We have we're supposed to have a justice system that avoids double jeopardy, but in this case, you can see the plot being created by these lawyers and by the collaboration. Today, we raise a question or we provide some evidence to a question that Jim Jordan raised about a year ago, the House Judiciary Committee Chairman. He believed that Fonny Willis' prosecution of Trump was being underwritten by the justice department because he saw a stream of funding. What we see, what we've provided to the public, is an unusual situation. In the middle of Willis building your case against Donald Trump and 18 of his allies and and to charge them with conspiracy in and racketeering in Georgia to double up on what Jack Smith charged in Washington, The justice department comes to Fonny Willis and says, hey. We just want you to apply for this grant, and we're gonna take this grant, which is normally competitive. We're gonna make it noncompetitive. Basically, you're the only one that's gonna get the money. Just fill out the paperwork and take your cash, about $2,000,000. It's that classic Washington grant, go help kids, not really much specificity, but they move it from competitive to sole source, meaning that it's wired just for her. It looks like the old Boss Hogg way of doing business or Tammany Hall way of doing business. And I think for Jim Jordan or Barry Loudermilk who was on our show last night investigating January 6 from the judiciary committee, this is a pretty serious issue for them to investigate. This looks like a gift grant to Fonny Willis while she's doing the bidding of Joe Biden to pursue and tie down Donald Trump and his friends in a criminal prosecution in Atlanta. It looks just like Tammany Hall, Chicago style politics, and there's now a complete body of documents for congress to look at this. It's it's a pretty pretty clear case of what's going on.

The speaker believes many January 6th defendants were wrongly charged with 1512, an obstruction charge, and that a bipartisan Supreme Court threw it out. As a US Attorney, the speaker wanted to investigate the use of 1512, which they attribute to Merrick Garland and Lisa Monaco, but ultimately to Andrew Weissman. Weissman, connected to the Mueller investigation, allegedly advocated using 1512 to target Trump, even if it meant "making it up." The speaker claims Weissman wanted to charge Trump after first jailing hundreds of people to validate the charge. 1512 was initially created after Enron to prevent the destruction of documents related to an official proceeding. Weissman allegedly planned to expand the definition of "official proceeding" to include the electoral college count. The speaker asserts that this plan involved jailing people, securing guilty pleas, and influencing judges to support the charge before targeting Trump.

Just the News reports a story based on thousands of pages of documents obtained over years with the help of America First Legal, focusing on Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and her prosecution of a state case against Donald Trump that mirrored the federal case led by Jack Smith. The documents, they say, show that Willis was in deep collusion with the Justice Department, with the January 6 Democrats, and with the Biden White House. The claim is that the Biden White House said it would waive Donald Trump’s executive privilege for Willis, and the Justice Department said it would waive and approve Willis’s 2E requests to obtain federal workers to help build a case against a national figure at the state level. The report asserts the “fix was in” and that this constitutes the strongest evidence to date of coordinated action to pursue Trump across jurisdictions. The asserted significance is that the Democrats intentionally and strategically created a double jeopardy, double drain machine to go after Trump, potentially infringing civil liberties by pursuing prosecutions in multiple venues for the same or related conduct. The narrative claims this involved the Biden White House, the Biden DOJ, and the January 6 Democrats pressing Willis to create a system where Trump could be targeted in more than one place, a scenario described as a “double jeopardy, double drain.” The report suggests this development is now focused in Miami and anticipates further disclosures. Looking ahead, the program teases next steps: tomorrow they plan to reveal whether there was a financial incentive or “financial follow the money” stream to Willis tied to her pursuit. They note that if this pattern occurred in Georgia, there are similar election cases in Wisconsin and Arizona, raising questions about federal taxpayers funding state efforts to smear Trump and create multi-state double jeopardy scenarios. The discussion frames these elements as part of a conspiracy case beginning to unfold in Miami. Upcoming segments are promised to include new election integrity revelations from figures like Tulsi Gabbard, Kash Patel, and Pam Bondi. These revelations are expected to concern intrusions and issues targeting the 2026 election, with the aim of informing Senate members—potentially swaying those on the fence about the Save or related measures. The program signals that these developments will be explored in upcoming appearances, including guests such as Barry Loudermilk.

Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, is facing scrutiny after emails surfaced suggesting that he knew about Jeffrey Epstein's illegal activities. The emails, dated August 2008, indicate that money transfers from Epstein were pending Dimon's review. This is significant because just months earlier, Epstein had pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution of a minor. The Virgin Islands government is now investigating what Dimon knew and when. JPMorgan has filed a third-party claim, blaming a former executive for any wrongdoing related to Epstein. However, the government's lawyer questions why Dimon shouldn't be held responsible if the executive is considered rogue. The implication is that knowledge of Epstein's actions reached the top of the organization.

Devin says he's expecting a full investigation and notes transparency from the intelligence agencies under Trump. He argues the 'Russia hoax' was designed to get Trump and that officials were worried about Hillary Clinton emails coming public in 2016. He asks how Jack Smith was appointed in 2022, who decided the Mar-a-Lago raid, and what documents they were seeking. He asserts there was a conspiracy to weaponize US intelligence against the Republican, citing 'five investigations tied to the Russia hoax and Ukraine impeachment hoax,' accusing officials of lying and misleading Congress. He mentions 'August 2016 discussions in the Obama White House' and the 'August 2022 Mar-a-Lago raid,' Monaco’s role, and the '40-page Russia influence report' concluding Russia didn't think Trump would win. On Gaza, he says no one trusts Hamas, but sees an opportunity with Trump's diplomacy. He closes as chairman of President Trump's advisory intelligence committee.

- "the senate judiciary committee confirmed yesterday what many of us knew had been the case. Biden era officials at the Department of Justice and FBI, politically targeting, certain individuals." - "And look, there is no room for malicious prosecution or political witch hunts in our system of justice." - "As you mentioned, on the list of almost a 100 individuals and organizations, had Turning Point USA, our own Republican Attorneys General Association, that is our political arm, was also targeted." - "Everybody at home knows what was done to president Trump. This is wrong. It's unlawful, and we're gonna hold people accountable." - "So I don't have names yet. We're gonna start at the top, and we're gonna go as broad as we can." - "We're going to use every civil and criminal tool, including civil rights violations that are at our fingertips."

- "Do you know who Ray Epps is, and where is he? And, is he sitting behind bars like some of these other, protesters who've been sitting there without bail for so long?" - "And what we need to know is whether or not that cooperation existed on January 5 and January 6 to get people to do things that they might otherwise not do, like enter the capital." - "We already know as a consequence of reporting in revolver.news and in re really, that was confirmed by the New York Times that there were people texting their handlers from the crowd in January 5 and January 6." - "Now we just need to know whether the folks being controlled by the federal government were, in fact, the very people that were doing the worst things on January 6."

Speaker 0 questions the Mar-a-Lago raid, asking, “how is the FBI just gonna go and raid Mar A Lago at president's home,” and “would it happen again?” Speaker 1 replies that it was “a total weaponization and politicization by the FBI and DOJ and the Biden administration dating back to the Obama administration that led not only to Russiagate as you opened up with, but to the invasion of Donald Trump's private home in Mar A Lago.” He says “there was no constitutional basis to do so. There was no lawful predicate to open that investigation.” He says the FBI is “ridding this place of its former leadership structure” and that documents are being declassified for public viewing. He notes, “Every single person that has been found to have weaponized or participated in that process has been removed from leadership positions.” He states, “There was no crime. There was no predicate to go and invade Donald Trump's home.” On mortgage fraud: “it's a multi agency effort” and “we're going to route out any sort of corruption.”

Senator Johnson and I allege that your predecessor left the FBI politicized, and I publish whistleblower records about Arctic Frost. Arctic Frost was opened and approved by FBI agent Thibault and became Jack Smith's elector case against Trump, but it broadened to Republican organizations. The targets included the Republican National Committee, Republican Attorneys General Association, and Turning Point USA among them; 92 Republican targets were placed under Arctic Frost. Arctic Frost was not just a case to investigate Trump but a vehicle to probe entire Republican political apparatus. I have exposed 'the political way in which Peter Navarro was investigated and prosecuted.' When Thibault learned that Biden's DOJ would prosecute Navarro, he said, 'wow. Great. That's a quote, unquote.' Through whistleblowers, I obtained an audio recording of Special Agent Giogardina and Special Agent Gardner delivering a subpoena to Navarro, and I’m making audio public today.

Speaker 0: I began my journey into chronicling the censorship industrial complex. Speaker 1: Some of the most terrifying conversations I've had with some of my dear friends who work inside CIA, and their jobs is to go to other countries, get involved in elections, protests that will help overthrow a regime. It's no secret at this point. The CIA has been doing that for years, for decades. But the most terrifying conversations I've had are the ones where they would look to me and say, my god. Like, the twenty twenty election? We're doing to our people what we do to others. Speaker 2: CIA, the other intelligence agencies were exposed with projects like Operation Mockingbird. Speaker 0: The State Department, USAID, the Central Intelligence Agency went from free speech diplomacy to promoting censorship. Speaker 2: They created, purchased, controlled assets at the New York Times, the Washington Post, all of these top down media structures that used to control the information that Americans got. Speaker 3: I pulled into the driveway, opened up my garage door, these two gentlemen come out of a blue sedan with government license plates. And they came up to me and said, you're mister Solomon? And I said, yes. And they said, you're at the tip of a very large and dangerous iceberg. Speaker 4: Oh, yeah. The the FBI sent agents over to my home to serve a subpoena. They're questioning me about my tweets. How is that not chilling? Speaker 2: Our whole page on Facebook for the world Seventh day Adventist World Church was removed. Speaker 5: The level of censorship that we experienced from publishing this documentary was beyond anything I could have imagined, and we really didn't even understand why. Speaker 3: We are going to win back the White House. The Russian collusion started broken '16. That's where the big lie first erupted. Speaker 6: Russian operatives used social media to rile up the American electorate and boost the candidacy of Donald Trump. Speaker 0: That's why they went after Trump with the Russia gate and with the FBI probes and with the CIA impeachments and things like that. Speaker 3: My FBI sources told me there's nothing there. And I kept wondering to myself, how could it be that something that's not true be taken so seriously and be portrayed as true? Speaker 7: How do you expand sort of top down control in this society? How do we flip? How do we invert America? Speaker 6: The evidence that the Supreme Court recounts is bone chilling. The federal government would call a private media company and say, cancel this speaker or take down this post. Speaker 3: I mean, just think about this. A sitting president of The United States had his Twitter and Facebook accounts frozen. Our founding fathers could not possibly have imagined that. Is there a chance that this documentary will be censored? Speaker 1: I think there's a huge chance this documentary gets censored. Speaker 2: Yeah. So it's interesting when you look at so many of the big censorship cases in The United States involving COVID, Hunter Biden's laptop. They all go back to a common thread. What is that thread? National security. Speaker 0: Google Jigsaw produced world's first AI censorship product. Things the model were trained on, support for Donald Trump, Brexit referendum that the State Department tried very desperately to stop. These are all these sort Speaker 5: of component pieces of what you called the censorship industrial complex. Speaker 3: Censorship Industrial Complex. Censorship Speaker 2: Industrial Complex. Speaker 7: Censorship Industrial Complex. Censorship Industrial Complex. Speaker 1: I've long felt that it was a bubbling god complex.

Host: The discussion covers a range of new findings and questions about Jeffrey Epstein’s death and the surrounding investigations, focusing on footage, forensics, coded communications, and the involvement of powerful figures. JP: They claimed the prison cameras weren’t working, but footage shows at least one camera in Epstein’s area was recording. The cameras supposedly stopped the day Epstein was released back into the prison and were fixed the day after he died. Host: There’s a statement about Epstein being found dead in a cell dated Friday, August 9, but Epstein was found unresponsive at 06:30 a.m. on August 10. An OCME official said he would arrive at the loading dock with a black vehicle to thwart the media, and asked if a decoy body is a common tactic. Is that standard practice? JP: It’s exceptionally unusual. I’ve never heard of a decoy body used to trick the press in this context. Host: There’s mention that Epstein’s ear looked off compared with what’s typical in descriptions, and that forensic exams describe his penis as the penis of a normal circumcised male, which contradicts victims’ descriptions. JP: There’s been “a lot of powerful” footage from the prison area the day after Epstein’s death; the DOJ has removed some material from their site. The cameras not recording to the DVR was a known issue; a specific camera allegedly focused directly on Epstein’s housing area was reportedly not recording, yet a clip exists from that camera. Host: They’ve found sulfuric acid purchases. One line of thought is water treatment for a pool on Epstein’s island, but sulfuric acid could also be used to decompose bodies. There’s debate about whether Epstein would hire a water-treatment company or buy acid himself, and a tweet-inflamed exchange about its use in drugs. JP: There are claims that sulfuric acid could be for water treatment or for decomposing bodies; another theory is that it’s used for meth production. There’s also a claim that a hotel-ban on sulfuric acid purchases was posted, and Elon Musk and Roger Stone commented—Stone denying the “dead bodies” theory and saying it’s for drugs. Host: The discussion shifts to a hearing with Pam Bondi, which was described as unhelpful—she wouldn’t answer direct questions. This aligns with a broader frustration that the DOJ hasn’t followed up sufficiently on questions raised by leaked material. JP: The code-language topic: pizza and grape soda appear in emails that are redacted or ambiguous. A common interpretation is that pizza refers to girls and grape soda to something else, with other terms like cheese, pasta, and beef jerky appearing in the communications. Host: A DOJ intelligence bulletin maps code words used by pedophiles; “pizza” correlates with girl, “pasta” with little boy, “cheese” with little girl, and “beef jerky” appears in multiple messages. There’s a specific exchange: Jeremy Epstein’s people discuss a “torture” topic in an email chain, and others reference “torture videos” or “torture” in various contexts. JP: The interpretation of “torture” could be sexual in nature (role-playing) or something more explicit; there’s a push to see if the language is literal or coded. The difficulty is prosecutorial—coded language can be hard to prove in court, and people often plead plausible deniability. Host: There are examples like a discussion about “shrimp” and “white sharks” with references to Russian girls, and a separate exchange on “a baby” being bought, with Epstein replying in a way that avoids explicit commitment—further supporting the idea of evasion via coded or oblique language. JP: There’s a long thread involving a Harvard professor, a Nigerian-Portuguese contact, and an Israeli operation thread; Epstein’s reply, “I loved the torture video,” is read as a sexual or possibly role-playing reference, though another interpretation is that it’s about a non-literal, sexualized scenario. The doctor-patient or professional context is complicated by the presence of sexual tokens and “torture” terminology. Host: There’s also a notable exchange about “an aquarium full of girls” and “white sharks” with reference to Russian girls, and a line about a “king of Saudi” with possible high-level connections. The breadth of names—royal, political, academic—suggests a wide network, possibly used for blackmail, leverage, or influence. JP: A recurring theme is blackmail: Epstein’s network could have backed or driven blackmail operations. There are redacted or partially redacted files that could contain more explicit material, including a photo involving a public figure with a girl; even if the girl is over 18, the context remains incriminating and suspicious. Host: The possibility Epstein is alive remains a fringe theory, but there are inconsistent elements—the ear and nose differences in purported body images, the decoy body claim, and the press-release date discrepancy—that feed ongoing speculation about whether there was a replacement or manipulation of the body, or whether a genuine death occurred with unresolved questions remaining. JP: Overall, the files present a web of coded language, high-profile associations, and forensic ambiguities that keep fueling questions about Epstein’s death, the handling of evidence, and the breadth of possible blackmail networks tied to powerful individuals. Host: The conversation ends with a plan to revisit these threads, given the ongoing releases and the sheer volume of material, acknowledging that each new item tends to expand the mystery rather than resolve it.

The speaker questions why billionaires like Bill Gates need referrals to banks like JPMorgan Chase, hinting at potential involvement in black market activities. JPMorgan allegedly failed to report suspicious transactions, allowing illegal activities to continue. Compliance officers were concerned about the risks but were overruled by Mary Erdos, who prioritized profit over morals. Mary and Jamie Dimon sold bank stock, highlighting corruption in the financial system. Visit wallstreetonparade.com for more insights on banking crimes.

The speaker questions why the FBI paid Christopher Steele $1 million to verify a dossier on Trump and offered $3 million to Twitter to suppress a story on Hunter Biden. They express concern over the FBI's actions being politically motivated. The FBI director responds by explaining the payments to social media companies are for legal process costs. The speaker accuses the FBI of damaging its reputation and questions if the FBI requested financial institutions to provide customer data. The FBI director is unsure and the speaker presents an email from Bank of America as evidence.

Jack Smith, granted a subpoena to investigate Donald Trump's Twitter account. The subpoena requested information on users who liked, followed, and retweeted Trump. The scope of the subpoena is concerning, as it includes the names and user account information of everyone associated with Trump on Twitter. Twitter initially didn't challenge the subpoena's scope but fought against the restriction on disclosing the request. The Justice Department, led by Biden, is involved in this operation, which raises questions about potential targeting of Facebook users as well. This politicized investigation by the federal level Justice Department and FBI is seen as a form of political policing under Biden's administration. Trump has vowed to protect his followers from such intrusion.

I'm going to provide examples of that today, including making public new whistleblower records. At your nomination hearing, I made public records that whistleblowers provide me about Arctic Frost. Arctic Frost was the FBI case opened and approved by antitrust Trump FBI agent Thibault. Arctic Frost then became Jack Smith's elector case against then citizen Trump and now president Trump. These new records show that Arctic Frost was much broader than just an electoral matter. In total, 92 Republican targets, including Republican groups and Republican linked individuals, were placed under investigative scope of Arctic Frost. On that political list was one of Charlie Kirk's groups, Turning Point USA. In other words, Arctic Frost wasn't just a case to politically investigate Trump. It was the vehicle by which partisan FBI agents and Department of Justice prosecutors could achieve their partisan ends and improperly investigate the entire Republican political apparatus.

Speaker 0 from Fox News asks Senator Durbin why he won't subpoena Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs. Senator Durbin claims to have no knowledge or interest in the issue, stating that it has never been raised to him. Speaker 0 mentions that Senator Blackburn has wanted to subpoena the flight logs but there hasn't been a vote in the committee. Speaker 0 questions if Senator Durbin is curious about high-profile individuals potentially involved in illegal activities, but Senator Durbin dismisses the question and thanks Fox News for their time. Speaker 0 persists in asking if Senator Durbin will take action, but the conversation abruptly ends with Speaker 1 calling Durbin a liar.

Claims include that "we're not getting the cooperation that we need" from the Department of Justice, where "Pam Bondi sits as the head of it" but "the COO" is "Todd Blanche," whom the speaker says is "failing on all measures." "Because of him, we haven't had a pardon granted since May" and "Because of him, the he wants the j sixers to not be compensated for all that we put them through." He adds, "we're not, getting the things that we need for Dominion machines, etcetera, etcetera." He notes Blanche "used to be until 01/04/2024, he was a Democrat, a registered Democrat" and "then he represented Donald Trump on the Stormy Daniels case that any Democrat would have done the same job," and argues that "everything that needs to be going forward in order to make Donald Trump's presidency work is being stalled intentionally by this man." "It's not because of ineptitude." "This is a smart guy. This is a very capable guy." "It's because he's intentionally, doing things the opposite of what Donald Trump has ordered to be done."

Speaker 1 describes being blacklisted by various platforms and services following the events of January 6th. They mention being permanently banned by PayPal, Venmo, Stripe, Patreon, and donor portals. Their organization, the WalkAway Foundation and Walkaway campaign pack, were also permanently banned. Speaker 1 expresses concern over Bank of America turning over records of individuals who bought coffee in DC on January 6th, violating privacy. They mention a fellow defendant who had their bank mortgage canceled. Speaker 1 believes that legal reforms are needed to prevent people from being barred from the financial world based on their nonviolent politics. They discuss being put on a terrorism watch list and facing extensive screening at airports. Speaker 2 emphasizes the importance of venue reform to ensure fair trials. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 2 believes they were framed by the January 6th select committee, to which Speaker 2 responds affirmatively and criticizes the suppression of evidence of election fraud.

JPMorgan Chase allegedly told the speaker they had 20 days to move their hundreds of millions of dollars in cash, despite a 35-40 year relationship with the bank and no loan defaults. Bank of America also showed no interest in opening accounts for the speaker, even after previously being very cordial. As a result, the speaker deposited funds in smaller banks, $5-12 million at a time. The speaker believes banks discriminated against them and other conservatives/Trump supporters. They claim the Biden administration directed banking regulators to target them, but despite this, the speaker became president.

Speaker 1 describes being blacklisted by various platforms and services following the events of January 6th. They mention being permanently banned by PayPal, Venmo, Stripe, and Patreon, as well as being banned by multiple email services. Speaker 1 also discusses how Bank of America allegedly turned over records of individuals who bought coffee in Washington, DC on January 6th, expressing concern about privacy violations. They emphasize the need for legal reforms to prevent people from being barred from the financial world based on their nonviolent politics. The conversation then shifts to the topic of venue reform, allowing defendants to face charges in their own jurisdiction. Finally, Speaker 2 believes they were framed by the January 6th select committee and accuses Bill Barr of suppressing evidence of election fraud.

The uproar over the anti-Trump partisan Mueller operation suggests that the Garland Justice Department may be hiding something. Special prosecutor Jack Smith and his team are targeting Trump and other Republicans with unprecedented investigations. It is important for Smith to be held accountable and for transparency to be maintained. The American people deserve to know the truth.

"There's no Epstein list. There are no Epstein files." "All of the real story begins in 02/1967 when he's arrested in Palm Beach." "The search warrant basically protected him and it prevented the authorities from collecting meaningful information." "It was like, you're allowed to look in Drawer 3 but not Drawer 4." "So the truth is the US government doesn't have that much." "Massive transfer of money from this guy Les Wexner in Ohio to Jeffrey Epstein." "Leon Black, same thing. He says for accounting services, that's clearly not true." "That's not about Mossad or MI6 or CIA. Right." "So I think as usual, the crime is right in front of our faces."