reSee.it - Related Video Feed

To reduce the federal bureaucracy, we must recognize that many regulations are illegitimate. The executive branch has created numerous rules unlawfully, and acknowledging this is key to shrinking its size. This approach could effectively curb the bureaucracy's illegal actions and ultimately save the country. The growth of the federal government is relentless, as institutions inherently aim to protect and expand themselves. It's rare to hear suggestions about significantly reducing its size, but even a modest cut could transform foreign policy, the economy, and culture. There is potential for meaningful change.

What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether it is controlled by the people. For too long, a small group in our nation's capital has benefited from the government while the people have suffered. The establishment has protected itself, neglecting the citizens. But that is about to change, starting here and now.

California has five more congressional representatives than it should because the state counts undocumented immigrants when determining congressional apportionment.

The average income in my district is $55,000, while congress members earn $174,000. In some areas, the average salary is as low as $32,000, and if I complained about my salary, I'd face backlash. Maintaining two residences and managing expenses in Washington is challenging, as these costs come out of our pockets without reimbursement, and we can't deduct them. Many congress members even sleep in their offices due to high living costs. We need to consider who can afford to serve in Congress. It's crucial to ensure that the House remains representative of all Americans, not just the wealthy. Therefore, there should be adjustments for inflation and the cost of living to support a diverse group of elected officials.

As government expands, individual freedom diminishes. Over the years, freedoms have been eroded by increasing laws, regulations, and the growth of federal agencies, which currently number 428. It's hard to justify the need for so many agencies, especially as two new ones are created each year. Each agency contributes to the loss of personal freedom. To regain our freedoms, it's crucial to reverse this trend, which will lead to greater prosperity and personal happiness.

You're not being honest this morning, and it feels disrespectful to the American people. If congressional seats are based on the census, with about 750,000 people per seat, would that affect how seats are drawn? Yes or no? I'm sorry, could you slow down? No, I can't. The answer is yes.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court race is critical because it will determine the court's majority. This is important due to gerrymandered congressional lines in Wisconsin, which currently favor Republicans. Although Wisconsin is a fifty-fifty state, its congressional delegation consists of six Republicans and two Democrats. Revisiting and establishing fair congressional lines is crucial, but can only happen with an "enlightened" Supreme Court. Therefore, the outcome of the Supreme Court race has significant implications for fair representation in Wisconsin.

In a republic, the larger issue at hand is who governs. It is believed that We The People, under the constitution, hold the answer to this question.

Human population growth is a major issue that impacts many other problems. If the population was the same as it was 500 years ago, many of these issues wouldn't exist.

The transcript argues that private companies running prisons have a financial incentive to maximize inmate numbers, to the point of suing the state or locality if occupancy drops. The claim is that the profit motive creates pressure on law enforcement to arrest more people and to demand strict enforcement, because a safe city would reduce profits and jeopardize contracts. Private equity owners, and publicly traded prison operators, are described as viewing facilities as occupancy units rather than housing real criminals, with a “bed quota clause” in contracts ensuring jails stay 90–100% full. If crime declines, the companies sue for lost profits, exploring the idea that tax dollars are weaponized against public safety to meet quarterly earnings. The discourse suggests the jails and borderless ownership are a “foreign embassy of corporate greed,” with symbols like county jails and state seals described as misleading. The firms named include GEO Group and CoreCivic, along with security and facility managers such as Serco and G4S, depicted as having no local skin in communities and aiming to harvest beds rather than ensure sovereignty or public safety. The police are portrayed as turned into “delivery drivers for a global supply chain of incarceration,” and the constitution as a lease agreement, with towns becoming occupied territories where occupancy matters most. A second major claim is about “prison gerrymandering.” Under the Census Bureau’s usual residence rule, the bureau is said to refuse to fix the rule in 2026, resulting in inmates being counted as residents of rural districts where private prisons sit, not of their home communities. The effect is described as phantom constituents—prisoner populations that boost rural political power and funding while the prisoners themselves cannot vote. The result is a redistribution of political influence from urban areas to rural districts, incentivizing politicians to block reforms and maintain bed quotas, since population counts affect legislative power and funding. The text asserts that more people locked up correlates with greater political leverage for certain politicians, not because of representing the people behind bars but because of representing the capacity of the system. Even as some states purportedly push back, a majority are accused of continuing the practice, especially in Texas, Florida, and Mississippi, where urban communities’ political influence is allegedly diluted by the presence of incarcerated populations. Finally, the “exit” is described as the private prison economy’s pay-to-stay model: upon release, individuals are billed for confinement, sometimes daily costs, leading to debt that prevents reentry into society. If there is missed payment, warrants may be issued, sending people back to jail for being unable to pay. The “Texas two-step” is cited as a tactic to divide profits from medical liabilities by creating two entities—one for profits and contracts and another for medical lawsuits—allowing the profitable shell to continue while victims’ claims are often constrained. The summary portrays a closed loop in which the private justice industry profits from every stage of incarceration, with medical neglect lawsuits navigated to bankruptcy, and the bill ultimately paid by taxpayers. The overall narrative closes by labeling the system a harvest that sustains itself as long as there is profit in the pulse of a prisoner, signaling phase three is complete and asking, “Who’s next?”

Human population growth is a significant issue that cannot be ignored. It is the root cause of many other problems we face today. If the population size was the same as it was 500 years ago, the problems we discuss would not exist.

Legal immigrants tend to lean Democrat, potentially impacting elections. The census counts all people, not just citizens, affecting House seats and electoral votes. Without counting illegal immigrants, blue states could lose 20 House seats and electoral votes. The Electoral College aims to balance power between smaller and larger states, contrary to the impact of illegal immigrants in blue states.

We are introducing legislation to address the issue of illegal immigration and its impact on congressional districts and electoral votes. Currently, the number of people, not just citizens, is counted for these purposes, which allows Democrats to gain more power by attracting illegal immigrants to sanctuary cities. This legislation aims to ensure that only citizens are counted, giving American citizens the representation they deserve. We believe this will bring an end to the abuse of the system and prioritize the interests of American citizens. Thank you for joining us today.

We're reviewing the budget, starting with Congress. The Members Representational Allowance totals $810 million for 535 members, averaging $1.5 million each. Despite earning $175,000—three times the average American salary of $59,000—Congress is proposing a $70,000 raise, pushing their average salary to $245,000. Meanwhile, they refuse to raise the federal minimum wage. Additionally, leadership receives $37 million, and house committees get $212 million. This raises questions about the spending: what justifies these costs? The government needs to cut unnecessary expenses instead of misleading the public about their concern for citizens. The focus should shift from self-serving raises to addressing the needs of the American people.

There are 535 federal legislators in the US, including representatives and senators. Surprisingly, not a single one, regardless of their political party, has called for a truth and reconciliation commission to investigate the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein. This is quite astonishing, as it means that all our federal legislators are willing to overlook this issue.

Without a strong feedback loop between the people and their government, democracy loses its meaning. Bureaucratic rule undermines the power of elected officials—the president, the Senate, and the House—to represent the will of the people. If unelected bureaucrats make the decisions, we don't have a democracy; we have a bureaucracy. It's crucial to repair this feedback loop so that our elected representatives, not unelected bureaucrats, determine our nation's course. The public's chosen leaders in the presidency, House, and Senate must be the ultimate decision-makers.

The situation at the border is critical because it will fundamentally change the country. The core issue is who resides here, which directly impacts democracy and voting outcomes. Over the past 30 years, the U.S. population has increased by 100 million, a fact many Americans are unaware of. This demographic shift is seen as insufficient by those in power, leading to efforts to influence the electorate. By opening borders and granting citizenship and voting rights to newly admitted individuals, there is a clear intention to alter election results.

For years, there’s been a growing realization that America’s government doesn’t truly represent its citizens. A Princeton study revealed that public support for an idea has little impact on whether it becomes law. While the average American's preferences barely influence policy, economic elites and lobbyists wield significant power, often pushing through legislation that benefits them, regardless of public opinion. This system allows special interests to legally buy political influence, leading to policies that result in expensive healthcare, a flawed tax code, and widespread poverty. Despite the perception that this issue arose from the 2010 Citizens United decision, corruption has been entrenched for decades. The solution is straightforward: make corruption illegal. Since Congress is unlikely to act, we need a grassroots approach to address this issue ourselves.

The issue at hand is the disparity in asset ownership among members of Congress. Many Americans question how certain politicians achieve impressive investment returns, especially those involved in stock trades during the COVID pandemic. This isn't just a perception; it's a real problem. Congress members are trading based on information not available to the public. While insider trading is prohibited, members often receive information that, while not classified as insider information by securities laws, still provides them with a significant advantage. This situation raises concerns about fairness and transparency in financial dealings among lawmakers.

Our federal bureaucracy must be responsive to the people; that's fundamental to our democracy. Currently, this unelected bureaucracy holds excessive power, exceeding that of elected officials – a situation unacceptable to the public. We must address this imbalance. Furthermore, our $2 trillion deficit demands immediate attention. Failure to act will lead to national bankruptcy. The interest payments on our national debt now surpass even our defense budget, a truly alarming reality given our substantial defense spending. We must find a solution to this critical financial problem.

This court has lost all legitimacy. The gun, voting, and union decisions damaged its standing, but the Roe v. Wade decision completely destroyed any remaining credibility. To restore confidence in the Supreme Court, we need to expand the number of justices.

Recently, a discussion arose regarding how federal authorities allow illegal aliens to fly without ID, while American citizens face restrictions. This raises a critical voting rights issue: as new voters are imported, the political power of existing citizens is diluted. The focus should not be on race but on the impact of demographic changes on democracy. Democrats support mass immigration to gain electoral advantage, not out of compassion. Historical examples, like California's shift from Republican to Democratic dominance post-1986 immigration reforms, illustrate this trend. The influx of immigrants with differing political views has transformed states, undermining the political power of long-term residents. Ultimately, this strategy threatens the democratic principle of one person, one vote.

What matters is not which party controls our government, but whether it is controlled by the people. For too long, a small group in our nation's capital has benefited from government while the people have suffered. The establishment has protected itself, neglecting the citizens. But that changes now.

We are introducing legislation to address the issue of illegal immigration and its impact on congressional districts and electoral votes. Currently, the number of people, not just citizens, is counted for these purposes, which allows Democrats to manipulate the system. By creating sanctuary cities in blue states, they attract illegal immigrants who are then included in the population count, giving more power to liberal voters. Our legislation aims to change this by ensuring that only citizens are counted. This will ensure fair representation and allocation of electoral votes. We appreciate the support of our colleagues in this important endeavor.

A small group in the nation's capital has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost. The establishment protected itself, but not the citizens of our country. That all changes starting right here and right now. What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people.