TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

My life has been like a movie. I have important info from Pfizer exec Nick Warren about lying to the FDA for childhood vaccine approval. Project Veritas has this info but hasn't released it. FBI raid happened after whistleblower Carrie Medei's appearance. Project Veritas also withheld Ashley Biden's diary. Project Veritas had the means to expose the truth about vaccines but chose not to. This should be held accountable.

No one openly discusses certain truths, but they are evident. Leads lead. Twitter permanently suspended an account after exposing CNN's hypocrisy. Project Veritas, known for controversial conservative views, has been accused of spreading misinformation. They recently won a defamation case against the New York Times. James O'Keefe is also suing Twitter for defamation after confronting a Facebook executive. He argues that Twitter made false statements about him. Critics label O'Keefe as despicable, noting that some news articles inject personal opinions rather than sticking to facts. This situation reflects Project Veritas's ongoing strategy of promoting misinformation. Ultimately, the truth is not determined by opinions or biases.

The speaker reports a federal judge ruled in their favor, allowing them to continue deposing individuals and request comments on their reporting about Project Veritas. The speaker states this is a victory for the Amendment. The speaker says Project Veritas argued that the speaker was intimidating witnesses, but the judge noted the speaker wants them to talk. The speaker says this is an epic moment because people claim their journalism harms people. The speaker acknowledges claims of threats or anonymous comments against people, but asserts the public has a right to know information under the Amendment. The speaker says they will report more on this ruling after obtaining the court transcript.

James O'Keefe is deposing remaining board members and executives under oath regarding his ouster from Project Veritas, after Project Veritas sued him in 2023 and he countersued in 2024. Barry Hinckley, who criticized O'Keefe's use of black car services, filed a protective order in Florida federal court to prevent his deposition from being video recorded, arguing O'Keefe will use footage to falsely portray him as lying or participating in a fraudulent ouster, harming his and his family's safety and reputation. O'Keefe argues this request violates First Amendment principles, as the truth is a defense and the public has a right to know what happened. He claims Project Veritas is judge shopping, as a New York federal judge already denied a similar request. O'Keefe states the lawsuit is not a private matter, given the public audit and leaks to media outlets. He asserts the public has a right to know about confidential FBI informants within Project Veritas and potential board conflicts of interest. FBI agent Kyle Sarifen's deposition is scheduled to be video recorded.

James O'Keefe shares a video of someone banging on his front door. He opens it to find a stack of documents, which turns out to be a federal lawsuit filed by Project Veritas against him. O'Keefe expresses surprise and questions what the lawsuit aims to achieve. He mentions that Project Veritas had a significant amount of money when he left but has apparently spent it all without raising much more. O'Keefe also reveals the names of the lawyers involved in the lawsuit, expressing his confusion and concern about their efforts to silence journalists.

We sued CNN for defamation after they falsely reported that Twitter suspended Project Veritas for spreading misinformation, when it was actually for publishing private information. CNN argued in court that there's no difference between promoting misinformation and revealing private information, but the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed. A circuit judge even noted his disbelief that a major news organization would downplay the importance of truth. This legal victory is overshadowed by Project Veritas firing me, in part, for spending the money to fight these battles. It's difficult when the organization is now celebrating a victory that they were against, and suing me for the actions that led to it.

Elon Musk accuses Media Matters of fabricating a story about corporate ads appearing next to Nazi content on Twitter. According to Musk, Media Matters created fake accounts that followed Nazis and took screenshots of ads next to the content. Musk plans to file a lawsuit against Media Matters, calling it a "fraudulent attack." If successful, this lawsuit could be a significant win for free speech and conservative media.

James O’Keefe confronts Garcia’s office over Epstein photos. O’Keefe says, “You guys said that you you had Epstein photos that you you broke, and we actually broke it already. You redacted some of the stuff on the chalkboard. We we broke the story in May.” Garcia staff counters, “We stand by our story. We put out information that is not included in your photo, so we did include photos that were not. But thank you so much for coming.” O’Keefe asks why the words on the chalkboard were redacted; staff replies they “go above and beyond to make sure that we protect any victims or potential victims.” O’Keefe notes they “broke the exact same photo.” The staff asserts they have many photos O’Keefe did not, and they “included photos that did not have” what O’Keefe released. O’Keefe presses for credit; staff says, “Absolutely not,” and claims, “we put out photos that were never before seen.” The source allegedly is the US Virgin Islands, “with response to a request from Congress.” O’Keefe says he has his own sources and asks for attribution. The staff accuses O’Keefe of “selectively editing videos” and of a broader reputation for filming people without their permission, stating, “That’s your reputation, and that’s why people don’t trust you.” O’Keefe challenges with, “Can you give me an example of how I’ve edited a video selectively?” The staff responds that Project Veritas’ reputation preceded him and declines to provide an example, saying they don’t want to speak to his audience and that he has a “reputation for filming people without consent selectively editing.” The exchange grows heated; O’Keefe asserts he is here as a member of Congress in Garcia’s office and asks for fair treatment. The staff reiterates, “Photos that you haven't put out. We said we were putting out photos that are never before seen. We did that. We did not lie at all.” O’Keefe highlights that he and Garcia’s office have “kicked out here” and describes the interaction as elitist and condescending. He references a quote idea about perception versus reality, then notes they “broke” an image where Democrats in House Oversight claim they broke it, and mentions that one word redacted was “dank or dark brain,” questioning which victim that protects. He promises to seek a retraction and signs off: “This is James O’Keeffe. You know me for exposing the truth and holding the corrupt elite responsible and accountable.” The interaction ends with the two sides firm in their positions, and O’Keefe walks away after being asked to leave, with Garcia’s staff maintaining their reporting and accuracy, while O’Keefe frames the encounter as a confrontation over credibility and transparency.

James O'Keefe is suing Twitter for defamation after confronting a Facebook executive. He highlights a video showing CNN engaging in similar actions. The lawsuit claims that Twitter made false statements about O'Keefe and his organization, Project Veritas, which is known for its conservative activism.

James O'Keefe is suing Twitter for defamation after they made factual statements about him. This situation arose following a confrontation with a Facebook executive. Concerns about doxing led to the removal of a video, despite similar content being aired by CNN. The discussion also touches on Project Veritas, a conservative activist organization, and the implications of their actions, including accusations of fake donations. Ultimately, the truth and evidence surrounding these claims are called into question.

The New York Times is preparing a critical article about James O'Keefe and O'Keefe Media Group, alleging violations of voter privacy and intimidation laws. O'Keefe argues that his organization has explicitly advised against illegal activities, providing guidelines to ensure lawful citizen journalism. He criticizes the reporter, Ken Basinger, for misrepresenting their efforts and for using misleading language. O'Keefe emphasizes that they have created resources to help citizens navigate complex recording laws and that their campaign is legal. He asserts that they are committed to First Amendment rights and plans to continue their citizen journalism efforts, regardless of the negative portrayal by the media. O'Keefe also mentions a partnership with the Citizen Journalism Foundation to promote civic engagement. He concludes by expressing confidence in their mission and the legality of their actions.

For over 2 years, the media and Democratic Party leaders controlled the narrative around the January 6th surveillance footage. However, we broke that monopoly by obtaining access to the footage. Other media outlets reacted strongly, accusing us of downplaying the violence. They argued that the footage should be shared with all news organizations simultaneously. Some even compared our actions to a Soviet or Nazi system. Despite the criticism, we believe in presenting the truth. The reactions we received were fueled by panic and fear.

Project Veritas' inflammatory allegations are based on the words of the company's own employees. However, the individual cited is not a procurement leader. Project Veritas' claims regarding the company's interactions and relations with its suppliers are inaccurate. These relationships are built on trust, transparency, and a commitment to innovation, quality, and reliability. Project Veritas has refused to provide a copy of the recording made without the individual's awareness or consent.

Hidden camera footage shows the FBI raiding the home of a Project Veritas journalist last November. This invasion of First Amendment rights is alarming for journalists nationwide. The government targeted Project Veritas, following our lawful acquisition of materials related to Ashley Biden's diary in 2020, which we chose not to publish and returned to local law enforcement. This raid is part of a broader effort to intimidate and silence journalists, but Project Veritas remains committed to defending our rights and those of all journalists. More revelations about the SDNY's attacks on journalism are forthcoming, and we will continue to fight for our First Amendment protections.

I'm definitely not buying Mark Zuckerberg's supposed MAGA conversion. After I posted a Twitter thread linking a group he donated to with organizations that are actively sabotaging Trump's agenda, Meta ran to the New York Times to smear me. Their defense was basically, "We gave money, but don't know what they did with it." Digging deeper, I found over a dozen organizations funded by Zuckerberg that are suing Trump and organizing protests against his policies. Zuckerberg hasn't publicly stated any intention to withdraw funds from these groups. He issued a letter apologizing for their impact on the 2020 election, but provided no evidence. The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative website, which previously listed thousands of grants to left-wing organizations, now only shows grants from 2024 onward, conveniently erasing the record of election interference.

James O'Keefe reported on developments in the Project Veritas situation, including efforts to regain control and a film exposing board member business entanglements, such as Petrogen potentially being sold to Pfizer. He noted that more board members are to be deposed, but Project Veritas requested a stay on discovery, alleging O'Keefe was publishing deposition excerpts, leading to death threats. A federal judge acknowledged the public nature of the proceedings. Project Veritas's lawyer claimed O'Keefe was intimidating witnesses, citing a police report about O'Keefe visiting a witness's home and requesting depositions proceed remotely. O'Keefe highlighted a cordial interaction with George Scakel, despite Scakel's company potentially being sold to Pfizer. The judge denied the request to prohibit O'Keefe from attending depositions and sharing materials publicly, stating a proper showing of intimidation was needed. Discussions included violent threats against O'Keefe, including a former Project Veritas attorney's email containing threats of physical violence. The judge acknowledged limitations in preventing public commentary and reporting on the case. O'Keefe agreed to seek comment through means other than unannounced visits. Project Veritas's lawyer stated they intend to depose O'Keefe. The judge scheduled a future update.

A Florida-based discussion centers on Barry University allegedly suspending a student amid a campus controversy connected to Project Veritas. The public-facing details describe the suspension as the student not being allowed on campus or in class. An apparent suspension letter states the university’s reason: the student “created a hostile environment here” on campus. Project Veritas has posted an undercover video on its site that it says sparked a firestorm of negative publicity for Barry University. The organization, led by president James O’Keefe, asserts the school is sympathetic to the extremist group ISIS, and argues that a secretly recorded video taken by a student proves this. Senior Laura Loomer partnered with Project Veritas in this case, and Project Veritas claims it aims to expose corruption by attempting to reveal information about nonprofits and corporations; in this instance, Barry University. In the video, which NBC Six notes it is choosing not to air, Loomer pretends to want to start a club that supports and aids ISIS. The individual who signed the documentation to start the ISIS-themed club—the adviser—allegedly indicated in general terms that the university doesn’t try to limit clubs. Project Veritas uses this to attack the university, accusing it of being terrorist-sympathetic. Campus officials respond by stating it is reprehensible to think any organization would acquire video and edit it in such a way as to denigrate the reputation of Barry University or its staff. They say the interpretation of the video is not representative of the school. Project Veritas is asserting that the suspension is a personal attack on an honor student because the university could not defend its staff members. Administrators, however, say the allegations of anti-ISIS sentiment are absurd. The university notes it cannot confirm the suspension at this time because doing so would violate student privacy laws. For Life Night in Miami Shores, Jamie Garola (or Grilla) of NBC6, Florida, reports on the developing situation.

In this video, James O'Keefe from Project Veritas confronts Charlie Chester, a technical director at CNN, about his intentions to help Biden win the election without explicitly stating it. Chester admits to this and also acknowledges that their medical analysis of Trump was based on speculation. The video goes on to highlight various instances where CNN and other media outlets spread false information about Trump, including misleading photos, edited videos, and inaccurate reports. The video concludes by pointing out that trust in the media has declined during the Trump presidency.

Project Veritas sued me for a preliminary injunction, but the federal judge ruled in my favor. I refused a deal to limit my speech, testified for hours, and just won the case. Project Veritas is still trying to silence me, but I will not be silenced. I will never agree to any deal that restricts my first amendment rights. We are releasing a story about the DNC this afternoon. Translation: I was sued by Project Veritas, but the judge ruled in my favor. I rejected a speech-limiting deal, testified, and won the case. Despite Project Veritas's efforts to silence me, I will not be silenced. I will never agree to any deal that restricts my right to free speech. We will release a story about the DNC later today.