TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Catherine Engelbrecht of True The Vote announces that they have been fully vindicated in the case Fair Fight v True The Vote by the Northern District Court of Georgia. They were sued by Fair Fight in December 2020 for helping Georgia citizens file lawful elector challenges. True The Vote provided data showing that around 364,000 voters had moved from their registered county or state. After three years of battling it out, the court has decided in their favor. Engelbrecht expresses gratitude to their supporters and emphasizes the importance of standing up for trustworthy elections. She concludes by thanking everyone and expressing blessings for America.

The speaker states they are in litigation with 18 states across 19 different lawsuits over these states’ alleged refusal to comply. They say objections raised include privacy, noting they are requesting information such as the last four digits of individuals’ Social Security numbers and whether someone is in the country legally or a citizen, which they describe as a matter of federal records. The speaker asserts that the concept of this being a privacy issue is “total nonsense,” and argues that those states have no right to be on the voter rolls. They express an expectation to win these cases, even if it takes going to the Supreme Court. The speaker indicates they started this effort earlier in the year to give states a chance and mentions targeting jurisdictions like Fulton County, Georgia, which still has custody of some ballots from the 2020 election that they would like to examine, along with a couple of other jurisdictions. They say they reached a settlement with North Carolina, which is cleaning up its voter rolls with 100,000 records that were incorrect and needed updating. They mention they waited on behalf of Wyoming’s voter ID law and helped them win a case in court against liberal efforts to push it back. The speaker outlines an overall expectation for 2026: cleaner voter rolls, with many election officials, as noted by John, doing their job after receiving these letters. They anticipate hundreds of thousands of people in some states being removed from the voter rolls correctly. The speaker notes a past hesitation to act, suggesting it was because the DOJ and some left-wing organizations would sue when states attempted to do their job, framing it as “damned if you do, damned if you don’t.” They conclude that for the remainder of this administration, they will be supporting states in cleaning their voter rolls as required by federal law and emphasize that they are just getting started.

Efforts to prevent noncitizens from voting are gaining attention, despite it being rare. Only American citizens should vote, and in Georgia, a 100% citizenship verification process revealed that about 1,600 attempted registrations could not verify citizenship and were excluded from voter rolls. A recent court case, initiated by a coalition including Stacey Abrams' New Georgia Project, upheld the right to conduct citizenship verification before adding individuals to the voter rolls. This ruling sets a precedent for other states. All officials emphasize their commitment to ensuring only U.S. citizens vote, adhering to federal laws and state regulations. It's crucial for states to enshrine this in their constitutions, as Georgia has done.

Fulton County, Georgia admits in a consent decree that 3,600 ballots were duplicated, with 36 batches involved. This raises concerns about potential wrongdoing. We eagerly await further information and facts to emerge. It marks the start of a significant period in the ongoing voter situation.

Many Georgia counties have failed to provide electronic ballot images from the 2020 election, with as many as 74 counties admitting to destroying these records. Legal action is being considered due to violations of federal and state law, as well as obstruction of open records requests by over a dozen counties. The possibility of two separate lawsuits arising from these issues is being discussed.

A journalist asks about a recent FBI action at the Fulton County, Georgia elections office, where twenty twenty ballots, voter rolls, and scanner images were seized. The journalist notes that the president claimed, “they got into the votes. You're going to see some interesting things happening,” and asks why the president was so involved in an FBI and DOJ raid. A spokesperson responds that the president’s statements do not imply his involvement. He emphasizes that this is a criminal grand jury investigation, and clarifies that there was a search warrant authorized by a federal judge, a magistrate judge in Atlanta, which allowed the FBI to seize the records. The spokesperson notes that the records have been seized by the FBI as part of the ongoing investigation. The journalist presses on what the investigation is about. The spokesperson reiterates that he cannot discuss specifics of any grand jury investigation, but previously stated that election integrity is of the highest importance to the American people, and that the efforts are aimed at ensuring free and fair elections for everyone in the country, Democrats and Republicans alike. The spokesperson adds that they are doing everything possible to uphold election integrity. The journalist mentions that in Georgia, claims of voter fraud related to the twenty twenty ballots have been debunked repeatedly and that there were multiple recounts. The transcript ends without further elaboration on those claims. Key points conveyed: - The FBI seized twenty twenty ballots, voter rolls, and scanner images from the Fulton County elections office. - The president suggested that “interesting things” would occur, prompting questions about his involvement. - A spokesperson denies the president’s involvement and describes the actions as part of a criminal grand jury investigation. - A federal magistrate judge in Atlanta issued the search warrant permitting the seizure; the FBI conducted the seizure. - The investigation’s specifics cannot be discussed, but officials assert a commitment to election integrity and ensuring free and fair elections for all Americans. - The dialogue references prior debunking of voter fraud claims in Georgia and multiple recounts, without presenting new specifics.

The justice department is fighting back against attacks on the right to vote by doubling the voting section of the civil rights division. They are challenging discriminatory voting restrictions like mail-in voting, drop boxes, and voter ID requirements. Efforts are also being made to block unfair redistricting plans that diminish the voting power of black and other minority voters.

The justice department is fighting to protect the right to vote by expanding the voting section of the civil rights division. They are challenging discriminatory voting restrictions like mail-in voting, drop boxes, and voter ID requirements. Additionally, they are working to stop unfair redistricting plans that weaken the votes of black and other voters of color.

Judicial Watch litigation led to the removal of approximately 4,000,000 names from voter rolls in the last 1.5-2 years. Specifically, lawsuits resulted in 1,200,000 names removed in California and 450,000 in New York. A warning sent to Pennsylvania led to one county removing 69,000 names, with more removed as part of a settlement. Kentucky removed 500,000 names following a consent decree. North Carolina also removed a number of names. Judicial Watch is continuing its efforts, having sued Illinois and California again due to remaining issues with their voter rolls.

Some states are allowing votes to be received and counted after election day, which contradicts federal law that designates the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November as election day. This practice raises concerns about potential fraud and undermines voter confidence. Judicial Watch is currently suing Illinois and Mississippi for permitting ballots to be counted days or weeks after election day, as long as they are dated on or before that day. Judicial Watch is committed to ensuring fair and honest elections and is prepared to take necessary actions to uphold the law.

A Georgia judge ruled that election officials must certify results even amid suspected voter fraud. Democrats are suing to block measures like drop box surveillance, hand counting ballots, and voter ID protections, raising concerns about election security. In Virginia, Governor Youngkin removed over 6,000 noncitizens from voter rolls, a move criticized by the Biden administration, which is now suing Virginia for this action. The law allowing the removal of noncitizens has been in place since 2006, originally signed by then-Governor Tim Kaine. The push for secure elections is framed as a common-sense constitutional measure, contrasting with perceived efforts by Democrats to weaken election integrity.

Judicial Watch uses the National Voter Registration Act to compel states and localities to clean up voter rolls. They cite successes in California (1,200,000 names removed), New York City (nearly 450,000 names), Washington DC, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Kentucky, and Colorado. Lawsuits are ongoing in California, Illinois, and Oregon. States are reportedly not taking basic steps to regularly clean up voter rolls. Judicial Watch's litigation has led to the removal of over 4,000,000 names from voter rolls in the last two years.

We are committed to ensuring that only U.S. citizens participate in elections, and so far, there is no evidence of noncitizen voting. However, there have been instances where noncitizens voted; this year, 135 were identified as having voted, with another 400 registered but not yet voting. Just because something is illegal doesn't mean we shouldn't have measures in place to prevent it, similar to how we maintain TSA for air travel security.

Speaker 1 outlines a plan to revisit all 50 states and 'clean up voter rolls' and 'ensure as best they can that people are citizens when they're registering to vote in a federal election.' He notes letters have been sent to states under two statutes: 'Help America Vote Act' and 'NVRA, National Voter Registration Act.' States must maintain data, keep rules up to date, and have procedures for federal registrations to safeguard citizenship. He says many states are 'sloppy, cutting corners, not doing this, certainly not doing the list maintenance required,' and not properly ensuring people are on the rolls. The goal is that 'every citizen, whatever their party, whatever their views are, they should feel confident in the outcome of the election.'

It is against the law for noncitizens to vote in federal elections. However, some states are not requiring proof of citizenship when noncitizens register to vote. Governor Glenn Youngkin in Virginia issued an executive order to clean up voting rules. The Biden administration's Department of Justice sued the governor and the Commonwealth of Virginia to try to prevent them from cleaning up their voter rolls. This creates doubt and concern because everyone should want the law to be followed.

Judicial Watch’s legal action led to the removal of 5,000,000 names from voter rolls nationwide. Specifically, 1,000,000 names were cleaned from New York City’s rolls, 1,200,000 from Los Angeles’s rolls, and hundreds of thousands to millions of names were cleaned from Colorado, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Kentucky. The list goes on, all thanks to Judicial Watch’s heavy lifting in court. They say millions more names need to be cleaned up, and Judicial Watch is in federal court now. In the meantime, there are 5,000,000 fewer opportunities for voter fraud.

It is against the law for noncitizens to vote in federal elections. However, some states do not require proof of citizenship when noncitizens register to vote. Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin issued an executive order to clean up the state's voting rules. The Biden-Harris administration Department of Justice sued the governor and the Commonwealth of Virginia to prevent them from cleaning up their voter rolls. This creates doubt and concern in the minds of many Americans.

A bill signed in 2006 requires using DMV data to remove non-citizens from voter rolls if they are registered. This process has been ongoing for 18 years, even under Democrat governors. When someone identifies as a non-citizen at the DMV and is registered to vote, registrars are notified and the individual is given 14 days to affirm citizenship or be removed from the voter roll. The Department of Justice ordered the process to stop 25 days before a presidential election. The governor believes this is unprecedented and indicates the DOJ is trying to achieve something other than fair elections. The governor's job is to ensure fair, accurate, and safe elections in Virginia, and he will continue to do so because he believes the Department of Justice is wrong.

Merrick Garland vowed to crack down on any state that implements tougher election security measures, including using an ID to vote. Garland stated that the right to vote in America has been under attack throughout the country's history. He said the DOJ is challenging efforts by states and jurisdictions to implement discriminatory, burdensome, and unnecessary restrictions on access to the ballot. These restrictions include those related to mail-in voting, the use of drop boxes, and voter ID requirements.

We have initiated a civil rights lawsuit for Mississippi voters opposing the state's practice of counting absentee ballots that arrive up to five days after the election. Federal law mandates that elections conclude on election day, not extend into a week. Additionally, we are pursuing a lawsuit in Illinois regarding the counting of ballots that arrive up to 14 days post-election, even without a valid postmark. This practice of counting ballots after election day raises concerns about potential fraud, undermines public confidence in the electoral process, and is illegal.

The FBI is responsible for safeguarding Americans' voting rights and takes allegations of election-related violations seriously. They investigate federal election crimes, which include campaign finance crimes, voter ballot fraud, and civil rights violations. While the primary responsibility for ensuring a fair election process lies with the state and local authorities, the FBI's Washington field office collaborates with state and federal partners, engaging with law enforcement agencies and providing resources to educate about the FBI's role in elections.

Fight Voter Fraud, active in 49 states, provides free data on double-registered voters, some of whom have voted in multiple states. Voter rolls are described as a mess, with examples cited, including one individual who allegedly voted three times in North Carolina and Florida. The speaker advocates for law enforcement to prosecute egregious cases of double voting. The organization claims to have perfected methods for identifying double-registered voters, double voters, and instances of deceased individuals voting. They also address the issue of "illegals" voting. The speaker highlights a situation in Georgia where election board members verified ballot reconciliation, a process of matching voters to ballots. Democrats are allegedly suing these individuals, and the speaker suggests this is because the reconciliation rule prevents them from cheating.

Fulton County, Georgia admits that 3,600 individual ballots were duplicated in a consent decree. This includes 36 batches of duplicated votes. The extent of this wrongdoing is significant, and people are eager for more information to be revealed. It marks the start of a remarkable period in our history, highlighting the magnitude of voter fraud.

The office and the DOJ will revisit all 50 states to clean up voter rolls and ensure compliance with voter laws. Letters have been sent to states under two federal statutes—Help America Vote Act and the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). These acts have different purposes and rules, but states must maintain data, keep rules up to date, and have procedures whereby people are registered for federal elections to safeguard that registrants are citizens. They are finding that many states are sloppy, cutting corners, not doing list maintenance, and not properly ensuring people are getting on the voter rolls in the first place. The goal is to clean that up so every citizen should feel confident in the election outcome; too many Americans don’t feel confident because of sloppy voter rolls.

There was meaningful voter fraud in Fulton County, Georgia during the 2020 election. At least 36 batches of mail-in ballots were double counted, totaling over 4,000 votes. The Atlanta Journal Constitution independently reviewed digital ballot images and found hundreds of improperly duplicated ballots. Surveillance footage obtained by Voter GA showed ballots being scanned multiple times. Fulton County failed to provide over 100,000 audit tally sheets, and when they were finally turned over, falsified sheets were found. A whistleblower noticed that the mail-in ballots had no creases and were filled out by a printer. An elections expert found that nearly 35,000 voters illegally voted in their old county. It is important to find out the truth and ensure the integrity of our elections.