reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In 2015, Josh Roche proposed a plan for the EU to accept 1 million asylum seekers yearly, issue euro bonds for financing, and establish safe channels for migrants. He accuses George Soros' NGO of influencing EU institutions to implement this plan, which he believes undermines Christian and national political forces in Europe. This migration issue is not random but part of a deliberate agenda.

In 2015, Josh Roche published a plan stating the EU must accept at least 1 million asylum seekers annually. Financing is critical, and he proposed issuing long-term Euro bonds to finance the migration crisis, including migrants' social welfare. Safe channels must be established for asylum seekers, starting by transporting them from Greece and Italy to destination countries, including Hungary and Austria. This is not accidental but a deliberate plan. The speaker claims they are fighting an organized gang called the Empire of George Soros and NGOs. They allege this group supports those transgressing the legal system, finances illegal activity, and aims to capture main positions inside EU institutions by buying out MPs and leaders. The speaker asserts this plan aims to change Europe, push aside Christian, conservative, and national-based political leaders and voters from EU decision-making bodies, and that migration is not just about migration.

In 2015, George Soros proposed a plan involving the EU accepting 1 million asylum seekers annually, issuing euro bonds for financing, and establishing safe channels for migrants. This plan is seen as an organized effort to change Europe by sidelining conservative, Christian, and national-based political leaders. Soros is accused of influencing EU institutions and supporting illegal activities against nations. The focus is not just on migration, but on reshaping the European Union's decision-making process.

In 2015, George Soros proposed a plan to the EU, calling for the acceptance of 1 million asylum seekers annually, issuing euro bonds for funding, and creating safe channels for migrants. This plan is seen as an organized effort to change Europe by influencing EU institutions and sidelining Christian conservative leaders. Critics argue that Soros and NGOs are undermining national sovereignty.

In 2015, George Soros proposed a plan for the EU to accept 1 million asylum seekers annually and issue euro bonds for financing. He emphasized safe channels for migrants to reach their destination countries, including Hungary. This plan is seen as an organized effort to change Europe by influencing EU institutions and sidelining conservative leaders and voters. The focus is not just on migration, but on broader political objectives.

Hungary chose to defend its borders in 2015 and deny entry to migrants without permission, which was the only reasonable thing to do. We have a right to protect our country, people, history, and language. Other European countries decided to create post-Christian, post-national societies, mixing different communities, which is risky. Hungary decided against that risk, which is why we're attacked and I'm seen as the European Union's black sheep. Germany made its choice to accept migrants and now faces the consequences. Hungary has the right to make its own choice. Despite past US support, I was labeled a "totalitarian thug" by Joe Biden. This is disrespectful, but we remain respectful of America and seek to clarify misunderstandings. Our economic and defense ties are strong, but political differences with liberal Washington create tension. Our success, rooted in traditional values and national identity, challenges Western liberals who struggle to accept a successful conservative alternative.

Prime Minister Orbán is seen as a controversial figure in the West due to disagreements with figures like George Soros, who believes borders are obstacles and migration is the goal. Orbán's resistance to this view has made him a target for left-wing media. Accusations of centralizing power, being undemocratic, and violating civil rights are addressed with a focus on Hungary as a "conservative island of difference." Orbán's nationalism clashes with international organizations like the EU and ICC, the latter of which Hungary exited due to disagreements over justice. Orbán is fighting postmodern secularism and radical Islamic immigration. On the Ukraine conflict, where Hungary takes a middle position, the question is raised whether it matters if Putin takes Ukraine and what the off-ramp is. Orbán defines Hungarian nationalism and the government's role in promoting Hungarian culture, including pronatalist policies. He emphasizes the importance of Christianity to Hungarian identity and fostering cooperation between government and religion. Regarding the U.S., Orbán has a warm relationship with President Trump and seeks U.S. foreign policy that strengthens allies like Hungary. He navigates a multipolar world with the U.S., China, and Russia, and considers the implications of China's rise. The U.S. president has tried to motivate Europe to move away from China.

The Obama administration, and even the early Trump administration, used taxpayer money to support the socialist government in Albania. This involved partnering with George Soros on projects aimed at weakening the independence of the Albanian judiciary. This wasn't isolated to Albania; similar activities occurred in Romania, Hungary, Guatemala, and Colombia. Soros, a billionaire, doesn't need this funding, yet the State Department and USAID enabled his influence, allowing him to shape foreign policy and even review funding applications. This taxpayer funding, the speaker argues, indirectly subsidizes Soros’s activities, both domestically and internationally, and is a way for the State Department to oppose conservative agendas. The speaker highlights this as an example of the government funding groups that oppose American interests, while right-leaning organizations are largely ignored. Legal action was necessary to obtain the documents revealing these activities.

The exchange centers on claims regarding a plan attributed to George Soros and its alleged global implementation to increase migration to the United States and Europe. Speaker 0 references a 2015 publication by George Soros, stating that the plan has now been implemented worldwide to bring millions of illegals into The United States and into Europe, and notes that Viktor Orban, Hungary’s leader, recently pointed this out. Speaker 1 recalls the details from the 2015 Project Syndicate publication, outlining two main components. First, Soros purportedly argued that the European Union must accept at least a million EU seekers annually. Second, he purportedly emphasized that Abekwa financing is critical and proposed issuing long-term euro bonds to finance the migration crisis, including funding related to migrants, social welfare, and care as they arrive in the European Union. In addition, the plan allegedly called for establishing safe channels for asylum seekers, beginning with moving them from Greece and Italy to their destination countries. The dialogue attributes these specific elements to Soros, presenting them as a policy framework or strategy. Throughout the discussion, Speaker 0 adds a brief, fragmentary remark, “that’s why they don’t like,” which appears to reference opposition or criticism without elaboration within this excerpt. Key claims highlighted in the conversation include: (1) a 2015 Soros plan published in Project Syndicate proposing that the EU accept a minimum of one million asylum seekers annually; (2) the proposal of Abekwa financing as a critical element, including the idea of issuing long-term euro bonds to fund the migration crisis, along with supporting migrants’ social welfare and care needs as they arrive; and (3) the suggestion to create safe channels for asylum seekers, starting with relocating individuals from Greece and Italy to other EU destination countries. The participants frame these points as explanations of a policy approach that they assert has been implemented globally, and they reference Viktor Orban’s commentary to support their argument. The transcript captures a concise allegation-based discussion about Soros’s 2015 proposals, their supposed financing mechanisms, and the establishment of safe relocation channels for asylum seekers, tied to ongoing political debates surrounding migration in Europe and the role of opposition figures such as Viktor Orban.

Orban, Maloney, and Wilders in Europe oppose immigration, but they fail to acknowledge that the refugee crisis in 2015 was caused by Israel and Saudi Arabia's proxy war in Syria and the NATO coalition's war against Gaddafi in 2011. The destabilization of Syria and Libya led refugees to move through Turkey and Libya into Europe, with the help of Jewish NGOs. These politicians claim to support Israel and the Jewish people while rejecting Middle Eastern refugees. However, the solution lies in creating stable countries in the Middle East, including a Palestinian state and maintaining Bashar al Assad's presidency in Syria. This contradicts the Likud government's policies in Israel, which supports these anti-migrant politicians while destabilizing the countries that produce the migrant crisis.

George Soros's Open Society Foundations have been revealed to be actively trying to influence political processes in Europe and Russia through funding local advocacy groups, social media projects, and journalists. For example, they provided over $130,000 to EU Observer, which used professional news reporting to promote open society values during the European elections. Additionally, leaked documents show the organization's half a million dollar effort to find evidence of Russia's alleged influence in European politics, although they acknowledge the challenges of accusing Russia. Some critics argue that Soros aims to disrupt Europe and promote open borders, referring to his version of democracy as "Sorosocracy."

European leaders favoring restrictive migration policies are meeting in Budapest following Hungary's vote to criminalize those aiding asylum seekers, a move defying the EU and human rights groups. Austrian Chancellor Kurz and Hungarian leader Orban, both immigration hardliners, are attending. Hungary also outlawed EU attempts to relocate asylum seekers. Orban views himself as the defender of Christian Europe against a perceived Muslim invasion, a rhetoric that led to his election victory. The "Stop Soros" campaign was popular, despite Hungary having one of the EU's lowest immigration rates. Soros is seen as the personification of a foreign invasion. Human rights groups are disappointed and hope for intervention from the EU and the Council of Europe, which is reviewing the bill. The European Commission is expected to react, but human rights organizations risk jail sentences if they help illegal immigrants apply for asylum. The EU has warned Hungary before, but Orban continues to defy them. The EU can threaten, but excluding a member state is difficult and unpopular. A mini-summit on migration is planned in Brussels this weekend. Despite low immigration numbers, the issue remains urgent, highlighting a gap between reality and perception.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, George Soros stepped in to fill the power vacuum in Hungary, Poland, and China in the late 1980s. This marked the rise of what some call the Soros Empire, taking over where the Soviet Empire left off. How successful do you think Soros has been in his imperial ambitions?

European leaders favoring restrictive migration policies are meeting in Budapest following Hungary's vote to criminalize individuals or groups aiding asylum seekers. This move defies the EU and human rights groups. Austrian Chancellor Kurtz and Hungarian leader Orban, both immigration hardliners, are attending. Hungary also outlawed EU attempts to relocate asylum seekers. Orban views himself as the defender of Christian Europe against a perceived Muslim invasion, a rhetoric that led to his election victory. The "Stop Soros" campaign, popular in Hungary, paints George Soros as the organizer of this "invasion," despite Hungary having low immigration rates. Human rights groups are disappointed and look to the EU and the Council of Europe for recourse. The EU Commission is expected to react, but Orban has defied the EU before. While the EU can threaten sanctions, excluding a member state is difficult, especially with rising populist support. A mini-summit on migration is planned in Brussels, highlighting the issue's urgency despite low immigrant numbers.

George Soros is a foreign-born, left-wing individual who aims to change the nature of our country. Leaked memos reveal three key points: a belief in their success at influencing global immigration policy, the refugee crisis as an opportunity to further this influence, and the perception of the refugee crisis as the new normal. Soros is a strong supporter of open borders, advocating for unrestricted movement for all. He views the immigration crisis as a means to advance his broader immigration agenda.

European leaders favoring restrictive migration policies are meeting in Budapest after Hungary passed laws criminalizing those who help asylum seekers, defying the EU and human rights groups. These laws include an amendment stating that alien populations cannot settle in Hungary, thus outlawing EU attempts to relocate asylum seekers. Victor Orban sees himself as the defender of Christian Europe against Muslim invasion, a rhetoric that led to his election victory. The "Stop Soros" campaign was popular, even though Hungary has one of the lowest immigration rates in the EU. Human rights groups are disappointed and hope for intervention from the European Union and the Council of Europe, which is reviewing the bill. However, these groups risk jail sentences if they help illegal immigrants apply for asylum. The EU has warned Hungary before, but Orban continues to defy the EU. While the EU can threaten sanctions, excluding a member state is difficult and unpopular. A mini-summit in Brussels will address the migrant issue, despite the fact that immigration numbers are down. There are only around 3,000 refugees in Hungary, revealing a gap between reality and perception.

In September 2015, Josh Roche outlined a comprehensive plan for addressing the migration crisis, proposing that the EU accept at least one million asylum seekers annually. He emphasized the need for additional financing, suggesting long-term euro bonds to support migrants' welfare upon arrival. A key aspect of his plan involved establishing safe channels for asylum seekers, particularly from Greece and Italy to Hungary. This situation is not merely a series of random events but part of a deliberate strategy. There are concerns about organizations, referred to as the "Empire of George Soros," that allegedly support illegal activities undermining national regulations. The broader issue encompasses the transformation of Europe, aiming to marginalize Christian and conservative political forces from decision-making within the EU.

Josh Roche published a plan in 2015 calling for the EU to accept 1 million asylum seekers annually and issue euro bonds for funding. He proposed safe channels for asylum seekers to reach their destination countries, including Hungary. This plan is seen as part of a larger effort by George Soros and NGOs to influence European Union decision-making against Christian and national-based political forces.

Hungary faces opposition from various entities: the Soros Empire, Brussels bureaucrats, and American democrats. They demand things we don't want to give. The US administration wants us to join the war, provide weapons, and give more money to Ukraine. Brussels wants us to accept migrants, build migrant ghettos, allow sexual propaganda in schools, and surrender economic decision-making rights. They also want us to give up unanimous decision-making on foreign policy. If we refuse, they will withhold funds and support our internal enemies. Hungary rejects being part of a right-wing club that only answers to Brussels. We prioritize our independence and sovereignty, as mandated by our constitution.

George Soros is the speaker's opponent, commanding an army of money, NGOs, universities, research institutions, and Brussels bureaucracy. Soros uses this army to impose his will on opponents like Hungarians, believing their values caused 20th-century horrors. The speaker claims the opposite is true: their values prevent repeating history's mistakes. Nazi and communist horrors arose because some Western European states abandoned Christian values, and today's progressives are planning to do the same.

George Soros is donating $500 million to help migrants and refugees start businesses, and he is urging others to do the same. Additionally, his foundation has committed $220 million to support leaders in black communities in the US. Soros previously pledged $1 billion to combat the spread of nationalism through a new university network. He considers this project the most important of his life and aims to build on the work of the Open Society Foundation.

George Soros is my opponent. He has a powerful army at his disposal, including money, NGOs, universities, research institutions, and Brussels' bureaucracy. He uses this army to impose his will on us Hungarians. Soros believes that the values we hold dear led to the horrors of the 20th century, but I disagree. It was the abandonment of Christian values by some Western European states that led to the atrocities of Nazism and communism. Unfortunately, today's progressives are planning to repeat those mistakes.

George Soros has been a target of misinformation and conspiracies since the 1990s, often portrayed as part of a globalist agenda. His Open Society Foundation has funded various initiatives, including support for migrant integration and democracy-building efforts. Critics argue that his influence extends to funding protests and movements in the U.S., including those opposing Israel. Allegations suggest that Soros indirectly supports groups through fiscal sponsors, complicating the tracking of donations. Discussions also touch on the ideological subversion tactics used by leftist organizations, with claims that they aim to reshape American perceptions and governance. Amidst these controversies, the narrative emphasizes a perceived threat to national security and the integrity of American values. The ongoing struggle against globalist influences is framed as a fight for sovereignty and identity.

George Soros, a Hungarian billionaire, is disliked in Hungary and many other nations for his attempts to influence governments. He was the first person to meet with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez after his election, as reported in Spain. Despite being questioned about this meeting, Sánchez has never responded in parliament. It is interesting to see the alliance between the left and extreme left with globalist billionaires. This alliance contradicts their previous anti-globalization stance and allows these billionaires to dictate how we should live while they live luxuriously.