reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The president has secret powers called presidential emergency action documents (PIATs) that allow him to suspend the constitution. These powers are worrying, especially before a national election. PIATs are essentially presidential orders created for worst-case scenarios. They originated during the Eisenhower administration to plan for a potential Soviet nuclear attack but have since expanded to address other emergencies. Very little is known about PIATs as they are kept in secret and have never been released or leaked. Not even Congress has access to them. The president's references to these secret powers are not made up, but the limits of these authorities remain unknown.

Tomorrow, all of the Kennedy files will be released. People have been waiting decades for this release. Tulsi Gabbard and others were responsible for putting the files together.

Speaker 0 describes unidentified phenomena operating in the airspace over restricted nuclear facilities, stating that these are not ours and that they are “otherworldly things” performing maneuvers that have not been seen. He asserts that he has seen with his own eyes nonhuman craft and nonhuman beings. Speaker 1 emphasizes the extraordinary secrecy surrounding the matter, noting that there have been “very few people in our entire government” who have been allowed or provided access to it. Speaker 0 adds that even presidents have been operating on a need to know basis, but argues that the system is beginning to ramp out of control. He states that it is not acceptable to have secret parts of government that no one ever sees. He says that people have been hurt protecting and hiding this information, and that some individuals claimed it would cost them their lives, yet they spoke out about these things. He further claims that there was information being locked away that could change the trajectory for a species. Speaker 0 concludes by calling the matter “the biggest discovery in human history,” underscoring the enormity of the claimed revelation and its potential implications. In sum, the speakers discuss the presence of nonhuman, apparently otherworldly craft and beings operating in restricted airspace over nuclear facilities, the extreme secrecy and unprecedented access restrictions within the government, the personal risks and sacrifices of those who spoke out, and the belief that suppressing the information has prevented potentially world- or species-changing insights, culminating in the assertion that this constitutes the biggest discovery in human history.

The FBI told NBC News that a civilian found a hijacker's passport some distance from Ground Zero. An agent reported finding the passport blocks away from the attack. The agent's superior dismissed the idea that the passport was planted. He then ordered an invasion of the entire Middle East. The indestructible passport is now missing. The speaker wonders who took it and if they reverse-engineered it. He speculates that buildings made of passport paper might have survived. He wants to prevent the passport from being misused.

The speaker admits to being scared to cover two specific topics: the 2020 election and the UFO story. They acknowledge that there may be some merit to the claims made about the election and that some of the ideas about UFOs are dark and difficult to understand. The speaker believes that the government has known about non-human entities for a long time and that there is evidence to support this. They also discuss the government's reluctance to disclose this information due to fear of scaring people. The speaker understands the impulse to hide such radical and heavy truths but still believes in the importance of truth and disclosure.

The speaker expresses a belief that globalists are following Biden and Trump with a low-yield tactical nuke, and that people unknowingly transport the weapon in safes. They claim that the globalists have the power to detonate the bomb with a pulse magnetic communicator. The speaker warns of the imminent danger of nuclear war and suggests that the FBI and Secret Service are part of the problem. They also mention potential scenarios such as poisoning, electromagnetic attacks, and blaming other countries for an attack on Trump. The speaker urges prayer and peaceful action to prevent catastrophe.

I had complete access to every compartment in a facility at the South Pole Station, where there are advanced technologies that people are unaware of. One of these technologies is the IceCube Neutrino Detector, which is not only a listening device but also has the ability to transmit. It contains digital optical modules embedded in the ice, making it the world's largest telescope and directed energy weapons system. This system is believed to be responsible for the earthquakes in Christchurch, New Zealand.

На первый взгляд вопрос может показаться незначительным, но он важен. Вместе с ядерными кодами президенту передают специальную папку с пометкой "совершенно секретно", посвященную пришельцам, которые посещали Землю. Также предоставляется доклад закрытой спецслужбы, контролирующей инопланетян в стране. Эти документы передаются новому президенту после окончания полномочий. Для более подробной информации можно посмотреть документальный фильм "Люди в черном". Количество пришельцев среди нас обсуждать не буду, чтобы избежать паники. Также на неделе обсуждалось предложение премьер-министра о необходимости для водителей менять что-то. --- At first glance, the question may seem insignificant, but it is important. Along with the nuclear codes, the president receives a special folder marked "top secret," dedicated to aliens that have visited Earth. A report from a closed intelligence agency monitoring aliens in the country is also provided. These documents are passed to the new president after their term ends. For more information, one can watch the documentary film "Men in Black." I won't discuss the number of aliens among us to avoid panic. There was also a discussion this week about the Prime Minister's proposal for drivers to change something.

The speaker recalls a conversation about going to war with Iraq. They question the reason behind it and inquire about any evidence linking Saddam to Al Qaeda, but there is none. The speaker later learns about a memo outlining plans to attack seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and ending with Iran. When they ask if the memo is classified, the person confirms it is. The speaker mentions bringing up the memo again in a recent conversation, but the person denies ever showing it to them.

The discussion claims that an “antivirus” was a “deadly virus spread by field mice in the Southwestern United States” several years ago, and that a newspaper reported FEMA was called to manage an outbreak of this virus in suburban Texas. The speaker then argues that FEMA’s “real power” is allowing the White House to suspend constitutional government upon a declaration of a national emergency. They question what an agency with such sweeping power is doing managing a “small viral outbreak,” and dispute the idea that the outbreak was limited, stating “No.” When asked what virus it was, the speaker says it was not Hanta virus and connects the topic to a military project they describe as being recruited for when they were young men. They claim they were told it involved biological warfare or a virus, and that they know “what killed those men” but “won’t even write about” it. They say there is “no context” for what killed those men or an appreciation of the future scale “it’ll be unleashed in.” The transcript introduces a claim of a coming “plague to end all plagues,” described as “a silent weapon for a quiet war.” It asserts “the systematic release of an indiscriminate organism” for which “the men who will bring it on still have no cure,” and says “they’ve been working on this for fifty years.” It further claims that while the rest of the world fought conflicts against “gooks” and “commies,” these men were “secretly negotiating a planned armageddon,” and asks “Negotiating with whom?” The speaker claims the timetable has been “said” to involve an event “on a holiday when people are away from their homes.” They say the president will declare a state of emergency, during which “all government, all federal agencies will come under the power of the Federal Emergency Management Agency,” described as “the secret government.” The speaker ends by telling “agent Muller” to go back to Dallas and “dig,” warning that otherwise “we’re gonna find out along with the rest of the country when it’s too late.”

NASA owns the rights to the interior of the Great Pyramid, a section of the Grand Canyon, and Chaco Canyon. They restrict access to these areas, citing technological discoveries. A mysterious encounter at the Grand Canyon with a man in black military attire revealed NASA's ownership. The speaker questions the connection between NASA, these ancient sites, and space technology.

We have been in contact with your government and agreements have been made in secret. Your planet is in grave trouble with contaminated air, water, dying forests, and breaks in the food chain. There is an overwhelming amount of nuclear and biological weapons, and the planet is overpopulated. Those in power have the capability to save the planet but view it as a military threat. Complete amnesty is needed for these leaders to come forward with the truth and work together for survival.

The speaker discusses a pile of papers that were presented to them, which they claim shows secret information about wanting to attack Iran. They mention that President Trump talks in a certain way and that his supporters take him seriously but not literally. They also bring up the authority of the president over classified information and reference an article by Andy McCarthy discussing leaks during the Obama administration. The speaker concludes by criticizing Joe Biden for not using his declassification powers.

In the conversation, the interviewee describes finding intriguing material in his girlfriend’s aunt’s flat during a search. Among items, he recalls an Excel spreadsheet titled non terrestrial officers. He explains that his search terms included UFOs, ET, terrestrial, and anything spacecraft, noting the document might not use those words in the title. The spreadsheet reportedly listed ship names, materials (with military spellings rather than civilian terminology), and transfers between ships and fleets. It also contained references to exotic chemicals, including molybdenum and other hard-to-pronounce substances. The interviewee notes that, at the time, he checked the ship names thinking they would be US Navy vessels, but found nothing that matched seagoing ships. He does not remember any individual names, only a long list with initials or surnames, and the ship names did not resemble typical navy hulls like USS Lincoln. He recalls using AltaVista rather than Google and finding no seagoing vessel matches. Regarding the chemicals, he recalls molybdenum, barium, and other exotic items, and reflects on what these imply. The discussion then shifts to related topics the researchers had explored later, such as biofilm brown stuff, dielectrics, and nano deposition of thin layers, with mention of materials engineered in layers thinner than a human hair (microns or sub-micron thickness). A participant describes a sample of multilayered bismuth and magnesium, with bismuth layers thinner than a human hair, allegedly recovered from the crash retrieval of an advanced aerospace vehicle, noting there was no evidence that anyone had manufactured such a sample. The interviewee estimates the spreadsheet’s size on an old 800x600 monitor, suggesting about 24 lines and roughly 30 to 40 names overall. He admits he did download the Excel file but, when he was arrested, all data were taken to the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), and his hard drives remain with ONI as part of an ongoing investigation, with attempts to retrieve them blocked. The discussion broadens to historical context: the Office of Naval Intelligence is described as the oldest U.S. intelligence agency (authentically predating the CIA and OSS), with a brief mention of Thomas Townsend Brown’s work for the Navy and Harold Malmgren’s claims. Malmgren purportedly said ONI “knows the most about this issue,” and that entering that door can lead to a closed system with no exit. Another participant notes that Naval Intelligence may approach researchers with special access if they show substantial knowledge, but such access constitutes a closed system. Overall, the dialogue centers on a hidden spreadsheet linking non terrestrial officers, unusual materials, and clandestine naval intelligence dynamics, with implications of restricted access and ongoing investigations.

The speaker discusses a film about WikiLeaks that is said to attack Iran and potentially start a war with it, noting Benedict Cumberbatch is playing the speaker. The opening scene, set in a military complex in Tehran, shows a file for a nuclear bomb marked with nuclear symbols. There are notes in Farsi, and an older scientist speaks as a high-speed camera measures an explosive charge wave designed to trigger a chain reaction. Four scientists in white coats walk in a windowless corridor, and the youngest, named Simsana, writes on the file. The payload’s dimensions are said to be consistent with a Shabab missile. The next scene, in Cairo, features the Iranian nuclear scientist meeting a US CIA agent named Kate. A close-up again shows the handwritten diagram of a nuclear bomb—the same diagram seen in the opening—with Simsana claiming he copied it from memory. The scientists are said to be testing the explosive within six months. The speaker references Tom’s national intelligence estimate, which asserted that Iran did not have a nuclear program. The speaker notes that all 16 US intelligence agencies contributing to that report said Iran did not have a nuclear program with high confidence, and this has been reaffirmed annually since then. A senior diplomat at the table with the CIA agent says, “shit, We thought they were at least three years away from a bomb,” asserting that Tom’s report does not say they were three years away, describing this as a lie upon a lie and a large budget-driven effort to push the narrative in November. The Iranian nuclear scientist allegedly says that if the project works, they won’t hesitate to sell the technology, and even if one of these devices falls into the wrong hands, they’ll sell it anyway. The speaker summarizes this as a reality of a world where not only intelligence agencies are at war, but corrupt media and culture. They emphasize a long-standing group of people who have revealed truths about the world and institutions, noting that powerful cultural and industrial forces—corporations interfacing with governments and global logistics—shape outcomes. The National Security Agency’s expenditure is claimed to be approximately 70% through contractors like Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin, creating a lobby pushing particular directions. The central question raised is how such a lie entered a script about WikiLeaks, given the national intelligence estimate, and why it was acceptable to slander an entire nation and drum up war, because certain people in the system desire war.

There are two things that scare the speakers: the 2020 election and the UFO story. The UFO story is particularly dark and has a spiritual component that they don't fully understand. They haven't shared this information with their wives or families because it is deeply disturbing. The implications of the UFO story are profound and the public may not be able to handle it. The speakers agree that it is too disturbing to share with their children.

Nick receives a message about a code to blow up the world. He questions if it involves nuclear weapons.

The speaker, claiming to be a sim card playing a genie, denies the existence of a movie called Shazam and states that it started in 2009. They mention government intervention to remove videos from stores and imply that they were involved due to their military background. The speaker warns that having the Shazam video puts one on a hit list and advises against sharing it. They express regret for their involvement and encourage people to believe in the movie's existence. The speaker then shifts to a different topic, suggesting a fresh start and introducing themselves as a Sure.

Speaker 0 opens by stating the people involved have “been at war with us for forty six years,” framing the ongoing conflict as a long-standing confrontation. Speaker 1 responds with a broader critique, asserting that Scott Jennings is “more than happy to defend a war with a country that starts with the letters IRA,” and accusing the administration of failing, which would lead to “trillions and trillions of dollars more in debt.” They note their own relative youth during earlier administrations that defended prior endless wars, and they argue that the current war is “not going your way,” asking if eight weeks is “endless” to Speaker 1. Speaker 0 tries to remind the audience that the conversation is about the pace and direction of the war, stating the plan as “gonna be four to six weeks,” while Speaker 1 questions whether Speaker 0 “had the attention span of a net?” and recalls a previous TV debate “four to six weeks ago” where Speaker 0 claimed “we were weeks away from it.” Speaker 1 uses this to cast doubt on Speaker 0’s credibility, suggesting a failure to defend the war’s progress and calling out what he sees as a “political concession.” He asks Speaker 0 to name “one political concession” the administration has made, implying a demand for concrete examples of compromise or capitulation. Speaker 2 intervenes to restore order, saying, “Hey. Woah. Honestly. I’m not gonna have this guy’s gonna on my face,” and asks everyone to calm down, emphasizing that they are in a debate where points can be responded to. Speaker 1 presses the question, again asking for a named concession, while Speaker 0 reframes the issue, asserting a “very simple goal”: to “keep terrorists and a terrorist regime from having a nuclear weapon that can threaten The United States, our allies in Europe, anybody else.” This statement is presented as the core objective that should guide assessment of the war’s conduct and any concessions, though Speaker 1 challenges the framing by pressing for concrete evidence of political concessions. Speaker 2 concludes by signaling a transition: “Alright. We’re gonna leave it there, guys. Next for us, the president suggests ABC.” The exchange thus juxtaposes a debate over war strategy, duration, and concessions with a stated overarching objective of preventing nuclear threats from terrorist regimes, before moving on to a new topic framed as what the president is proposing to ABC.

The conversation centers on a device the crew attempted to bring back from Antarctica. The key points are: - The group discusses being on the way back from Antarctica, with a device that has been confiscated. - They ask whether the device can be used on land. The response: no, it cannot be used on land. The item was checked in biosecurity yesterday, and although there were no problems found, the captain is responsible; the device will be received by him at the end of the day. - The device is said not to be related to the Internet or cybersecurity; one speaker asserts that cybersecurity is "completely fraudulent," and that the device is not about online connections. - The other speaker explains that this applies to all ships in Antarctica, not just their ship. All ships have cybersecurity measures to follow, and they cannot let such devices onto land. - The process is described as very strict. The claim is made that it is available for all ships around Antarctica, especially this one, with cybersecurity and forces to follow. - The first speaker thanks them and apologizes for any issue, noting they did not see any problem online during research. The captain is acknowledged as the responsible party.

Nick receives a message about a marine carrying out a code to blow up the world. He questions if it involves nuclear weapons.

A speaker claims an event was a thousand times worse than the Cuban Missile Crisis but unknown. He told his crew they were facing a serious action, and only one man opted out. Another speaker states he was ordered to prepare air squadrons to bomb military and communications targets in Israel. Dick Thompson, a retired CIA agent, was told by Shotsky that he was ordered to launch nukes against Israel as soon as a nuclear weapon detonated in Cairo.

Nick receives a message about a marine carrying out a code to blow up the world. He questions if it involves nuclear weapons.

Trevor Coppola and Deborah Tavares discuss a NASA war document they found publicly accessible on the NASA website, presenting it as a crucial revelation about planned technologies and strategies for future warfare. Key details about the NASA document - The document is a PowerPoint presentation by Dennis Bushnell, described as the chief NASA scientist at the Langley Center, titled future strategic issues, future warfare circa 2025, presented in July 2001, a few months before 09/11. - Deborah Tavares notes the document states on page four that the presentation is “based in all cases upon existing data, trends, analysis, technologies, no pixie dust,” and emphasizes a premise about robots, cyborgs, and humans. - The discussion highlights page 93 as particularly shocking, including statements about “capture torture Americans in living color on prime time,” “terror attacks within the Continental United States using binary biologicals,” the use of an EMP, radiation frequencies against brains, and other forms of serious warfare and collateral damage; the document also references “exploit CNN syndrome.” - On page 66, the document asserts that humans have increasing limitations and downsides—“Humans are too large. Humans are too heavy, too tender. Humans are too slow, both physically and mentally”—and argues that huge logistical trains are required because humans are of decreasing value. - The document lists involvement by a range of agencies and entities such as the US Air Force, DARPA, the CIA, the FBI, Southern Command, Atlantic Command, the Australian Department of Defense, and other corporate/government bodies, portraying a global corporate-influenced framework in which “USA Inc.” operates beyond a constitutional structure. - Other asserted topics in the document include beam weapons, microdust as a new type of warfare, and the claim that the use of frequencies will be central to future conflict. It is alleged to mention technologies like brain mapping and direct manipulation or intervention in human evolution, with references to transferring a human brain into machinery and the existence of micron-sized mechanized dust distributed as an aerosol. - The discussion connects these ideas to smart meters and energy infrastructure, stating that frequencies and metering systems would affect people and that campaigns and technologies could target populations via communication networks and energy grids. Overall narrative and context - The interview frames the NASA document as evidence of a planned, multi-faceted assault on populations using frequencies, beam weapons, bioweapons, and surveillance, culminating in social control and depopulation goals, with mass media playing a propaganda role. - Deborah Tavares links the document to broader conspiratorial literature and documents, including the Iron Mountain report and the Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars (41 pages), describing them as war plans to control humanity and restructure society through surveillance, economics, education, and engineered fear. - The speakers argue that the document reveals a program of mind control, depopulation, and technocratic domination, with specific references to chemtrails, nanofibers, fluoridation, and a global strategy to reduce population and dependence on traditional governance. Path to action and resources - The recommended response is rapid public education about these documents and their implications, with emphasis on reading and understanding sources such as the Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, the Iron Mountain document, and the New World Order exposes (all linked from stopthecrime.net). - They advocate for awakening a grassroots movement rather than revolution, warning that revolution could trigger martial law and enable more severe weaponization. Public access and where to learn more - The primary site is stopthecrime.net, with links to smartmetersmurder.com and related YouTube content, including a series by Barry Trower on the weaponization of frequencies in relation to wireless infrastructure and cell towers.

The speaker discusses the transfer of a special folder containing top-secret information to the country's president. This folder is dedicated to visitors who have come to the planet and includes a confidential report from the intelligence agency responsible for monitoring our country. These folders are passed along with a nuclear briefcase when the presidency changes hands. For more information, the speaker suggests watching the well-known documentary film "Men in Black," which touches on this topic.