TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The president isn't addressing us, so we're heading to the capital where our issues lie. Spread the word. Should we go out there? No, we might get arrested. Are we risking arrest? Yes, but we don't want to get shot. Should we all be arrested?

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss an incident where a person named Ray Epps repeatedly urged them and others to go into the capital building. Speaker 1 recalls encountering Epps on January 5th during a protest outside BLM Plaza. Epps followed Speaker 1 and began instructing the crowd, famously saying they should go into the capital the next day. Speaker 0 also expresses readiness to go into the capital. Speaker 1 questions whether Epps was part of a scripted plan or an undercover agent inciting violence. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 emphasizing the need to go to the capital where their problems lie.

The speakers discuss their plans to enter the capital and coordinate with other individuals. They mention meeting at specific locations and express their intention to take action. They discuss the use of guns and munitions and mention the need for gas masks. They also mention clearing certain areas and holding the line. The speakers express frustration with the lack of organization and communication. They discuss the presence of law enforcement and their efforts to navigate the building. The speakers mention specific locations within the capital and discuss their strategy for moving forward.

Tomorrow, the speaker expresses the need to go into the capital, but is cautious about saying it out loud due to potential arrest. They emphasize the importance of a peaceful approach. Another speaker wonders if they will get arrested or shot, to which the first speaker responds that they don't need to get shot and questions if everyone can be arrested.

Two speakers discuss going into the capital tomorrow, insisting on a plan despite hesitation. They oscillate between urgency and caution: "Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital" and "I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested." They try to keep the rhetoric "Peaceful" and "Fed" in the mix, then confirm aloud: "We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright." A sharply cut interjection—"Shut the fuck up, Uber"—is followed by: "To the capital." They label it as "Based Fed posting? Yeah. Need to go into the capital." The exchange ends with a resigned acknowledgment: "I didn't see that coming in. Okay."

I plan to go to the capital and trespass, even though I might get arrested. We should all go tomorrow, but we have to be careful not to say it out loud. We need to spread the word and go inside the capital building. We should avoid getting shot and instead get arrested together.

I might go to jail for this, but tomorrow we need to peacefully go into the capital.

Some individuals had planned to storm the Capitol as part of their agenda. Although I hesitate to mention it, as it could lead to my arrest, we must take action. We need to enter the Capitol. Let's proceed.

Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital. Hang on. Into the capital. What? No. Peacefully. Fed. Fed. Fed. Fed. Fed. Tomorrow, I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright. We need to go in Shut the fuck up, boomer. To the capital. Base fed posting? We need to go into the capital. I didn't see that coming in. Okay. Condiment Hill. Is good speaking. We are going to the capital where our problems are. It's that direction. Please spread the word. Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Yeah. Can we go up there? No? When we go in Are we gonna get arrested? We go up there? Yeah. We don't need to get chucked. Can we arrest us all? Let's go.

We need to go into the capital tomorrow. It's crucial. No violence, just a peaceful approach. I hesitate to mention it because of potential consequences. But we have to make our presence known. Shut up, older generation. We didn't actually go into the capital; that was unexpected.

Monument Hill. 'President is good speaking. We are going to the capital where our problems are. It's that direction. We spread the word.' The speaker notes the plan to move toward the capital to address issues and spread the message. 'Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Yeah. So can we go up there?' They then ask for permission to advance and discuss possible entry. 'No? When we go in Are we gonna get arrested when go up there?' The exchange continues with concern about violence, as they respond, 'Yeah. You don't need to get shot. Arrest us all?' today.

Tomorrow, we're planning to peacefully go into the capital to address our problems. We don't want to be arrested or harmed, so we should be cautious. However, one person asks if we'll all get arrested, to which another person replies affirmatively.

Tomorrow, we need to go into the Capitol peacefully. I apologize for my previous comments. We should not engage in any violent behavior. However, we should still gather at the Capitol. I didn't expect to say this, but we need to make our voices heard. We should be cautious though, as we don't want to get arrested or harmed. Let's stand together and make a peaceful statement.

Tomorrow, there is a need to go into the capital. The speaker hesitated to say it, fearing arrest. The speaker then stated the need to go into the capital.

The speaker expresses their intention to go to the Capitol, despite the potential consequences. They emphasize the need to enter the Capitol building multiple times.

On January 5th, outside BLM Plaza, a man named Ray Epps approached Speaker 1 and repeatedly urged them to go into the Capitol. Speaker 1 moved away from Epps, but he followed and continued instructing the crowd. Epps's statement, "We need to go into the Capitol. Tomorrow," became famous. Speaker 0 also expressed their readiness to enter the Capitol. Speaker 1 questioned whether Epps was part of a scripted plan or an undercover agent inciting violence. The video ends with Speaker 0 stating that they are heading towards the Capitol, where they believe their problems lie.

Tomorrow, we need to go to the capital, but we can't say it out loud because we might get arrested. We should go there to address our problems, but it's a risky move. We're unsure if we'll get arrested or shot. Can they arrest all of us?

Tomorrow, we need to go into the Capitol peacefully. No, no, no, no, no, peacefully. I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need to go in. Shut the fuck up, boomer. To the capital. Spread the word. No, Dave. But one more thing. Josh, shall we go out there? No? When we go in, are we gonna get arrested? We don't need to get shot, just arrested.

Tomorrow, we need to go into the Capitol peacefully. No, no, no, no, peacefully. I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need to go in. Shut the fuck up, boomer. To the capital. Yeah, we need to go into the capital. Spread the word. No, Dave. But one more thing. Josh, shall we go out there? No? When we go in, are we gonna get arrested? We don't need to get shot, just arrested.

Some individuals had planned to storm the Capitol, and tomorrow they intended to carry out their plan. Although I hesitate to mention it, as it could lead to my arrest, I will say it anyway. We must enter the Capitol. Let's go.

Tomorrow, there is a need to go into the capital. The speaker hesitated to say it, fearing arrest. The speaker then stated, "We need to go...to the capital."

Tomorrow, we're planning to go to the capital, but we need to be careful not to say it out loud. We want to peacefully address our problems there. We didn't expect to actually enter the capital. We're concerned about getting arrested or shot. Can they arrest all of us?

We need to go to the Capitol. It’s where our problems are. Let’s spread the word. Are we going to get arrested when we go in? We need to be cautious; we don’t want to get shot. If it comes to it, arrest us all.

Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital. I don't even want to say it out loud because I could get arrested. But we need to go. Shut up, Uber. No, bad idea. Okay, fine. Let's go. But wait, will we get arrested? Will we get shot? Do we all need to be arrested?

Speaker 0 argues that the individual is late, then urges going into the capital, which is described as incitement and premeditated. The speaker asserts the person is on video stating, “we need to breach the capital” and says this is very relevant because people ended up doing it. The claim is that the individual is instigating violence, trying to provoke or catalyze illegal acts so that the government can arrest those involved, describing undercover federal assets as honeypots that goad people into committing crimes to enable arrests of people law enforcement wanted to arrest anyway. The speaker then questions if the DOJ or federal law enforcement is seeking an insurrection, conspiracy, or acts of violence aimed at undermining an act of Congress, and asks why they aren’t looking into this person, suggesting that a lack of interest implies he may be part of the government or federal law enforcement. The implication is that there could be a reason for not pursuing him other than him being unaffiliated, namely that he is working with law enforcement. Ted Cruz is described as addressing this in a Senate hearing, with the speaker plan to read a report from the New York Post. The report is quoted: “magically, mister Epps disappeared from the public posting. According to public records, mister Epps has not been charged with anything. No one has explained why a person videoed, urging people to go to the capital, a person whose conduct was so suspect, the crowd thought he was a fed, would magically disappear from the list of people the FBI was looking at.” The overall claim is that Mister Epps, who encouraged people to go to the capital, vanished from FBI attention without explanation, despite being photographed urging action and being suspected by the crowd of being a federal agent.