reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We received four Pfizer vaccines, and the one we sequenced is different from any previously analyzed. This may be an earlier version that Pfizer modified later. The vaccine contains a common plasmid used in coronavirus research, which raises questions about its origin. While Pfizer is the likely source, it's possible it leaked from a lab. We found similarities and differences in the components of the vaccines. The contamination hypothesis is unlikely since the plasmids have never been handled in our labs, and formalin fixation prevents spike protein production. Pfizer could have multiple undisclosed plasmids, which would be concerning, especially since we found one in a colon cancer sample that produces spike protein at high levels, indicating it could be replication competent and potentially transmissible. Transmissible cancer is a significant issue.

The Red Cross has stated that individuals who have received a COVID-19 vaccine cannot donate convalescent plasma to assist other COVID-19 patients. Convalescent plasma, which contains antibodies from recovered patients, becomes ineffective for treatment after vaccination, as the vaccine eliminates those antibodies.

There are concerns about the long-term side effects of modifying DNA and RNA to enable the production of antibodies. The potential for causing mutations or other risks in the future is uncertain.

Some batches of the vaccine may have serious side effects or be degraded. The batch number can be checked to see what to expect. Documentation shows that certain batches have more serious adverse effects. Even the best batches from Pfizer and Moderna had a high rate of serious adverse events in the short term, around 1800.

A study from Lund University in Sweden indicates the Pfizer vaccine can reverse transcribe and integrate DNA into the human genome within a human liver cell line. This challenges the assertion that the vaccine's mRNA cannot alter a person's DNA. The finding raises concerns about potential genetic discrimination, opening the door to lawsuits against those who discriminate against unvaccinated individuals. Federal law prohibits discrimination based on genetic information (GINA). Additionally, there are worries about the vaccine's impact on germ cells (sperm and egg), potentially leading to the transmission of altered DNA to offspring, which could result in birth defects. The CDC states that the vaccine will not change your DNA. Further research is needed to confirm the study's findings, verify the complete code installation, and determine if the spike protein is continuously expressed from human cells.

Speaker 0 asks: "Do you think there's evidence that the changes to people to their genetic structure wrought by these vaccines could be passed on to their children?" Speaker 1 responds: "The McCullough Foundation, of which I am the vice president, we just published a person who had cancer of the bladder, which is a very severe cancer, in that tumor, so in the bladder cells that had become dysplastic, that messenger RNA was found in the cancerous cells of this tumor. So it seems to be integrating. Now the question is, is it integrating in a way that is can be passed on to the offspring, or is it so dysfunctional that it's killing the host before it can be passed on? And and I don't know that we yet know that, but remember, the science is the topography of ignorance. I mean, there's a lot about this that is is very, very concerning. There's also a study that this messenger RNA seems to have transcribed into liver cells."

For biodistribution, Pfizer did not use the actual spike mRNA product in their studies. Instead, they substituted in a luciferase reporter mRNA packaged in the same lipid nanoparticles. This approach allowed them to track where the mRNA traveled in rodents. The studies showed that following intramuscular injection, most of the mRNA remained at the site of injection, but there was also notable levels detected in the liver. Despite the limitations of this approach, which can underestimate low level or transient distributions to other tissues, it nevertheless showed that the vaccine components do not remain confined to the injection site. Next slide. For Moderna, no dedicated biodistribution study was performed with the COVID mRNA itself. Instead, data was provided from a surrogate product, a CMV mRNA, mRNA-sixteen 47, which used the same lipid nanoparticle formulation. In their rat study, after intramuscular injections, high levels of the mRNA were detected at the injection site, but also in multiple organs such as the draining lymph nodes, spleen, eye, and liver. Lower levels were also found across a wide range of tissues, including the heart, lungs, testes, and brain. Importantly, this study clearly showed that the mRNA can cross the blood brain barrier. Next slide. Consistent with what is seen in animal studies, the vaccine mRNA and its spike protein have been detected in humans across multiple tissues, including blood, lymph nodes, the heart, and even the brain. These findings make it clear that the mRNA does not remain confined to the injection site. Importantly, persistence has been documented well beyond the initial hours or days, lasting weeks in some tissues, and in certain studies detectable for many months. Next slide. To summarize the biodistribution data, it's important to note that neither Moderna nor Pfizer used their actual commercial mRNA vaccine products in the preclinical biodistribution studies. Instead, they relied on surrogate construct packaged in same or similar lipid nanoparticles. Second, the results of those studies show that the mRNA and lipid nanoparticles were not confined to the injection site. Systemic distribution was observed with evidence that the mRNA can cross the blood brain barrier. Consistent with these findings, studies in humans have confirmed that vaccine mRNA can be detected in multiple tissues, including lymph nodes, the heart, the central nervous system, and blood. Finally, persistence is not just short term. In some reports, mRNA has been detected for weeks to months, and in certain cases as long as seven zero six days post vaccination. Taken together, these data highlight that biodistribution is broad and persistence is longer than initially expected, raising important questions and concerns for ongoing research and safety monitoring.

Matt Baker shares the harrowing story of his wife's severe vaccine injury after receiving a blood transfusion. Despite their efforts to avoid vaccinated blood, they were told there was no way to differentiate between vaccinated and unvaccinated blood. His wife developed pericarditis and required two drainage valves to relieve the fluid buildup around her heart. The doctors were confused about the cause and did not test the blood for spike proteins. Matt urges people to ask questions and be advocates for their loved ones in the hospital. Recent revelations from the Red Cross confirm that vaccinated blood is not separated from regular donations. Matt is seeking a lab to test the blood sample he saved to investigate the presence of spike proteins.

The speaker claims sequences found in vaccines are now also being found in people. According to the speaker, five peer-reviewed studies involving RNA sequencing of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals show DNA from vaccine manufacturers in patients' blood. The speaker cites studies by Ryan et al., Chakrabarty, Rhine, and Odek as evidence of Moderna and Pfizer vaccine sequences in patients' blood, suggesting blood supplies are contaminated. The speaker mentions three additional papers (Lee, Navel, and Krauszik) that, while not explicitly looking for it, also confirm residual plasmid sequences in recipients. One study, which investigated a particular disease, revealed differential gene expression in the cGAS-STING and interferon pathways, indicating a potential DNA stimulatory response. The speaker suggests this RNA sequencing data reveals the nature of the contaminant, with gene expression changes indicating a cGAS-STING-like event potentially induced by the DNA.

We do not accept donations from vaccinated individuals due to potential risks associated with the spike protein in stem cells. This spike protein may trigger an immune response and cause inflammation, potentially worsening the situation. While there is some data on this, it is not completely clear. Therefore, we only accept donations from unvaccinated women.

In emergency situations like car accidents, vaccinated blood may be used without patients knowing. Blood isn't separated by vaccination status, except for self-donations or donations from family members. Symptoms post-vaccination are monitored to ensure donor eligibility. For example, a donor experienced ear ringing after vaccination, making her ineligible to donate. Symptoms beyond fever or nausea are considered. Tracking vaccinated blood to patients isn't done. Translation (if needed): Blood isn't separated by vaccination status, except for self-donations or donations from family members. Symptoms post-vaccination are monitored to ensure donor eligibility. Tracking vaccinated blood to patients isn't done.

A study from Lund University in Sweden indicates the Pfizer vaccine can reverse transcribe and integrate its DNA into the human genome within a human liver cell line. This challenges previous assurances that the vaccine's mRNA could not alter a person's DNA. The study raises concerns about potential genetic discrimination, suggesting that denying opportunities to unvaccinated individuals could be construed as genetic discrimination under federal law. Additionally, there are worries that if the vaccine alters the DNA in gametocytes (sperm and egg cells), it could potentially be passed on to offspring, possibly leading to birth defects. The findings contradict the CDC's statement that the vaccine does not change DNA. Further research is needed to confirm these findings, determine if the entire code is integrated, and verify if the spike protein is continuously expressed from human cells.

A study from Lund University in Sweden indicates the Pfizer vaccine can reverse transcribe and install DNA into the human genome within a human liver cell line. This suggests an enzyme can transfer messenger RNA vaccine information into a person's DNA, a process previously claimed impossible. This finding potentially opens the door to lawsuits regarding genetic discrimination (GINA) against individuals who chose not to receive the vaccine. It raises concerns about potential impacts on the DNA of those vaccinated, including pregnant women and their babies. The CDC states that the vaccine will not change a person's DNA, but this new paper suggests otherwise.

The spike protein in the vaccine is specific to humans, affecting the ACE 2 pathways in sperm and ovaries. Genetic susceptibility to the virus varies by race, with African blacks having a 39% increase, Caucasians from Europe a 54% increase, and Ashkenazi Jews and Amish showing no increase.

The entire blood supply in America and worldwide is contaminated with spike proteins from vaccines. We need to stop accepting blood from vaccinated individuals, as unvaccinated patients receiving these transfusions are experiencing serious health issues like blood clots, heart attacks, and strokes. This was predicted three years ago, and those who spoke out were silenced. It's crucial to remove the spike protein from the blood supply and hold accountable those responsible for this situation. The current management of this issue is reckless and dangerous.

We don't accept vaccinated people because there is research suggesting that the spike protein in stem cells triggered by the vaccine may cause inflammation and potentially worsen things. Although the data is not 100% clear, we only use products from unvaccinated women to avoid any potential risks.

mRNA can travel through bodily fluids, potentially affecting unvaccinated individuals. Studies show mRNA in blood, lymph nodes, breast milk, and possibly other secretions. Animal studies suggest transmission through saliva. Caution advised for close contact, including sexual activity, with vaccinated individuals. Long-term effects on reproduction unknown, FDA recommends 5-15 years of observation post-vaccination. Concerns raised about potential impact on future generations. Uncertainty creates a divide among people. Translation: The mRNA from vaccines can spread through bodily fluids, raising concerns about interactions between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Studies suggest mRNA can be present in various bodily fluids, including saliva. Caution is advised for close contact, including sexual activity. Long-term effects on reproduction are unknown, with FDA recommending 5-15 years of observation post-vaccination. This uncertainty raises concerns about potential impacts on future generations, leading to a division among people.

The COVID-19 vaccine pamphlet states that comorbidity has not been evaluated for potential carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or impairment of male fertility. Specifically, it hasn't been tested for cancer-causing effects or the ability to damage genetic information, which could lead to mutations and cancer. Despite claims that the vaccine cannot cause cancer, there has been no study to confirm this. Additionally, concerns are raised regarding male fertility.

Initially, there was concern about the toxicity of the vaccine, but efforts were made to reduce its short-term harm. A friend shared a paper discussing the racial specificity of the ACE2 pathway, where the spike protein attaches. This is unique to this virus. The paper indicates that white Caucasians from Europe (excluding Finnish), and non-African Blacks have about 56% upregulation in the ACE2 pathway. This drops to 39% in African Blacks and 10% in Asians and Finnish. Surprisingly, the Finnish are genetically distinct. Two groups show zero upregulation: the Amish, who typically avoid vaccines and the system, and the Ashkenazi Jews. This is just a fact to consider.

Is America's blood supply tainted with deadly mRNA poisoning? New research from Kevin McCurran and doctor Peter McCullough shows that mRNA can linger in the body years after vaccination, yet our blood banks still refuse to track whether a donor has had the shot. Families are now coming forward with stories of injuries after transfusions. They didn't even get the shot. At least 11 states are pushing blood freedom bills to protect the right to non mRNA donor blood, but federal regulators aren't budging on this. Baby Matthew in Washington state received a blood transfusion and died; during a preliminary surgery, they gave him blood off the shelf and that proved deadly. We're seeing the same adverse reactions to the mRNA vaccines that are being reported in VAERS: Bell's palsy; Correlia Corral, who had days in hospital with pericarditis; Bill Heineck, clotting in his veins, he ultimately died. More than one in five Americans say they'll take the COVID shots this fall.

Alden and colleagues found that Pfizer's genetic code can be integrated into the human genome within an hour in a cancerous cell line. This suggests that Pfizer and Moderna's genetic material might become a permanent part of human DNA. There is no study confirming or denying this possibility. The concern is that if eggs or sperm incorporate this genetic code, it could be passed on to future generations. This lack of research is seen as reckless and worrisome.

The Pfizer vaccine contains not only mRNA but also plasma DNA from the vector used in its production. I sequenced samples from two batches of the vaccine in Colombia and found this DNA, which raises concerns about potential health risks. This DNA could integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, leading to permanent changes. Such integration poses theoretical risks, including autoimmune responses and cancer, depending on where the DNA inserts itself in the genome. While these risks may be rare, they warrant investigation to understand their implications better.

We currently don't accept vaccinated individuals due to potential risks. Research suggests that the spike protein in stem cells could trigger an immune response, causing inflammation and potentially worsening the situation. Although there is some data on this, it's not entirely clear.

The Red Cross has announced that individuals who have received the COVID-19 vaccine are ineligible to donate convalescent plasma for treating other COVID-19 patients. Convalescent plasma contains antibodies from those who have recovered from the virus, but the vaccine eliminates these antibodies, rendering the plasma ineffective for treatment purposes.

We could have answers soon by conducting immunohistochemical staining on tumors for viral proteins. A 2020 study found spike protein in hearts and tissues but not in cancers. Post-vaccine rollout, spike protein was found in cancers, hinting at vaccine involvement. Staining tumors on a large scale could reveal more. However, this is unlikely due to the lucrative mRNA vaccine industry, with plans to produce millions of doses. Connecting mRNA vaccines to cancer could threaten this industry's profits.