reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims the media covers up violence by Antifa and ignores violence against Trump supporters. The speaker says that after a White House press briefing, they asked assembled journalists why they wouldn't cover violence against Trump supporters or demand that Democratic leaders disavow violence from Antifa, as they demanded of Trump regarding his supporters. The speaker states the journalists laughed at them, which the speaker took as proof that the media laughs at violence against people they don't like.

A journalist is recording people marching against Trump. The journalist asks if Reid Hoffman and George Soros paid them to be there. The journalist states they can document stuff on the street and that the people got busted and are paid. One of the people tells the journalist to get out of here and leave, stating they are not welcome. The journalist claims to live there, but the other person repeats that they live in the city and demands the journalist leave.

I've been undercover with Real City Antifa since July 2000. If caught, violence could be directed towards me. Currently, I am a prospect for Rose City Antifa, halfway through the process to become a full member. The goal is to make supporters of America and Trump feel outnumbered and ridiculous. They reached out to me through proton mail and we met in Portland for an interview. Caroline, the founder, moved to Sweden, creating a European connection. Rose City holds secret lectures for prospective members and requires us to leave our phones in a bathroom with a fan to muffle sound. Antifa is willing to use violence and teaches tactics like eye gouging. They discuss weapons and the concept of black bloc, where individuals conceal their identity. It seems like there may be outside funding or resources involved. The focus is on destroying the enemy, not just delivering blows.

I don't have personal opinions or biases, but I can help you summarize the video. Here's a concise transcript: The speaker mentions that their face is not on Instagram and they have learned that it's all fake. They talk about wearing a Trump hat and attending a Trump rally during the daytime. They also mention being a journalist and having a camera on their shoulder. The speaker briefly mentions Antifa as an idea, not elaborating further.

The speaker notes that people might be surprised that he has never interacted with Donald Trump face to face, though that is about to change. The speaker then references a statement made last month by Trump, who suggested that the speaker turned black recently for political purposes, questioning a core part of his identity. The speaker dismisses this as the same old tired playbook and declines to comment further. The speaker then expresses confusion as to why a shot wasn't taken. The speaker reiterates that people might be surprised that he has never interacted with Trump.

The speaker discusses the distinction between ideological movements and those who engage in violent actions. They mention that Antifa operates on a decentralized level, making it difficult for law enforcement to take action. Antifa is known for organizing through social media and encrypted chats. They openly solicit donations on platforms like PayPal, Venmo, and Cash App to sustain themselves. The speaker also mentions personal observations of seeing the same individuals at protests and questioning how they maintain employment. Overall, the speaker emphasizes that Antifa is a real movement with a history of violence against innocent people.

The speaker says the subject of the interview is not a Democrat and would be offended to be called one. The speaker doesn't believe a political issue would cause the subject to do such a thing. The subject never mentioned the senator or representative who were targeted. He didn't like Tim Walz and would say things like, "I don't like that Tim Walz did this." The subject mentioned a protest, but the speaker doesn't think he said anything about it. The speaker would tell him to surrender himself so he could be taken alive. The subject listened to Infowars, and the speaker told him not to take everything they say for granted. The subject was a Trump supporter, voted for Trump, and liked Trump.

One speaker is getting his disguise ready and considering what to wear, including wearing a mask under another mask and choosing a hat. The other urges blending in and having a visual identifier, insisting, “you gotta blend in,” and adds, “you can't you have to have a visual identif ier.” They debate whether to wear this mask or that hat, with the America hat being a possible move, and say they will bring both in a backpack. They mention bringing boxers and note CNN, signaling readiness. The first speaker wonders aloud about committing crimes, saying, “I work I don't know if we're committing crimes doing this,” while the second questions whether the first speaker thinks they don’t work for all three companies simultaneously, saying, “Are you insinuating that I don't work for all of them.” The second asserts that trust requires a visual cue, “There’s something visual,” and the first confirms they won’t be allowed to proceed without a visual identifier. The exchange centers on blending in, possessing a visual identifier, and the logistical details of their disguises (hats, masks) and preparations (backpack, boxers).

Speaker 0 is excited about their channel and believes their upcoming film will be the best they've ever made. Speaker 1 admits that their face is not on Instagram and plans to wear a Trump hat to a rally. They claim to be a journalist and have their camera ready to record.

The transcript follows a chaotic exchange among multiple speakers discussing information sources, political narratives, and protests, with several recurring themes and claims. - There is a pattern of questioning information sources and personal actions. Speakers repeatedly ask, “Who the fuck is Jeremy? Where do I get my information? Why did I delete karaoke?” and “Who the fuck is Jonathan? Where does he get his information? Why did he delete karaoke?” indicating a concern with source credibility and content deletion. - A speaker (Speaker 2) describes a sense of purpose from sharing information, claiming that Wisconsin was the first state where “the evidence that I and my one of my associates, Chris, had put together for Peter, Wisconsin was the first state where it was actually presented, you know, under oath in, you know, a senate… Wisconsin Senate Committee on Election Integrity.” -Jeremy Oliver (Speaker 3) promotes alternative information channels, stating he has a YouTube page, a personal Facebook page, and that viewers can see “at the last protesting.” He frames mainstream media as unreliable, promising to “stream live and show exactly what's going on at the protest and really just support the people that are out there fighting for our First Amendment rights.” - Several participants discuss plans to act on protest grounds, including references to “Using other state capitals for practice dry runs” (Speaker 4) and “we’re basically ready to storm the capital with us in a couple of minutes” (Speaker 5). - There are assertions that “we’re all actors, but I wanna direct and act” (Speaker 6) and depictions of confrontations with others during protest or media interactions, including exchanges where people demand to speak with others about Mary Fenix/Fanning (Speaker 5). - A series of critical assertions target then-President Donald Trump and link various individuals and organizations to a network. A speaker states: “Donald Trump has no business being president,” followed by further claims about a coalition “super think tank of Biden, Harris, a couple intellectual figure behind them… Mike Flynn… and two economists,” including Simon Johnson, described as IMF chief economist, with English birth. - The conversation introduces the America Project and Patrick Byrne, claiming Flynn registered Flynn Intel Group from Stanley McChrystal’s home and associating McChrystal with the Defeat Disinfo Pack, an AI system that detects opposing viewpoints for Trump, and then shares those viewpoints to counter them. The system is said to target the Patriot movement. - There is a claim that the Flynn network included Ali Alexander and Michael Flynn, and that their aim was “to create instability as they're trying to carry out a color revolution,” listing criteria such as “a united and organized opposition,” “an ability quickly to drive home the point that voting results are falsified,” “compliant independent media,” and “capable of mobilizing tens of thousands or more demonstrators.” - A discussion on 2020 voting numbers is presented as a comparison to the midterms. It is stated that “2020, they reported 395,000 in-person voters on election day,” with debate about whether that figure was statewide or in Maricopa County. Projections speculate on how many Republicans intended to vote but did not cast ballots, with estimates ranging from around 150,000 to 700,000. - Additional claims connect groups and individuals to broader political finance and media ecosystems, including mentions of the US Agency for Global Media, prior Hillary Clinton and John Kerry involvement, and references to propaganda concerns. - Toward the end, the discussion touches upon Wisconsin politics again, with commentary on a state supreme court candidate and voter ID emphasis as a Democrat-leaning position contrary to expectations, followed by a shift into a more personal debate about a case involving a mother’s tragedy and media attention, ending with a tangential accusation of sympathy manipulation.

They push back on critics who say they can't investigate online, declaring "We're FBI agents. We're the investigators." They highlight Blake Bednar's rise—from about 500 to 23,700 followers—saying "he deserved... a 100." They discuss the Meta Glasses story: "the button on these glasses... it's on the right side" and "hit it once... that is a picture" and "hold it down... record." They say "snapping photos... for confirmation" to use facial recognition to verify a target, and note Blake "jump over to rescue Charlie Kirk" while wearing Meta glasses, "standing over his body." Speaker 2 confirms the sunglasses case: a security guard wearing "meta Ray Bans" records over Charlie's body. They critique the FBI/media narrative about a trans shooter and speculate Candice may reveal GPS and receipts to challenge the timeline, ending with "Save me the fucking lecture."

The speaker is preparing for a disguise and asks for advice on what to wear. They consider wearing a mask and ultimately decide on an American-themed mask. They discuss the importance of blending in and having a visual identifier. The speaker mentions bringing both masks in their backpack and jokingly mentions working for Fox News, CNN, and another company simultaneously. The conversation ends with a comment about the need for a visual element to gain trust.

Speaker 0 admits that the other person was right about something, but couldn't say much. They talk about making a film and how it's all fake. They mention not having their name or face on Instagram. Speaker 0 talks about wearing a Trump hat and attending a Trump rally during the daytime. They mention being a journalist and using a camera to record.

An individual with a "Trump hat" is confronted by others, with one person repeatedly calling them a "fascist" and telling them to "go home." The person wearing the hat asks why it matters where they are from, then states they are from Poland and love Americans, while accusing the others of hating Americans. One person says they love immigrants. The person with the hat says that most Americans voted for Trump. The person wearing the hat questions why someone is wearing a mask if they are proud. They accuse someone of being "self loathing" and "unattractive." They also say someone following them is "orgasmica." They state they fought for the flag. The person wearing the hat yells that someone is going to jail for spitting on them and scaring their baby.

I wore a MAGA hat when Joe Biden saw me at the state of the union. They are scared of the hat.

The speaker points out a suspicious individual wearing black gear and speculates if they are part of Antifa. They highlight the person's aggressive actions towards the window and questions why they are wearing a wire. The speaker criticizes Democrats for focusing on Trump's role rather than addressing these suspicious incidents. They mention a cop who allowed people into the Capitol and wonders why this hasn't been explained. The speaker also mentions individuals taking selfies with police officers and questions the FBI's handling of information regarding the march. They conclude by expressing frustration with Liz Cheney and Nancy Pelosi for avoiding these questions.

Speaker 0 is hot and unable to see the police lines: “I'm hot. I can't see where they're like, where the police lines are. No.” They urge vigilance: “Keep your eyes open for antifa. We will. We are.” “That's why we're here.” They claim “They're all over here” and search for Rico: “Where's Rico? How do we lose Rico?” After locating someone, “Oh, I see him. I see him. I got him.” They wonder, “Is Trump still walking here?” and ask, “Which way do you guys wanna go? Keep going.” They note, “Yeah. They're suiting up.” “Now we're letting everybody in. There ain't nowhere to go. Yeah.” and conclude, “This is I think it's gonna they're gonna trap everyone in. Yeah.”

Speaker 0 says they are hot and can't see the police lines. They tell others to keep their eyes open for Antifa, stating that Antifa is all over. Speaker 0 asks where Rico is and then says they see him. Speaker 0 asks if Trump is still walking here. Speaker 1 says "they're suiting up." Speaker 0 says that "they're gonna trap everyone in."

Two speakers volley questions about fascism and anti-fascism. Speaker 1 asks: "Are you Antifa?" and "You're pro fascism?" "But can you at least say that you're anti fascist?" Speaker 0 responds: "I wouldn't say so." "I'm not really... I have still both political views on things." "I'm not gonna say that if I don't know." The exchange probes neutrality: "You think we're new you think you were we were neutral on fascism in World War two?" "The US was Antifa against the Nazis." Speaker 1 presses: "So then, like, why wouldn't you want to be Antifa?" Speaker 0: "I don't know. I'm trying to." "I can't believe Trump has you, like, so cooked in the brain that you don't even know how to say that fascism is wrong." A sponsor line interrupts: "Innovega is redefining what's possible for people with vision loss." Later, "Are you against fascism?" and "If you are against fascism in the comment section, type three in the comment section you're against fascism." The discussion veers to "Partying convicted felonies. Well, let's talk about that. So"

The speakers are asked what makes Trump a fascist. One speaker says Trump "just does everything he wants" and is a "convicted felon." Another speaker claims Trump is trying to control the media narrative, citing the renaming of the Gulf of Mexico and allegedly not allowing the Associated Press into the White House. When asked if renaming the Gulf of Mexico is pointless, the speaker agrees. The speakers are asked again what makes Trump a fascist. One speaker says a core tenet of fascism is creating an enemy. The speaker admits they received the sign and talking points from someone else. They say they came out to protest because of executive overreach.

The speakers discuss disguises and the need for visual identifiers. They mention wearing masks and carrying different ones. They talk about the presence of non-uniformed individuals and the identification markers they may have. They also mention the events of January 6th and the portrayal of it as a deadly insurrection. They discuss the death of Officer Brian Sicknick and how it was exploited for political purposes. They mention surveillance footage that contradicts the narrative surrounding his death. The speakers express regret for lying and promise not to do it again.

The speaker attempts to define fascism. The other person admits they don't know what it is, identifying themselves as a photographer. The speaker prefaces their explanation with "So is kind of like when United." They then ask if they are being recorded.

The speaker expresses a commitment to questioning what they see in the media and from public figures, stating they believe in asking questions about why they’re lied to “on a regular basis with the media and the Muppets and the politicians and everybody around us.” They mention a belief in flat earth, but frame it as part of a broader stance of skepticism toward widely reported truths. They list a series of purported deceptions: fake viruses, fake nukes, fake moon landings, and fake CGI of the Earth. They also claim videos of hurricanes are falsified, noting that newscasters seem to pretend to be blown around by storms when winds are only about 10 miles per hour. The speaker argues that people shouldn’t be discouraged from asking questions, criticizing “the Muppets and the NPCs” for pressuring conformity. They compare society to the Truman Show, saying we live in it and that “the Muppets come up to you and they’re like, oh, it’s a beautiful day.” They reiterate the call to disobey and to use common sense, referencing chemtrails as part of the surrounding discourse.

the fact that there is no... nobody even knows what it is. The first person I ever heard use the word Antifa was Donald j Trump when he was going on about how there were good people on both sides at Charlottesville. "That's the first time I ever heard anyone use the term." So now there it's this amorphous thing, and and and if nobody's really antifa, then everybody could be. And the reason you can't find them is because they're just that crafty.

Speaker 1 identified 48 people as antifa at the Capitol, most of them in disguises. They had Trump flags, American flags, and Trump hats to blend in. Some even entered the Capitol, including a Trumpster and a Viking, who were seen with Nancy Pelosi's daughter and her husband. These individuals are professional agitators from Antifa, not Trump supporters. Additionally, there were people with megaphones discussing the invasion of the Capitol.