reSee.it - Related Video Feed

This bill is described as a pipeline to the criminal justice system for parents. The speaker opposes criminalizing parents for wanting to love their children.

The speaker believes that being in Congress is a privilege, not a requirement, and that many people could serve if a congressperson chooses to prioritize being home with their family. They are against Luna's bill and the way she is trying to force it to the floor, claiming it will open the door to unconstitutional proxy voting. The speaker suggests members of Congress should leave their egos at the door and recognize the importance of the job, similar to soldiers who deploy overseas and meet their babies months later. They argue that if a member cannot do the job, they should step down, as they are not more important than anyone else. The speaker disapproves of working with Democrats who use a baby to prove a point, and believes the situation is distracting, off-message, and not serving the American people.

A representative is on their way to vote on a bill to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, calling it a waste of time. The representative believes House Republicans are pushing this name change for two reasons: to support the president and to distract from other issues. They would rather focus on the Gulf of Mexico name change than address House Republicans' attempts to repeal healthcare for millions of Americans or Donald Trump's tariff policies allegedly harming the economy. The representative questions the priorities of Congress, suggesting that renaming the Gulf of Mexico is inappropriate given the current economic climate.

The speaker criticizes the hearing as an inadequate substitute for a bipartisan committee hearing. They argue that there was ample opportunity to go through the proper legislative process in the last five months. They express concern about the lack of transparency and accessibility of the legislation being discussed. The speaker, who works as a paralegal for a vaccine injury attorney, claims to witness vaccine injuries regularly and questions the safety of vaccines. They mention the absence of double-blind placebo safety studies for childhood vaccines and challenge the assertion that unvaccinated individuals pose a threat to immunocompromised individuals. The speaker also raises concerns about the increase in childhood chronic illnesses and questions the removal of First Amendment rights in relation to vaccine mandates. They argue that vaccination is akin to a religion and express their refusal to participate in a forced religion. The speaker concludes by asking the audience if they would vote for a party that prioritizes their decision-making over parental choice and questions the necessity of the increasing number of vaccines.

The speaker expresses frustration over Congress not allowing a recorded vote on a bill, accusing them of a cover-up to protect members politically. He emphasizes the importance of representatives doing their jobs and voting in person. Despite opposition, he insists on a recorded vote to hold members accountable. The speaker criticizes the lack of action by Congress and asserts the need for transparency in decision-making. He confronts Pelosi and McCarthy for their role in preventing a recorded vote. Ultimately, he believes forcing everyone to return for a vote is necessary to uphold democracy.

The speaker claims that the House of Representatives is broken and controlled by corporate lobbyists and globalists. They suggest that some members have been compromised during overseas trips and engaged in inappropriate activities with children. These actions allegedly lead to their compromise and involvement in the world of big money.

As a mom and a member of Congress, the speaker opposes the rule restricting parents from working after a new child's birth. She highlights the challenges of being a new parent in Congress, recalling how she couldn't fly while pregnant and the difficult decision she faced after giving birth to her son at four weeks old. She emphasizes the vulnerability of newborns and the fear of exposing them to germs while traveling to vote. She thanks colleagues for supporting the resolution and shares stories of parents with newborns in the NICU who must choose between their child's care and their duty to vote. The speaker argues that it's unfathomable that Congress hasn't modernized to address these challenges, calling the current situation anti-woman and anti-family. She urges colleagues to reject the rule and pass the resolution to enable new parents to represent their constituents.

The speaker states they cannot support a party that wants to redefine family, which they consider the core of society. They cannot vote for laws that would allow children to mutilate their bodies, possibly without parental consent, or that would allow LGBTQ+ couples to marry. They also cannot support a party that favors parents losing custody for not affirming a child's transition, children of opposite sexes sharing bathrooms, or biological males competing against the speaker's daughter in sports. The speaker is not pushing their views on others, but sharing the reasons for their voting decision. They suggest voters should ask which party promotes values that are unbiblical and directly contradict a Christian worldview. While both parties may promote some biblical values, the speaker believes the listed issues are weightier matters and influence their vote.

I'm not as eloquent as my colleagues, but politicians voting for this bill own the consequences. American people expect us to fight, not just slow down the country's destruction. We need to pick principled fights, like stopping the border invasion. To the American people: pay attention and stop sending politicians who talk one way and vote another. I'm a strong no on this bill.

Speaker 0 asks if the person really wants Tom Emmer to be speaker, as they did not vote for congressman Jim Jordan. Speaker 1 responds that they do not like Tom Emmer and think it is a terrible job. Speaker 0 clarifies that they voted for someone they don't like because they didn't want to vote for Jim.

The speaker discusses the composition of the house and senate, and then expresses a controversial opinion about abortion. They suggest that everyone in a particular room should be made to lick a full-term aborted baby to understand the consequences of their beliefs.

We just voted for Mike Johnson as Speaker of the House. Before that, I expressed my refusal to support the rules package due to concerning language from Nancy Pelosi's Congress. The Democrats had established an office of diversity and inclusion and included gender-inclusive language that removed traditional family terms like father, mother, son, and daughter, replacing them with neutral terms. I demanded changes, and I'm pleased to announce that the language has been revised. The office of diversity and inclusion has been eliminated, and traditional family terms have been restored in the rules. Republicans are committed to upholding traditional family values, and we will ensure that biological men are not allowed in women's private spaces. We'll share the updated language for your review.

The speaker defends the president, stating that the only accusation against him is loving his child unconditionally. They express hope that their own parents love them as much. The speaker urges a focus on the people's work and keeping the government open to prevent hunger in the US. They yield the floor. Timmons from South Carolina is then recognized by the chair.

Proposition 1 on the New York ballot is presented as an abortion bill, but the speaker claims it doesn't mention abortion. Instead, the speaker asserts it grants voting rights to illegal citizens in local elections. The speaker alleges the bill removes parental rights by requiring parents to assist children in transitioning genders or face neglect charges. The speaker also claims the bill allows men to participate in women's sports and use women's bathrooms. The speaker urges listeners to read the three-page bill and says abortions have never been under attack in New York. The speaker accuses proponents of lying to manipulate voters.

My Republican colleagues, led by Donald Trump, are in a meltdown because their presidential nominee and policies are unpopular. They are pushing for a nationwide abortion ban and their project 2025 is failing. Democrats just want to focus on moving the country forward and prioritizing people over politics.

Speaker 0 expresses frustration with the constant influx of bills and the struggle to provide for their constituents. They believe that the power given to one person goes against the constitution. Speaker 2 agrees, feeling trapped by rules that limit their ability to represent their people. They argue that although they live in a democracy, it doesn't feel that way in their current situation. They urge others to understand the power and control held by the speaker and the need to convey this message to their own districts. They emphasize that everyone, regardless of party, is affected by these limitations.

The speaker criticizes the current state of the House of Representatives, claiming it is broken and controlled by corporate lobbyists and globalists. They suggest that some members have been compromised during overseas trips, where they allegedly engage in inappropriate activities with children. These actions supposedly lead to their compromise and involvement in the world of big money. The speaker emphasizes that these are real issues.

Speaker 0 criticizes Speaker McCarthy for taking credit for the single subject appropriations bills, stating that it was not his original plan. They argue against lumping together departments like Education and Labor with the military and border patrol, calling it chaotic. Speaker 0 claims that they forced the change and warns that if Speaker McCarthy continues, the appropriations process will become a sideshow controlled by lobbyists and special interests. They express frustration with how the American people have been mistreated for decades and vow to fight against it.

First speaker: Calls the indictment unjust and says intimidation tactics have been pervasive, with weeks showing different members seeking sanctuary in hopes of intimidating and distracting from the Epstein files. They look forward to their day in court to prove themselves and state the truth. If Congress becomes about intimidation and scare tactics, especially attacking minorities, they will keep fighting for the district. They have received much support and will continue fighting until the district gets fair prices, housing, and fair representation in Congress. They note that those who hate the fight will come for them. They urge some colleagues to step down or resign, arguing they weren’t elected by those who are in the district. They insist they will keep fighting for the people and work to ensure only those who elected them make decisions. They reiterate that they are here for the people. Second speaker: Questions about the investigation into the congresswoman’s families, stating that this is part of congressional duties. They say the congresswoman is under investigation for congressional ethics regarding violations of campaign finances and assert that she must answer to the people of her district.

Speaker 0 asks if the person really wants Tom Emmer to be speaker, as they did not vote for congressman Jim Jordan. Speaker 1 responds that they do not like Tom Emmer and believes it is the worst job in America. Speaker 0 clarifies that they voted for someone they don't like because they didn't want to vote for Jim.

As a mom and a member of Congress, the speaker opposes the rule restricting parents from working after a new child's birth. She highlights the challenges of being a new parent in Congress, recalling how she couldn't fly late in her pregnancy and the difficult decision of leaving her four-week-old to vote. She thanks Representative Luna and colleagues for supporting the resolution. She shares stories of parents with newborns in the NICU forced to choose between their child's care and their congressional duties. The speaker argues that Congress needs modernization to accommodate these challenges so parents can represent their constituents. She urges colleagues to oppose the rule, calling it anti-woman and anti-family, and to pass the resolution ensuring new parents can continue their representation.

Speaker 1 admits to leaving a required oversight hearing in order to go on a personal vacation. Speaker 0 finds this unacceptable and questions if Speaker 1 paid for the flight. Speaker 1 confirms they paid for it and agrees to provide receipts to the committee. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 is still capable of doing their job, to which Speaker 1 responds affirmatively. However, Speaker 0 disagrees and believes Speaker 1 should have been removed long ago.

The speaker discusses their rate of operation and their commitment to the American people. They express frustration with the current state of Congress and the power dynamics within it. They mention a conversation with Nancy Pelosi about the rule of one person ruling out others, and how it affected their ability to gather votes. They also mention their offer to Vayner and criticize the actions of certain individuals that they believe have harmed the institution. The speaker questions how to govern when a small group of people can partner with the opposing side. They express disappointment with the motion made against them despite making a decision for the country.

The speaker criticizes the current system for losing track of 85,000 children. They dismiss claims of an infant seeking asylum as absurd. They highlight the increase in unaccompanied children since Democrats took charge, with only a blip during Republican leadership. They emphasize the need to reunite children with their families and bring them to a port of entry for proper care. The speaker expresses frustration with colleagues asking about 1,000 children not being reunited, questioning the whereabouts of the 85,000 children under the Biden administration.

I hope someone can get enough votes to become Speaker of the House. The recent funding bill doesn't address border security, funds abortion and DEI, and promotes trans ideology to young kids. We need real leadership to restore safety and security for all Americans. I'm ready to fight for victory in the upcoming election to bring greatness back to our country, which is currently lacking under the Democrats and Biden administration.