TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 asserts that Nine-Eleven began as commercial insurance fraud and that in 1988 the Twin Towers were condemned because they did not want to pay to dismantle them, with controlled demolitions forbidden. He says Dick Cheney, as secretary of defense, responded, “praise the lord,” expecting a terrorism event to justify invading Iraq and Afghanistan. He claims Nine-Eleven was planned and executed by “the Zionists,” clarified as not the Jews, describing a “red mafia”—Russians, Israelis, and Americans—controlling Benjamin Netanyahu but not Donald Trump, who he says is biding his time. He contends the NSA is not about safety but keeping money moving, and that the program was canceled because it would reveal Americans complicit in Nine-Eleven. He alleges the intelligence community wastes money on bad actions, focusing only on war and terrorism, and that they start wars and fund terrorists. Speaker 1 recounts a group of Zionists negotiating with the Nazis to allow German Jews to immigrate and transfer assets to Palestine, citing the 1933 Transfer Agreement. He notes that German Jewish settlement in Palestine was Nazi policy for a time and references Der Angriff publishing photos of Jewish life in Palestine with a Nazi series; a medal by Gerbils commemorating this, showing a swastika and Star of David. He states Hitler demanded Zionists reject the call for a boycott of the Reich, which the Zionists conceded. Speaker 2 says some allies have been funding ISIS and Al Qaeda, asks who, implying Saudis and others, and notes that people know this but do not say it publicly. Speaker 3 explains that CIA, Mossad, and intelligence agencies are unnamed but suggests Mossad is under the prime minister’s office and would be called the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service, joking that initials would be ISIS. Speaker 7 makes a snide remark about Julian Maxwell’s father being an Israeli super spy, and Speaker 5 references “antiseptic, Jenny.” Speaker 8 discusses building a relationship with some unspecified actors and acknowledges a trust deficit; he recalls the U.S. support of fighters in Afghanistan against the Soviets, arming mujahideen with Stinger missiles, and leaving them after the Soviet withdrawal, admitting the U.S. helped create the next problems. He notes a pattern of moving in and out of Pakistan, emphasizing that the current fight involves people funded two decades earlier. Speaker 3 adds details about Brzezinski’s 1980s effort to arm the mujahideen while concealing U.S. involvement, speaking warmly of the fighters and their cause. Speaker 4/Speaker 10 discuss a 2017 plan to push against Russia, portraying the fight as against Putin rather than the Russian people, with commitments to inform the American public of Afghan bravery and to support the effort against Putin; Speaker 10 expresses confidence in winning and receiving support. Speaker 11 shifts to the U.S., asking about the assassination of Osama bin Laden in Pakistan; Speaker 12 responds that bin Laden was trained by the ISI and CIA along with Al Qaeda two decades earlier, stating that these groups were assets of the Pakistan Army and the ISI. Overall, the transcript presents a series of unverified conspiracy claims about 9/11, Zionist influence, NSA motives, Nazi-Zionist interactions, international funding of extremist groups, and U.S. covert actions in Afghanistan/Pakistan, interwoven with insinuations about intelligence agencies and state actors.

US national security adviser, Brzezinski, visited Pakistan to support the mujahideen secretly. He encouraged them near the Afghan border, emphasizing their strong faith and assuring them of victory. He reminded them that their land would be reclaimed, their homes and mosques restored, as their cause was just and supported by God. The aim of collaborating with Pakistan was to weaken the Soviets.

Victoria Nuland, the top US diplomat for Europe, had a fascinating phone call with US ambassador to Ukraine, Jeff Pyatt. Pyatt said that Sari and Von Kymun agreed that Sari could come in Monday or Tuesday to help glue the situation with the UN and the EU. The United States has invested over $5,000,000,000 since 1991 to assist Ukraine in building democratic skills and institutions, promoting civic participation and good governance, all preconditions for Ukraine to achieve its European aspirations. The US supports Ukrainian resistance, as protesters want closer ties to Europe, not Russia. The US's main interest has been the relationship between Germany and Russia, because united, they are the only force that could threaten the US. The US fears German technology and capital combined with Russian natural resources and manpower.

I believe you will win. We will provide everything you need to succeed. Our success is not due to equipment, but your courage. Thank you. The world is watching because we cannot let Vladimir Putin succeed here, as it would set a precedent for other countries.

We admire your fight for your homeland and promise to support you. In 2017, we will push against Russian aggression and make sure they pay a heavier price. Our fight is not with the Russian people, but with Putin. We will take your calls to Washington, inform the American people of your bravery, and make the case against Putin to the world. We believe you will win and will provide whatever you need to succeed. The world is watching because we cannot allow Vladimir Putin to succeed here.

Speaker 0 describes the situation as not a lone incident but an intentional design to start an internal component of what he calls a color revolution, one among many to expect. Speaker 1 asks for clarification on what is meant by a color revolution, who is driving it against the United States, and who is in charge. Speaker 0 replies that a hard look back to 2016 under Obama is necessary and believes Obama is still in the mix, with John Brennan as the operational commander on the battlefield in the United States. He says there are indicators from Brennan’s statements and actions, and that Obama is part of the command structure. He mentions an international component he calls the axis of resistance, consisting of communists emanating from the CCP’s control and communists inside the United States, arguing that there are communists in Congress who voted in 1992 not to vote against socialism. He adds Islamists, narco cartels, and terrorist groups such as Hamas, Hezbollah, FARC, and the Cartel del Sol as part of this axis, with people at the “pincer” of it organizing and controlling the activities. He asserts the color revolutions in Ukraine as an example and claims the war there is a “total loser war” that must end. He says Trump must tell his team to ensure executive orders are implemented at all levels and emphasizes the phrase, “lawyers advise, leaders decide,” urging President Trump to gather all relevant agencies (CIA, DNI, Sec War, Sec State, Sec Commerce, and especially the Secretary of Homeland Security) and make a decision. He states that the color revolution is a long-term effort that accelerated after Trump’s 2016 victory, with ongoing actions described as economic warfare, cyber warfare, and political interference. He cites the New Virginia Majority, a communist movement inside the United States aiming to place communists in local government and school boards, and mentions contrived cultural shifts including Islamification in various parts of the country, including Florida, Dearborn, and Houston. He asserts Islam is not compatible with Christianity and Sharia law is not compatible with constitutional law. Speaker 1 agrees there were people who served their country; she supports removing those who served but opposes letting any of them into the United States, emphasizing a different culture. Speaker 2 agrees. Speaker 1 notes the large Muslim population spread across many regions, suggesting others could have taken Afghan refugees, but questions the appropriateness of bringing them in. Speaker 2 states it is not surprising that a CIA-trained individual who previously appeared untroubled could appear in Washington, D.C. to shoot at troops, and explains a broader pattern: old-school descendants became part of a strike force, loyal at one time but funded and equipped by the U.S., who were later abandoned during the Obama–Biden period. He describes withdrawal from bases and overnight equipment removal, followed by a lack of transition to self-sufficiency, leading to brought-in desperate fighters who may be paid to kill National Guard members. He asserts these events demonstrate a deep state pattern involving Biden, Obama, and Brennan.

We admire your fight for your homeland and promise to support you. In 2017, we will go back to Washington to push against Russian aggression. Our fight is not with the Russian people, but with Putin. We will inform the American people of your bravery and make the case against Putin to the world. We believe you will win because of your courage. The world is watching because we cannot allow Putin to succeed here, as it would set a dangerous precedent for other countries.

Good morning, everyone. It's great to see you all. I'm excited to be here. We appreciate you being here. It's not our first meeting, and I'm very proud that Ukraine has such great strategic friends like the United States. We are thankful for this support. We're here today as a show of support, and we have committee chairs and the president with us.

From the start of the war, we have been alone, but we are thankful for the support we have received. We are staying in our country and remaining strong. You have not been alone. Through this president, we have given you $350 billion and military equipment. You are brave, but our military had to be utilized.

The speaker is in Brussels for critical discussions with friends and partners from the humanitarian community about providing life-saving aid to the world’s most vulnerable people and making concrete commitments to turn ideas into action. Since 2017, more than 6,000,000 Venezuelans have sought refuge in 17 countries across the region, representing the largest displacement in the Western Hemisphere. At the 2023 International Conference in Solidarity with Venezuelan Refugees and Migrants, the United States announced more than 171,000,000 in humanitarian assistance and development funding to respond to the needs of vulnerable Venezuelans in their own country, Venezuelan refugees and migrants, and the generous communities that host them across the region. The speaker expresses being inspired by the stories of strength and resilience of Venezuelan refugees and migrants and pride in the United States’ role as the largest single donor to this crisis response. The United States is highlighted as the largest single donor of humanitarian assistance worldwide. The speaker looks forward to next week’s European Humanitarian Forum, where government representatives, international organizations, non-governmental organizations, and others will collaborate on issues such as refugee resettlement, humanitarian diplomacy, and forced displacement. Addressing the unprecedented 100,000,000 persons now displaced worldwide will require additional aid and support from new and nontraditional donors, as well as new ideas and approaches. The speaker stresses that no single country can address all needs alone, and that the only way forward is together. Gratitude is extended to the European Union for bringing everyone together for these discussions. The challenges ahead are described as formidable, but equally strong is the will to overcome them. The speaker affirms confidence that, together, progress can be made.

We have a history of involvement in Pakistan, particularly during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. To counter this, we funded the mujahideen, collaborating with the Pakistani military and ISI. This effort, supported by President Reagan and Congress, ultimately contributed to the Soviet Union's retreat and collapse. However, after achieving this goal, we distanced ourselves from Pakistan, leaving them to manage the consequences of our actions, such as leftover weapons and mines. We imposed sanctions and ceased military cooperation, leading to a significant gap in our relationship with Pakistan, which we are now trying to address.

Good morning, everyone. It's great to see you all. We appreciate you being here. We know each other well, and this isn't our first meeting. I am very proud that Ukraine has such strategic friends like the United States. We are very thankful for your support. We have committee chairs and the president present today.

The speaker explains that the US funded the Mujahideen in Afghanistan 20 years ago to fight against the Soviet Union. They imported fighters from Saudi Arabia and other places to defeat the Soviets, which eventually led to their retreat and the collapse of the Soviet Union. However, after the Soviets left, the US distanced itself from Pakistan and the Mujahideen, leaving behind a mess. The speaker acknowledges that the US helped create the problem they are now fighting, as the people they supported against the Soviets are the same ones they are fighting today.

Speaker 0 states that the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the United States and European countries through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational security alliance. That is the goal: to have an endless war, not a successful war.

The speaker discusses an upcoming trip and the actions needed to sustain progress, emphasizing that the audience should not turn away any friends and should mobilize all possible support. The central message is that the era of “Black Hawk Down” is over, and Somalia is on the upswing. Several reasons are highlighted for optimism: Somalia has a fully thinking progressive president; a parliament that is working hard to construct a system of laws for the Somali people; and, for the first time in twenty-two years, the United States government is so confident in this government in Somalia that we recognize this government. In addition, it is noted that two days after the speaker left Mogadishu, Rod Shaw, who is the head of The United States in international development, landed in Mogadishu himself, underscoring visible engagement from the U.S. At the same time, the speaker emphasizes that the bottom line is that steady progress will require the help of everyone present. There is a clear admonition that no one in the room can assume that other people will do the work, implying that personal responsibility is essential for continued progress. The speaker calls for broad participation: “We need your help.” Addressing the audience directly, the speaker says, “Yes, you. You understand what I mean? Every single individual needs to take personal responsibility for the continued progress of Somalia and the continued strengthening of the United States–Somali relationship.” This framing reinforces the expectation of individual contribution to collective advancement and the deepening of ties with the United States. Finally, the speaker articulates a hopeful vision for Somalia’s future: “My dream, God willing, is to see Somalia in the eyes of the world move from being a security threat to a security partner.” The vision includes transforming Somalia’s role on the global stage and domestic economy: moving from a recipient of emergency food aid to a commercial and trading partner. The overarching theme is the necessity of active, individual commitment to sustain political stability, legal development, and stronger U.S.–Somali relations in order to realize this favorable trajectory.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the presence and influence of the Taliban within government and international circles, and the U.S. approach to engagement. Speaker 1 suggests that while there may not be overt Taliban infiltration as a formal party, there are lobbyists, supporters, and Taliban in neckties and suits in Washington, pointing to the speech of the U.S. special envoy to Afghanistan, Thomas West, as evidence of whitewashing the Taliban. Speaker 0 counters that the U.S. is in regular, productive dialogue with the Taliban, and believes the Taliban are sincere but frustrated. He notes that no sanctions have been passed against the Taliban since last August, that four Americans have returned, but several remain in Taliban custody. He also highlights that the U.S. has backed the shipment of hundreds of millions of dollars in cash into the country since August, and claims it is actually over $1,000,000,000. Speaker 0 states that the U.S. has cooperated with the Taliban on certain discrete issues, including closing roads and managing crowds to prevent terrorist disruption, and that he has had a series of engagements with senior Taliban leaders. When asked about returning to Afghanistan to meet with the Taliban, he says, “The sooner, the better,” noting that the Taliban want sanctions relief, development aid, and a big seat at the table. He mentions an announced plan to pump in another $308,000,000, and describes mechanisms that are getting hundreds of millions of dollars in cash directly into the banking system. The Taliban purportedly want to seat their permanent representative in New York. ISIS-K is described as a common enemy, with the Taliban maintaining a vigorous and robust effort against it. He asserts that, despite concerns, they are building productive relationships and an honest dialogue with Taliban members, while acknowledging the priority of countering ISIS-K. He references the Doha agreement breach by the Taliban in sheltering Ayman al-Zawahiri in downtown Kabul, which he characterizes as unacceptable and a major breach, and states that even after this event, the U.S. is prepared to engage pragmatically with the Taliban regarding terrorism concerns. Speaker 1 adds that the UN and World Bank are developing a humanitarian exchange facility to move more Afghans into the system, noting that many banknotes have circulated for over ten years and are not accepted by shops or the central bank. He mentions a private-sector arrangement in Europe facilitating the shipment of hundreds of millions in cash into private banks in Afghanistan, with money going to the Afghanistan International Bank (AIB), which allegedly lacks authority to convert dollars to Afghanis and to auction them, and then passes funds to the Taliban-controlled Central Bank of Afghanistan. He asks who is in charge of the Central Bank, identifying Nur Ahmad Ora as the head, described as sanctioned by the U.S. for financing IED attacks that killed American soldiers. He concludes that diplomacy with the Taliban is essential to achieve objectives and asks whether there are Taliban in elections, asserting that they hold official offices and are present, urging the listener to review their statements to determine if they are Taliban sympathizers or whitewashing the Taliban. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 remarking, “Man, that's scary.”

We planted the US flag in support of the people enduring hardships here. We must end this destruction and help rebuild. It's crucial to support Russia, achieve our goals, and stop the devastation. I'm proud to stand with incredible people making a difference. The situation here is unlike anything I've seen, even in Afghanistan. The work being done is remarkable, and we must assist these individuals.

The speaker states the Taliban was killing American soldiers with snipers, so the speaker got involved with the Taliban. Abdul is the head of the Taliban, and the speaker told Abdul to stop, or there would be problems. The speaker sent Abdul a picture of his house. For 18 months, no one was killed. Mike Pompeo negotiated a good agreement for the U.S. to withdraw without losing soldiers or leaving Americans or $85 billion in equipment behind. The speaker claims the agreement required certain actions, but "they" didn't do them, so the agreement was terminated. The speaker believes "these people" executed the worst withdrawal, causing the most embarrassing moment in American history. The speaker believes Russia attacked Ukraine because of the perceived incompetence of "she and her boss."

I was honored to be the first president to welcome Aung San Suu Kyi to the White House and to visit this remarkable country. This marks a new chapter in U.S.-Burma relations. Last year, I asked Secretary Clinton to explore ways the U.S. could support reform efforts in Burma. We need to identify the necessary steps forward, focusing on the rule of law and ending civil conflict. All hostilities must cease promptly. Democracy has always been our goal, and while the path has been challenging, we see new opportunities today. The United States is committed to partnering with Burma as you continue your journey toward democratization.

I want to express my gratitude to Secretary of State Colin Powell for his unwavering support in expanding NATO. I also want to thank the United States Senate members, including Majority Leader Bill Frist, Chairman Dick Lugar, and Ranking Member Joe Biden, for their exceptional leadership. Their efforts led to a unanimous vote in favor of admitting these nations into NATO. Well done, senators.

We're discussing a phone call between Victoria Nuland, the top US diplomat for Europe, and the US ambassador to Ukraine, Jeff Pyatt. They talk about getting Sari to come in on Monday or Tuesday with the help of the UN and EU. The United States has supported Ukraine since its independence in 1991, investing over $5 billion to promote democracy, good governance, and civic participation. Americans support Ukrainian protesters who want closer ties to Europe. The United States has always been concerned about the alliance between Germany and Russia, as it poses a threat. The combination of German technology and capital with Russian resources and manpower has historically worried the US.

So we spent a lot of time talking about NATO. First, I do wanna remind people that Ukraine and the NATO alliance have built a strong partnership. Ukraine is the only non NATO nation supporting every NATO mission. In Afghanistan and Iraq, Ukrainian troops are helping to support young democracies. In Kosovo, Ukrainians are help keep the peace. Ukraine now seeks to deepen its cooperation with the NATO alliance through a membership action plan. Your nation has made a bold decision, and The United States strongly supports your request. In Bucharest this week, I will continue to make America's position clear. We support MAP for Ukraine and Georgia. Helping Ukraine move toward NATO membership is in the interest of every member in the alliance and will help advance security and freedom in this region and around the world.

We will not fight with one hand tied behind our back. We hope this fighting will be short and casualties will be minimal. We have made progress in ending conflict and the cold war. We have the opportunity to create a new world order, where the rule of law governs nations. When we succeed, we can establish a credible United Nations that fulfills the vision of its founders. We have no argument.

We are staying in our country and staying strong. From the beginning of the war, we've been alone, and we are thankful. But you haven't been alone. Through this president, we gave you three hundred and fifty billion dollars in military equipment. You men are brave, but you had to use our military.