TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I will work tirelessly to ensure peace and recognition of two coexisting states. I will not compromise on this issue and condemn colonization policies that go against the 1992 agreements. It is crucial to be firm with Israel and the choices made by Mr. Netanyahu. I have stated and will reiterate that I will use all my diplomatic efforts to de-escalate the situation and establish a genuine peace treaty and recognition.

Palestine was never Britain's to give away. The truth will set you free. Washington is Israel's most subservient colony. I'm a former Zionist and Jew, join me in uncovering the truth. Netanyahu said the 9/11 attacks swung American opinion in Israel's favor, using it to terrorize the public into supporting Middle East wars for Israel's benefit. Al-Qaeda and ISIS were created by the Mossad and CIA to justify these wars and advance Israel's goal of a Middle East empire. Israel used 10/07/2023 as justification to implement a plan for genocide against Palestinians. JFK supported Palestinian refugee rights and opposed Israel's nuclear program, leading to conflicts with Zionist leaders.

Ireland is ready to recognize Palestine. They condemn Israel's actions, saying reason has been replaced by revenge. The Irish people urge Prime Minister Netanyahu to stop the fighting and allow aid to reach those in need.

The International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Israel's Prime Minister Netanyahu, his former defense minister, and the military chief of Hamas, charging them with crimes against humanity. The court stated there are reasonable grounds to believe Netanyahu and his defense minister used starvation as a weapon of war by blocking humanitarian aid to Gaza. Netanyahu denies this, claiming the court's ruling undermines democracy's fight against terrorism. The White House and the incoming Trump administration condemned the decision. While unlikely to face imminent arrest, Netanyahu could be arrested if he enters a country that is a member of the court, including the UK, France, and Canada. Attacking or criticizing Israel is not anti-Semitic, and Israel's behavior is despicable. The Israeli government is committing war crimes and crimes against humanity. South Africa brought a case in the International Court of Justice accusing Israel of genocide. Israel has been slaughtering innocent people for a long time.

The International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Israel's Prime Minister Netanyahu, his former defense minister, and the military chief of Hamas, charging them with crimes against humanity. The court stated there are reasonable grounds to believe Netanyahu and his defense minister used starvation as a weapon of war by blocking humanitarian aid to Gaza. Netanyahu denies this, claiming the court's ruling undermines democracy's fight against terrorism. The White House and the incoming Trump administration condemned the decision. While unlikely to face imminent arrest, Netanyahu could be arrested if he enters any country that is a member of the court, including the UK, France, and Canada. Attacking or criticizing Israel is not anti-Semitic, and Israel's behavior is despicable. The Israeli government is committing war crimes and crimes against humanity. South Africa brought a case in the International Court of Justice accusing Israel of genocide. Israel has been slaughtering innocent people for a long time.

Without light, there's no path from this darkness. I understand the passion of the people and have been working quietly with the Israeli government to reduce their presence in Gaza. Thank you.

I will work tirelessly to ensure peace and recognition of two coexisting states. I will not compromise on this issue and condemn any colonization policies that go against the 1992 agreements. It is crucial to be firm with Israel and the choices made by Mr. Netanyahu. I have stated and will reiterate that I will use all my diplomatic efforts to de-escalate the situation and establish a genuine peace treaty and recognition.

"Tell the Palestinians, I will never support Palestinians." "Israel is our ally. We'll always be our ally." "I will support Israel forever." "Even when they kill 30,000 kids." "Israel will exist. The Jewish state will exist." "I will always support Israel's children." "Goodbye to Palestine." "Goodbye to Palestine. Israel." "Goodbye. Goodbye to Palestine." "You so you just said goodbye to Palestine. So you are saying you are comfortable with the murder of thousands of children." "The Jewish people will never suffer again answer your question." "Under Palestinian terrorism, under Hamas, under Hezbollah, Israel will be secure forever." "Okay? God bless Israel forever. Thank you." "And you wanna wipe Palestine off the earth. Yeah? Bless Israel forever."

There is no such thing as a Palestinian, and this has been a political tool to try to force land away from Israel. A two-state solution, if it means two governments holding the same piece of real estate, is irrational and unworkable. If there is a two-state solution, the Palestinian state needs to be outside the boundaries of the nation of Israel. There is plenty of land in the world to create a Palestinian state. There is no such thing as a West Bank; it's Judea and Samaria. There is no such thing as a settlement; they are communities, neighborhoods, and cities. There is no such thing as an occupation.

The speaker claims ten years of irresponsible liberal policies have divided people into groups, and this division must end so everyone feels safe. People from around the world care deeply about where they come from and should have the freedom to do so. Another speaker states that the treatment of Palestinians has been disgusting and what's going on in Gaza has clearly become a genocide. They call for an immediate ceasefire and maximum effort to encourage the return. The government has put in place a hundred million of humanitarian aid. The speaker supports a two-state solution, with a viable and free Palestinian state living side by side in peace and security with the state of Israel. They state the need to check and turn Iran. To work together, consistency is required.

For 30 years, I've been consistent in saying that the conflict isn't about a Palestinian state, but the existence of a Jewish state. Every time we've given up land, we faced terror. Israel must control the entire area from the river to the sea. A prime minister must be able to say no to even the best of friends, to protect our country. Translation (if needed): The speaker emphasizes the importance of Israel maintaining control over the entire region to prevent terrorism, and the need for a prime minister to be able to say no when necessary.

Tommy Robinson is in Tel Aviv and says it’s an honor to be there. He bluntly claims the British government is weak and cowardly for recognizing the “terrorist state” of Palestine, citing stateofisrael.com and noting Avi is with him. He says he hopes to show solidarity with real strong leadership and wishes Britain had a leader like Netanyahu, arguing the government has no mandate and was elected with only about 20% of public votes, and he doesn’t want Israelis to think the other 80% oppose recognizing a terrorist state. He explains he’s there to show solidarity with the Jewish and Israeli people, to form good friendships, and to understand that Israel is surrounded by jihad while Britain will be too; he asserts Europe will face security problems from Islamic extremism as leaders appease them, an approach Israel has already rejected. Robinson recalls that there was a time when Jews were dragged out of Gaza as part of a peace deal that supposedly would bring peace, which he says does not. He presents himself as a friend and ally of Israel, stressing that he has never been paid by Israel and that he acts out of belief in Israel as a beacon of freedom and democracy, in contrast with surrounding areas he describes as human rights violations, terror states, and jihad states. In an exchange with his colleague, they announce they are not being paid to be there and to cover it, and that Rebel is hosting coverage with a front-row seat to Robinson’s tour via tommyinisrael.com. They mention a $7,000 post and invite support at tommyinisrael.mate. They credit Amichai Chikli from the diocese with bringing him there, calling him “Enemy of the state” in Britain and “friend of the state in Israel.” Robinson shares a Panama anecdote: he was deported after being refused entry in Colombia; in Panama, the mayor saw it online, sent a security cyber truck to pick him up, and apologized, sending a gracious message. He says the episode shows the reach of the story and the growing attention abroad. At the airport, people recognize him as Tommy Robinson; some are excited, including some on the left who express support. The presenters remark that he may receive a welcome akin to Trump’s, noting Trump’s visit a few days earlier and expressing a wish to be there as well. He closes by reiterating that many in Britain’s government have “hung the Jews out,” describing Britain as a scary place.

I am addressing President Biden from Israel. We will not cease the conflict in Gaza or allow Jews to resettle the entire area.

God helped us defend our state after centuries of struggle. Many cities were taken, and Jaffa is nearly empty. Western media supports Israel, but we condemn attacks. Peace is impossible until terrorists are gone. We support Israel in solidarity.

I am tired of the word genocide. If Israel wanted to commit genocide, they could. They have the capability to do that. They choose not to. Hamas, they would commit genocide in thirty seconds. They just can't. Israel is our friend. They're a democracy surrounded by people who would cut their throats if they could. A word of warning, if America pulls the plug on Israel, God will pull the plug on us. October 7 was an effort to destroy the state of Israel, the largest loss of Jewish life since the holocaust, and here we are almost two years later and Israel's the bad guy. That's ridiculous. Israel is not the bad guy. They're the good guy. The bad guys are the radical Islamists who would kill everybody in this room if they could. When it comes to foreign policy, president Trump has stood up for all the right things, and he stood up against wrong things just like Reagan.

The discussion centers on the fragile peace deal and the ongoing conflict with Hamas, with emphasis on Hamas’ true nature, disarmament, hostage issues, humanitarian aid, and regional dynamics including Lebanon and Iran. - Hamas remains a terrorist organization. The interlocutor states that Hamas has not changed its stripe and is using the ceasefire to reassert control in Gaza through mass executions of those opposed or suspected of working with Israel, while attempting to rebuild its strength. The plan, in partnership with Netanyahu, is to disarm Hamas, dismantle its terror infrastructure, and build Gaza into something different, a top priority under the Trump plan. - The peace deal is a work in progress. Neither Israel, the United States, nor other actors expect Hamas to act in good faith. The discussion emphasizes that if Hamas does not disarm, it will be eradicated, a statement framed as a serious US commitment reflecting the nature of the war and regional determination to end Hamas as a threat. - The 20-stage plan and pathway forward. The plan provides a pathway to end Hamas as a regime and terror army in Gaza and to prevent Gaza from threatening Israel going forward. The goal is to disarm Hamas, dismantle its infrastructure, and transform Gaza into a stable, peaceful entity, though it remains a “work in progress.” - Hostages and displaced persons. A central issue is the status of hostages: Hamas holds 13 of the 28 people Hamas allegedly murdered and held, with 18 returned so far, and 25 originally cited in discussions (the transcript mentions 28 total murdered and 18 returned, with 13 still in Hamas control). The speaker argues that Hamas knows the whereabouts of several more hostages and should deliver them; the claim is that some hostages who were said to be unlocated could be found even if debris removal is slow. The Red Cross and humanitarian organizations say recovering bodies will be a massive, decades-long challenge, but the speakers argue that locating hostages does not require full debris removal. Aid and humanitarian access are discussed, including a suspension of aid after the killing of Israeli soldiers that was brief and then reinstated; aid trucks are allowed through to humanitarian zones controlled by Israel in Gaza, with concerns about Hamas siphoning aid for its own purposes. - Aid leakage and Hamas control of aid. The speakers contend that Hamas stole or redirected up to 95% of aid in Gaza prior to the ceasefire, using it to fund its war against Israel. They argue that UN agencies operating in Gaza are often under Hamas influence, whether willingly or unwillingly, and thus aid distribution has been compromised when Hamas governs. - Hamas’ current behavior in Gaza and security concerns. Hamas is described as reasserting control by mass executions and intimidation; there is concern about how much control they exert over the areas they govern and the potential for continued war if they disarm remains unactioned. The discussion stresses that the longer Hamas can control areas, the more they can pursue their war. - Trump–Kushner–Witkoff diplomatic leverage. The discussion credits President Trump’s diplomacy with changing Hamas’s calculus. The Qatar strike that nearly targeted Hamas negotiators is acknowledged as a turning point; Kushner and Witkoff claimed that Hamas wanted peace when engaged directly in Egypt, and that the strike on Qatar frightened Hamas into reconsidering its position. The interlocutor suggests that palace diplomacy, allied pressure in the Arab and Islamic world, and the military pressure on Gaza City converged to push Hamas toward releasing hostages and engaging with the peace process. - Israel’s regional strategy and deterrence. The speaker emphasizes that Israel must be able to defend itself and maintain power in the region. The Abraham Accords are cited as a success, with normalization continuing because partners recognize Israel’s stability and the advantages of cooperation. The Palestinian statehood question is reframed as a broader test of Palestinian willingness to accept Israel’s existence; the speaker notes parliamentary support in Israel opposing a Palestinian state and argues that Palestinian society must change its stance toward recognizing a Jewish state. - Lebanon and Hezbollah. Optimism is tempered by caution. In Lebanon, there is some movement toward demilitarization, with the Lebanese army involved and Hezbollah’s power being re-evaluated. The speaker stresses that even if conflict ends, Israel will remain vigilant and prepared to prevent a rebuilt Hezbollah threat along the border, citing past upheavals and the need to protect border towns like Kiryat Shmona. - Iran and the wider threat. Iran’s missile program and its nuclear ambitions are described as two cancers threatening Israel: missiles capable of delivering heavy payloads and a nuclear program. The strategic aim is to prevent Iran from creating a “ring of fire” around Israel (Syria, Lebanon, Gaza, Yemen, Iraq) and to prevent metastasis of Iran’s influence from spreading. - Global sentiment and demonization. The speaker acknowledges growing global antisemitism and demonization of Israel post-October 7, but argues that Israel’s demonstrated ability to defend itself strengthens its position and that support should endure as the conflict recedes from prominence. The Palestinian leadership’s stance and the broader regional dynamics remain central to whether a two-state solution can emerge, with a tempered expectation that the peace plan will proceed step by step.

Trump wants a Nobel Peace Prize, by the way, for the planned ethnic cleansing so that they could profit on the land and turn it into a beach town. This is our never again. This is a Holocaust. A Holocaust just happened. We will never forget this. You need to tell your children what happened in Gaza. You need to tell them exactly who did it, exactly whose families were involved in this. Gaza belongs to nobody but the Palestinians. So when you begin to move the Israelis in there and when the Trump hotel gets built on there, I caution the rest of the world to stay far away from that cursed land because something is coming. You can't commit that much evil in broad daylight and not think it's gonna come back to haunt you. Anyways.

"The events of October 7 were so catastrophically horrendous, such an appalling act of terrorism. You know, twelve hundred people killed, two hundred and fifty plus kidnapped, seven thousand more wounded." "They had a moral duty to defend their people, and I still believe that." "The bombardment has been utterly relentless all over Gaza." "They've obliterated 70% of Gaza." "At least 60,000 people have been killed, including reportedly over 20,000 children." "Ethnic cleansing— to displace and ethnically cleanse the Palestinians." "This is horrific." "It is a both sides problem." "When artificial intelligence learns to self design, in other words, think for itself, that's the end because it will pretty rapidly work out human beings are pointless." "I thought it was outrageous." "America's taken a view. We are all in with Israel because Israel would be all in with us."

The first speaker says the UK holds a special place because it helped birth the Jewish state in World War I through the Balfour Declaration, the San Remo Accords, and the mandate for Jewish Palestine, with the UK at the forefront. Then they “turned on us,” and he asks, “Can we turn it back?” The second speaker agrees and adds that while the British government has turned on Israel, the British people have not necessarily turned on Jews; the establishment has. He argues that if a democratic vote were held on recognizing the state of Palestine, “it would be a resounding no.” He states, “The people haven't turned on Israel,” and attributes this to the left-wing establishment appeasing their block vote and their future vote. He also draws a parallel to the American establishment under Joe Biden, noting that “the American people didn't support that.”

Jonathan (Speaker 0) and Michael (Speaker 2) along with Jonathan Conricus (Speaker 1) discuss the Australia Hanukkah attack, antisemitism, and the political context surrounding Palestinian statehood and Islamist extremism. They also touch on free speech, protests, and potential international implications. - Jonathan’s initial reaction to the Australian shooting: He was not surprised, framing it as part of a broader pattern he terms “globalize the Intifada.” He cites experiences in Australia, including Bondi Beach visits and conversations with the Jewish community, who he says feel betrayed by legislators and exposed by law enforcement. He argues the atmosphere in Australia has allowed antisemitic attacks, with radicals allowed to shout antisemitic slogans and attack synagogues. He accuses the Australian government of being weak and cowed, quick to side with Hamas and Palestinians while demonizing Israel, and contends this climate enabled violence against 2,000 Australian Jews celebrating Hanukkah. He calls for full support and protection for Jews in Australia and for leadership to change its stance toward global affairs. - Netanyahu connection and limiting principle: Michael notes Netanyahu’s August letter to Australian Prime Minister Albanese warning that support for a Palestinian state fuels antisemitic violence and benefits Hamas. Conricus is asked about a limiting principle: could endorsing Palestinian statehood by various figures (Ehud Barak, the UN Security Council’s Oslo-era blueprint, etc.) be linked to such attacks, potentially implicating many figures including Donald Trump? Conricus responds that the situation in Australia goes beyond a mere recognition of a Palestinian state and highlights the disquiet in Israel across political spectrum about linking Israel’s actions to global support for Palestinian statehood, especially after October 7 atrocities. - Protests and incitement: Jonathan argues the protests in Australia, including chants like “gas the Jews,” reflect incitement and a broader systemic failure by authorities who allowed Hamas supporters to dominate public spaces and harass Jews. He recounts encounters with Hamas supporters in Melbourne and claims police and local government enabled harassment against Jews, including demands Jews remove kippahs to avoid incitement. He says hate crimes against synagogues have gone unsolved and that this atmosphere of violence and antisemitism needs to change. - Pro-Palestinian vs pro-Hamas distinction: Michael asks where to draw the line between pro-Palestinian and pro-Hamas protesters. Conricus argues the distinction is artificial and notes that polls show Hamas is the most popular Palestinian political group, suggesting that many demonstrators imply support for Hamas even if they do not explicitly say so. He believes the dominant sentiment among protesters on October 7-8 was supportive of Hamas, even if framed as pro-Palestinian nationalism. He also mentions paid protesters, particularly in US/UK campus contexts, but emphasizes ideologically driven protesters. - Free speech and incitement: Michael insists that if protests include chants and actions that incite violence, this becomes a free-speech issue, citing First Amendment protections in the US and contrasting with other countries. Jonathan counters that incitement can justify restriction when it explicitly calls for violence against a protected group, noting that “gas the Jews” crosses lines beyond free speech, and criticizes Australian authorities’ tolerance of violent incitement. - Chronology and retaliation: The participants discuss the October 7 Hamas attack and Israel’s subsequent response. Jonathan clarifies that Hamas conducted an unprecedented, unprovoked attack killing 1,200 Israelis, with later identification of missing and abducted individuals. He describes Israel’s border closure and subsequent major offensive in Gaza. Michael points out debates around whether attackers’ motives included broader geopolitical narratives, while Jonathan underscores the gravity and scale of the October 7 killings and the need to acknowledge the initial atrocity. - Islam and Western integration: Jonathan addresses Islam as a monotheistic faith with nearly 2 billion followers, expressing no issue with Islam as a religion but concern about Islamist ideology and an imperialistic mindset. He cites Sweden’s immigration policy as an example of perceived societal strain and argues for cautions about cultural integration, border policies, and governance standards in Western societies. - Acknowledgment of individual bravery: They remark on Ahmed Ben Ahmed, a Muslim shop owner who helped defend Jews during the Australian attack, acknowledging his bravery and suggesting he should be recognized for valor. - Iran, Israel, and alleged blame: The discussion covers claims about Iran or Israel behind the attack. Michael asserts there is no evidence linking Mossad or Iran to the attack, while Jonathan suggests Iranian involvement is possible but not proven, noting Iranian propaganda and the potential for blowback, while maintaining that the attackers’ exact affiliations remain unclear. They note Iranian condemnation of the attacks, with skepticism about Iranian statements.

I grew up in a world centered around politics and Israel. Good morning, APAC. I will meet with Prime Minister Netanyahu today, and President Obama will meet him tomorrow. He once referred to me as the first Jewish president. We must stand up for Israel and the rights of the Jewish people. I could easily be elected prime minister in Israel. When Israel faces anti-Jewish hatred, it is anti-Semitism. I am a Zionist, and we need to support Israel. We are committed to making Israel great again. This is serious; we must save Israel.

Children slaughtered, worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. Israel has the right to exist and defend itself. Some members in this body refuse to acknowledge this and lack the courage to condemn the killing of babies. They even spread a false claim that Israel bombed a hospital. These individuals are unworthy of serving in this body. The fact that some didn't sign on to this resolution speaks volumes. If you can't support Israel, our greatest ally in the Middle East, a symbol of democracy and freedom, you shouldn't be here. Those members should resign in disgrace.

Israel must assert its strength and declare to the United States, the international community, the European Union, and France that Jerusalem will never be divided. They do not want a Palestinian state because the borders are indefensible. The Judea and Samaria regions are the birthplace of Judaism and an integral part of Israel. It is up to us to respond with more firmness than before.

For 30 years, I've consistently said that the conflict is not about the lack of a Palestinian state, but about the existence of a Jewish state. Whenever we have evacuated an area, we have faced terrible acts of terrorism, whether it was in South Lebanon, Gaza, or Judea and Samaria. Therefore, I believe that in any future arrangement, Israel must have control over the entire area from the river to the sea. This is what sovereignty entails. I want to emphasize this truth to our American friends and prevent any attempts to impose a reality that would put us in danger. As the Prime Minister of Israel, it is important to be able to say no, even to our closest allies, when necessary, and to say yes when possible.

Tommy Robinson arrived in Israel on an official invitation from Israel’s minister of diaspora affairs, Ami Chikli, described as a major moment for free speech and truth telling on the world stage. The accompanying interview sets up a live-followed tour at tommyinisrael.com. Avi expresses his own perspective: he’s happy to be there and hopes to show solidarity with strong leadership, praising Netanyahu while criticizing Britain’s government for recognizing a “terrorist state” and claiming it was elected with only 20% of public votes. He warns that the 80% not supporting the government likewise do not support recognizing a terrorist state, and asserts that the problems Israel faces—security issues for Jews in Israel—are the problems Europe will face as Islamic extremism is empowered and “leaders have gotten their knees to them.” He recalls Jews being dragged out of Gaza as part of a peace deal and says Israel cannot be appeased. He frames his visit as friendship with Israel, a beacon of freedom and democracy, in contrast to surrounding states described as human rights violators and jihad states. He adds that Britain will face similar issues. The two discuss money and media. Mossad allegedly ran out of money, joking that Avi has been sent instead; they deny being paid by Israel or any organization and say they are not paid to cover the trip. They say Rebel’s coverage aims to counter BBC/Sky “fake news” narratives. A website, tommyinisrael.com, is launched to give a front-row seat to Tommy’s tour, with a call to followers to help cover the travel costs, including a humorous note about seven-thousand-dollar per post. They state they have not received funds from Israel and are covering their own travel and hotel expenses, without government or NGO support. Avi notes that Tommy has become “enemy of the state” in Britain but a “friend of the state” in Israel, and possibly in other countries, recounting an incident in Panama where authorities refused entry and deported him until the mayor intervened with an apology and security escort. They describe a growing public interest, with airport footage showing people recognizing Tommy Robinson and welcoming him; even some protesters on the left express positive sentiments. They encourage following the full tour on tommyinisrael.com and subscribing to updates, and reiterate the personal financial cost of the trip—about ten thousand dollars between the two of them for flights, plus hotel expenses—emphasizing they are funding the trip themselves.