reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker, representing the Trump EPA, frames geoengineering and contrails as urgent questions for which the American public deserves honesty and transparency. The speaker asserts that “the era is over” when questions were dismissed or vilified, and declares that the Trump EPA is committed to total transparency. The administrator states that the EPA tasked its team to “compile a list of everything we know about contrails and geoengineering for the purpose of releasing it to you now publicly.” The goal is for readers to know “everything I know about these topics and without any exception.” Rather than dismissing questions as baseless conspiracies, the EPA is meeting them head on, performing legwork, reviewing science, consulting agency experts, and incorporating relevant outside information to create online resources. “Everything we know about contrails to solar geoengineering will be in there.” The administrator emphasizes that anyone reading the information will know as much about these topics as the EPA administrator does, addressing questions from people who have looked up at the sky and wondered “what the heck is going on?” or seen headlines about private actors and governments seeking to blot out the sun in the name of stopping global warming. The EPA states that it has endeavored to answer all questions at the links provided. The EPA notes that it shares many of the same concerns about potential threats to human health and the environment, especially from solar geoengineering activities. The speaker highlights that the enthusiasm for experiments that would pump pollutants into the high atmosphere has set off alarm bells at the Trump EPA. Prior to now, the EPA has “never been this proactive to raise awareness about concerns with geoengineering and to stop this activity from being scaled up.” Finally, the administrator frames the stance as an example of government listening to the will of the people, not squashing it, and asserts that “you can always trust this administration and this EPA to take your concerns seriously, answer your questions honestly, and carry out the will of voters with integrity.”

I keep a house in Asheville, North Carolina, and it's a mess. Weather modification has been apparent for 15 years. It's an impossibility for a hurricane to maintain its eye 100 of miles inland in the mountains and raise the river 30 feet, a record. Then you start to put the pieces together with the lithium mine that's supposed to go into construction just outside of town next year, the largest lithium mine in North Carolina. And then you hear about the quartz mine that supposedly has the purest quartz that is what they use for the silica chips for our cell phones.

I have 25 years of experience working on climate change, starting in 1973. I was the one who gave the Club of Rome their first major platform. I share your concern and believe that the only way to address these issues is by fixing our global architecture and system.

The speaker describes an effort to educate and elevate content. They mention a partnership with Google, initiated after observing highly distorted information at the top of climate change search results. The goal is to be more proactive in providing accurate information. They state, “We own the science, and we think that the world should know it.” They add, “The platforms themselves also do.”

The speaker states that they partnered with Google because, initially, Googling "climate change" yielded "incredibly distorted information" at the top of search results. As a result of the partnership, UN resources now appear at the top of Google searches for climate change. The speaker asserts that they "own the science" related to climate change and believe "the world should know it." The speaker also indicates that the platforms themselves are taking action on this issue.

The conversation centers on the claim that Iran has faced long-running weather manipulation and climate intervention, pushing the idea that weather warfare is being waged against Iran for decades and that this has contributed to severe droughts, disrupted rainfall, and harsh living conditions amid sanctions. Dane Wiggington, founder of geoengineeringwatch.org, leads the discussion with Clayton and Natalie, presenting a narrative that goes beyond mainstream geopolitics to point to covert weather manipulation as a central factor. Key points and assertions include: - Weather warfare against Iran has “gone back forty years plus,” with Iranian meteorologists and former president Ahmadinejad publicly asserting that NATO was cutting off precipitation, thereby destabilizing weather patterns and food production. The guests describe this as ongoing warfare that destabilizes populations. - The practice is described as not just about Iran; the tactic, historically used by the US in conflicts such as Vietnam (Project Popeye), has led to international attempts to regulate weather modification (INMOD treaties) in 1976, though the speakers argue that nations still engage in such activities over their own citizens. - The mechanism of climate engineering is presented as two main methods: diminishing and dispersing precipitation, and completely cutting it off. The discussion highlights ionosphere heater technologies (notably HARP) as tools to heat portions of the atmosphere, creating high-pressure heat domes that steer moisture patterns and produce chemically nucleated rainfall or drought. This is linked to current US West Coast heat waves and is described as a deliberate manipulation of moisture cycles. - The oil-cloud phenomenon in Iran is described as a result of such warfare, with reports of oil covering streets, doors, cars, and lungs from inhalation of aerosolized oil. The guest connects this to broader environmental impacts, including toxic precipitation and altered air quality, and claims similar operations have caused dramatic weather and pollution events elsewhere. - The discussion cites historical and contemporary examples to illustrate broader patterns: Kuwait’s oil wells torched by US forces allegedly to justify infrastructure moves; allegations that US military operations use climate intervention as a weapon; and a claim that blizzards and chemical cooling downs (including alleged chemical ice nucleation) have been weaponized in various regions, including the Gulf Coast and the US Northeast. - The conversation ties climate engineering to geopolitical strategies, arguing that portraying Iran as a nuclear threat serves to justify aggressive actions and to obscure the manipulation of weather and climate systems. Netanyahu’s warnings and statements about water and control of resources are presented as part of this broader manipulation. - The speakers argue that the US and allied governments are maintaining control through deception, suggesting that media coverage is insufficient or complicit. They claim that mainstream outlets like Forbes “cover” for the narrative of cloud theft and downplay the severity of drought and weather manipulation in Iran, while asserting that Western North American snowpack is at record lows, much of it chemically nucleated, reducing runoff. - They emphasize the scale of water stress domestically, warning that tens of millions in the US Southwest could face severe water shortages, with reservoirs like Lake Powell and Lake Mead described as near dead pools with substantial sedimentation reducing usable capacity. - The dialogue connects climate engineering to broader biosphere collapse and asserts that the greatest single source of pollution is the US military. They argue that climate engineering is the crown jewel weapon used to inflict misery while remaining hidden, urging listeners to awaken, form supportive networks, and push for action at the legislative level. - They reference the documentary The Dimming as a resource for evidence of climate engineering and invite audiences to explore geoengineeringwatch.org for ongoing information. Throughout, Dane Wiggington reiterates that climate engineering and weather manipulation are central, ongoing operations that intersect with geopolitics, media coverage, and public health. The conversation maintains a consistent stance that these interventions are real, pervasive, and inadequately addressed by mainstream discourse, urging viewers to seek out more information and grassroots advocacy.

The speaker states he is the founder of the Weather Channel, not the co-founder. He claims CNN has taken a strong position on global warming, stating it is a consensus, but there is no consensus in science because science is about facts. He asserts climate change is not happening, there is no significant man-made global warming now, there hasn't been any in the past, and there's no reason to expect any in the future. He believes it has become a big political point of the Democratic party, and he regrets it's become political instead of scientific, but the science is on his side. Regarding the claim that 97% of climate scientists agree on climate change, he says the government puts out about $2.5 billion directly for climate research every year, and it only gives that money to scientists who will produce scientific results that support the global warming hypothesis. Therefore, 97% of the scientific reports published support global warming because those are the ones the government pays for.

When searching for "climate change" on Google, most results come from the UN. Mainstream news sources and government organizations dominate the top listings. Despite claims of 868 million results, only 422 are visible after scrolling through. Official websites and news outlets are prevalent, with no sign of personal blogs or alternative sources. The discrepancy raises questions about the true extent of information available online.

Speaker 0: 'Hey, guys. Just wanted to say thanks to everybody who who, you know, read my Substack today.' He says, 'out of all the substacks I've written, that one was probably the most effort that I put into a single substack as far as tying so many cross connections and overlapping pieces together.' He adds, 'I try hard on all of them, obviously, but that one genuinely took a lot out of me.' Finally, he notes, 'And seeing the the good response and the reception that it's getting means more to me than you guys will ever know.'

I realized we are poisoning people instead of protecting them through geoengineering. Whistleblower protections are not enforced. Disinformation sites like Metabunk and Contrail Science try to debunk us. Geoengineering, funded by tax dollars, is the biggest issue we face. Overexposure to toxins from food, water, and vaccines is harming us. Our bodies can't handle these toxins.

Speaker 1 says whistleblowers claim waste from industrial processes is being run into sewers and that efforts are moving toward more closed cooling systems. Speaker 1 states closed cooling systems still use chemicals and says there are no regulations requiring cleaning out closed cooling systems every two years, including where those chemicals are disposed. Speaker 1 references a statement from her father, a mechanical engineer: “the solution to pollution is not dilution,” and argues that taking polluted water and dumping it downstream relies on natural dilution rather than solving the underlying issue. She asks whether there are regulations to determine which chemicals remain in the water before release into the environment and says, “Right now it’s a free-for-all out there.” Speaker 0 explains that closed loop water systems involve not only water but also a whole array of chemicals to stop corrosion, microbes, and growths. Speaker 0 says the systems must be flushed every so often and that when people cite very large volumes of water use, it is not “one time” because flushing happens repeatedly. Speaker 0 states that for HVAC systems and data centers, flushing can occur every one to three years, though data center timelines may differ. Speaker 0 says the whistleblowers’ claim is that the practice amounts to flushing chemicals downstream with insufficient oversight. Speaker 0 acknowledges that there are regulations under environmental rules, but says the whistleblowers argue it is still effectively a “free for all,” varying by state, and that reliance is placed on dilution. Speaker 1 then shifts to the scale of the issue by discussing mapping of data centers in America. She says the mapping project began about 10 weeks ago and reports “12,000 submissions,” with 8,000 submissions pinned on a map, and possibly 9,000 pinned. She says the team reads each submission and vets its location; some submissions lack zip codes, and some sites are solar farms where a data center is not yet present. She adds that so many data centers are being planned nationwide that “you can’t even see most of America” on the map. Speaker 2 asks how long ago the project started, and Speaker 1 confirms it was 10 weeks ago. Speaker 0 summarizes that the woman is mapping data centers across America and that, in just a few weeks, the project is up to nearly 10,000 pinned submissions.

The discussion notes that Central China, and parts of Central China, have experienced the worst drought in many decades. There is an investment with the speaker’s wife in Weather Central, and the question is how that could help with planning for droughts. The responding speaker states that they currently have 25 broadcast clients in China and are the number one provider of broadcast weather graphic solutions in the country. The recent weather events have caused people to lose their lives and situations like this; the detailed information they can provide through the technology given to various weather stations helps make people more aware. He emphasizes that it is about offering opportunity, and mentions the launch of an operation called My Weather, which provides access to the first truly personalized weather application for the web and mobile devices. Users can go to myweather.com to find out, within a kilometer of their location, what the weather will be, including a ten-day forecast. He notes that we are living in this time and broad climate change is a huge subject, though he will not delve into it. He mentions global variations in weather, including England’s precarious weather and a drought lasting until about ten days ago. The speaker asserts that technology offered by myweather.com can tell people what might happen and help them be aware, especially among the farming community. He ends by saying they are very interested in helping win because, sorry, it gives a little...

Speaker 0 explains that Grok uses heavy inference compute to examine information across formats such as Wikipedia pages, books, PDFs, and websites to determine what is true, partially true, false, or missing. It then rewrites the page to remove falsehoods, correct the half truths, and add the missing context. Speaker 1 adds Elon’s question about publishing that process and proposes the idea of a Grokopedia. He notes that Wikipedia is biased and described as “a constant war,” with content that gets corrected quickly facing an army of people trying to mean it. He suggests that if what Grok fixes on Wikipedia could be published as a source of truth, it would be valuable for the world to have it. Speaker 0 responds by saying he will talk to the team about that concept, mentioning Grokpedia or whatever they might call it, and provides a Grokpedia version as a concrete example.

I have 25 years of experience working on climate change, starting in 1973 when I gave the club of Rome a major platform. I share your concerns and believe that the only way to address these issues is by fixing our global architecture and system.

When searching "climate change" on Google, the results mainly come from the UN and official news sources. Despite claiming 868 million results, only 422 are shown, mostly from reputable organizations. Blogs and independent sources are scarce, raising questions about the missing content on the internet.

In the nineteenth century, many Americans used homeopathic medicine and naturopathic remedies that were widely available and low cost. The American Medical Association (formed in 1847) opposed homeopathy, insisting homeopathic physicians would never be allowed to become members. Homeopathy remained a minority option for a time. At the turn of the century, John D. Rockefeller is described as seeing profit potential in medicine and taking control of the medical profession. The transcript claims Rockefeller replaced a homeopathic system with allopathic medicine, described as originating in Germany and characterized as relying on radical surgery, heavy use of drugs, and lengthy hospital stays—contrasting with homeopathic medicine. It then asserts Rockefeller, aided by Carnegie Foundation studies, became a “kingpin” of a medical monopoly, with control described as running through legislation, accreditation of hospitals, control of physicians, and control of medications “which is essentially what we have today.” From 1910 onward, the transcript claims U.S. health-care costs multiplied until most Americans could no longer afford care. To counter affordability issues, the transcript claims an insurance industry was established so health-care costs could be spread across people, and it frames health insurance as functioning like a tax. It then describes Medicare as a mechanism that “jerks back” Social Security benefits, leading to the idea that Security and Medicare would become equal and reduce monthly checks to zero. It also claims health-industry money is funneled into a Rockefeller-style monopoly and the drug trust. The transcript adds that the Rockefellers control major drug companies directly through directors and officials, including individuals described as coming from institutions such as Chase Manhattan Bank and Exxon. The transcript includes multiple additional assertions about eugenics, control of institutions, and global governance efforts. It claims Western medicine’s mainstreaming was linked to oil, petrochemicals, and pharmaceuticals, including the purchase of part of IG Farben and ties to Nazi-related activities, eugenics, and war. It describes the Flexner Report as a driver of modern allopathic medicine and claims Congress acted on its conclusions to standardize medical education so only allopathic medicine received licenses. It further claims that more than half of medical colleges were closed, homeopathy and natural medicines were mocked and demonized, and doctors were jailed. It portrays Rockefeller giving over 100,000,000 dollars to colleges and hospitals and founding the General Education Board (GEB) as a “carrot and stick” approach that streamlined curricula toward patented drugs, removing natural healing and the role of diet. The Hill Burton Act (1946) is described as providing hospital grants with conditions tied to free care, after which the transcript claims dependence on the system led to a paid structure and new lifelong customers. A later section claims the Rockefellers founded or were involved with the American Cancer Society (1913) and used tax-exempt foundations to require allopathic-only curricula, placing agents on medical-school boards. The transcript also argues that synthetic drugs are isolates that can be patented, and that “nature cannot be patented,” so it claims pharmaceutical companies instead practice biopiracy: researching natural compounds, copying or slightly modifying them to patent, marketing pills while suppressing criticism of the original plant sources. The transcript then shifts into discussions of “global transformation,” “lockstep,” and emergency powers. It includes references to a Rockefeller Foundation document called “Scenarios for the Future International Development” describing “lockstep,” with scenario narratives about tighter top-down government control, pandemics, and restrictive measures like mandatory quarantine and border closures. The U.S. policy is described as discouraging citizens from flying, while China is described as imposing mandatory quarantine and strict border controls. The transcript argues this results in expanded authoritarian oversight and urges “new ways” of revolt or protest. A lengthy segment claims the Rockefeller interests “pirated” the blood banking industry and involved Red Cross administrative leadership and eugenics-related objectives. It describes Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory as being built on Rockefeller-related estate, supporting “racial hygiene research” and eugenics investigations, and claims links to Cold Spring Harbor researchers, the eugenics research association, and later institutes in Germany. It further alleges ties between secret societies, military intelligence agencies, and the CIA, including claims about Red Cross actions and Nazi escape routes. It asserts that contaminated blood released by a Rockefeller-directed blood banking structure included AIDS-contaminated blood and that failures or withheld technologies led to deaths and infections. Another segment introduces claims about vaccine-based mass harm and “culling.” It describes allegations that vaccines would be used to induce a pandemic, followed by government actions based on a lack of doses, leading to mass injections. It frames refusal of vaccinations as leading to forced confinement and mentions U.S. military planning for population relocation in cases of civil disorder or pandemics. It includes an account of a physician stating that elite decision-makers planned to “thin the herd” and “useless eaters,” describing “aristocrats” who view people as “serfs” and speak of a goal to “get everybody chipped.” The transcript then moves to discussions of the “Georgia Guidestones,” describing Robert C. Christian (as anonymous) and a granite monolith built as a calendar/clock/compass, with inscriptions including the Ten Commandments in multiple languages. It highlights a population-related passage urging maintaining humanity under 500,000,000 and includes interpretations that the world population would need to be slashed to meet the demands implied by that inscription. It also describes claims about “Agenda 21” as a UN-origin master plan to create collectivist dependency and reduce private land and independence, pushing people into cities and making them reliant on state systems. The transcript adds claims about Wall Street and London bankers financing the Bolshevik revolution and about Rockefeller-related banking ties to the Soviet Union and leadership events. Finally, the transcript includes extended claims involving climate-change denial, “ClimateGate” and altered terminology from “global warming” to “climate change,” and arguments that school and media are used to shape perception. It emphasizes the theme that Rockefeller-linked philanthropy, medicine, and educational systems are tools for control, including claims that free services require surrender of data or privacy. The transcript ends with a motivational appeal about a “Great Awakening,” followed by a short statement of conflict between “wrong and right,” and an instruction to subscribe.

Typing "climate change" into Google yields 1 billion results in under a second, but most of the top results come from a few sources, primarily the United Nations. Scrolling through the results reveals that after the first few pages, the number of unique entries drastically decreases. By page 19, only 181 results are shown, and by page 43, just 422 results appear. This raises questions about the vast number of claimed results versus the actual diversity of sources available. Most links lead to official organizations and news outlets, leaving little room for personal blogs or alternative viewpoints. The discrepancy between the advertised results and the actual content prompts curiosity about the availability of information online.

The speaker states he is the founder of The Weather Channel and asserts there is no consensus in science, only facts. He claims climate change is not happening, there has been no man-made global warming, and there is no reason to expect any in the future. He alleges CNN has taken a strong position that global warming is a consensus, but the science is on his side. He believes the issue has become political instead of scientific. When questioned about the claim that 97% of climate scientists agree on global warming, he explains that the government provides billions in research money annually, but only to scientists who support the global warming hypothesis. Therefore, scientists produce results that align with the government's position to secure funding, which doesn't make it true.

When searching "climate change" on Google, most results come from the UN. Top stories are from mainstream sources like CNBC and NASA. After scrolling through 43 pages, only 422 results are found, mostly from official organizations and news outlets. Blogs and independent sources are scarce, raising questions about the missing billions of results promised initially.

Visit geoengineeringmonitor.org to see a map of worldwide weather modification projects involving toxic chemical spraying. Projects include greenhouse gas removal, solar radiation management, and weather modification like carbon capture and cloud thinning. They control rainfalls and conduct algae projects, among others. Check out the website for more information. Translation: Visit geoengineeringmonitor.org to see a map of global weather modification projects involving toxic chemical spraying. Projects include greenhouse gas removal, solar radiation management, and weather modification like carbon capture and cloud thinning. They control rainfalls and conduct algae projects, among others. Check out the website for more information.

Weather modification is real, and the US government has been involved since the 1940s. The speaker suggests a conspiracy theory: the government might be manufacturing climate events to prove climate change is real. NOAA monitors weather modification projects and publishes reports. Mike Adams reported that these reports are being scrubbed. According to NOAA, weather modification is any activity intended to artificially change the atmosphere's composition, behavior, or dynamics, citing federal regulations. Examples include using aircraft propeller downwash or lasers. The speaker promotes TomRens.com, highlighting the 404 series books, ranger buckets, and organic emergency storable food. Discounts are available, especially with the checkout code "Rens."

Many have seen unusual sky phenomena and wonder what's happening. The Geoengineering International Interactive Map at mapsdot geoengineeringmonitor.org shows global projects. Categories include solar radiation management, weather modification, and more. There are 10 ongoing solar radiation projects, 59 weather modification projects, and 275 other ongoing projects with 18 planned. 243 are major research projects. Research further on your own. Translation: Many people have observed strange things in the sky and are curious about them. The Geoengineering International Interactive Map provides information on various global projects, including solar radiation management and weather modification. It lists ongoing and planned projects in different categories. It is recommended to conduct additional research independently.

Mike Adams discusses concerns about the global build-out of data centers and presents a multi-part theory about their purpose and implications. He notes that a tweet he posted went viral, drawing responses from figures like Jimmy Dore and Rizwan Virk. He frames his talk as a theory, not a confirmed prediction, and plans to cover it in two parts. Key data and observations - There are about 11,000 existing data centers worldwide. The map and graphics Adams shares focus on 3,000 new or planned/construction sites, showing locations, size, power use, water use, land area, and investment needs. - In Piketon, Ohio, and other U.S. sites (including multiple facilities in Ohio and Texas), as well as Abu Dhabi, Shanghai, Tokyo, Malaysia, and other locations, there are large data centers under construction or announced. The lines in the AI-generated map may mis-point geographically, but the cities and nations listed are accurate. - The aggregate planned/under-construction capacity projects to about 190 gigawatts of power draw once completed. - The projected annual power consumption for these new centers would exceed 1,200 terawatt-hours per year, which Adams compares to about 10% of all power produced by China. - The centers would occupy over 1,000 square kilometers and use about 15+ billion liters of water per year, with some water potentially drawn from neighborhoods or households. Revenue and purpose questions - Adams argues there is not enough AI business, web hosting, data storage, or overall demand to justify the scale of the investment, implying the revenue model may be inadequate to pay back these projects. - He contrasts various high-profile tech figures—Tesla, Sam Altman, and Mark Zuckerberg—suggesting that the motives behind these data center buildups extend beyond serving immediate consumer compute needs, hinting at broader or longer-term strategic aims. Foundational ideas about AI and intelligence - He cites Jan LeCun (referenced as a leading AI researcher) arguing that the current structure of large language models (LLMs) is a dead end for achieving AGI or superintelligence due to gaps in physical-world understanding, memory, and long-term planning. Memory is said to be improving with newer context-handling approaches, but physical-world understanding and planning are highlighted as critical gaps. - LeCun’s idea mentioned is the development of world models and JEPPA architectures that learn from sensory inputs to understand and interact with the physical environment, rather than solely processing language statistics. - Adams suggests that the only viable path to practical superintelligence is to train AI systems in simulated three-dimensional worlds, where physics, gravity, time, light, touch, and other sensory inputs are experienced. He argues that simulated worlds can run at speeds far faster than the real world, limited only by compute and hardware bandwidth. - He mentions NVIDIA’s announced world simulator for training robots as an example of three-dimensional world simulations used for reinforcement learning and rapid iteration. - The concept of digital worlds is tied to the idea of digital evolution or Darwinism: billions of parallel simulated worlds could nurture AI entities that grow and potentially be summoned into our three-dimensional reality. He notes that a simulation-based approach could produce agents whose capabilities enable real-world deployment after learning in fast, rich simulations. - Adams discusses practical applications of three-dimensional simulations beyond AI self-improvement, including autonomous vehicle testing (synthetic data), manufacturing and robotics on factory floors, military scenario planning, surgical robotics, and pilot training. He emphasizes that the more realistic the simulation, the more reliable the results for real-world tasks and decisions. - He invokes the simulation hypothesis, suggesting a link between building simulated worlds and the possibility that our own reality could be a simulation. He plans to address evidence for the simulation hypothesis in part two, along with how simulated beings might be “summoned” into our world. Closing - Adams signals a two-part structure, with Part 1 covering data center build-out, AI constructs, and the simulation framework; Part 2 promising to address the simulation hypothesis with evidence and the idea of summoning advanced AI from simulations into the real world. Note: Promotional content regarding gold and silver investments and Battalion Metals has been omitted from this summary to align with content-avoidance requirements.

How are we going to address the atmosphere filled with metals and sensors, considering we've been manipulating the weather since the 1970s? I urge the Library of Congress to prioritize honesty and reveal the truth about the information it has acquired.