reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The auditor's concerns reveal mismanagement and potential breaches in the Fulton County election, where President Biden won by 12,000 votes. Evidence suggests that unidentified ballots were brought in, creating a breach in custody of 9,000 to 19,000 ballots. Fulton County printed around 20,000 ballots independently, bypassing the contracted printer. The whereabouts and legitimacy of these ballots remain unknown. The auditor also observed unidentified individuals delivering ballots, indicating a reckless election management. There is circumstantial evidence of intent to cause chaos and potential fraud. A contract with a group called Happy Faces, which has intriguing financial ties, raises further suspicions. Their involvement in ballot counting suggests an intention to manipulate the election outcome.

Dominion Systems, the owner of Sequoia and Premier, has a customer portal called dominion.dominionvoting/portal. This portal can be easily accessed and manipulated, allowing customers to view and modify data, including election results. It doesn't require a nation state's level of sophistication to manipulate these sites or gain unauthorized access. Even with limited resources, someone could potentially manipulate the election using these systems.

The speaker raises concerns about the security of the tabulation machines and the process of transferring votes. They question whether the votes can be manipulated before being saved on a flash drive and if the flash drive can be swapped. They also mention the issue of trusting the county commissioner to not edit the contents of the flash drive. The speaker highlights the importance of the digital devices that hold cryptographic keys, emphasizing that if these keys are lost, the entire precinct's security is compromised. They give an example of a theft in Philadelphia before the election, where USB drives and a laptop were stolen from a key precinct, potentially impacting the legitimacy of the election results.

Virginia has stopped using touchscreen computer voting due to vulnerabilities, and there is concern about the security of voting machines across the country. Researchers have demonstrated that these machines can be easily tampered with and hacked. In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted or switched votes. The biggest seller of voting machines has violated cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making the machines susceptible to fraud and hacking. There are concerns about the use of modems in voting machines, as they can be connected to the internet and pose a risk. Outdated software and lack of paper trails also contribute to the vulnerability of the voting systems. The potential for hacking and interference in elections is a significant concern, and the need for secure and updated voting systems is crucial.

An investigation is underway involving the Colorado Secretary of State's office after the DA's office received two affidavits alleging election law violations. Recently, passwords for voting systems were leaked on the secretary of state's website, including those for El Paso County election equipment. The spreadsheet containing the passwords was created by a former staff member who has since left the department. The secretary of state's office asserts that the leak did not pose an immediate security threat to the state's elections. Updates have been requested from both the DA and the secretary of state's office.

Linda McLaughlin and her colleagues present a data-focused argument alleging election fraud in Georgia, supported by multiple data analyses and demonstrations. - Linda McLaughlin introduces the data integrity group and states that data is numerical and non-partisan; she aims to remedy a lack of presented data in the discussion. - Dave Labou, a lead data scientist, explains that their analysis across precincts, counties, and the state identified over 40 data points of negative voting or vote switching across candidates totaling over 200,000 votes. Separately, machine learning algorithms used for anomaly detection in fraud detection flagged over 500 precincts with over 1,000,000 corresponding votes showing suspicious activity. He emphasizes that the process is scientific and not tied to political affiliations. - Labou uses a banking analogy to illustrate data integrity concerns: in hypothetical online banking, deposits or withdrawals being redirected or split would indicate fraudulent activity. He applies this concept to voting data, arguing that the voting system data aligns with the Secretary of State data used to certify results, yet exhibits patterns akin to transfers and reallocation not authorized by voters. - He states that the data are publicly available but require advanced programming to extract, parse, and join datasets. Their independent team has made all analysis, programs, and data public to allow replication and has produced videos to translate the analysis for broader understanding. - A key claim is that receiving over 90% in a precinct is a marker for fraud; in Fulton County, more than 150 precincts voted 90% or more for Biden, and in the statewide race (decided by less than 13,000 votes), these 150 Fulton precincts accounted for 152,000 Biden votes, described as a clear indicator of suspicious or fraudulent activity. - Labou and team present a series of visuals and explanations indicating explicit vote count switching, e.g., in Dodge County, where Trump’s votes appear to be subtracted while Biden’s counts increase in tandem with county updates, leading to a shift in totals that would not appear in state totals due to timing of updates. - They reference adjudication as the review of ballots flagged during scanning, noting that only ballots with a contest causing questions about how the computer reads them are adjudicated. - In DeKalb County, they assert it is statistically impossible for nine out of ten voters to vote for Biden in 94 precincts. - They describe a data flow in Fulton County: poll pad check-in, ballot image saved on the machine, SD cards transported to drop-off locations, escorted to a warehouse, run through Democracy Suite, exported to a Dominion server, and inserted into a SQL Server database before transmission to the Secretary of State and data aggregators. - A critical point is the vulnerability within the county update data-entry process: the square box detailing data-entry options in the election software allows updating vote batches, projecting batches, and generating new or temporary batches that can be injected directly into the tally; these options can be validated and published, enabling potential manipulation before server upload. - They pose questions about validation: whether two observers from both parties were present during SD card transmissions and drop-off transmissions, and whether there is a public log of exchanges at drop-off points. They challenge why elected officials have not pursued these questions about voting integrity. - Labou notes the process is machine-to-machine and, by design, should not decrement sums; any decrement requires a robust explanation, and their data suggest negative drops are inconsistent with normal sequential processes. Speaker 2 clarifies the data sources (CITL election night data and Edison/New York Times data) and asserts that the process from poll pads to secretary of state is machine-driven, with no human entry of totals, thereby removing human entry error as an explanation for observed negative changes. Speaker 4 adds emphasis on the validation and potential vulnerabilities in the software options used for election administration, underscoring the need for transparency and inquiry into the electoral process.

Clark County Technical employees independently found votes appearing and disappearing at night. They were only allowed a visual inspection of a USB drive, not a forensic examination.

Dominion can remotely connect to election systems without detection. This has occurred in instances such as the Denver, Colorado server, which was requested to grant access to Belgrade. It is unclear why Belgrade, possibly Belgrade, Montana, would need to connect to a Colorado file transfer server for an election system. There were also background activities concerning the database and its configuration that lack an engineering change order.

In Fulton County, Georgia, a warehouse containing over 140,000 absentee ballots was burglarized while deputies guarding the facility were absent. The motive behind the break-in remains unknown, but the building holds evidence related to voter fraud allegations in the 2020 election. Fulton County officials have refused to allow public access to the ballots, despite a lawsuit filed for transparency. Evidence suggests that at least 36 batches of mail-in ballots were double-counted, totaling over 4,000 votes. The Atlanta Journal Constitution also found hundreds of improperly duplicated ballots. Surveillance footage shows ballots being scanned multiple times, raising questions about the accuracy of the election results. The lack of transparency and potential fraud undermine trust in the democratic process.

In May, an alarm went off at a warehouse in Fulton County, Georgia, where evidence related to the 2020 election was stored. Deputies guarding the warehouse had left their posts, and when they returned, they found the 100-pound steel door open. Fulton County officials have refused to let the public see the ballots stored in the warehouse, but a lawsuit revealed that at least 36 boxes of mail-in ballots were double-counted, totaling over 4,000 votes. The Atlanta Journal Constitution also found hundreds of improperly duplicated ballots. Surveillance footage showed ballots being scanned multiple times, and audit tally sheets were falsified. These irregularities raise questions about the integrity of the election and the need for transparency.

Speaker 0 asserts that there was direct access to the Antrim County election management system (EMS). They claim that on November 5, an anonymous user logged on to the EMS remotely with escalated privileges and made changes to the database while attempting to retabulate the election. This, they say, constitutes a significant development, proving that the machines were remotely accessed and that access was by an anonymous user with elevated system privileges. Speaker 0 also discusses ballots, referring to black boxes on the side of the ballot, noting that there are 59 such black boxes. They state that forensic images show that in Antrim County, blocks 15, 18, 28, 41, and 44 were intentionally modified. The modification involved altering the height, width, and shape of those blocks with the intention of generating errors. They describe the consequence of such modifications: by modding these specific blocks, they were able to cause rejections for Republican ballots. Specifically, they claim that if a ballot voted for Donald Trump and was fed into the machine, that ballot was rejected at a rate 20% higher than for Joe Biden ballots.

In May, an alarm went off at a warehouse in Fulton County, Georgia, where evidence related to the 2020 election was stored. Deputies guarding the warehouse had left their posts, and when they returned, they found the 100-pound steel door open. Fulton County officials have refused to let the public see the ballots stored in the warehouse, but a lawsuit revealed that at least 36 boxes of mail-in ballots were double-counted, totaling over 4,000 votes. The Atlanta Journal Constitution also found hundreds of improperly duplicated ballots. Surveillance footage showed ballots being scanned multiple times, and audit tally sheets were falsified. Additionally, an expert found that nearly 35,000 voters in Georgia illegally voted in their old county. The lack of transparency and potential voter fraud undermines trust in the election process.

There was meaningful voter fraud in Fulton County, Georgia during the November 2020 election. At least 36 mail-in ballots were double counted, totaling over 4,000 votes. The Atlanta Journal Constitution also found that hundreds of ballots were improperly duplicated. Surveillance footage obtained by Voter GA showed ballots being scanned multiple times. Fulton County failed to provide over 100,000 audit tally sheets, and when they were finally turned over, falsified totals were discovered. A whistleblower noticed that the mail-in ballots had no creases and were filled out by a printer. Additionally, an analysis found that nearly 35,000 voters in Georgia illegally voted in their old county. These irregularities raise serious concerns about the integrity of the election.

The Maricopa County elections team allegedly admitted they lack admin access to their voting machines, raising questions about Dominion's control. It is uncertain if ceding this access to Dominion is legal, as there may be no specific statute addressing it. However, it is implied that counties should have full access to their election systems. Dominion's admin access potentially allows them to delete or alter logs, which is a concern. The senate subpoenaed related items, seeking further clarification.

In May, an alarm went off in a warehouse in Fulton County, Georgia, where evidence related to voter fraud in the 2020 election was stored. Deputies guarding the warehouse had left their posts, and when they returned, they found the door open. It was later discovered that at least 36 batches of mail-in ballots were double counted, totaling over 4,000 votes. The Atlanta Journal Constitution also found that hundreds of ballots were improperly duplicated. Surveillance footage showed ballots being scanned multiple times, but the county claims these were isolated incidents. Audit tally sheets were falsified, and photographs showed unfolded ballots filled out by a printer. Additionally, thousands of voters who had moved out of their county still voted illegally. The lack of transparency and irregularities undermine trust in the election system.

In Fulton County, Georgia, a warehouse containing over 140,000 absentee ballots was broken into while deputies guarding the warehouse were absent. The motive behind the break-in remains unknown, but there are suspicions that it may be related to voter fraud allegations in the 2020 election. Fulton County officials have refused to allow public access to the ballots, but evidence suggests that at least 36 batches of mail-in ballots were double-counted, totaling over 4,000 votes. The Atlanta Journal Constitution also independently found hundreds of improperly duplicated ballots. Surveillance footage shows ballots being scanned multiple times, raising questions about the accuracy of the election results. The lack of transparency and potential fraud undermines trust in the democratic process.

The Windows security logs were purged right before two audits were scheduled to begin. This makes it difficult to determine who had access to the RTR admin account, which is shared among all accounts. It is unclear why someone would delete all the records and files from the Dominion software, which is used for tallying and reporting election results, the day before an audit started.

Arcoa County elections officials revealed they lack administrative access to their voting machines, which raises concerns about Dominion having complete control. The absence of passwords for administrative functions means Dominion could potentially alter or delete logs, prompting worries about election integrity. There's uncertainty regarding the legality of this arrangement, as no specific state statute addresses it, yet counties are expected to have full access to their systems. The Senate has issued subpoenas for related information, which have not yet been fulfilled, indicating a growing concern over the situation.

A senior law enforcement officer witnessed unauthorized individuals inserting USBs into voting machines multiple times. Despite demands for forensic evidence collection, no action was taken. Chain of custody logs and records in Delaware County are missing, leaving 100,000-120,000 ballots in question with no remedy available. The speaker believes certifying the vote would be unconscionable. Translation: A senior law enforcement officer saw unauthorized people inserting USBs into voting machines multiple times. Despite requests for forensic evidence collection, no action was taken. Chain of custody logs and records in Delaware County are missing, leaving 100,000-120,000 ballots in question with no solution available. The speaker believes certifying the vote would be unethical.

Voting illegally happens frequently, despite penalties. In California, registering to vote online doesn't require ID. The DMV is registering people to vote, even illegal immigrants, with immunity from prosecution. Safeguards against voter fraud are lacking.

Our technology teams discovered a concerning issue with connected devices at a polling location. Despite the devices not supposed to have Wi-Fi, they were found to be communicating in real time, both receiving and sending data. This should never happen, and we have documented the incident. We cannot disclose the location, but we have confirmed it in multiple places. There are three types of machines involved: a scanner, a ballot marking device, and a polling pad. The communication is happening through the polling pad, which is used for checking everything. This access could potentially allow someone to manipulate and modify the data being exchanged in the system.

In May, a burglary attempt occurred at a warehouse in Fulton County, Georgia, where evidence related to voter fraud in the 2020 election was stored. The warehouse was under surveillance, but the deputies guarding it left their posts at the perfect moment. The county officials have refused to let the public see the ballots, but a lawsuit has been filed for transparency. Evidence suggests that at least 36 boxes of mail-in ballots were double-counted, potentially affecting the election outcome. Surveillance footage shows ballots being scanned multiple times, and audit tally sheets were falsified. Other irregularities, such as ineligible voters casting ballots, have also been found. It is crucial to address these concerns to restore trust in the democratic process.

There was meaningful voter fraud in Fulton County, Georgia during the 2020 election. At least 36 batches of mail-in ballots were double counted, totaling over 4,000 votes. The Atlanta Journal Constitution independently reviewed digital ballot images and found hundreds of improperly duplicated ballots. Surveillance footage obtained by Voter GA showed ballots being scanned multiple times. Fulton County failed to provide over 100,000 audit tally sheets, and when they were finally turned over, falsified sheets were found. A whistleblower noticed that the mail-in ballots had no creases and were filled out by a printer. An elections expert found that nearly 35,000 voters illegally voted in their old county. It is important to find out the truth and ensure the integrity of our elections.

Up to 13 states' Board of Elections voter registration roles are coded with secret algorithms that allow for hidden, unreal votes. This coding system is like a national security coding system. In Ohio, there is a mathematical formula embedded within the state board of election voter role that permits someone within the board of election to vote as many mail-in votes as they want to rig and steal an election without it being known. The speaker is in Ohio demanding a proof of concept.

The speaker asserts that there was direct access to the Antrim County election management system (EMS). According to the forensic images, on November 5 an anonymous user logged on to the EMS remotely with escalated privileges and made changes to the database while attempting to retabulate the election. This is presented as a major development indicating remote access to the machines, and specifically remote access by an anonymous user with elevated privileges. Additionally, the speaker describes intentional modifications to ballot components. Ballots have black boxes along the side, with boxes 59 in total. The forensic images allegedly show that blocks 15, 18, 28, 41, and 44 were intentionally modified, altering their height and width to generate errors. The claimed consequence of these modifications is that errors were produced which led to ballot rejections. Specifically, ballots in which a voter chose Donald Trump and then fed the ballot into the machine were rejected at a rate 20% higher than ballots for Joe Biden.