TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: I'm a never Trump guy. I never liked him. Just kidding. do you believe Donald Trump who always tells the truth? Speaker 1: I cannot stand Trump because I think he's a fraud. Well, think he's a total fraud that is exploiting these people who is a total fraud. Speaker 2: Like you said, I I agree with you on Trump because I don't think that he's the person I I I don't think he actually cares about folks. Speaker 0: Definitely there is definitely an element of Donald Trump support that has its basis in racism or xenophobia. I think there's a chance if Trump has a really good chance of winning that I might have to hold my nose and and vote for Hillary Clinton. I’m gonna vote third party because I can't stomach Trump. I think that he's noxious and is leading the white working class to a very dark place.

The speaker questions why voting for the Democratic party would make Black men "no longer ridiculous or crazy." They cite the party's stance on gender, boys in girls' sports, and perceived pandering attempts. The speaker accuses the Democratic party of destroying Black communities for 60 years and opening borders to replace Black votes. They contrast this with the Republican party's history of opposing Black suffrage and supporting Jim Crow and slavery. The speaker also criticizes the current Vice President's track record and perceived inabilities, questioning why they should vote based on skin color rather than policy impact.

The speaker directly addresses Kamala Harris, expressing anger at Harris for contacting them. The speaker asserts they are not Harris's friend, referencing their debate performance against Trump. They demand to know if Harris supports their campaign. The speaker declares they will never support Harris's "scam pain" and references Willie Brown, telling Harris not to contact them again. They then call Harris "Skamala Come."

I used to be a Democrat, but after meeting this man, I won't vote for a Democrat again.

The speaker stands by a statement made, refusing to elaborate further. They defend the senator's remarks, emphasizing her good intentions and dismissing any ill will. The speaker questions the lack of outrage over abortion of African American children, highlighting their efforts towards race relations in the state. They express confusion over the silence on this issue.

To the democrats in the senate and others considering supporting this proposal, I urge you to think twice. Supporting it means surrendering to right wing racism and even enabling it.

I don't want anyone telling me or my grandchildren to vote against something ungodly. We have so many things to vote for in this beautiful country. I don't need to talk about the filth, it speaks for itself. I thank the two most powerful people in American history, the black individuals.

If you want to defend things like Sig Hales and Nazi salutes, that's your choice. But I'm against all of that. I'm not with the Nazis.

The speaker denies supporting fascists. They question who is being accused of supporting fascists and repeatedly state "No." The speaker asks for clarification regarding their identity and poses the question, "Who am I?"

I'm a never Trump guy. I never liked him. do you believe Donald Trump who always tells the truth? Just kidding. I cannot stand Trump because I think he's a fraud. Well, I think he's a total fraud that is exploiting these people who is a total fraud. Definitely there is definitely an element of Donald Trump's support that has its basis in racism or xenophobia. I think there's a chance if I feel like Trump has a really good chance of winning that I might have to hold my nose and and vote for Hillary Clinton. I think that that I I'm I'm I'm gonna vote for I'm gonna vote third party because I can't stomach Trump. I think that he's noxious and is leading the white working class to a very dark place.

The speaker criticizes the Democratic Party, accusing them of being involved in slavery, the Confederacy, and the mistreatment of black people during the Jim Crow era. They also claim that the party supports extreme actions like late-term abortions, gender transitioning of children, and using puberty blockers. The speaker believes that the Democratic Party is responsible for the chaos in communities and warns against following them. They argue that Martin Luther King Jr.'s association with the party was a mistake and that anyone in the Democratic Party who disagrees with their views should be rejected.

David Duke announced his senate candidacy, claiming the speaker's agenda as his own. Newt Gingrich stated that every Republican should repudiate David Duke. When asked if the speaker would prefer a Democrat over David Duke if necessary to defeat him, the speaker said yes, depending on who the Democrat was. The speaker emphasized the need to answer quickly, noting past criticism for not rebuking Duke fast enough. The speaker then stated "Rebuked. Rebuked. Done. Done."

Are you willing to condemn white supremacists and militia groups? I disavow David Duke. I’ve done it numerous times. I don’t want the support of white supremacists. Racism is evil, and those who commit violence in its name are criminals, including the KKK and neo-Nazis. I’ve spoken out against hatred and bigotry. I don’t like any group of hate, whether it’s white supremacy or any other form. In one voice, our nation must condemn racism and white supremacy. I am very concerned about all groups of hate, and I will take action against them. It’s disappointing that a sitting president can’t outright condemn white supremacy.

The speaker claims that someone received 14,000,000 votes but was thrown out of office. The speaker states this action is a threat to democracy. The speaker also claims that this person hates the woman who ran instead of him and cannot stand her.

I support Donald Trump and will not tolerate any disrespect towards him. Keep his name out of your mouth.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they are ruling out the possibility of calling for the slaughter of white people in the future. Speaker 1 responds by saying they don't know what will happen and it may or may not be them. Speaker 0 clarifies that it could be Speaker 1 and asks what would necessitate that. Speaker 1 doesn't know and questions why they would do that. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to pledge to never call for the slaughter of white people, but Speaker 1 refuses to make that pledge. Speaker 0 understands.

Are you willing to condemn white supremacists and militia groups? I disavow David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan. I’ve done this numerous times. I don’t want their support. Racism is evil, and those who commit violence in its name are criminals. I reject all hate groups, including neo-Nazis and white supremacists. I spoke out against hatred and bigotry. Despite claims, I have condemned these groups clearly. In one voice, our nation must condemn racism and white supremacy. I am concerned about all groups of hate, including Antifa. I will take action against hate in any form.

A sponsor requested the removal of something, but the speaker responded with strong language, expressing their refusal to be told who to vote for. They also dismiss any accusations of being a bad person for not believing them. The speaker's message is clear: they have no interest in complying with the sponsor's request.

The speaker states that the idea of law enforcement intentionally allowing individuals to cross the border illegally for the purpose of voting is preposterous. The speaker believes everyone should condemn that rhetoric.

I believe it's crucial to escape from Trump and the MAGA movement. Despite receiving criticism, I want to emphasize the significance of this moment. Trump should not be our nominee. I stand with Free, and I would rather have no nominee than allow Trump to continue destroying our party's hope.

Have you ever heard the president criticize white supremacists? I’ve repeatedly rejected David Duke and the KKK. The events in Charlottesville, where a young woman was killed resisting hate, prompted my return to this race. The president claimed there were "very fine people on both sides," ignoring the neo-Nazis and white nationalists. You wouldn’t even condemn David Duke. The party is struggling with figures like him joining. They don’t want to take responsibility for the hate associated with their party. I’ve disavowed these groups multiple times. When white supremacists say to vote for me, I don’t want their support, and I can’t control what they say. I don’t want their votes.

I cannot support an insurrectionist. I would love to see Democrats and independents take a stand against Donald Trump.

Speaker 0: The speech opens with a critique of denouncing and a reference to the red guard/ c ultural revolution, questioning why nobody denounces others the way that era was denounced. The speaker recalls that the entire point of Charlie Kirk’s public life was to have actual debate, and asserts that Charlie “died for it.” The last several months of Charlie’s life were devoted, in part, to arguing about this event and this speech, which he asked the speaker to deliver earlier this year, this summer. The speaker notes that Charlie faced immense pressure from people who fund Turning Point who wanted him to remove the speaker from the roster. This has all become public, and the speaker describes the situation as sad, stating that Charlie stood firm in his often stated and deeply held belief that people should be able to debate. The speaker emphasizes that if someone has something valid to say and is telling the truth, they ought to be able to explain it calmly and in detail to people who don’t agree with them, and that they shouldn’t immediately resort to “shut up racist.” The speaker adds that “shut up racist” is the number one reason they voted for Donald Trump. They declare that if they were a racist or a bigot, they would simply say so, noting that it’s America and one is allowed to be whatever kind of person they want. They insist they are not a racist and have always opposed-bigoted views, but criticize the style of debate that prevents the other side from talking or being heard by immediately going to motive, asking why the question is asked, and stating they detect “a certain evil in your soul” in the question. They say that listening to such a question implicates the listeners too, and that someday they may be asked to denounce that person; they assert that friendship is not a reason to defend someone and that love is no defense. The speaker reflects that they thought that phase had ended and that they are not going to engage in those rules. They affirm that if someone doesn’t like what they think, that’s fine as long as they get to express it. That remains their view.

The speaker expresses strong disapproval, stating someone is an idiot and not their president. They declare they will never refer to that person as the President of the United States.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about their statement regarding the potential future call for the slaughter of white people. Speaker 1 initially states that they are not ruling out the possibility, but later clarifies that they cannot guarantee it. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to make a pledge to never call for such an act, but Speaker 1 refuses. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 acknowledging Speaker 1's response.