reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Each state should have its own rules. Many young women, including one recently murdered, were victims of rape by family members. It's not just immigrants causing harm. Arrest those who cross state lines. Thank you. Translation: Different rules for each state. Many young women, including one who was recently murdered, are victims of rape by family members. It's not just immigrants causing harm. Arrest those who cross state lines. Thank you.

This video shows a Ukrainian refugee being stabbed on a light-rail train, a scene the speaker says has kept him awake at night. He notes the attacker stood up and used maximum force, and that "This girl didn't do anything. She got on the bus, sat down, and played on her phone." The speaker argues this danger is not isolated, saying, "I've only just scratched the surface here" after listing multiple incidents. He laments a "trust has been broken" society and a "the agreed upon social order has collapsed", blaming liberal judges and noting liberals protest the guy trying to help. Speaker 1: "We cannot incarcerate our way out of violence... It is racist. It is immoral. It is unholy." He warns, "this could be you" if things don't change.

In Germany, insulting someone in public or online is a crime, with online insults potentially incurring higher fines due to their permanence. Even reposting untrue statements can be considered a crime. Authorities are actively curbing online hate speech, as demonstrated by coordinated raids targeting individuals posting racist content. Despite growing concerns over migration and related issues, there's a lack of political will to address these problems effectively. The focus seems to be on prosecuting opinion crimes rather than deporting criminals. My party, the AFD, faces persecution despite being a major opposition force. We're smeared as Nazis and right-wing extremists, but this isn't true. Free speech is eroding, with new laws targeting online expression. People risk punishment for criticizing mass migration. Even if the AFD performs well in elections, other parties may refuse to cooperate, maintaining a firewall against us. It is time to vote to make Germany great again.

The speaker contrasts European political responses to immigration and crime with American policies, arguing that European left-wing politicians ignore urgent problems. They claim: - In Spain, “they just legalized residents of half a million illegal aliens.” - In France, “they throw grenades into hair salons in a broad daylight.” - In Germany, “not a single day goes by without someone being murdered with a knife.” - In Sweden, “you have bomb attack every other day.” The speaker asserts that these are real problems for the European left-wing politicians, yet contends that those politicians do not care. The immediate target is a European debate about the rule of law in the United States and deportation policies: the speaker says, “You are seriously discussing here the rule of law in United States and criticizing American government for deporting illegal aliens, for deporting criminals out of their territory in the same time when Western European cities are gradually turning into a war zone.” A call is made to apply the same approach in Europe: “We should do exactly the same. We should deport them from Europe and not legalize their stay.” The speaker urges listening to them and not to “what you are proposing to all of us,” asserting that “Everybody can see, no, you are enemies of Europe. You hate Europe.” The rhetoric culminates in a warning: “You hate our nations, and you want to destroy the future for our children. We should stop you. We should defeat you politically if we want to survive. Otherwise, it will be the end of Europe.”

A 28-year-old Afghan migrant allegedly stabbed and killed a two-year-old child and a 41-year-old man in Aschaffenburg, Germany. The speaker expresses frustration, stating that these incidents are recurring. They claim that migrants "take take take from us" and hate the native population to the point of violence. The speaker says that politicians promise change and deportations, but fail to deliver due to international human rights treaties. The speaker questions the country's sovereignty and democratic options to demand change. They ask if more videos and "thoughts and prayers" are the only recourse.

What's your name? Where are you from? I was born in Thailand. Have you ever been deported from the U.S.? No, I've never been deported. What have you been charged with? I'm not a citizen; my mother is. I've seen Dr. Phil on TV. This is an example of sanctuary cities, where illegal immigrants, like those involved in sex crimes against children, are walking the streets instead of being detained by federal agents. You've been charged with sex crimes? Not really. So, you've never been deported? Nope. We need to process and lock them up.

Henry, as a Holocaust survivor from Germany, it is troubling to see Arabs in Berlin openly celebrating attacks on Israel and sharing sweets. Allowing in people with different beliefs creates internal pressure groups within countries.

Randomly kidnapping people and throwing them out of the country violates their civil and constitutional rights. It would be insane if another country started randomly throwing people out of our country. These people need to be removed from here.

The speaker expresses frustration with the laws and culture of the country, claiming that they do not apply to them because of their different religion, mentality, and culture. They criticize the lack of action from the police and politicians, stating that they can do whatever they want without consequences. The speaker also mentions their disregard for the country's laws, culture, and mentality, and their intention to stay in the country regardless of any attempts to send them back. They mention their experiences in other countries and assert that now it is Germany's turn to deal with them.

The speaker states that because they are in a sanctuary city, they do not report illegal immigrants. They claim to have released a double homicide suspect because of this policy. The speaker says someone came to pick up $320,000 from their grandparents and is working their way through it. The speaker is asked to take seriously that someone is repeating an offense while being illegal. The person is reportedly in Chinatown, New York.

In the exchange, Speaker 0 recounts feedback from “real Chicagoans,” describing them as mostly Black and Brown, and claims they tell him that the other person does not seem to know the difference between illegal aliens and real Chicago citizens. He asserts that these individuals feel the other person is siding with illegal aliens over their communities. He then pivots to a direct line of questioning. The real question, as Speaker 0 presents it, concerns a violent incident: “An illegal alien from Nicaragua grabbed a woman on the North Side, bashed her head into the sidewalk, knocked her unconscious, and raped her.” He presses for a direct response about what would have happened “if that had been your wife, Stacy.” He stages the hypothetical to elicit a clear stance from Speaker 1 on how to respond to such a crime and its immigration context. Speaker 1, however, interrupts to steer the conversation away from the loaded scenario. He repeatedly signals a move on, indicating a preference not to engage with the hypothetical or to answer the pointed ethical dilemma on the spot. The back-and-forth centers on the tactic of addressing the question versus avoiding it, with Speaker 0 insisting on a straightforward answer “as a man, not as mayor, but as a man.” The exchange escalates as Speaker 0 urges Speaker 1 to provide a simple yes or no and to address the issue directly, effectively challenging Speaker 1 to commit to a position regarding ICE and deportation in light of the described crime. Speaker 1 responds by again stating to move on, resisting the direct yes/no framework. Throughout, Speaker 0 persists in pressing for a candid, personal response to the hypothetical crime and its immigration implications, while Speaker 1 maintains a boundary about continuing the discussion in that moment. Ultimately, Speaker 1 declines to answer the specific deportation question in the moment, and Speaker 0 reaffirms the demand for a direct personal answer. The segment ends with Speaker 1 thanking the audience and moving on, leaving the explicit yes-or-no question unresolved in this exchange.

Judge Brian Murphy blocked the Trump administration's deportation of eight illegal immigrants convicted of murder, pedophilia, and sexual abuse, arguing they deserve due process. The immigrants are currently in Djibouti awaiting adjudication. One speaker argues that these individuals did not want due process when entering the country illegally, so they shouldn't get it upon deportation. They should be deported immediately, especially murderers, pedophiles, and rapists, which is what Donald Trump is doing. The speaker believes Judge Murphy cannot override Trump's agenda to keep America safe. Trump should deport these criminals quickly to protect women and children. Some countries release violent criminals into the U.S., which is a national security problem. The U.S. has the right to stand up for its freedoms, liberty, and national security.

"Did you know the judge that released this guy didn't even go to law school? Yeah. Not even a lawyer." "These magistrate judges that are making a decision to release these people without bail? Yeah. They're they're not even lawyers." "They didn't go to law school. They didn't pass the bar." "They just got appointed to be judges." "No training required." "They don't even have to be lawyers, but they can be judges." "They don't have to go to law school. They don't have to pass the bar." "How the fuck is this a thing? How the fuck do we have judges who didn't even study the law?" "But to be the judge, to be the person overseeing these lawyers, to be the ultimate arbiter of the law, you don't have to go to law school. You don't have to pass the bar." "How is this a fucking thing?"

The German parliament is full of left-green traitors and egomaniacs who will virtue signal us to hell to push their ideology. How many more times must we endure Aschaffenburg, Magdeburg, Mannheim, and Zolling? How many more rapes, stabbings, and murders, even of children, must we expect? This could happen to your family; you could be next.

There are people pretending to request asylum in our country, but instead they are smoking weed and doing drugs without any regard for our laws. This is happening because the Democrats invited them in and our cities are being overrun. We have taken God and the rule of law out of our country, resulting in crime, drugs, an invasion on our southern border, and the destruction of America. This is all by design from the left who hate our country. It's up to American citizens to take action and stop it.

A woman says her daughter was stalked at Walmart and chased by immigrants with a machete on the way to work. After the incident, the police did not return her call to file a report. Speaker 1 responds that if someone's first act upon entering the country is breaking the law, they are more likely to break the law again. He states that 350,000 mothers are in prison in the U.S., but they are not forced to take their children with them. He says shoplifting has doubled and auto thefts are up over 50% in the last two years. He believes many crimes go unreported. He concludes that the U.S. needs to restore the culture of the rule of law from top to bottom, because criminals see top law enforcement agencies not following the law.

A speaker argues that allowing young men from countries where women aren’t treated as equal to live in four-star hotels and work illegally leads to attitudes toward women that are completely different and have appalling social effects. A second speaker recounts a case in Warwickshire, England where a 15-year-old girl was raped by two asylum-seeking Afghan men. The attackers’ lawyer blamed the assault on cultural differences, saying his client was not used to a society where women are free and deemed equal to men. The speaker says this defense illustrates why those young men shouldn’t have been in that country in the first place, and suggests that a similar mindset should be applied in the United States to prevent such things from happening here. The speaker asserts that if one sees someone getting hit by a car, it should remind us not to walk into the road, implying we should act to prevent harm before it occurs. The argument continues that action is needed now, not once it becomes widespread in the United States. This is offered as a justification for borders and for ICE, and a warning against those who advocate getting rid of ICE or removing borders. The position is that borders and immigration enforcement are necessary to keep the country sustainable economically, arguing against importing “the whole world.” The speaker contends that immigration should be controlled to prevent overwhelming the systems, and that people who do not share the country’s cultural values should be kept out or removed and sent to another country. The speaker then promotes a free email newsletter, noting it is sent every morning around 7 AM Central and occasionally covers specific topics in more depth. The link is stated to be in the speaker’s profile; readers are invited to subscribe. In closing, the speaker signs off, indicating they will see the audience in the next video.

Speaker 0 opened by saying that over the last week he has interacted with over 300,000 plus real Chicagoans who say it is hate speech to evoke the Civil War or the Confederacy, to say that law enforcement is a sickness, while the other person has over 150 sworn CPD officers on his detail. He asked what the other person would say to those people and whether he would ask his 150 sworn officers to stand down if he and his wife Stacy are ever attacked, shot at, or rammed with a protester’s vehicle. Speaker 1 responded with sarcasm about the large number, joking that the interactions had “gone down to 300,000,” and claimed he had checked the other person’s comments. He asserted that the addiction on jails and incarceration and the addiction of militarism is evil, referencing Doctor King, and said it is incumbent to ensure that “the real Chicagoans” or the real people of America receive attention, suggesting we should spend billions of dollars overseas on the people in Chicago instead. Speaker 0 pushed back, saying that the real Chicagoans he talks to, mostly Black and Brown, feel that the other person does not distinguish between illegal aliens and real Chicago citizens, and that he is siding with illegal aliens over communities. He asserted that a recent incident involved “an illegal alien from Nicaragua” who grabbed a woman on the North Side, bashed her head into the sidewalk, knocked her unconscious, and raped her. He asked whether, if that had been the other person’s wife, Stacy, he would want ICE to deport that illegal alien, and asked for a yes or no answer. Speaker 1 pressed to get a direct answer, asking for a response “as a man, not as mayor,” and repeated the question about whether ICE should deport the rapist. Speaker 0 reiterated his question and stated that the answer for real Chicagoans is the deportation of the rapist, and that was the “answer for real Chicagoans.” Speaker 1 then apologized for being late, blaming traffic, and the other person quipped about the traffic, noting, “You’re not blaming me for the traffic, are you?” and said he had been watching.

A man has been sentenced to 19 years in prison for a brutal sexual assault on a woman who mistook his car for a taxi. The perpetrator, who had a previous conviction for a similar crime in Spain, should have still been serving his sentence and should not have been allowed into the country. The judge also ordered him to undergo 10 years of post-release supervision. The speaker expresses frustration with the government's immigration policies and believes that the criminal should be sent back to Romania upon release. The victim is seen as paying the biggest price due to the government's negligence. The speaker emphasizes the need to close the borders and prioritize the safety of the country's citizens.

The USA and Canada issued a travel warning for Germany due to a rise in crime since 2015 when asylum seekers were allowed in. Crime rates, especially for rape and murder, have increased by 300 percent. The absence of guns doesn't deter violence, as knives are used. A story is shared about a friend who welcomed asylum seekers but changed her mind after her daughter was raped. Many cases go unreported, leaving the true number of incidents unknown.

Speaker 0 claims real Chicagoans, mostly black and brown, say you don’t distinguish between illegal aliens and real Chicago citizens and that you side with the illegal aliens over them in their communities. The real question: I don’t know how to make it any more direct. An illegal alien from Nicaragua grabbed a woman on the North Side Was it question? Bashed her head into the sidewalk, knocked her unconscious, and raped her. If that had been your wife, Stacy Okay. We're not gonna answer it. Would you want ICE to deport her? Let's move on. Answer the question as a man, not as mayor. Would you call Thanks. My man. To the fourth back rapist. Mayor. That's the answer for real Chicago. Mayor, sorry for being late. The traffic's bad. Maybe the beds could help. You're not blaming me for the traffic, are you? It there.

I'm outraged by the situation in Dublin. The Irish government sent army vehicles to attack its own people, labeling them far-right hooligans. They were protesting an Algerian migrant who stabbed women and children. If Ireland didn't have open borders, this wouldn't have happened. The government sold out its people, and now no one is safe.

The speaker has seen videos of white, blonde, blue-eyed women in Europe saying they feel unsafe due to immigrants. The speaker mentions proposed classes for immigrants on how not to rape women, and left-wing people in France suggesting women "just say no." The speaker questions why these immigrants are being allowed into the country, claiming they are raping women and children. They believe these immigrants do not benefit or enrich the culture, arguing that those who do would immigrate legally and likely have money.

The speaker asserts the primary concern is everyone's welfare and safety, but believes the individuals in question are illegal migrants, not refugees. The speaker claims it's telling that no one specifies what these people are fleeing from, what wars, countries, or persecution they are escaping. Because of this lack of information, the speaker believes they are by definition illegal immigrants and technically criminals. The speaker states they shouldn't be housed in five-star hotels but in cells. The speaker believes they should not be allowed to leave until they pay for their ticket back. The speaker's question is not where they will be moved to in a year, but how they will be removed from the country.

It's common sense that we have many migrants here illegally who have committed crimes. It's hard to understand why anyone would defend allowing them to stay in the country. If someone is here illegally and engages in criminal activity, they should be removed. This issue was significant in the recent election. In the Senate, with 47 members, if we can't secure at least 7 votes on this matter, it reflects why we lost. This is one of the reasons for our defeat. Brett, consider that perspective; it's a crucial point being made.