TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 1, who identifies as Russia, says: We did not break in. We did not broke shit. They were Antifa. We told the DC police, there's Antifa. Go get them. They did not move. They use on a pepper spray, mace, rubber palette. They treat us like we're animals. From beginning, when we start going down the steps up way before we enter the shit building. And then they start with the pack. They hit two woman in the head. There's three kids, probably 17, 18. They were bleeding in the head. There's two elderly people. One of them in a cave, got maced. So we did not break shit. The woman the police shot her, and then they throw her by the stairs. We did not break shit. We told DC police, those are Antifa. Go get them. We wear mega hat. We don't have much shoes. We don't look like we're in a crack. Those antifa, you tell them, they're in a fucking crack. Filthy disgusting. DC did not do nothing. They just stand up. They just stand up. Speaker 0 asks: So it wasn't it wasn't the MAGA people that that get that... Speaker 1, Russia, responds: It wasn't MAGA inside the city, whatever my brain froze. Capitol all day. The doors are open. There's Antifa has a black chair, folding chair. The cops seen him. Whether it's us or Antifa, you see somebody with a metal chair fold it. That means it's a fucking weapon. You will stop him. We go and tell them. There's probably people were taking video of me telling the police. Go get Antifa. We catch two. And the woman that there was a woman talking to them, and I told her, don't bother the police. Leave the police alone. They need to choose a side. If they lost us, they have no support. And then they start with pushing back back and hitting people. So it's not us. It's not us. Speaker 0 clarifies: Antifa It was... Speaker 1: The DC police saw them with a fucking black metal folding chair. They saw them. We pointed at them. They saw the brat boy following Antifa guy, and they did not do shit. One of Antifa could have a fucking knife to get one of us inside. No one did shit. Don't tell us we broke in. We did not break a glass. So you got in, but it wasn't you guys. The doors are open. The door. And guess what? It's a federal building. The police has no power on us. It's a federal building. It's our building. Speaker 0: Right. Okay. So it wasn't it wasn't the MAGA people that broke in. Speaker 1: Nope. We told DC police, those fucking antifa go get them. Okay. Speaker 0 asks: What's your name? Speaker 1: Russia. Speaker 0: Russia? Where are you from? Speaker 1 explains: I can't. It's a I'm under the state No. No. No. I came from Lebanon. I run from Lebanon because of this shit. And I'm not gonna raise my kids in that shit. Speaker 0 thanks Asha and says: Thank you. You need to do a testimonial of what happened. Put it on Twitter. Put it on every news channel because What? Speaker 1 completes: Fist this off. Black Lives Matter burned the country. Burned the city. They were ordered the police to back back, standby. They were not allowed to use tear gas. They were not allowed to use maze. They were not allowed to use rubber bullets. On us, they're. When they went in the White House and burned the church, all the fucking congress went and told Trump, you let your people pepper spray them. Meanwhile, BLM came there with a fucking weapons. Screw the police. They lost our support. Yes. Amen. They begin they're all gonna follow order. When we stand up in the front of Black Lives Matter to protect a cop I'm a woman and I did it numerous time in New Jersey. I didn't ever say we go in a rally and sadness know. But now, if I see a cop get shot, I would kill myself before I save him and mark my words on it. Speaker 0 closes: Thank you, Asha. Good to see you.

Speaker 1 claims that Speaker 0's statements are lies. Speaker 1 founded the Asylum Seeker Network of Support to fight US policy, which evolved into creating programs. Speaker 2 says Speaker 0 is there to take from them, but they are standing as a community. Speaker 0 asks if they are taking pictures of children near trans flags, condoms, and sex-related items, which they deem inappropriate for a public park. Speaker 0 tells Speaker 2 to stop touching them. Speaker 1 says Speaker 0 is not welcome in their space, but Speaker 0 says it is a public park. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of assault. Speaker 1 denies being violent and suggests Speaker 0 give them personal space. Speaker 0 accuses them of gaslighting and asks why they threw coffee at them, stating they are just there to cover the event.

I dressed up to look like I work for Kamala's campaign and I'm trying to find a place for some immigrants who just crossed the border. They need somewhere to stay, even if it's just on the floor. I asked if they could sleep on the lawn, but the response was hesitant because of kids living there. I mentioned that they’re supportive of the border situation, and we’re just looking for a safe place for them. There was some confusion about how to pronounce Kamala's name, and I pointed out that it seemed like they were leaning towards voting for Trump instead. The conversation became tense, and it was clear there was a disagreement about the situation.

The speaker questions why liberals should be trusted to determine the future of the country. The speaker claims that many liberals have depression, anxiety, and personality disorders, and some are uncertain about their gender. The speaker asserts that most liberals have never worked or were unsuccessful in their jobs. They allegedly spend most of their money on food and hair dye and do not care about their health, glamorizing obesity. The speaker describes protesters as fitting this description and questions why they should be seen as capable of making better choices for the country.

"You just announced the official civil rights investigation into the Portland Police Bureau." "She called me this morning about this." "Portland Police Department has absolutely failed to protect the people of Portland going back well over a decade." "A federal consent decree was actually issued against Portland's police department in 2012." "They tried to delay it up by a couple of years, but it went into effect eleven years ago in 2014." "Since that time, as we've all seen on the television, there have been numerous riots with Antifa over the last five years." "So what we're doing today is actually under the purview of an existing federal consent decree over bad police practices." "Why does it seem like the Portland police are actually working for antifa as opposed to the people of Portland?"

Come to Skid Row and see the state of the streets; they are dirty and neglected. A woman shares her struggles with her children being taken while she lives in a tent, a common issue here. There's discussion about the effectiveness of housing initiatives and the definition of what constitutes housing. Concerns are raised about the lack of accountability in homelessness funding and the outcomes of programs like Insight Safe, where many have not transitioned to permanent housing. The conversation emphasizes the need for compassion and effective solutions, as past efforts have not yielded the desired results. The group expresses a desire for transparency and better definitions of housing solutions moving forward.

I work 60 to 80 hours a week and have to live next to an RV with trash and a vehicle with drug paraphernalia. I'm tired of Ted Wheeler saying he understands our pain; we want action. I'm a disabled veteran who fought and bled for this country. I don't have much, but I worked hard for it. It's about them imposing their will on us. I take care of my family and don't bother anybody, but I shouldn't have to worry every day. I'm worried the child in the RV might blow up because of propane tanks and open electrical wires, but the government doesn't seem to care. They'll respond when it blows up and catches fire.

An individual asks another to step outside, threatening to call the police. The other person welcomes the threat and suggests calling 911. One of the individuals claims they are looking at a 12-story building and accuses someone of treason. They allege the building was renovated to house illegal aliens while US citizens are sleeping in tents. They state they followed two individuals, who appeared to be from Venezuela, into the building. They claim they were cursed out and the police were called on them when they asked for some of the "free shit," referencing their own Airbnb expenses.

Speaker 0 is frustrated about receiving two tickets in one week for helping people in need. Speaker 2 joins in, expressing anger towards the feds and border patrol. Speaker 1 tries to calm the situation, warning not to damage equipment. Speaker 0 questions the treatment of his people and asserts his American identity. Speaker 1 emphasizes freedom in America. Speaker 0 urges them to go home, while Speaker 1 explains they are showing what's happening in El Paso. Speaker 0 insults someone named Perez. Speaker 1 blames illegal entry for disrespecting the country and criticizes Joe Biden's policies.

A speaker describes a "dirtbag coalition of leftist violent so called protest" as a growing problem, mentioning similarities to BLM, free Palestine, and other protest movements. Another speaker notes the lack of outrage from Democrats regarding the destruction, contrasting it with their outrage over ICE officials. Five figures—Karen Bass, Gavin Newsom, Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell, and Nancy Pelosi—are called out for allegedly attacking ICE officials instead of condemning the attacks. It is claimed this inaction from California officials amounts to "war" on federal agents. A speaker warns of a bad look if leaders don't intervene and stop the protests, especially with city leaders allegedly encouraging resistance.

- Speaker 0 explains that there is a delicate balance between First Amendment rights and allowing cars to move through; protesters are not a one-way situation, and there are corridors to move traffic. As of now, theyare not enacting measures to prevent people from being in the roadway while practicing their First Amendment right, and they are asking protesters to avoid the street if possible. This could change, but currently protesters are allowed to occupy street space because they are exercising their personal right to protest, and there are ways for people to get around them. - Speaker 1 asks about past policies, recalling that during 2020 riots and after Trump’s 2016 election there were hard-line arrests for stepping off sidewalks. Speaker 0 responds that people could not be arrested for being in the street at present, and if arrests were to occur they would make an announcement; anyone who wants to leave the street can leave without arrest. This is not considered a major roadway, and there are corridors protesters provide to move traffic. - Speaker 1 asks who is making the day-to-day decisions; Speaker 2 clarifies that the decisions are made day by day, minute by minute, by our CMIC (incident commander). Speaker 1 asks for the name; Speaker 0 does not know the person by name but confirms the CMIC is in charge on site and relays information to the chief. - Speaker 1 asks whether Bob Day is involved; Speaker 0 confirms that everyone answers to the chief (Bob Day) at the end of the day, since the chief is the head of the city. Speaker 2 confirms that the mayor is at the top of the hierarchy for decisions. - Speaker 2 and Speaker 1 discuss whether if the mayor ordered protesters not to be in the street at all, the responders would carry that out and arrest accordingly, with Speaker 0 indicating they would figure out the most equitable way to do so. - Speaker 1 recalls a prior incident in Portland involving a women’s rights free speech event and expensive permits/insurance, and asks whether Antifa has a permit or insurance; Speaker 0 responds that they wouldn’t call these people Antifa and that they have not identified themselves. - A subsequent speaker (Speaker 3) interjects with a rant; the group continues with a chaotic exchange about evaluating arrests and jaywalking, with Speaker 0 and Speaker 2 discussing arrest priorities and past enforcement patterns, including reference to "jaywalking" as a focus. - Overall, the discussion centers on current policy allowing street occupation by protesters, day-to-day decision-making by the CMIC under the mayor and chief, and the potential for changing enforcement depending on instructions from city leadership.

Protests are still happening in major U.S. cities, but Speaker 0 is not seeing the same level of reporting as in the first few weeks. Speaker 1 asserts the protests are a movement and will not stop. Speaker 1 warns that the protests will continue before and after election day in November. Speaker 1 believes protestors should not let up, and neither should "we."

The speaker describes spending in Los Angeles on homelessness, stating that last year $13,000,000,000 was used to combat homelessness in the city. They claim that this money went to “these trash nonprofits” where “a bunch of executives” earn “half a $1,000,000 a year.” The speaker asserts, “You’re working for a nonprofit dealing with homelessness. That’s my money. That’s my parents’ money.” They emphasize that hardworking people of California pay incredibly high taxes that fund this through the claimed expenditures. The speaker connects this spending to the broader political perspective by saying they are sick of it and describe their experience on the ground in California as causing them to question a lot about left-wing ideology.

Two speakers discuss protecting the area's residents, innocent people, and businesses. One speaker says they are not trying to protect the government and that civilians have done nothing wrong. They state they don't want a gas station to go up. The other speaker says they are on their side as long as they are against the cops, but shouldn't bring down local businesses. One speaker suggests business owners are out with the police and that people are destroying their own neighborhood, while the government killed someone's neighbor. The other speaker says they are not affiliated with any militia and are just out there.

Elizabeth, the story centers on Seattle’s homelessness issue, framed as a broader drug crisis visible in parks across the city. A park described as once built for the community is now portrayed as the epicenter of Seattle’s homeless and drug crisis, with drug paraphernalia everywhere and daily exposure to chaos as school kids pass by unfazed. Jonathan Cho, a reporter for Turning Point USA and a researcher for the Discovery Institute, describes wide-spread problems: “Pretty much all the drug addicts, criminals, the black market of stolen goods, it all thrives here,” and notes an individual seemingly overdosing while holding a sandwich. Cho and others say the issue is essentially a drug crisis that the city allows to persist, depicting a “totally lawless environment.” Speakers contend there’s been a failure to address root causes. The narrative claims the homelessness nonprofit sector operates as part of a “homeless industrial complex” engaged in financial grift, and that Antifa has infiltrated these networks. The claim is that the nonprofit sector works with far-left militants and violent domestic terrorists like Antifa, tying the homeless crisis to political activism and organized protest. Andrea Suarez, a lifelong Democrat and Seattle resident who started We Heart Seattle to clear trash from parks and encampments, recounts personal danger: “Oh my god. You’re so cold. Get the rocks out of here.” She says she was attacked, staff attacked, and pushed into traffic, expressing that she is not aligned with the ideology of those who oppose cleaning efforts and who confront volunteers. Mike Solon, president of the Seattle Police Officers Guild, asserts that Antifa mobs target police officers and that activists aligned with socialist ideologies fuel anti-police, pro-homeless sentiment that hinders problem-solving. He notes Antifa firebombed his office in 2020 and argues that those backing the homeless agenda are not interested in real solutions. The interviewees allege a link between the “homeless industrial complex” and Antifa, describing it as “clear as day,” with the claim that supporters within these networks enable disorder while opposing help for those in need. Toward the end, the journalists note that outreach to high-profile housing nonprofits in Seattle yielded no responses, and they observe that President Trump recently declared Antifa a domestic terror group, suggesting that more scrutiny may follow.

Speaker 1 attempts to interview Speaker 2, who claims Speaker 1 says lies. Speaker 2 says they founded the Asylum Seeker Network of Support to fight US policy, which evolved into creating programs. Speaker 2 says Speaker 1 is there to take from them, while they stand as a community. Speaker 1 asks why pictures of children are being taken, citing trans flags and condoms on a table as inappropriate for children. Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 2 of touching and stepping on them. Speaker 2 says Speaker 1 is not welcome. Speaker 1 claims they are being assaulted and asks why they were hit. Speaker 2 denies violence and asks for personal space. Speaker 1 accuses them of gaslighting and asks why coffee was thrown at them while covering the event.

Speaker 1: Mentions there are many things she wishes people knew, but mostly with the administration she wishes people knew that “we're letting in criminals daily.” Speaker 2: States the big issue for the region is migration, noting “we poured a lot of money into Central America,” amounting to “4,000,000,000 over four years,” but migrants are now coming from elsewhere, including Venezuela. Speaker 3: Asks, “So what is the end goal?” Speaker 1: Asks why aren’t they allowing children, noting “a lot of children travel to The United States, David.” Speaker 2: Explains aid goes to female presence in Mexico, training women, and mentions working with gender issues in Pakistan, aiming to recruit, retain, and advance more women in law enforcement. Asks whether US taxpayers’ money should be spent in “our country on this issue,” implying women may not care about certain aspects. Speaker 2: Asks how close Secretary Lincoln is to him, “five degrees separation,” and notes migration is a niche industry that flies under the radar; the average American doesn’t know what they do. Speaker 1: Thanks the chairman, ranking member, and members for the opportunity to testify. Speaker 2: Mentions upcoming briefings in two weeks on the FY 2025 budget request on the Hill. Speaker 0: States migration is the big issue for the Hill and asks, “Stop migration. What are we doing to stop migration?” Speaker 1: Responds that he’s not accountable for that and says, “We do stuff,” referencing the root causes strategy, which is about giving money to support and help people at the origins of migrants so they feel they can stay there instead of migrating. It’s “Central America, basically.” He says they poured a lot of money into Central America, and again mentions “4,000,000,000 over four years.” Speaker 2: Asks if it’s doing anything; response: yes, for them, but migrants are now coming from elsewhere like Venezuela, and acknowledges that outcome looks bad for the administration and for politics in general. Speaker 3: Seeks the end goal and asks again why there’s a limit on who’s allowed in. Speaker 1: Cites changes in demographics in the United States; notes that Nebraskans are traditional Americans not leftists, while Latin Americans are described as leftists, framing it as a system to try to change demographics.

Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass claim everything was peaceful, but this is contradicted by what is being observed. People are spitting on police officers, throwing concrete at them, looting stores, defacing buildings, and taking over the street. People are stopping traffic on the 101 freeway. People are waving the Mexican flag while burning and spitting on the flag of the country they insist on staying in. Karen Bass is not telling the truth and is not acting as mayor. The speaker is looking for positive suggestions from the opposition party.

Portland doesn’t feel like America; Speaker 0 says police are infiltrated by a leftist militant group, and downtown is post-apocalyptic with graffiti, vandalism, and boarded-up windows. He asserts police aren’t protecting residents and that conservatives are treated as criminals. He was assaulted and then arrested for disorderly conduct after Antifa militants allegedly attacked him, breaking his camera and throwing him into a hole; the DA later dropped the case. He and about 12 officers waited 45 minutes for charges to be clarified, then were driven to jail. Rioters attack cars and are not arrested; police allegedly defer to Antifa to control traffic. He cites a DOJ investigation, Harmeet/Harmit Dillon, Rose City Antifa, and the possibility of federal control over Portland Police to reform it; a Secret Service agent was fired for praising Charlie Kirk’s assassination. He hopes for a forensic review and warns this could spread to other cities.

Speaker 0 asserts there is a mental health crisis in the country and "the left" needs immediate help. Speaker 1 calls "Trump bigots" racist and claims they think they are superior. Speaker 0 suggests people are triggered by a gay man's message that they can leave the Democratic party. Speaker 0 states their message is that people don't have to be Democrats and that their "unhinged devotion to a radicalized party" is resulting in the negative reactions. Speaker 1 says "prove more" and expresses dislike.

The speakers are protesting for various reasons. One speaker says the protest seems pro-Hillary and pro-Kamala, and that America has been evil since before Trump. Another speaker says they are protesting for Palestine and humanity, and that America is a "God of a country." One sign says "Trumpy Pool's Russian asset," but a speaker admits this is an assumption without proof. Another speaker wearing a Ukraine hat gets angry when asked if they support the United States, calling it a stupid question. One speaker claims people from Venezuela are being wrongly accused of being gang members and deported without due process. The speaker fears this will lead to the repression of protesters. Another speaker calls someone a fascist dictator and "America's Hitler," claiming freedoms are being destroyed.