reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing her Thanksgiving break and transitions into a critical commentary on President Biden's recent pardon of his son, Hunter Biden. She expresses disbelief at the left's shock over the pardon, asserting that it was widely anticipated. Kelly accuses Biden of lying about his intentions, stating that he has a history of dishonesty and that the pardon is indicative of a larger issue involving the Biden family and alleged corruption. The discussion then shifts to the timeline of Hunter Biden's involvement with Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company, and the implications of the pardon, which retroactively covers alleged crimes dating back to 2014. Kelly questions whether this action will influence public perception of Biden and what it means for Trump if he returns to office, particularly regarding the January 6 defendants. Rich Lowry and Charles CW Cook join the conversation, agreeing that Biden's lies about not pardoning Hunter were evident to those outside the far-left media. They discuss the dishonesty of Biden's statements and the implications of the pardon, emphasizing the disparity in treatment between Hunter Biden and ordinary citizens facing similar legal issues. They highlight the broader narrative of political corruption and the perception of a two-tiered justice system. Marcia Clark, a well-known prosecutor, later joins the show to discuss her new book, "Trial by Ambush," which examines the case of Barbara Graham, a woman executed in the 1950s for murder. Clark draws parallels between the media treatment of Graham and her own experiences, noting the sensationalism and bias in coverage. She reveals that Graham's trial was marred by prosecutorial misconduct, including the withholding of exculpatory evidence. The conversation touches on the Menendez brothers' potential release from prison, with Clark expressing skepticism about their chances of being freed. She emphasizes the importance of fair trials and the consequences of media narratives on public perception and justice. As the show wraps up, Kelly and Clark briefly discuss the implications of Biden's pardon for Hunter and the broader issues of justice and accountability in the political landscape. Clark humorously declines a hypothetical political run, underscoring the challenges of navigating the current political climate.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the backlash following President Biden's pardon of his son, Hunter Biden. She expresses amusement at the reactions from left-leaning media, suggesting they are grappling with the implications of Biden's actions. Kelly encourages viewers to diversify their news sources, criticizing MSNBC for misleading narratives. She highlights the New York Times' attempts to spin Biden's pardon as a heartfelt decision made under a "dark sky," while also noting internal Democratic frustrations with Biden's leadership and the impact on Kamala Harris's political future. The conversation shifts to the implications of Biden's pardon, with Kelly and her guests from the Fifth Column—Camille Foster, Michael Monahan, and Matt Welsh—discussing the broader political ramifications. They argue that Biden's actions reveal a pattern of dishonesty and question the integrity of the Department of Justice. Foster suggests Biden may not have lied but rather acted under pressure, while Welsh emphasizes the significance of Biden's previous promises against pardoning Hunter. The group reflects on the media's inconsistent coverage of Biden's actions compared to past political scandals, particularly regarding the COVID vaccine mandates and the treatment of individuals in the justice system. They criticize the media's failure to hold Biden accountable for his past statements and the hypocrisy surrounding the pardon. Kelly shares a personal story about her family's experiences with addiction, contrasting it with Hunter Biden's privileged background. She expresses frustration at the media's portrayal of Hunter as a victim, arguing that many individuals face similar struggles without the same advantages. The discussion then turns to the political landscape, with the group analyzing the potential consequences of Biden's pardon on his legacy and the Democratic Party's future. They express skepticism about the party's ability to recover from the fallout and question the sincerity of Biden's motivations. As the conversation progresses, they touch on the challenges facing the incoming Trump administration, particularly regarding foreign policy and the complexities of global conflicts. They highlight the need for strong leadership in the Department of Defense and the importance of addressing issues of corruption and accountability within the government. The episode concludes with a discussion about the media's role in shaping public perception and the need for a more nuanced approach to reporting on sensitive issues, particularly those involving allegations of misconduct. The hosts emphasize the importance of transparency and fairness in journalism, advocating for a balanced perspective that considers the complexities of each situation.

On December 2, 2024, Dave Rubin discusses recent political developments, particularly focusing on President Joe Biden's pardon of his son, Hunter Biden. Rubin highlights Biden's previous statements against pardoning Hunter, suggesting hypocrisy in his actions. He presents video evidence of Biden asserting he would not pardon his son, emphasizing a pattern of dishonesty from Biden throughout his presidency. Rubin critiques the media's portrayal of Biden as a principled leader, contrasting it with their treatment of Donald Trump. He notes that Biden's administration is characterized by a culture of lies, with both Biden and his press secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre, having previously denied any intention to pardon Hunter. Rubin argues that this reflects a broader issue of dishonesty in politics, where the media often serves to reinforce these narratives. Transitioning to other news, Rubin discusses Donald Trump's nomination of Cash Patel as the new FBI director, framing it as a move towards transparency and accountability in government. He praises Patel's previous work in exposing corruption and suggests that his leadership could bring significant changes to the FBI. Rubin also mentions Trump's approach to tariffs and negotiations with Canada and Mexico, asserting that Trump's tactics are effective in compelling foreign leaders to address issues like drug trafficking and immigration. He concludes by reflecting on the current political climate, suggesting that the American public is ready for change and that the influence of traditional media is waning in favor of independent voices online.

Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti discuss several key topics, starting with President Biden's decision to pardon his son, Hunter Biden, which has sparked significant debate. Biden claims Hunter was unfairly prosecuted due to political pressure, asserting that no reasonable person would conclude otherwise. The hosts reflect on the implications of this pardon, noting the contradiction to Biden's previous statements about not pardoning his son. They also highlight the broader political context, including Biden's failure to uphold the norms he campaigned on, and the potential backlash from Democrats regarding Trump's future pardons. The conversation touches on Biden's perceived selfishness and the impact of his decisions on the Democratic Party, particularly regarding Kamala Harris. They conclude by acknowledging the disillusionment among some liberals who once viewed Biden as a moral leader.

Jordan Peterson assesses the psychological implications of Joe Biden's pardon of his son, Hunter. Biden had previously stated he would not pardon Hunter, making the pardon a significant conflict of interest and a moral failing. Peterson criticizes the narrative that Biden's actions stem from parental love, arguing that it reflects a pattern of enabling Hunter's destructive behavior rather than holding him accountable. He suggests that the Biden family has portrayed Hunter as a victim, which undermines the seriousness of his actions and perpetuates a cycle of dysfunction. Peterson highlights that making excuses for adult children’s criminal behavior is not empathy but rather a sign of codependency. He discusses the psychological impact of familial roles, suggesting that Hunter's position as the "black sheep" may have fueled resentment and led to self-destructive actions. He argues that the pardon, rather than being a loving act, is a continuation of enabling behavior that harms Hunter more than it helps. Peterson concludes that Biden's actions are self-serving and detrimental, ultimately failing to provide the tough love necessary for Hunter's growth and accountability.

John Stewart criticizes the Democratic Party for its muted response to Joe Biden's pardon of Hunter Biden, highlighting the hypocrisy of Democrats who previously made Biden's refusal to pardon Hunter a moral benchmark. While some Democrats, like Gavin Newsom and Colorado Senator Michael Bennett, have voiced criticism, many have remained defensive. Stewart points out Biden's past statements against pardoning Hunter and the broader implications of his actions, including the potential for a double standard in justice. He also notes that Trump's legal team is using Biden's pardon as part of their defense strategy.

The media's reaction to Hunter Biden's pardon has sparked significant discussion. Whoopi Goldberg questioned why President Biden lied about ruling out a pardon, emphasizing the perception of a system benefiting the powerful. The pardon is noted as the broadest in U.S. history, shielding Hunter from prosecution since 2014. Critics argue it reflects political nepotism, comparing it to past presidential pardons. The hosts highlight Biden's broader failures, including foreign policy issues and economic challenges, suggesting his legacy may be worse than that of previous presidents.