reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The member from Spadina, Fort York, addressed the prime minister regarding national security and the upcoming Hogue Commission report on foreign interference. He questioned the prime minister's ability to work alongside ministers who may not be serving Canada's interests, implying that at least one minister could be compromised. In response, the prime minister criticized the member's comments as disgraceful and irreverent, emphasizing the seriousness of national security issues. He pointed out that the member's alignment with the Conservative Party is concerning, as their leader lacks the necessary clearance for briefings essential to keeping Canadians safe.

Speaker 0 states that over 6,000 bodies have been found, citing information from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and other government bodies. Speaker 1 questions this claim, asking for clarification on where these bodies were found and if the Truth and Reconciliation Commission reported finding 6,000 bodies. Speaker 1 asserts that as a journalist, Speaker 0 should be concerned about the accuracy of their claims. Speaker 0 requests to complete their questions.

There was a terrorist attack and explosion at the Niagara crossing of the Canada-US border, resulting in at least 2 deaths and 1 injury. The prime minister is being asked for an update and an action plan to ensure the security of the people. The prime minister acknowledges the seriousness of the situation and mentions that multiple agencies are involved in providing support. Four border crossings are currently closed, and additional measures are being considered across the country. The prime minister excuses himself to gather further updates. In a separate discussion, concerns are raised about government spending and its impact on inflation.

During a question period, Pierre Polayev cited a Fox News report about a terrorist attack, which was the only outlet reporting it at the time. He was questioned about the responsibility of using media reports when the Canadian government was still learning about the situation. Polayev defended his statement by criticizing the Canadian press for making three corrections in one article. Another speaker pointed out that attacking the agency instead of addressing the question was not appealing in terms of leadership and constructive conversations. The discussion ended with the mention of a GTA voter who didn't appreciate the aggressive tone.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about calling the explosion at the Rainbow Bridge terrorism, as no officials confirmed it. Speaker 1 defends their statement, mentioning that the government of Canada presumed it was a terrorist incident based on media reports. Speaker 0 argues that media reports are not the same as calling something terrorism. Speaker 1 disagrees, stating that media reports of a terror-related event came from security officials in the Trudeau government. Speaker 0 asks if CTV was irresponsible for their tweet, to which Speaker 1 responds with a comment. Speaker 1 hopes Speaker 0 won't publish something they need to apologize for again.

Paola Lorigio from The Canadian Press questions the speaker's decision to label the explosion at the Rainbow Bridge as terrorism, despite no official confirmation. The speaker defends their statement, citing media reports and claiming that the government of Canada presumed it to be a terror-related event. They also criticize The Canadian Press for issuing three corrections in one article. When asked if they think CTV was irresponsible for reporting the incident as terrorism, the speaker redirects the question. The conversation ends with the speaker pointing out the contradiction in the reporter's comment.

According to high level police sources, an explosion occurred in a vehicle, indicating an attempted terrorist attack. The car had a significant amount of explosives, resulting in the death of the two individuals inside. One border patrol officer was injured during the incident. The vehicle was heading from the US to Canada and was trying to approach the CBP building. As a precautionary measure, all bridges in the vicinity have been closed, and government buildings in the area have been evacuated.

There has been a terrorist attack and explosion at the Niagara crossing of the Canada US border. Two people have died and one is injured. The prime minister is asked for an update on the situation and the action plan to ensure the security of the people. The prime minister acknowledges the seriousness of the situation and mentions that the NSIA, Minister of Public Safety, CVSA, RCMP, and Transport Canada are all providing support. Four border crossings are currently closed and additional measures are being considered at all border crossings. The prime minister will continue to work closely with US officials and provide updates. They excuse themselves to gather further information.

The speaker defends their statement about the explosion at the Rainbow Bridge checkpoint being terrorism, citing media reports that the Canadian government presumed it to be so. They criticize CP for making false claims in an article and question CTV's responsibility for reporting on the incident. The speaker also mentions the awkward situation of CP attacking CTV's reporting, considering that CP works for CTV.

The Prime Minister previously supported ENSCOCOP's role in examining foreign interference in Canada's democracy, but there seems to be a shift in stance. Questions arise about whether a recent ENSCOCOP report revealed involvement of Liberals seeking political and financial gain. Is the Prime Minister still committed to transparency and public trust in institutions, or has external influence changed this approach? In response, the Minister for Public Safety emphasizes the importance of oversight, noting that the government established a committee of parliamentarians to monitor security agencies for the first time. This committee includes members from all political parties, and their recommendations have been acted upon to enhance national security and combat foreign interference.

Speaker 0 references the World Trade Center bombing and a diplomat who allegedly issued a terrorist visa with CIA involvement. Speaker 1 expresses disbelief at a plan to fake a terrorist event to secure congressional funding. Speaker 0 responds that faking the deaths of 4,000 people is impossible, implying the event must be real. Speaker 0 adds the event should not be blamed on Muslims.

According to high-level police sources, an explosion occurred in a vehicle, indicating an attempted terrorist attack. The car contained a significant amount of explosives. Sadly, both occupants of the vehicle died, while a border patrol officer sustained injuries. The incident took place as they were driving from the US to Canada and attempted to approach the CBP building. As a precautionary measure, all bridges in the vicinity have been closed, and government buildings in the area have been evacuated.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau addressed a serious situation at the Niagara crossing of the Canada-US border. There was a vehicle explosion at the Rainbow Bridge crossing, resulting in two deaths and one injury. The government is working closely with NSIA, CVSA, RCMP, and Transport Canada to provide support and gather information. Four border crossings, including Rainbow Bridge, Whirlpool Bridge, Queenston Bridge, and Peace Bridge, are currently closed. Additional measures are being implemented at all border crossings nationwide. The government is taking this situation very seriously and will continue to provide updates. In question period, Conservative leader Pierre Poliyev criticized the government's spending, accusing it of causing inflation to rise.

According to high-level police sources, an explosion occurred in a vehicle, indicating an attempted terrorist attack. The car contained a significant amount of explosives, resulting in the death of the two individuals inside. Additionally, a border patrol officer was injured while driving from the US to Canada, seemingly targeting the CBP building. As a precautionary measure, all bridges in the vicinity have been closed, and government buildings in the area have been evacuated.

The speaker from Halton Hills accuses the government of neglecting national security, citing documents that show collaboration between Canadian government employees and Beijing's biological weapons unit. The Health Minister's claim that no sensitive information left the country is contradicted by the documents. The speaker questions if the minister still supports those comments. Translation: The speaker criticizes the government for ignoring national security concerns and collaborating with Beijing's biological weapons unit. The Health Minister's statement that no sensitive information left the country is disputed by the documents. The speaker questions if the minister still stands by those remarks.

Justin Trudeau addressed a serious situation regarding border crossings in Canada. There was a vehicle explosion at the Rainbow Bridge crossing in Niagara Falls, resulting in two deaths and one injury. The government is working closely with NSIA, CVSA, RCMP, and Transport Canada to gather information and provide support. Four border crossings, including Rainbow Bridge, Whirlpool Bridge, Queenston Bridge, and Peace Bridge, are currently closed. Additional measures are being implemented at all border crossings nationwide. Trudeau assured that they are taking the situation very seriously and will continue to provide updates. He excused himself to gather further information. In question period, Conservative leader Pierre Poliyev criticized the government's spending, accusing it of causing inflation to rise.

The speaker of the house resigned after inviting an actual Nazi to the House of Commons. The prime minister is being blamed for the embarrassment, but he claims no one knew ahead of time. The government vetted the Nazi, and a minister tried to erase the incident from the historical record. The member for Thornhill demands an apology from the prime minister for slandering and dishonoring Holocaust survivors. The government house leader defends the speaker's decision and emphasizes that no one in the chamber knew who the Nazi was. The speaker has taken responsibility and resigned.

The Prime Minister is accused of covering up a national security breach involving collaboration with Beijing military scientists. The Minister of Health deflects by highlighting achievements like National Pharma Care. The opposition criticizes the Prime Minister for ignoring Beijing's interference and allowing access to sensitive biological information. The Minister denies the accusations, stating that the scientists involved were Canadian citizens who deceived the Public Health Agency of Canada, leading to their dismissal and an ongoing RCMP investigation.

There has been a terrorist attack and explosion at the Niagara crossing of the Canada U.S. Border. Two people have died and one is injured. The Prime Minister is asked about the government's plan to ensure the security of the people. The Prime Minister acknowledges the seriousness of the situation and mentions that the NSIA, Minister of Public Safety, CVSA, RCMP, and Transport Canada are all involved in providing support. Four border crossings, including the Rainbow Bridge, are currently closed, and additional measures are being implemented at all border crossings. The Prime Minister assures that they are in close contact with U.S. officials and will continue to provide updates. The Prime Minister excuses themselves to gather further information on the situation.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about calling the explosion at the Rainbow Bridge terrorism, despite no official confirmation. Speaker 1 defends their statement, citing media reports and corrections made by CP. Speaker 0 argues that it was irresponsible to make such a statement without proper evidence. Speaker 1 counters by mentioning that CTV reported the incident as terror-related, based on information from security officials in the Trudeau government. Speaker 0 avoids answering the question and ends the conversation.

The exchange centers on who is responsible for approving an asylum claim linked to an Afghan individual who was part of the Afghanistan evacuation and who was involved in a deadly incident in Washington, D.C. The dialogue is combative and procedural as members press for accountability and a straight answer. - Speaker 0 references a National Guardsman’s death in an incident involving the same individual, calling it an unfortunate accident, while Speaker 1 insists it was a terrorist act and asserts the guard member was shot in the head. The interaction escalates as Speaker 0 seeks clarification about who approved the asylum application for this person. - Speaker 0 asks plainly: “Who approved the asylum claim?” Speaker 1 responds that the asylum application was thoroughly filled out by information gathered by the Biden administration and that the asylum process was put into place under rules established by the Biden administration. Speaker 0 counters that, by implication, the Trump administration had changed the vetting process and the asylum had moved forward under those changes, prompting a dispute over attribution of responsibility. - Speaker 1 emphasizes that the evacuation of Afghanistan under Operation Allies Welcome was “thoroughly vetted by the Biden administration at that point in time” and insists that the individual’s asylum process followed the vetting and rules established by the Biden administration. Speaker 0 pushes back, pressing for a yes-or-no determination of who approved the asylum. - Speaker 2 offers a different framing, stating that the individual was vetted to serve as a soldier in Afghanistan and that this vetting standard was used by the Biden administration “as a ruse to bring him here.” He asserts that had standard operating procedures for special immigrant visas been followed, “none of the Allies Welcome people would have come to America,” attributing responsibility to President Biden. He also invokes a point of order and references a murder “that took place in DC,” insisting the prior description as “unfortunate” was inappropriate. - The dialogue includes interruptions and procedural motions: Speaker 2 asserts the comment about a murder was not a valid point of order; a separate speaker notes that the incident being discussed was not merely an “unfortunate incident” but a murder. - Throughout, the participants accuse each other of misattributing the asylum approval to the wrong administration and of altering vetting processes, with repeated demands for a straightforward answer about who approved the asylum application and persistent insistence that the Biden administration’s vetting and rules were the basis for the asylum decision. The exchange ends with procedural interjections and the continuation of the dispute over responsibility for the asylum approval and the accompanying tragic incident.

There was a terrorist attack and explosion at the Niagara crossing of the Canada-US border, resulting in at least 2 deaths and 1 injury. The prime minister is being asked for an update and an action plan to ensure the security of the people. The prime minister acknowledges the seriousness of the situation and mentions that various agencies are involved in providing support. Four border crossings, including Rainbow Bridge and Peace Bridge, are currently closed, and additional measures are being considered for all border crossings. The prime minister excuses himself to gather further updates. In another topic, the government's spending is criticized for causing inflation to rise.

A scientist at the National Microbiology Lab collaborating with Chinese agencies raised security concerns. The government is investigating and taking steps to ensure safety. The Conservative party's focus on political attacks and conspiracy theories is hindering progress. Responsible leadership is needed to address national security issues effectively.

Speaker 0 argues that for years the radical left have compared Americans like Charlie to Nazis and the world’s worst mass murderers, and that this rhetoric is directly responsible for the terrorism seen in the country today and must stop right now. Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 describe the unfolding World Trade Center attacks. They say they cannot confirm that a plane hit one of the two towers, but live pictures are showing events. They report seeing another plane and state, “We just saw another one apparently go” and “into the 2nd Tower,” suggesting the second plane’s impact and calling it deliberate. They note, “Now given what has been going on around the world, some of the key suspects come to mind, Osama bin Laden. Who knows who knows what?” Speaker 3 and Speaker 4 respond to the crisis, with one expressing concern about the attackers and implying a confrontation with the culprits. Speaker 4 adds, “But he said, you can you can come and debate me. He invited that debate. He certainly didn't invite the violence,” and comments on the global nature of the problem, identifying “the people on the extremes, the Islamists, the radical Islamists, and their union with the ultra progressives.” They state that these groups “often speak about human rights. They speak about free speech, but they use violence to try to take down their enemies.” Speaker 5 reiterates a personal, contextual stance with the line, “I'm Israeli. And I …” (implying a personal perspective on the conflict). The dialogue collectively frames the incident as a large-scale terrorist attack and discusses the broader ideological landscape, contrasting claims of human rights and free speech with the use of violence by extreme groups.

According to high-level police sources, an explosion occurred, indicating an attempted terrorist attack. The vehicle involved had a significant amount of explosives. Sadly, both occupants of the car were killed, while a border patrol officer driving from the US to Canada was injured. The intention seemed to be driving towards the CBP building. As a result, all bridges in the vicinity have been closed, and government buildings in the area are also affected.