reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There is concern that Trump may be re-elected, which could have a negative impact on the global order. Some politicians create a false choice between patriotism and globalism, suggesting that one must choose between loyalty to their nation or a global government.

The speaker argues that Jews have thrived and remain safe only when liberal values dominate, the core values of liberal democratic society. The Trump administration is described as a substantial and dangerous regression from those values. Additionally, the administration’s attitude toward immigration, specifically Mexican immigration and Latin American immigration, is labeled a scandal.

It is laughable to describe Davos as protecting liberal democracy or to label President Trump as a dictator. However, the main point is that political elites are part of the problem. They mislead the public on issues like immigration, public safety, climate change, and China. The average person knows that open borders and illegal immigration harm the American way of life. They also understand that public safety is a concern in big cities. Climate alarmism is causing more harm than good, and the Chinese Communist Party's practices are questionable. The next conservative president, possibly President Trump, will address these issues based on the popular will and scientific facts. Ultimately, leaders should awaken the lions within the average American and free individuals worldwide.

Joe Biden's personal qualities don't matter because he's not in charge. The real issue is the globalists and communists who want open borders, high taxes, and control over your life. To stop them, vote for President Trump to protect the American way of life. Your future depends on it.

Speaker 0 notes that Trump used the Davos stage to demand Greenland back, warning allies to back off or face massive tariffs, calling Greenland “a piece of ice.” Speaker 1 says the goal is a piece of ice for world protection; the U.S. could have kept the land but chose not to, giving Greenland a choice to say yes and be appreciated or no and be remembered. Greenland is reportedly protesting in the streets, saying “hands off our country.” Speaker 0 adds that Trump has struck a deal framing a future agreement on Greenland and the Arctic, posted on Truth Social, stating that based on a productive meeting with the Secretary General of NATO, Marruta, a framework for a future deal with respect to Greenland and the Arctic has been formed, and that tariffs scheduled for February 1 will not be imposed. Speaker 2 challenges the claim, noting NATO doesn’t own Greenland, and questions whether Marruta can make such a deal. Speaker 0 continues the exchange, joking about not wanting a Met Gala, and suggests the post hints at the U.S. taking control of Canada as well because of Arctic interests. Canadian Prime Minister Carney responds by saying Canada will invoke Article 5 and support NATO to protect Denmark, with Denmark also unwilling to cede sovereignty following the framework. Speaker 2 adds that two people are deciding the fate of Greenland, and another participant begins to speak. Speaker 0 provides population context, saying about 57,000 people live in Greenland. Speaker 0 then mentions Putin’s response, quoting a brief remark that he’s “kinda behind this idea.” Speaker 2 notes Ravasi’s commentary and asks for a referendum, which Speaker 3 says would give Greenlanders a semblance of deciding for themselves, though it’s unclear how such a referendum would impact broader strategic interests. Speakers turn to Ralph Schulhammer, who is in Austria, to assess European reaction. Speaker 3 says Trump’s rhetoric in Davos was “very Trumpian” but contained carrots as well as sticks: he highlighted ancestry, support for a strong Europe, concerns about migration and energy policy, and suggested that Europe must strengthen itself to be a true partner; otherwise, the U.S. may retreat. The discussion acknowledges sentiment that Europe’s elites tend to frame issues as global rather than addressing national needs, with Speaker 3 arguing that policy-wise there can be shared interests, but communication strategy differed from Trump’s approach. The panel considers whether Greenland’s referendum would matter, noting that many peoples pursue autonomy but that Greenland’s outcome would not necessarily alter large strategic interests. They discuss historical precedents of land acquisitions and acknowledge the Greenland dispute sits at the intersection of Arctic strategic interests and great-power competition, including China and Russia’s activity in the region. Speaker 3 emphasizes that the future of Europe should be anchored in defending European territory and citizens, not only global agendas, and critiques the perception that Europe should always prioritize global issues over internal concerns. In closing, Speaker 0 references Macron’s overture to meet in Paris, noting Trump’s remark that Macron won’t be in power much longer. Ralph Schulhammer is thanked for his insights, with recognition of his Hammertime podcast.

Almost everyone is on board with the "great reset," except for one person who has the power to stop it: Donald Trump. Trump went to Davos and challenged the globalists, which angered George Soros and the Vatican. Trump's actions against globalism, such as pulling out of the Paris climate agreement and the World Health Organization, made him a target. He declared war on globalism at the UN, and shortly after, the coronavirus pandemic hit, damaging the US economy. The goal now is to bring the US economy down and make people desperate for the "great reset." To fight back, we should go back to work, school, and church, and pray for Trump's victory.

Using the term dictatorship at Davos is absurd. The next conservative president will challenge elite power. Many in this room contribute to the problem by misrepresenting reality on key issues. For instance, immigration: elites claim open borders are acceptable, while average Americans feel it undermines their way of life. Regarding climate change, elites promote alarmism, which contributes to a mental health crisis, while the proposed solutions are often more harmful than the issues themselves. China is a major adversary to freedom globally, yet Davos gives the Chinese Communist Party a platform. Additionally, the World Health Organization is pushing gender ideology in the global south, despite many Northern European countries rejecting these practices.

The government aims to control you, not serve you. Democrats and Republicans create problems, not solutions. They want to keep you feeling powerless and dependent. The establishment fears Trump's return not because of him, but because of you. Wake up, America, or lose your freedom.

Almost everyone is part of the great reset, except for one man who opposes it. Donald Trump defied globalists at Davos, leading to backlash from figures like George Soros and the Vatican. Trump's stance against globalism and his actions to protect American interests have made him a target. The push for a new normal and the great reset aims to weaken the US economy. The choice is clear: support America or fall to the New World Order. Stand with Trump to prevent the reset.

The speaker dismisses the idea that Davos protects liberal democracy or that President Trump is a dictator. They believe the next conservative president will challenge the power of elites. The speaker argues that political elites mislead the average person on issues like immigration, public safety, climate change, China, and gender ideology. They believe President Trump will address these concerns because he has the support of the American people. The speaker emphasizes the importance of leaders awakening the strength of the average American and free individuals worldwide.

The great reset is a significant concern, especially with Donald Trump's opposition to globalism. At Davos, Trump rejected the doomsday predictions of alarmists, emphasizing the need for national sovereignty over global control. Following his speech, George Soros warned that the U.S. election would impact the world’s fate. Critics, including figures from the Vatican, view Trump as a danger due to his capitalist stance and withdrawal from agreements like the Paris Climate Accord. The COVID-19 pandemic is seen as a tactic to weaken the U.S. economy and push for a new normal, which could lead to increased control over citizens. The call to action is to return to normal life and support Trump to prevent the rise of a new world order. The choice is clear: support America or succumb to globalism.

Mike Benz outlines a conspiracy tied to the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) and a June 2020 war game that purportedly sought “a way to use riots, nationwide riots, and do favors to the Black Lives Matter movement so that they would owe them favors back to take to the streets against Trump if Trump won the election fair and square,” while also needing “a robust, intentional, and specific strategy to go after the networks that enabled Trump's rise to power” so they could be jailed after Trump left office. Bubba Boyd, who has written about the event since August 2020, explains that the discussion will cover the key players in TIP, the plan to subvert the 2020 election, how rigging the election and four prosecutions of Trump flow from the June 2020 conspirators’ meeting, and excerpts from a January 2020 Donald Trump speech to the World Economic Forum that allegedly signals why Trump and Trumpism had to be eliminated. The publicly named sponsors of the war game are Rosa Brooks and Niles Gilman of the Berggruen Institute in Los Angeles, described as the “globalist home of Silicon Valley’s anti-Trump billionaires,” with branches in Venice and Beijing and a China branch in direct dialogue with Xi Jinping. Michael Anton is cited as the author of a Trump national security document who criticized TIP’s war game, stating they were planning a coup against the election and publicizing the war game to normalize the idea. Brooks’s background is summarized as a lawyer for George Shullis at the Open Society Institute, then a State Department attorney for regime change, then a Pentagon policy lawyer under Obama, while teaching at Georgetown Law. The narrative asserts she advocated impeaching Trump and a potential 25th Amendment move, and even a military coup, in a 2017 Foreign Policy piece titled “three ways to get rid of president Trump before 2020,” including the sentence: “For the first time in my life, I can imagine plausible scenarios in which senior military officers might simply tell the president, no, sir. We’re not doing that.” The claim is that she “couldn’t wait to launch a coup against Trump,” a portrayal attributed to a New York Times editorial response. In June 2020, Brooks and Gilman allegedly convened TIP’s war game about the 2020 election and its possible aftermath, with over 100 participants and 76 role players drawn from former Pentagon officials, the intelligence community, Silicon Valley, Wall Street, the media, and Republican and Democratic institutions. Names publicly associated with anti-Trump activity are listed, including John Podesta, Donna Brazile, Bill Kristol, Michael Steele, Jennifer Granholm, and other unnamed figures, all described as major players in attempts to nullify the 2016 election and overthrow the government. Benz is said to detail the TIP war games and concludes that to prevent a second Trump term, Biden would need a large victory margin to overcome fraud perceptions, with the insurrectionist scenario calling for control of the military, Black Lives Matter, and other street rioters. The narrative asserts that BLM raised about 90 million in 2020 with donors like the Democracy Alliance and the Ford Foundation, and that Mark Elias led financial filings associated with the effort. The discussion further cites Defense One articles from August 2020 that reportedly called for a military coup and a subsequent open debate within the military about accepting orders, and claims that Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley “was not about to obey any order from the president.” The appendix to TIP’s report allegedly debated criminally proceeding against Trump after leaving office and wiping out his “white supremacist and extremist base,” with a quote describing the need for a strategy to challenge networks that enabled Trump’s rise and remained “imbecible to the kind of pluralist democracy the founders intended,” implying a path toward removing Trump’s influence even after his presidency. The transcript also notes contemporary references to Arctic Frost, an FBI investigation linked to 2022 midterms, and alleged targeting of Republican election operations and other figures by the FBI. Excerpts from Trump’s World Economic Forum address and a January 2020 speech are presented to illustrate a moral and strategic framing against globalism and “radical socialists.” The presentation ends by inviting audience support and promoting further engagement, including a free newsletter.

The speaker argues that winning in political struggle is currently nearly impossible, and that Donald Trump grasped this reality in a way that others have not. They say, perhaps uniquely in the Western world, Trump understands how to handle the confrontation with the deep state, and they acknowledge Viktor Orban and Bekailly Malay as potential examples of others who have challenged entrenched power. However, the speaker emphasizes that Trump embodies “the playbook of how you need to behave,” suggesting that his approach is a model for contemporary politics. The speaker contends that many politicians are clinging to a dated strategy. They describe a past era—the seventies and eighties—when the prevailing belief was that it was possible to reason with the opposition, find compromises, be bipartisan, persuade people, and sell policies in the media through traditional pitching and persuasion. According to the speaker, that strategy cannot be adopted today because the opposition has changed. In contrast to those bygone expectations, the speaker asserts that the current opposition is not composed of social democrats who merely want to raise taxes or increase public spending. Instead, they describe the current opposition as aiming to destroy Western civilization. The speaker emphasizes the severity of this shift in aims, framing the opposition as having existential goals that go beyond ordinary political disagreement. Throughout, the core claims center on a diagnosis of a strategic pivot in modern politics: the old playbook of negotiation and persuasion is no longer viable because the opposition has fundamentally changed its aims, adopting objectives that are presented as existential threats to Western civilization. The speaker positions Trump as an exemplar of the new, effective approach to navigating this transformed political landscape, highlighting the perceived necessity of a more combative and uncompromising posture in confronting opponents who, in the speaker’s view, seek to undermine foundational Western values.

Donald Trump wants unchecked power. The question for the American people in 13 days is what they want.

The transcript centers on a dramatic framing of Trump’s Davos appearance and a strategic reorientation of U.S. and Western policy away from the post-World War II rules-based order. The speakers argue that Trump’s actions signal the end of the Bretton Woods-era system and the unipolar order, unsettling globalists who want to cling to the old framework. The main points: - Davos as a turning point: Trump walked into the World Economic Forum and framed the room as “friends and maybe a few enemies,” telling European elites he no longer trusts them to defend American interests. He challenged their energy policies as suicidal and criticized Europe for not leveraging its own energy resources, despite North Sea oil and gas; he referenced Europe’s rising electricity prices (claiming a 139% increase) and highlighted wind power versus oil reserves. - The Greenland signal and a broader realignment: While Greenland is noted as a significant detail, the larger story is Trump recentering U.S. strategy toward the Western Hemisphere. This includes stabilizing the hemisphere, deterring mass migration, crushing transnational criminal networks, and preventing hostile powers from owning key assets near U.S. borders. The plan is described as a Monroe Doctrine-like approach, or a Donroe Doctrine, focusing on the Western Hemisphere rather than Brussels’ priorities. - Europe and NATO exposed: Trump’s rhetoric targeted European elites and NATO members, pushing back against what the speakers describe as the old order that expects U.S. protection without reciprocal responsibility. The claim is that the United States is moving toward a national-interest-based posture, rethinking involvement in the UN and NATO, and deciding who is in or out of major security arrangements. - Canada’s contrast at Davos: Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney presented a polite globalist counterpoint—calling for a rupture in the rules-based order and a coalition of middle powers to resist superpowers. The speakers contrast this with Trump’s inward, transactional approach and point to Canada’s perceived ingratitude toward the United States. - Domestic and regional actions: The show notes concrete steps, including Argentina’s open support for Malay’s government, the designation of Mexican cartels as terrorist organizations, and a large Western Hemisphere military meeting (34 countries) to plan actions against cartels and transnational criminal networks. There is emphasis on the United States acting decisively in the region and the broader implications for national security. - Alberta and Canadian diplomacy: Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen (referred to as Scott Benson) comments in Davos about Alberta as a potential natural partner for the United States, illustrating a shift in how Washington is evaluating regional partnerships. The contrast with Carney’s call for a rules-based order underscores the political climate. - Money and minerals emphasis: The speaker pivots to the financial implications of a shifted world order, arguing that money is moving into mining stocks as the U.S. seeks to secure domestic supply chains. The narrative highlights a surge in gold and silver prices and a pivot to mining equities as a strategic investment response to geopolitical shifts. - Vanguard Mining and specific metals: The sponsor Vanguard Mining is presented as exposing a diversified portfolio across five metals—gold, copper, uranium, lithium, and molybdenum—with direct exposure to projects in British Columbia, Argentina, and Paraguay. China’s dominance over these critical minerals is outlined: China’s control of lithium refining (60–70% of world capacity), copper refining and consumption (roughly 58% of refined copper), and molybdenum production (42–45% of global output), plus new export restrictions on moly powders. The company’s portfolio, including a focus on the Pokitos-1 lithium project in Argentina, is highlighted as strategically significant for Western supply chains. The ticker UUUFF is mentioned for Vanguard Mining, with availability on major U.S. exchanges. Overall, the transcript asserts a geopolitical and economic shift away from the existing global order toward a more transactional, hemisphere-centered American strategy, with mining and critical minerals playing a key role in national security and economic policy.

Almost everyone supports the Great Reset, except for one powerful man - Donald Trump. Trump challenged globalists at Davos, rejecting their control over our lives. George Soros warned about the US election's impact, while Vatican figures criticized Trump. Despite his faults, Trump opposes globalism by pulling out of agreements and challenging the UN. The push for a new normal and the Great Reset aims to weaken the US economy. To resist, return to normalcy, support Trump, and reject the globalist agenda. Stand with America or fall to the New World Order.

I have faith in the American people. The way Trump talks to his audience is not right. Don't be fooled by attempts to humanize him.

It is very likely Trump might be elected again, which would likely be a death blow to what remains of the global order. Many politicians present a false dichotomy, a false binary vision of the world. They act as if one has to choose between patriotism and globalism, between being loyal to one's nation and being loyal to some kind of global government.

The future of Western civilization is in the balance. In Europe, political opposition is being jailed and free speech is under assault. Republicans and conservatives believe the fundamental values and tenants of Western civilization that the country has been built on are under assault. The November election was the beginning of the pushback on that assault, but it's not over.

Globalists aim for a world government controlled by crony capitalists using socialism to make people dependent. There's an internal war in government, with Trump seen as a key player. Despite leading in polls, Trump acknowledges the danger of his mission but is committed to making America great again. He believes the country is being eroded and can be greater than ever before.

The speaker dismisses the idea that Davos protects liberal democracy or that President Trump is a dictator. They believe the next conservative president will challenge the power of elites. The speaker argues that political elites mislead the public on issues like immigration, public safety, climate change, China, and gender ideology. They claim that President Trump will address these concerns because he has the support of the American people. The speaker emphasizes the need for leaders to awaken the average person's desire for change.

With Donald Trump leading the United States, we will never see another Afghanistan. We need border, energy, economic, food, defense, and national security, because if you are not secure, you are not free. That's why conservatives are growing and becoming more influential in European politics, making the left nervous. Unlike when Bill Clinton and Tony Blair created a global leftist network, conservatives are now collaborating globally, which some see as a threat. Despite the attacks against us, people vote for us because they are not naive. We defend freedom, love our nations, want secure borders, protect businesses, and defend family and life. We fight against wokeism, protect our faith and free speech, and stand for common sense.

Speaker 0 argues that describing Davos as protecting liberal democracy is laughable, and similarly calling Trump a dictator is absurd. He then provides substantive points in response to a question, focusing on the power of elites and the gap between elite messaging and the reality experienced by ordinary people. Key claims and points: - The very reason he is at Davos is to explain to many people in the room—and those watching—that political elites tell the average people on three or four or five issues that reality is x, when in fact reality is y. - Immigration: elites tell us open borders and even illegal immigration are okay, but the average American says these policies rob them of the American way of life; President Trump will take that on behalf of the average American. - Public safety: elites claim public safety isn’t a problem in big American cities; the average person experiences lack of public safety as damaging to their life, and President Trump will address that. - Climate change: the claim is that there is an existential crisis and climate alarmism is a major driver of mental health crises; the average person believes the proposed solutions are far worse and more harmful, costing more human lives, especially in Europe where heating is needed. - China: China is identified as the number one adversary—not just to the United States but to free people globally; Davos is criticized for giving the Chinese Communist Party a platform, and President Trump would end that. - World Health Organization: the organization is discussed as attempting to foist gender ideology upon the global South; Northern European countries are reviewing or rejecting these practices. - A return to science and biology: the new president, Trump, will “trust the science,” understand the basic biological reality of manhood and womanhood, not due to retribution or dictatorship, but because he has the power of the American people behind him. - Legislative trajectory: the popular will should inform both the House and Senate in 2025 to pass laws on these issues and more, as noted by Senator Portman. - Inspirational leadership view: President Trump, if elected, will be inspired by the words of Javier Milei, who said that he was in power not to guide sheep, but to awaken lions; this sentiment reflects what the average American and the average free person on Earth want from leaders. Additional context: - The speaker reiterates that the popular will and the vitality of the American people should guide policy, asserting that the next conservative president will confront elite narratives on immigration, public safety, climate policy, China, and global institutions.

Almost everyone is part of the great reset, except for one person who has the power to stop it - Donald Trump. Trump defied globalists at Davos, leading to backlash from figures like George Soros and the Vatican. Despite his flaws, Trump challenges the United Nations and globalism, which is why he faces so much opposition. The push for a new normal and the great reset aims to weaken America, but standing with Trump means resisting the New World Order. It's a choice between supporting America or falling into globalist control. Stand with America now.