reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I confronted Lisa McGee from Vaxx Choice about the bio cyber interface for e-health being taught at Cambridge and other universities. I asked her to clarify its definition, location in the body, and functionality. She claimed there was no misrepresentation of Professor Akhiles' work, but I disagreed, emphasizing that it involves an injectable bio cyber interface under the skin, not a wearable device. There are honest representations of this work and misleading ones. Doctor Edward Group has shared Acuity's latest keynote and a definition of the bio cyber interface, which includes internal biosensors and wireless biomedical telemetry for e-health, enabling wireless intrabody nanocommunication. More details will follow in part 2.

In July 2024, the issue of wireless biomedical telemetry without consent is still ongoing. Sabrina Wallace, a former network engineer, has been discussing this topic. In 2012, the medical body area network was approved, leading to the deployment of a nano cyber interface for intra-body communication. The IEEE standard for internal biosensors is 802.15.4 for patient monitoring. The Internet of Bio Nanothings is our current health monitoring system. This includes telemedicine, nano routing, and nano micro interface. Doctors and nurses should have informed the public about these advancements.

German and Italian universities are seeking papers on Internet of Bio Nanothings for digital healthcare. Doctors are asked if they are prepared to use bio cyber or nano cyber interfaces to create in-body networks controlled by an external unit. The network consists of synthetic or biological sensors. Manuscript deadline is July 15, 2024.

NanoComm being hosted by Ireland is significant because it's the world's premier conference in nanoscale computing and communication. CONNECT is very active in this field and has been heralding the idea of an Internet within the body, which represents a revolution in future communication networks.

The speaker explains the use of biosensors for global information connectivity and emergency broadcasts. They discuss the wireless body area network and how signals are sent to individual nodes, including the body itself. The speaker mentions the use of applied signals technology and the involvement of companies like Raytheon and L3 Harris. They also touch on software-defined networking, virtual machines, and the convergence of interconnect networks. The speaker emphasizes the tracking of the body rather than devices and the importance of health applications like telemedicine. They mention the use of metamaterials, nanotechnology, and graphene-based biosensors. The speaker concludes by discussing the routing protocols and the need for understanding these technologies.

Dear Doctor Cartland, you requested more information about the medical body area network. It's crucial to address the implications of computer networking within the human body, especially regarding informed consent. You’ve shown interest in topics like the injectable bio cyber interface for eHealth and wireless biomedical telemetry, which are part of the curriculum at Cambridge University. Additionally, there are discussions about frequency bands assigned to our bodies for the medical body area network and human body communication technologies. It's important to go beyond just liking posts; we need to share and discuss this information. There's an upcoming conference in Florence focusing on wireless healthcare, intra-body communication, and molecular engineering within the human body, again highlighting the need for informed consent.

Doctors are working with the telecommunications and computer industries to create the Internet of bionanothings in the human cardiovascular system. Initially, people may dismiss this information, but medical websites confirm it, leading to a strong reaction of concern.

Recently, a briefing from the European Parliament discussed smart bodies for smart cities and the Internet of Bio Nano Things. On page 7, BJ Torg's work is cited, highlighting injectable nano sensor technology for seamless human body connectivity. These sensors are designed for use both on and within the human body. BJ Onutolk collaborates with Professor Ian F. Akiris from the International Telecommunications Union on this topic. The focus is on graphene-based intra-body nano sensor networks, which can sense, process, and communicate at the nanoscale. The paper introduces a concept for localizing and tracking bio-nano sensors in the bloodstream.

The speaker explains that MAC addresses are not in the vaccine, but are used for assigning IP addresses to network adapters. MAC IDs come from sensors, not the vaccine itself. The speaker discusses the routing of MAC addresses in wide body area sensor networks and the need for different MAC IDs to target specific body parts. They mention various MAC protocols and the importance of quality of service requirements for biomedical devices. The speaker also touches on power consumption and the use of wireless sensor networks. They conclude by mentioning the practice of transhumanism and the connection between body area networks.

Doctor Michalcha discusses internal bionanosensors and synthetic biology at a medical symposium. She emphasizes the use of medical body area networks by physicians. Nano technology, biosensors, and nanomedicine are key components in the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning. The goal is to digitize every cell on Earth and merge organic life with synthetic biology for improved well-being. However, this advancement may come at the cost of losing our humanity. Bioleno sensors in our bodies enable bidirectional communication with the cloud.

Speaker 0 describes a theory they’re exploring: every vaccine examined, and the patents and testimony from the Department of Energy, point to a 500,000-strong collection of bioweapons categories, including plague, HIV, anthrax. They claim all these bacteria and yeasts have been mutated and converted into a “hybrid gamma irradiated” form, advanced and radioactive, and that these are entering humanity. They say, regarding a nuclear stockpile, humanity itself becomes the host of these radioactive materials, since they are digital and can be activated to detonate a mass casualty event. Speaker 1 clarifies by restating the concern: they can create a pandemic at any moment by activating materials that have infiltrated our bodies. Speaker 0 adds that they have become involved in helping families legally; their law firm supports families because some school districts have become worse than during COVID, even though childhood vaccines are still largely recommended federally. They claim school districts and scientists are desperate to get these materials into children, with Catholic schools allegedly no longer honoring religious or medical exemptions. They describe children with severe reactions and contraindications being denied entry to schools, faced with truancy threats or expulsion. They insist there is nothing healing about these vaccines and call it an infiltration system necessary for AI to function properly. Speaker 1 mentions the U.S. allegedly cutting ties with the WHO, but says research by John Fleetwood shows the U.S. maintains relationships relating to vaccines and influenza, with substantial taxpayer funding. They assert that with a digital ID, one’s bank account can be cut off if they don’t get certain vaccines or comply to maintain the digital ID, arguing the agenda has continued and accelerated with AI. Speaker 0 adds that the WHO remains a standing organization but has been rebranded, and emphasizes that the United States is front and center in partnerships with the WHO. Speaker 1 introduces Biomems (biomedical microelectromechanical systems) as a subset of MEMS used in biomedical research and medical devices, noting that this has existed for years. They describe sensors under the skin that transmit data to pharmaceuticals or governments, not just pacemakers. They reference Albert Bourla, who stated that a pill has been designed to track compliance. Speaker 0 confirms: “They tell us what they're doing.”

Doctors and nurses missed the chance to inform the public about computer networking in the body without consent. Medical body area networks and nano sensors are used for health monitoring. A nano cyber interface sets up networks for communication, data transfer, and surveillance in humans without consent. Sabrina Wallace shared this info in a 30-page PDF. This is biodigital enslavement and technocratic totalitarianism. Download and share the PDF.

Good doctors are urged to consider sustainability goals, bio digital convergence, bioengineering, and human augmentation. Sabrina Wallace discusses smart healthcare using meta materials, graphene healthcare, and BioCyber interface. She highlights the use of technology in telemedicine, nano Mhealth, and the integration of the body with the cloud for monitoring. The speaker criticizes the lack of transparency regarding sensors, open systems architecture, and electronic disease surveillance by the military and CDC.

The speaker discusses body sensor networks that can be injected into the human body to monitor health, detect tumors, and fight viruses. They mention bio nanoscale machines and mRNA vaccines as examples of this technology. They aim to mimic biological processes in the body by creating artificial nano scale machines like bacteria and molecular motors. Translation: The speaker talks about using body sensor networks to monitor health by injecting them into the body. They mention bio nanoscale machines and mRNA vaccines as examples of this technology. They aim to mimic biological processes in the body by creating artificial nano scale machines like bacteria and molecular motors.

This video discusses the concept of inter biomethings, which involves using bio nano sensors to monitor diseases in the human body. The data collected by these sensors is then processed using machine learning algorithms. The video also mentions the importance of considering security and privacy issues. The project involves hardware design, integration of different components, and communication between devices. It also explores near field wireless and power transfer. In the cyber domain, computer science research is conducted to collect and aggregate data. Overall, the video highlights the closed loop system of inter biomethings.

This message is directed to Dr. David Hughes regarding patents filed in London, the US, and Canada for the Internet of Bio Nano Things. The patents, titled "Smart Healthcare System," were filed by Josep Jornet, a former student of Professor Achilles from the International Telecommunications Union. Additionally, a PDF was sent a couple of months ago, detailing the main protocols for remote health monitoring within the medical body area network. This document, available on my Odysee account, covers the two primary protocols currently used by healthcare professionals with Cisco Yang software. The PDF is titled "IntraBody Nano and Molecular Communication."

The European Union website discusses terahertz nano networks for e-health systems, with nano nodes flowing in the bloodstream. People in France are concerned about this forced system. A post on this topic gained 17,000 views in French. The focus should be on IEEE 1906.1 standards for intravody molecular engineering, not vague future implications. The medical body area network has been in use since 2012.

Bionano scale machines are being developed for injecting into the body and monitoring health. This is progressing well, as seen with COVID vaccines. mRNAs are nanoscale machines that are programmed and injected. These nanoscale technologies will be part of 7G and beyond.

The telecom and health industries are developing the Internet of bionanothinks in the cardiovascular system. This network consists of nanodevices controlled externally, containing sensors and actuators in the body.

In his keynote speech in Abu Dhabi, Ian F. Arcidi discusses the Panacea project, a nonsurgical human-machine interface utilizing injectable metamaterials and graphene-based nanomachines, nanosensors, nanoactuators, and nanoantennas. He highlights the development of biology-inspired nanomachines and the communication challenges they address. He mentions hiring Massimiliano Fravan and acknowledges Joseph Jornet, who holds a patent for a remote smart healthcare system. Arcidi also references a workshop by Massimiliano Pierre Robin at Charite Hospital in Berlin, focusing on intrabody networks, molecular computing, communication engineering, and synthetic biology within the Internet of Bio Nano Things.

Covert surveillance systems are using remote monitoring, with doctors and nurses having access. This involves computer networking through the human body without informed consent and wireless intravody nano communication. Sabrina Wallace stated that Jane Ruby "pissed all over her" because, instead of informing the public about wireless biomedical telemetry and the Internet of Bio Nanothinks, Ruby obfuscates and misleads. Ruby allegedly provides just enough information to appear as an expert, despite not being a physician. The speaker questions why Ruby doesn't discuss related activities at the University of South Florida a decade prior. The speaker recommends Nanocom 2024 in Milano, Italy, to learn about the Internet of Bio Nanothings connected to AI precision medicine.

Clayton welcomed Jesse Beltran, a TSCM-certified investigator, and Edward Zahl, a producer of Died Suddenly, back to discuss new findings about nanotechnology in vaccines and alleged “synthetic telepathy” used by intelligence agencies. Beltran explained that an MI6 asset, Oxford-educated with chemistry background, disclosed that Havana syndrome-related communications could be a form of synthetic telepathy used by MI6 and Five Eyes nations to exchange orders discreetly, especially when frontal surveillance is possible. The asset described being head of operations on assignments in the Middle East and Somalia, and he said the system could serve as a plausible-deniability method of communication and as a multifaceted torture device if agents misbehave. He is currently involved in a UK lawsuit seeking damages and removal from the program. Edward noted that the claim sounds fantastical but argued this technology represents a realized goal from Project Artichoke and related efforts; he said the technology enables remote mind influence and that democracy and individual autonomy could be endangered if leaders tolerate such capabilities. He emphasized that the technology is reportedly used not only by MI6 but by every Five Eyes nation, and discussed potential uses in elections or military actions to influence populations. He described the broader consequences as a threat to cognitive freedom and societal structure. Beltran then described the mechanism behind the nanotech, stating that graphene oxide and silicon act as miniaturized amplifiers or antennas. He referenced a 1 cc syringe with trillions of nanorobots, citing Dr. Ittle Bachelet’s demonstrations and a prior study by Dr. Robert Young showing graphene oxide in vaccines and derivatives. Beltran connected silicon detection with harmonic signatures and said that a terahertz graphene-on-stack patch antenna article about future 6G communications demonstrates how such systems could operate at tiny scales, enabling deep penetration and communication with implants. He claimed the nanotech is now widespread, even in the environment—found in foundations of grasses, trees, air, and foods—making everyone a potential node in an integrated Internet of Things and a form of synthetic biology in human form. The discussion turned to Havana syndrome’s similarities: aftereffects such as cognitive struggles and strained relationships, with some victims reporting that the mind has been tampered with or manipulated. Beltran cited Aaron Alexis, a US soldier who contacted him about symptoms and later carried out the Navy Yard shooting, noting the presence of “ELF” (extremely low frequency) markings. Edward described the ongoing unauthorized experiments on US citizens as a priority for congressional inquiry, mentioning a Florida congresswoman, Luna, who chairs a task force on declassification and recommended hearings on MKUltra follow-ups. Jesse explained that graphene oxide functions as an RF amplifier, with experiments in the UK showing changes in silicon indicators and reductions in nanotech presence after targeted interventions. He cited the transition to 6G and President’s remarks about deeper skin penetration, arguing the importance of removing amplifiers like graphene oxide from the body to mitigate manipulation. Edward closed by asserting the sovereignty of the brain and soul and urged urgent action, noting that Died Suddenly (diedsuddenly.info) would cover further developments. They planned to release Died Suddenly 2 and provided a link for viewers seeking further information.

Recently, I shared a briefing from the European Parliament discussing smart bodies for smart cities and the Internet of Bio Nano Things. On page 7, BJ Torg's work is cited, highlighting injectable nano sensor technology for seamless human body connectivity. These sensors are designed for use both on and within the human body. BJ Onutolk collaborates with Professor Ian F. Akiris from the International Telecommunications Union on this topic. The focus is on graphene-based, injectable intra-body nano sensor networks. This emerging nanotechnology allows for the creation of devices that can sense, process, and communicate at the nanoscale. The paper also presents a concept for localizing and tracking bionano sensors within the bloodstream.

We are exploring body sensor networks that can be injected into the human body to monitor health, detect tumors, and fight viruses collectively. Bio-nano scale machines, like mRNA vaccines, are being developed to mimic biological processes and communicate within the body. These artificial nano scale machines aim to replicate neurons, hormones, bacteria, and molecular motors for health monitoring and treatment.

I admire your research. Look into intravody nano network via fax, transhumanism, Internet of bodies, and its link to the new digital financial system. Self-assembling nanotech creates a carbon nanotube network in the body to connect to the Internet of Bodies.