TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

We are being misled with exaggerated information about a climate crisis. Human carbon dioxide emissions are said to drive global warming, but only account for 3% of emissions. The rest is natural. The climate hysteria is about money, not the environment. Expensive electricity bills and job losses are linked to this deception. It is a con not supported by science.

Carbon dioxide is often seen as a pollutant, but I believe it is actually essential for life on Earth. It is a good thing that we are increasing its levels in the atmosphere because it was running low before. However, there is no definitive proof that CO2 is causing serious problems. As a student of science, I know that the scientific method has not been used to prove that carbon dioxide is causing global warming. In the future, people may look back and realize that the efforts to change energy policies based on cutting this gas were unnecessary. I firmly believe that the climate change hysteria is a fabrication.

I'm a skeptic about climate change, not a denier. It's important to clarify that I am a scientist, while the CEO of the Weather Channel is not. CNN promotes the idea of a scientific consensus on global warming, but science is based on facts, not votes. The evidence shows that significant man-made global warming is not occurring now, hasn't in the past, and isn't expected in the future. This issue has become politicized, especially within the Democratic Party, which I regret. I appreciate the opportunity to share my views with your audience, even if we may not reach a conclusion today.

There is a political movement that has used climate change to scare people. It started with global cooling, then changed to global warming, and now they use the term climate change. They claim the world will end in 12 years, but that's not true. We will adapt. The pandemic is even better for them because they can gain control. They can implement vaccine passports and restrict travel. We should be concerned about a potential bank crisis and the possibility of a central bank digital currency that can control our purchases based on our social credit score. This happens in China, and some technocrats in the US might want the same. We should be skeptical and ask questions.

Those in power are like a cancer, intent on unchecked proliferation until nothing is left. With nuclear bombs and power plants causing irreversible damage, it's crucial to stop climate intervention and let the planet heal. Help us expose and halt these harmful operations. - Dane Wington, GeoengineeringWatch.org.

We are being misled with exaggerated information about a climate crisis that doesn't exist. Human carbon dioxide emissions are not proven to cause global warming, as only 3% of emissions are from humans. The focus on climate change is driven by money, not environmental concerns. Expensive electricity bills and job insecurity are direct results of this deception. This is a major scam not supported by science.

As an engineer and business manager, I have never found any logical scientific evidence to worry about atmospheric gases. When hydrocarbon fuels are burned, they produce carbon dioxide and water vapor. Carbon dioxide is essential for life. Two global experiments in 2009 and 2020 showed that despite reductions in human carbon dioxide emissions, the levels in the atmosphere continued to increase. This proves that humans do not have a significant impact on carbon dioxide levels, as it is controlled by nature.

I'm the only Republican candidate who isn't influenced by money, so I can say that the climate change agenda is a hoax. We need to declare independence from it. The anti-carbon agenda is holding us back.

John Kerry, the US special presidential envoy for climate, claims that emissions from the food system will contribute to a 3-degree increase in global temperature, rather than the desired 1.5 degrees. He emphasizes the need to reduce emissions from the food system to combat the climate crisis. However, critics argue that Kerry's statements are lies and that the world's climate has changed naturally in the past. Kerry urges civil society to push for change and emphasizes President Biden's commitment to addressing climate change. He believes that with the right choices, victory in this battle is possible.

I offset personal emissions by spending $10 million yearly on various projects like electric heat pumps and solar panels. I avoid less proven methods like tree planting, which some believe can solve the climate crisis, but I disagree. We need to rely on science, not myths.

Fossil fuels are better for the environment because without them, all the trees would have been cut down. They also save the whales because whale oil was used before fossil fuels. The climate change issue is about controlling energy resources. If everyone uses electricity, it all has to be mined, mostly by slave labor in communist countries owned by dictators. This is not necessarily better than fossil fuels, which make money for those who extract them, involving less exploitation. Scientists who say climate change is real only get grant money if they say climate change is real, while scientists who disagree with climate change have their budgets taken away and are blacklisted. Changing energy resources changes who controls the power in the world.

I'm a skeptic about climate change, not a denier. It's important to clarify that I am a scientist, while the CEO of the Weather Channel is not. There is no scientific consensus on climate change; science is based on facts, not votes. The evidence shows that significant man-made global warming is not occurring now, has not occurred in the past, and is unlikely to happen in the future. This issue has become politicized, particularly by the Democratic Party, which I regret. However, I believe the scientific facts support my position. I'm glad to have the opportunity to share my views with your audience.

I have stated publicly that there's no definitive scientific proof, through real-world observation, that carbon dioxide is responsible for the slight warming of the global climate over the last three hundred years. If such proof existed through testing and replication, it would be documented for everyone to see. The idea that human emissions are the dominant influence on climate is just a hypothesis, not a universally accepted scientific theory. Therefore, skepticism is warranted when people claim the science is settled. However, it is certain that CO2 is essential for all life on Earth, and without enough of it in the atmosphere, the planet would be dead. Yet, our children are taught that CO2 is a toxic pollutant that will destroy life.

Climate change is real. The destruction of hard drives, my husband's frequent trips to Epstein's Island, my loss in the 2016 election, and my husband's infidelity are all attributed to climate change. Even Jeffrey Epstein's death is blamed on climate change. It wasn't me, it was definitely climate change.

I have 25 years of experience working on climate change, starting in 1973 when I gave the Club of Rome a major platform. I share your concerns and believe that the only way to address these issues is by fixing our global architecture and system.

I spend $10 million a year offsetting personal emissions by buying electric heat pumps for low-income housing and installing solar panels. I avoid less proven methods like tree planting. Some believe trees alone can solve climate change, but that's nonsense. Are we guided by science or ignorance?

I don't have opinions, only demonstrable facts. No one has ever shown that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming. If it could be demonstrated, then we would have to show that 97% of emissions, which are natural, do not cause global warming. This is a scientific fraud from day one. We have known for 200 years through chemistry that it is the opposite. When we drill ice cores, we can see chemical fingerprints that tell us the temperature and show that when there was natural warming, there was an increase in carbon dioxide. It's not carbon dioxide that drives temperature, it's the reverse. Another fraud.

I have 25 years of experience working on climate change, starting in 1973 when I gave the club of Rome a major platform. I share your concerns and believe that the only way to address these issues is by fixing our global architecture and system.

I believe I'm the only person in America who openly opposes the demands of the climate movement. Unlike others who just pay lip service to the idea of considering different strategies, I genuinely believe that the focus on reducing carbon emissions is misguided. Instead, we should prioritize maximizing human prosperity by promoting metrics like GDP growth. My agenda is centered around unleashing economic growth in our country.

There is a problem with our climate and environment, but it's not a hoax. The people claiming to save it are actually destroying it. They create weapons, cause droughts, hunger, and wars. Our food, water, and air are also affected. They call it a climate emergency, but they don't invest in healing the earth. They prevent the planet from healing itself. They manipulate our emotions to make us believe they want to help. It's the Hegelian dialectic, where they create the problem and offer a pre-planned solution.

Hi, I'm Hillary Clinton, and I'm committed to raising awareness about climate change and its potential impact on our lives. It's crucial that we take action immediately.

As an engineer and business manager, I have never found any logical scientific evidence to worry about atmospheric gases. When hydrocarbon fuels are burned, they produce carbon dioxide and water vapor. Carbon dioxide is essential for life. Two natural experiments in 2009 and 2020 showed that despite reductions in human carbon dioxide emissions, the levels in the atmosphere continued to increase. This proves that humans do not have a significant impact on carbon dioxide levels, as it is controlled by nature.

I'm the only person on the stage who isn't bought and paid for, so I can say this: the climate change agenda is a hoax. We need to declare an independent rule and acknowledge that the anti-carbon agenda is dampening our progress.

I believe the individuals who deny the stress deficit and sell out the public trust should be in jail, alongside other war criminals at The Hague. The politicians who do the bidding of the Koch brothers and deny the existence of global warming are contemptible. Although there may not be a law to punish these politicians, I think the Koch brothers should be prosecuted for reckless endangerment, as it is a criminal offense. They should serve time for their actions. Thank you.

Climate change is the biggest threat to the world. Time is running out, and this is a fact. Finally, everyone in America is acknowledging it.