TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

"100% proof that Ashley Babbitt was not shot." Before that, I wanna give credit to where credit is due. I wanna thank Jesus Christ, the lord and savior. It was his spirit, his spirit of truth that revealed to my heart that something was off. So I spent a lot of time analyzing the videos and check this out. So this is John Sullivan's footage and we're gonna see the gun. Of course, it's gonna make that quick movement, but also look at where it's shooting. It's shooting really low in comparison to Ashley Babbitt's neck. But then look in the upper right hand corner, and you're gonna see something move. You see that? See, we get the rare opportunity of seeing the travel of the bullet. So let's go back to this scene. This is a video clip from main mainstream media. We see Helmet Boy bashing the windows. He's gonna head over to the final window and the one that must have been installed with thumbtacks because he knocks it out in one shot. Oh, boy. But look at the wooden window trim. This is what's gonna get hit by the pathway of the bullet. Watch this. Did you see that? We got a clear shot of which way the bullet actually went after it left the gun. You may be thinking, well, it hit the window trim and then it hit Ashley Babbitt. That could happen if the shooter was shooting from in front of Ashley, but the shooter is shooting from the side of Ashley. So what we got is actually a really clear shot that Ashley Babbitt did not get shot by that bullet.

Speaker 0: "We still have, basically confirmation he got shot. ... immediate incapacitation." He asserts "the FBI is lying" and that "it's quite literally not possible for the shooter to have been on the roof that they claim he is along with other inconsistencies across the board." Speaker 1: "Keep your eye on this space here... the bullet matches the exit wound, ... the shirt puffing up and the angle of the entry and exit." He adds: "the same what appears to be the bullet coming down and it does line up with the actual gunshot itself." From Google Earth, "the shooter was up here somewhere, that's the angle that the bullet was coming down from." "the shooter was most likely here somewhere." "Somewhere on those stairs would be my tip, and if the FBI aren't looking there, I don't know why."

I think I found the shooter. This guy with the white hat starts it by creating signals—“touches the bill of his hat, and then he touches his ear.” The guy that shot Charlie is over on this side, and he’s seen by others who move to block him, with one man “rubbing his right arm” as he steps in front. “Watch this”—the background figure shifts, and the white-shirt man is “holding the gun right there.” If I go frame by frame, the moment the black-clad man moves his arm out, the white-shirt man “lifts his right elbow” and “shoots it.” His hand goes back, and then Charlie gets hit. “Watch the gun shoot right now”—the gun fires, Charlie is hit. “It’s clear as day.” The black-shirt man shows the white-shirt arm; “pop, bang.” Oh my god.

The speaker asserts a 100% proof that Ashley Babbitt was not shot and begins by giving credit to Jesus Christ, stating that “his spirit, his spirit of truth that revealed to my heart that something was off.” They claim to have spent a lot of time analyzing the videos. The speaker references John Sullivan’s footage and claims that “the gun” makes a quick movement, and that it is shooting “really low in comparison to Ashley Babbitt's neck.” They point to the upper right-hand corner of the frame, asserting that “you’ll see something move,” and claim that “we get the rare opportunity of seeing the travel of the bullet.” Returning to a scene from mainstream media, the speaker describes Helmet Boy bashing the windows and moving toward the final window—“the one that must have been installed with thumbtacks because he knocks it out in one shot.” They observe the wooden window trim and propose that it will be hit by the pathway of the bullet, asking the audience to watch and stating, “Did you see that?” The speaker claims to have obtained “a clear shot of which way the bullet actually went after it left the gun.” They state that viewers might think the bullet hit the window trim and then Ashley Babbitt, which they argue could happen if the shooter were in front of Ashley, but claim instead that “the shooter is shooting from the side of Ashley.” Consequently, they declare that what they have shown provides “a really clear shot that Ashley Babbitt did not get shot by that bullet.”

The speaker analyzes footage of a shooting, alleging it was a staged event using emergency response drill protocols. They identify individuals as "players, controllers, simulators, evaluators, actors, observers," referencing the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP). The analysis focuses on the actions of specific people before, during, and after the shooting, claiming their behavior suggests pre-planning and coordination. The speaker questions the authenticity of the blood, the victim's reactions, and the actions of medical personnel. They point out inconsistencies in the narrative, such as changing accounts of where the victim was shot. The speaker suggests the event was designed to further division and manipulate public perception, urging viewers to analyze the footage and share their insights. They state that something "ain't right."

Charlie Kirk was hit by a high velocity round that created a high pressure shock wave propagating at 1,500 meters per second through his body. This shock wave ripped his gold necklace in half and contributed to killing him. The analysis argues there was no exploding microphone and that some video artifacts can be explained by the rapid sequence of events occurring in milliseconds. The initial shock wave travels at 1,500 m/s and violently yanks the necklace backwards and slightly upward, as Kirk’s neck juts out to the back. The necklace, still under the shirt, is later launched forward a split second later as the shock wave reaches the front. The pendant junction shears the chain due to differential forces acting on the chain and pendant. The right half of the necklace is torn away from the pendant junction and whips around Kirk’s head above his ear due to the backward and slightly upward force. The pendant remains attached to the left half of the necklace and is thrown slightly forward into the shirt and upward over his left shoulder by the frontward expansion of the shock wave, which is not captured in that camera exposure, creating a swooshing projection seen in the next angle. The shock wave undulates down his back, indicating it is not uniform in timing, duration, or magnitude. It propagates around in an undulating manner: out the back, down the back, then forward into the chest and upward. This differential force along the length of the necklace, in contact with the body, leads to the tearing. The left half of the necklace with the pendant attached swooshes upward over the left shoulder; the right side of the chain is whipped around Kirk’s head, as seen in the prior frame. The middle panel shows Kirk’s body ballooned, with the neck expanded, resembling a donut-like inflation around the upper chest, interpreted as cavitation shockwave traveling through the body cavity. This is not uniform: the shock wave went out the back first, then a split second later out the front, imparting force on the pendant to the front and upward, opposing the force on the necklace going backward, contributing to the tearing and the swooping motions. A white smear in the middle panel, pointed to by a green arrow, is not smoke or vapor from a mic explosion. It is a double exposure: the shock wave’s speed causes the shirt to move so quickly that the camera exposure cannot keep up, producing a double exposure and motion blur. The middle panel’s double gold line is two chains forming a V due to the double exposure; in reality, there is one chain, with the right side whipped around the head and the left side still caught in the shirt, the pendant acting like a grappling hook inside the shirt. The video shows a possible exploding lapel mic claim, but the analysis notes that the mic is still attached after the shirt jerks and rebounds, not entering the neck. A small black dot is identified as the lapel mic and remains in place. The white projectile at the end is identified as spit or sweat ejected from the body due to the shock wave, not gang violence. In summary, the account asserts Charlie Kirk was hit by a high velocity round into the neck and body cavity, creating a 1,500 m/s shock wave that tore the necklace and caused the observed motions; there was no exploding mic or palm gun, and artifacts in the video are explained by rapid movement and double exposure. The presenter invites feedback and corrections.

The speaker notes that what appears to be a mullet, slowed down because it is very fast. They acknowledge uncertainty but say the trajectory aligns with Charlie in the final dot or mark just before he gets hit. They also observe that the trunk of the car went down immediately.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 address a viral video about Charlie’s chief of staff, Mikey, and explain why they are discussing it. - The video in question attacks Mikey, Charlie’s chief of staff, claiming based on a few seconds of clips that he allegedly has a nonchalant or calm reaction to Charlie’s murder. They describe this as a “extremely disgusting attack.” - Speaker 1 recounts what happened: they were at the scene when a shooting occurred. The loud crack is heard; they turn and see Charlie has been shot. They realize there is a shooter on the scene. They decide to get out of there rather than be shot, noting Charlie had a security team that leapt into action to get Charlie out. - Speaker 0 notes their own actions: he, too, considered getting into the car, but decided against it. He was ahead of Mikey as they left. He recalls a moment where he paused to assess the situation, then saw Mikey, who was profoundly freaked out. Mikey’s lip was quivering, and he said, “I need to call Erica,” then took his phone and began calling Erica. Speaker 0 also called his own mom, saying there had been a shooting and that he was okay. - They describe Mikey’s later actions: after the initial shock, Mikey took charge like a “general directing a battle,” coordinating hospital transport and information flow, and directing people where to go. When they learned Charlie had died, Mikey told them, “now none of you can say anything that you've heard because it is Erica is not going to hear about this from anyone except me.” - Speaker 2 asks if Mikey could be involved in a conspiracy to murder Charlie. Speaker 1 responds that such accusations are vile and describes how some people online fuel such narratives, comparing the mindset to getting a “high” from dangerous or provocative content. - The speakers emphasize Mikey’s heroic actions: Mikey was distressed but stepped up to direct people and communicate with Erica and others. Speaker 0 notes that he, too, was traumatized after learning of Charlie’s death and rushed to be with Erica and the team. - They address the specific allegation that Mikey was on the phone immediately during the incident; they state he was not on the phone but was taking social videos to share with their group chats. He would send updates to Charlie’s social media during the event while the crowd was changing, then, overwhelmed by the noise and shock, he put his fingers in his ears but his phone remained in his hand as he moved away. - They describe the scene as a cordoned-off area with a narrow gap that people used to exit, where Mikey walked briskly or ran as he processed the trauma and continued to direct actions. They reiterate Mikey “turned into a general on a field marshaling the troops.” - Speaker 1 closes by urging readers who propagate narratives attacking Mikey to reconsider, stating that such narratives are bad and gross and a choice that shouldn’t be made.

The speaker challenges the credibility of the narrative about Charlie Kirk’s incident and points to security footage to raise questions. They reference a security detail member wearing “meta AI shades” who appears to be filming. According to the speaker, when Charlie is hit, the security person turns on the shades, films, and then, as chaos unfolds with a crowd rushing the stage, carries out a handoff. The speaker describes a handoff occurring to a gentleman in a shirt. They claim that this is the moment when someone takes something off Charlie and hands it to the man in the black shirt, who then runs off. The speaker asserts that the item being handed off is the “laugh mic” that allegedly contained an explosive device, implying that the security detail’s first priority was to remove the suspicious object from Charlie and pass it to the other person rather than ensuring Charlie’s safety. The speaker emphasizes that the security detail “knew exactly what to do” and questions how the person receiving the item would know what to do in such chaotic moments, suggesting coordinated movement. They argue that the security actions undermine the official narrative about Charlie Kirk and Tyler Robinson, indicating that the FBI should be questioned and accountability demanded from the FBI and this administration. In summary, the speaker uses the footage to claim that the security team’s behavior—specifically the meta AI shades operator filming, the rapid handoff of an object from Charlie to a man in black, and the subsequent actions—casts doubt on the established story and points to potential coordination and a failure to prioritize Charlie’s immediate safety. The call is for greater scrutiny and accountability of the FBI and the administration.

Speaker 0 says the person shows back up in his neighborhood after the shooting. It shows him in a field, because they believe he probably popped up over there, came up the hill from where they feel the gun was dropped. He ran up there, over the hill, and then ran down that dirt path, and that’s where they see...

The speaker argues that the event, recorded from multiple angles and analyzed frame by frame, obviously happened. They express anticipation for a future “goalpost shift,” but instead expect others to agree with each other and lie, claiming various parties—CBS, Fox News, the media, reporters, the video—are lying, while insisting the event is real and that the speaker and others are vindicated. They mention emailing Donald Trump, noting they have never talked to him. The speaker then reads comments about the incident, referencing a claim that “she did hit him” and that this is part of the cycle, with the speaker implying some groups lack sympathy for the person involved. They conclude by noting that “she was peaceful.”

"A bullet cartridge." "Right there." "It's been thrown over there, setting the scene for something that would be possibly coming our way to be part of this whole insurrection rubbish?" "Because how all in the same scene or magazine, whatever you wanna call it, gets thrown and then conveniently in the same scene, the policeman drops his weapon on the ground." "So you got the the cartridge, and you got the weapon." "Right there, ladies and gentlemen. There's the weapon, and there is the cartridge." "Right here, weapon and cartridge." "Can you see?" "Now, ladies and gentlemen, it's the finer details we need to pay attention to."

Speaker 0: Somebody's shooting over here. How are the people running? There he is right there. That guy. He's the guy.

This is about an ICE arrest attempt involving Roberto Carlos Munoz Guatemala, a convicted sex offender, on an immigration order. Per the Department of Justice, on 06/17/2025, law enforcement officers attempted to arrest him. The officers were trying to carry out ICE’s responsibilities, and this situation is described as part of what ICE officers are trying to do. The person referenced is the same officer who had been dragged during an ICE arrest just this past June and who reportedly got seriously injured. The narrative states: this officer is the same one now being demonized as a murderer by protesters, while the speaker asserts he was the one who stopped Munoz Guatemala along with his fellow ICE agents. The suspect was uncooperative and refused to follow instructions. After warning him several times, an agent—identified as the same agent involved in yesterday’s shooting—broke the back window of the suspect’s car so that the vehicle could be opened from the inside. The man accelerated his car. The account notes that the video shows it’s the same agent; the man had a mask on yesterday, but the speaker claims the same hair. As the suspect sped away, the agent’s arm became trapped between the seat and the car frame. The agent is on the driver’s side toward the back, so the footage does not show him being dragged, but it is asserted that he was dragged for more than 100 yards while the driver of the car weaved back and forth in an attempt to shake him from the vehicle. The speaker states the driver was completely immune to the thought of running over him or causing other damage. The agent was eventually jarred free from the car but suffered significant injuries to his arms and hand.

"I said that the sniper, the BA sniper, actually shot from right here." This is where the BA sniper shot from, right here. "The first shot was taken from the BA sniper." "That little blink that you just saw, that is the actual flash that's coming from the muzzle of the sniper rifle." He ties the event to "the infrared beam" and notes "This is why the infrared beam was on the cell phone." He describes "the arm pop out behind the cell phone to give the signal to take the shot." "This is your guy right here. This is him." He asks, "Who is he? Where is he going?" He states "The man was killed by his own team" and adds "scratch it." He references "This is Phil Lyman right here in the middle of your screen" and points to "That person in the red circle right there, that's the sniper. He came from this location right here." He concludes, "This is your guy" and reiterates, "So whatever everybody's telling you, scratch it."

Speaker 0 asks repeatedly if the listener wants a video. They mention hitting a kid and continue to ask if the listener wants a video.

The transcript describes an agent crossing toward the left of the vehicle and grabbing his gun, then opening fire on the motorist and continuing to shoot as she drives past. “Oh, shit.” The moment the agent fires, he is standing to the left of the SUV, with the wheels pointing to the right, away from the agent.

The transcript depicts a police or federal agent moving to the left of a vehicle, approaching as the motorist is present. The agent grabs his gun, opens fire on the motorist, and continues firing as she drives past. The moment the agent fires, he is described as standing to the left of the SUV, with the wheels pointing to the right, away from the agent. The sequence is punctuated with the word “Shake.” The narration notes that this depiction appears to conflict with allegations that the SUV was ramming or about to ram the officer. The speaker references statements attributed to President Trump and others, who said that the federal agent was hit by the SUV, pointing to another video filmed from a different angle. It is asserted that, in this moment of grainy, low-resolution footage, it does look like the agent is being struck by the SUV. However, when this clip is synchronized with the first clip, the conclusion drawn is that the agent is not being run over. The claim made is that the agent’s feet are positioned away from the s...

The speaker points to a bullet cartridge, saying, "A bullet cartridge." They claim it's "It's been thrown over there, setting the scene for something that would be possibly coming our way to be part of this whole insurrection rubbish?" and note that "in the same scene or magazine, whatever you wanna call it, gets thrown and then conveniently in the same scene, the policeman drops his weapon on the ground." They emphasize by saying, "So you got the the cartridge, and you got the weapon. Right there, ladies and gentlemen. There's the weapon, and there is the cartridge. Right here, weapon and cartridge. Can you see?" Finally, they conclude, "Now, ladies and gentlemen, it's the finer details we need to pay attention to."

Speaker 0 says what appears to be the mullet. He slowed it down because it is so fast. He adds that the trajectory aligns with Charlie in the final dot or mark that we see.

The release of surveillance footage adds detail to the incident involving Renee Nicole Good. The video shows a dark-colored SUV on the right in the back, with agents milling about nearby before converging on the vehicle and shots being fired as the SUV begins to move. Prior to the shooting, the SUV had been stationary and positioned sideways across the road for about three minutes, though the reason for this placement remains unclear. CNN has obtained new video that is grainy and distant but covers four full minutes leading up to the shooting. The footage begins with Renee Goods’ maroon Honda Pilot entering from the right. About twenty seconds later, someone exits the car from the passenger side, though it is not clear who this person is or why they leave the vehicle. The video then shows Good turning and pulling perpendicular across the street, appearing to block the way while still leaving space for vehicles to pass by on either side. A new angle focuses on the federal officer who ultimately fires the shots. He arrives at the scene as another federal SUV pulls up. The ICE officer briefly returns to his own vehicle, then comes back, and another agent is seen grabbing at the driver’s door. Good begins to move forward again, though the exact action is difficult to discern from this angle. The sequence culminates with three gunshots fired in quick succession. The footage spans four minutes from start to finish, but it does not illuminate why Renee Good was where she was or what she was doing there. The material makes clear the sequence of events leading up to the shooting and the immediate actions of the federal officers, but it does not provide context about the circumstances that brought Good to that location or the reasons for the officers’ response. The report notes that despite the video’s detail, many questions remain about the situation and the events that led to the fatal shooting.

"What you're watching here, you're gonna watch the reaction." "Something is hitting that shirt before it goes through his neck." "There could easily be a white vest under it." "Or what I just realized here is you guys have black letters on there." "That round could have very possibly touched one of those black letters." "The shirt looks like after the fact, but he did even have this mic on here." "There is no way to get that angle of that shot." "the vest goes through this, hits something inside, ricochets back out, comes out the top." "it most likely was a long rifle." "I'm still not convinced of the trans shooter." "There have been lies that the FBI has told us." "Kyle's Kyle does this stuff for a living." "Drop some comments below."

In this video, the speaker analyzes a slow-motion footage of a shooting incident. They question the authenticity of the scene, suggesting that the pistol magically appears in the shooter's hand through CGI effects. They also point out that there is no visible damage to the shooter's arm despite being shot. The speaker finds it suspicious that the gun only becomes shiny and reflective after the shooter's hands cover it. They conclude that the situation seems fishy due to the mysterious appearance of the gun and the lack of harm to the shooter's arm.

The surveillance footage shows a dark colored SUV driven by Renee Nicole Goode on the right in the back as it passes by. Agents are seen milling about near the vehicle, then converging on it, and the SUV begins to move, at which point shots are fired. Prior to this, the video shows the SUV stationary and sideways across the road for about three minutes, though the reason for that is unclear. CNN has obtained new video, grainy and distant, that shows four full minutes leading up to the shooting. Renee Goods’ maroon Honda Pilot enters from the right, and twenty seconds later someone gets out on the passenger side; we do not know who or why this person leaves the car. We then see her turn and pull perpendicular across the street, seeming to block the way but leaving room for vehicles to pass by her on either side. There is also a new angle of the federal officer who shot her. He arrives as another federal SUV pulls up; the ICE officer briefly goes back to his car, then returns, and with another agent grabbing at her door she starts to move forward again. It is hard to see from this angle, followed by three gunshots in quick succession. The footage shows four minutes in all from start to finish, but for all the video that may reveal, it says nothing about why Renee Goode was where she was or what she was doing there. It’s not all we don’t know.

The footage describes a sequence where a man in a white shirt raises his right elbow while holding a gun. He fires, and his hand snaps back into place as Charlie is hit. The man in the black shirt identifies the white-shirt shooter and his arm in the background. The shooter then re-raises the gun and elbow, producing a pop and bang as Charlie is hit again. The scene is punctuated with exclamations such as “Watch this” and “Oh my god” as the events unfold. The speaker repeatedly emphasizes the clear sequence of actions: elbow movement, gun discharge, impact on Charlie, and the visual focus on the arm in the background.