TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

You think anyone can come to the U.S.? If you visit the Statue of Liberty, it seems welcoming. I picked up three guys from Honduras at Home Depot; they have nowhere to go. Hector needs medication twice a day, and they all need to use the bathroom. Can they stay here? No, why not? You support them coming to the country but not into your home? Come on, that's hypocritical. Let’s go, guys. Sorry, man.

You would do anything for the illegal stuff to be feared. I think we found a new home for you guys. What? I don’t understand this immigration situation. They need to hear us. They are not violent; they’re good people. Just like before, right? Can they stay for dinner? Sorry, but we have your signature. You guys have to drive back down south. Back to Home Depot.

They're pointing at someone on the roof. Gary is there, laying down. Millions of dangerous people, criminals, should not be in our country.

As a young Texas lawman, fresh out of the academy, you might receive an "illegal alien" to transport to jail, paperwork in hand. You might not think much of it, as border patrol issues weren't emphasized in training. However, by doing this, you could be ruining your life. Once the current political situation shifts, attorneys will target those who unlawfully detained this individual, including you. I will enforce laws dating back to 1868, holding you accountable for violating civil rights under the color of law. No one is above the law, regardless of their position. I will take everything you have, and you will have found out. Don't blame me, the law is the law, and ignorance is no excuse.

I've asked the DOJ where the line is regarding impeding or interfering with law enforcement. Some members of Congress are educating people on how to evade law enforcement, claiming they're educating about constitutional rights. But in reality, they're telling people who are in the country illegally, have committed crimes, and been ordered removed by a federal judge to not open their doors and hide from ICE. As a member of Congress, they should let us enforce the laws that have been enacted. If someone physically prevents an arrest, that's obstruction, but where's the line when it's just telling people to hide? I want to know where that crosses into impeding law enforcement, so I've asked the Department of Justice to define that line.

What's your name? Where are you from? I was born in Thailand. Have you ever been deported from the U.S.? No, I've never been deported. What have you been charged with? I'm not a citizen; my mother is. I've seen Dr. Phil on TV. This is an example of sanctuary cities, where illegal immigrants, like those involved in sex crimes against children, are walking the streets instead of being detained by federal agents. You've been charged with sex crimes? Not really. So, you've never been deported? Nope. We need to process and lock them up.

Are you worried about migrant groups working to obstruct ICE? Federal officials report that activists are increasingly tracking ICE movements and educating migrants on their rights, such as not answering questions or allowing entry without a warrant. Some believe these actions protect criminals and hinder law enforcement. In New Jersey, Governor Phil Murphy has housed a migrant at his home, challenging federal authorities to find her. This approach is seen as reckless, with concerns that it endangers people and defies legal processes. If charges arise against the governor for his actions, some believe he deserves them for protecting someone unlawfully present in the country.

Chicago leaders are urging residents to resist Trump's deportation policies. New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy acknowledged he was hiding someone without full documentation above his garage. The government’s response to this could lead to prosecution for knowingly harboring an illegal alien, as it violates U.S. law. The Trump administration plans to sue sanctuary cities, claiming they protect criminals. An example cited is a case in New York City where a failure to share information led to the death of a child. Sanctuary cities are blamed for numerous deaths, and the administration is prepared to take this issue to the Supreme Court to end their protections. A 2011 study indicated there were 3 million criminal aliens in the U.S.

This is breaking news from a contact in border patrol. They received a document written in Chinese found in Hakumba, California. The document provides instructions for individuals on where to go and what to say to border patrol. It also reveals that the organization behind it is Elochrolado, which is connected to the open borders left and the American Bar Association. This evidence suggests that these groups are directly aiding and abetting.

I am in El Paso, near a group of leftist attorneys supporting the invasion of our country. Mayorkas is lying about not allowing illegal entry. Border patrol is coordinating with someone on the Mexico side to pick up illegal immigrants away from cameras. They bring them to the port of entry, where customs and border protection processes them, giving them parole slips to enter the country as if they came in legally. This is all a fraudulent act, bordering on treason. When will America say enough is enough?

The speaker states that because they are in a sanctuary city, they do not report illegal immigrants. They claim to have released a double homicide suspect because of this policy. The speaker says someone came to pick up $320,000 from their grandparents and is working their way through it. The speaker is asked to take seriously that someone is repeating an offense while being illegal. The person is reportedly in Chinatown, New York.

AOC is doing webinars that give advice to undocumented immigrants about how to avoid being caught and how to stay in the United States, which may be gaming the system. I've contacted the Deputy Attorney General to see if this is obstructing law enforcement. I need the DOJ to determine if a line has been crossed. In my opinion, this is an impediment. We need advice on how to move forward. If necessary, we will take every federal dollar out of the city. This is a matter of public and community safety. Releasing dangerous people endangers the public, our officers, and even undocumented immigrants. If sanctuary cities won't act to make their communities safer, President Trump will.

In the exchange, Speaker 0 recounts feedback from “real Chicagoans,” describing them as mostly Black and Brown, and claims they tell him that the other person does not seem to know the difference between illegal aliens and real Chicago citizens. He asserts that these individuals feel the other person is siding with illegal aliens over their communities. He then pivots to a direct line of questioning. The real question, as Speaker 0 presents it, concerns a violent incident: “An illegal alien from Nicaragua grabbed a woman on the North Side, bashed her head into the sidewalk, knocked her unconscious, and raped her.” He presses for a direct response about what would have happened “if that had been your wife, Stacy.” He stages the hypothetical to elicit a clear stance from Speaker 1 on how to respond to such a crime and its immigration context. Speaker 1, however, interrupts to steer the conversation away from the loaded scenario. He repeatedly signals a move on, indicating a preference not to engage with the hypothetical or to answer the pointed ethical dilemma on the spot. The back-and-forth centers on the tactic of addressing the question versus avoiding it, with Speaker 0 insisting on a straightforward answer “as a man, not as mayor, but as a man.” The exchange escalates as Speaker 0 urges Speaker 1 to provide a simple yes or no and to address the issue directly, effectively challenging Speaker 1 to commit to a position regarding ICE and deportation in light of the described crime. Speaker 1 responds by again stating to move on, resisting the direct yes/no framework. Throughout, Speaker 0 persists in pressing for a candid, personal response to the hypothetical crime and its immigration implications, while Speaker 1 maintains a boundary about continuing the discussion in that moment. Ultimately, Speaker 1 declines to answer the specific deportation question in the moment, and Speaker 0 reaffirms the demand for a direct personal answer. The segment ends with Speaker 1 thanking the audience and moving on, leaving the explicit yes-or-no question unresolved in this exchange.

If an FBI employee leaked an ICE memo, allowing gang members to evade capture, there should be consequences. Interfering with legitimate law enforcement operations, like deporting criminals, is a serious offense that should be prosecuted. Leaking information to criminals that jeopardizes the safety of law enforcement officials is as wrong as it gets. I believe the Justice Department will investigate and prosecute anyone found to be tipping off criminals and helping them evade law enforcement.

There's someone in our community whose immigration status needs improvement. We decided to let her stay in our house above the garage, making it difficult for authorities to intervene. I took note of the situation. If it's confirmed that he's knowingly harboring an illegal alien, it violates Title 8 United States Code 1324, and prosecution will be pursued. He might be bluffing, but if not, we will address it accordingly.

I'm very worried that Donald Trump might report my mother-in-law, who is living here illegally. She resides at street 4, number 47, in an apartment near dark, right behind the green apartment. I'm concerned about what could happen to her. The gate is always open, and there are no dogs around. It's a funny situation in this southern apartment.

There are reports of ICE notifications being sent to businesses in Chicago, threatening audits of their workers. This is especially concerning for Mexican-owned businesses like my restaurant, where all my employees are also Mexican. The potential fines of $20,000 per undocumented worker could bankrupt us. We understand it's technically illegal to hire workers who aren't documented, but people come here to work hard and improve their lives, and I can't turn them away simply based on their status. If anyone has expertise on this issue, particularly regarding whether these audits are widespread or targeted, please share your knowledge. In the meantime, I'm praying for protection and guidance.

Attention, Baltimore residents. I received a message from a follower who got a tip from a trusted source. Johns Hopkins Hospital is expecting ICE to conduct arrests related to deportations this week. We don't know the exact days, but the information comes from a reliable source within the hospital. Please be aware and spread the word.

Tom Holman, former acting director of ICE, allegedly threatened to refer someone to the DOJ for using free speech to advise people of their constitutional rights. According to Speaker 2, some people are educating "the worst of the worst" on how to evade law enforcement. It is a crime to not comply with ICE removal orders or hinder one's removal ordered by a federal judge. Speaker 2 anticipates more judges in sanctuary cities making "bad decisions." Supporting sanctuary cities is acceptable, but impeding ICE is a felony that will lead to a request for DOJ prosecution. Democrats want different rules for illegal aliens, despite claiming no one is above the law. US citizen families are separated when a parent goes to jail, but there's resistance to separating illegal alien families. ICE sent three children with their mothers who requested it.

The president signed an executive order this week threatening to defund sanctuary cities. The speaker questions why the leaders of these cities, who are allegedly harboring and shielding illegal aliens and terrorists from deportation, are not arrested instead.

If he did his job, I wouldn't need to do this. I received a malicious report. Look, they're all pointing. Someone's on the roof. There he is, laying down. We have dangerous people in our country causing trouble.

The speaker states that because they are in a sanctuary city, they do not report illegal immigrants. They claim to have released a double homicide suspect due to this policy. The speaker says someone came to pick up $320,000 from their grandparents and is working their way through it. The speaker is asked to call ICE but refuses, citing the sanctuary city status. They are asked to take seriously that someone is repeating an offense while being illegal. The person is reportedly in Chinatown, New York.

There's someone in our broader community whose immigration status is not fully resolved. We decided to offer her a place to stay above our garage, making it clear that we are supportive of her situation.

We're providing free meals for fire victims today, but some individuals taking food from the distribution center do not have burned homes. I confirmed that their houses did not burn down. To investigate further, I visited an evacuation shelter and found that they do not inquire about the legal status of those present. It appears that tax-funded resources are being redirected by the Red Cross to provide food and shelter for illegal migrants instead of solely for fire victims.

We will not engage in efforts that harm our communities. Mass deportations, as proposed by the president-elect, will misallocate essential resources. It's crucial for everyone to educate themselves on this issue. Refer to Title 8, United States Code 1324, which outlines the legal implications of harboring or concealing an illegal alien; it is a felony. Understanding this statute is vital to avoid crossing legal boundaries.