TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

A recent paper suggests that COVID vaccines may meet the multi-hit hypothesis for cancer. According to the paper, the vaccines affect the p53 and BRCA tumor suppressor systems, impair DNA repair, and contain DNA fragments with cancer-promoting properties. The presence of SV40, a known cancer promoter, in the vaccines further supports this hypothesis. While it is important to note that this applies to some individuals, it suggests a potential link between the vaccines and cancer development.

Speaker 0 asserts that packaged DNA fragments have been found en masse as vaccine contaminants. Once they reach the nucleus, short DNA sequences have an increased propensity to insert into chromosomal DNA. The possible consequences are unending, including disruption of the exquisitely tuned network that controls cell division and differentiation, which can lead to cancer and developmental defects. Mutations in sperm and fertilized egg cells could render altered traits inheritable. Speaker 0 further states that cost effective procedures to reliably separate mass produced RNA from plasmids do not exist, and therefore contamination of RNA vaccines with plasmid DNA must be expected to be the rule and not the exception. Whoever propagates RNA vaccines as being safe and effective, whoever claims that nothing can happen to your genome is either incredibly ignorant or endlessly evil. That person is turning his back on the horror scenario that is unfolding in front of our very eyes. Fellow citizens and physicians of the world are urged to turn away from the perpetrators of this monstrous crime against humanity. Speaker 0 concludes with admonitions to do this to save yourself, your descendants, and to rescue the name of your family or go down in history as one of the greatest criminals of all time. Speaker 1 responds: Thank you very much, professor Bhakti. You continue to be an inspiration both scientifically and ethically for all of us.

Speaker 0 describes a genetic bioweapon as a “biological bull in a China shop” that causes extensive damage, noting he has discussed mechanisms of injury and that there are “28 mechanisms” by which it causes cancer alone. He says it was shocking from the moment of inspection of its ingredients before injection, leading him to halt his life’s work to try to stop it. He asserts that people are being genetically modified under the claim of vaccination, causing them to produce a variety of poisons, primarily the spike protein of a man-made-designed SARS-CoV-2 virus, which he says is the most toxic part of it. He claims the body would normally not produce this protein and that a random array of protein junk is triggered, potentially causing autoimmune diseases in many directions. He alleges that what was claimed to be in the vaccine—modified messenger RNA—was modified so it would both disrupt the production of proteins and persist longer, causing the body to produce foreign proteins and attack itself, but with unknown duration because the approach is “completely experimental” using a new 1-methylpseudouridinated version of mRNA. He references Doctor Kernan and others, stating that 30% of the genetic material there is DNA, including plasma DNA, and claims Pfizer hid that it could be present. He accuses the companies of inserting genetic sequences derived from the simian virus, calling these sequences genetic hacking tools. He explains that delivering foreign DNA with a pigylated nanoparticle and SV40 promoter enhancer sequences can move DNA into the nucleus and permanently modify and damage the human genetic code, asserting that there is now evidence of this. He emphasizes that this is not only an attack on people’s health now but also on future fertility and human reproduction. He cites tests on male sperm showing sperm DNA containing the spike protein genetic code, suggesting men’s sperm could pass this genetic flaw to offspring if reproduction occurs, and notes uncertainty about the extent but asserts “many” sperm cells are affected. He claims that about 30% of a woman’s eggs die shortly after injections due to the assault on the ovaries, and that cancers have had their DNA modified by these injections. He characterizes the situation as permanent genetic modification of humans without consent, based on a lie about a safe and effective vaccine for a disease with alleged available treatments, alleging a broader scheme linked to the same individuals. He ends by naming Fauci, Gates, Tedros, and Dashic as responsible for bringing together the virus, the bioweapon, and the “death shot.”

"Packaged DNA fragments have been found en masse as vaccine contaminants." "Once they reach the nucleus, short DNA sequences have an increased propensity to insert into chromosomal DNA." "The possible consequences are unending." "Disruption of the exquisitely tuned network that controls cell division and differentiation can lead to cancer and to developmental defects." "Mutations in sperm and fertilized egg cells could render altered traits inheritable." "Cost effective procedures to reliably separate mass produced RNA from plasmids do not exist." "Contamination of RNA vaccines with plasmid DNA must therefore be expected to be the rule and not the exception." "Whoever propagates RNA vaccines as being safe and effective, whoever claims that nothing can happen to your genome, is either incredibly ignorant or endlessly evil."

Kevin McKernan recently discovered that there is contamination in the mRNA shots with cDNA, including a cancer-promoting segment called SV40. SV40 turns on cancer genes in the human body and impairs tumor suppressor systems. This means that the shots not only promote cancer through SV40 but also inhibit our ability to fight cancer. The increase in cancer rates is undeniable, but the question remains: how much of this is due to the vaccines?

Integrating foreign genes into chromosomes can lead to cancer and other health issues, permanently altering genetics and affecting future generations. This is a call to recognize the dangers posed by RNA vaccines being introduced globally by organizations like the WHO, CDC, and FDA. The initial vaccines have already shown harmful effects due to the introduction of foreign genes into the body. The production of mRNA does not ensure that these genes, often derived from bacteria, won't enter human cells. As a result, individuals receiving these vaccines may experience genetic alterations, and any genetically altered cell is at risk.

Speaker 0 asks: "Do you think there's evidence that the changes to people to their genetic structure wrought by these vaccines could be passed on to their children?" Speaker 1 responds: "The McCullough Foundation, of which I am the vice president, we just published a person who had cancer of the bladder, which is a very severe cancer, in that tumor, so in the bladder cells that had become dysplastic, that messenger RNA was found in the cancerous cells of this tumor. So it seems to be integrating. Now the question is, is it integrating in a way that is can be passed on to the offspring, or is it so dysfunctional that it's killing the host before it can be passed on? And and I don't know that we yet know that, but remember, the science is the topography of ignorance. I mean, there's a lot about this that is is very, very concerning. There's also a study that this messenger RNA seems to have transcribed into liver cells."

The lipid nanoparticle in vaccines poses significant issues, particularly regarding cancer risks. While the spike protein is inflammatory, the real concern lies with the lipid nanoparticle's distribution. Instead of remaining localized at the injection site, these nanoparticles enter the bloodstream and spread throughout the body, leading to various health problems, including cardiac, neurological, and autoimmune issues. They can cross the blood-brain barrier and the placenta, causing complications in pregnant women and aggressive cancers in young adults, such as cholangiocarcinomas and breast cancers. The systemic distribution of these nanoparticles contributes to the delivery of genetic material to inappropriate sites in the body, exacerbating cancer risks and impacting the immune system.

The SV40 component, highlighted by David Dean and others, interacts with p53, known as the "guardian of the genome," crucial for maintaining DNA integrity. The introduction of billions of these molecules raises concerns about their effects, especially since they bind to p53. Research from the Brown Cancer Institute suggests that the spike protein may alter p53 transcription, potentially leading to cancer if p53 is compromised. Damaged DNA fragments can trigger the cGAS-STING pathway, signaling danger within cells and potentially leading to oncogenesis. There is skepticism about whether this DNA enters the nucleus, but even its presence in the cytosol can be harmful. Observations of rare cancers in vaccinated children, particularly blood cancers like lymphoma, raise alarms about these potential risks.

The speaker claims SV40 in literature turns on cancer genes. They further claim the spike protein impairs tumor suppressor systems P53 and BRCA, promoting cancer and inhibiting the ability to fight it. The speaker suggests cancer rates are up, and the question is how much is due to vaccines. They state that repeated shots every six months increase the chances of getting loaded with synthetic genetic material that will cause harm, including heart disease, neurologic disease, blood clotting, immunologic problems, and cancer.

The spike protein may inhibit tumor suppressor genes like MHS 3p53 and BRCA2, potentially leading to cancer. The mRNA vaccine contains a base that allows the spike protein to be produced for longer, possibly further inhibiting tumor suppressor genes. Concerns are raised about the long-term effects of these vaccines, with a call for them to be banned for general use and reserved for gene therapy in advanced cancer cases.

COVID-19 vaccines, especially mRNA ones, may promote cancer through impairing DNA repair, inhibiting tumor suppressor systems like p53 and BRCA, and containing DNA impurities. These impurities include fragments from circular DNA used in the manufacturing process, such as SV40, a known proto-oncogene activator. The vaccines could potentially initiate or accelerate cancer growth by weakening natural tumor surveillance systems. This phenomenon is referred to as "turbo cancer."

The introduction of foreign genes into human chromosomes can lead to immediate cancer and inflammation, and these changes can be passed on to future generations. This is a serious warning about the dangers posed by RNA vaccines being introduced globally by organizations like the WHO, CDC, and FDA. The first vaccines have already been released, and they are causing significant harm by introducing foreign genes into the body. The production of mRNA does not ensure that these bacterial genes will not enter human cells, resulting in genetic alterations. Any cell that undergoes such genetic changes is at risk.

The DNA sequence in gene therapy plasmids contains the SV40 promoter and enhancer region, an SV40 origin of replication, and an SV40 poly A signal. The SV40 enhancers are nuclear targeting sequences, ensuring the DNA enters the cell nucleus, especially during cell division when the nuclear envelope dissolves. Claims that it doesn't reach the nucleus are misleading. This plasmid was sourced from Pfizer's gene therapy department. The SV40 promoter and enhancer bind to the p53 gene, a tumor suppressor, which is concerning given that the spike protein also inhibits p53 expression. Literature indicates this sequence is a hypermutability element, inducing mutations in nearby DNA, suggesting potential tumorigenic activity. These findings contradict claims that this DNA has no function.

Pfizer's use of the RiboGreen technique to measure DNA in their vaccines has raised concerns about deceptive practices. The presence of billions of DNA fragments in each dose, some of which are small and more likely to integrate into the genome, is worrying. Preliminary data suggests a correlation between adverse events and contaminated Pfizer vaccines, but more research is needed. The DNA in the vaccines is different from previous contamination and carries a higher risk of integration. The FDA acknowledges the integration risk and the need for lower limits on DNA when copy numbers are high. The DNA is encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles, making it prothrombotic and potentially oncogenic. The presence of endotoxin and the spike protein in the vaccines further complicates the situation. The vaccines have been found in various tissues and can lead to prolonged expression of the spike protein. Insertional mutagenesis and cancer risk are concerns, especially for individuals with weakened immune systems. Regulatory bodies have confirmed the presence of the SV40 sequence in the vaccines, but the clinical implications are still unclear.

The speaker explains that there is contamination in the messenger RNA, including fragments of DNA called cDNA, with one of them being s v 40, a known cancer-promoting segment. The other speaker mentions that mainstream news reports estimate that millions of Americans had cancer due to SV 40 contamination in the past. The first speaker confirms that SV 40 turns on cancer genes and that the spike protein in the shots impairs tumor suppressor systems. They conclude that the shots promote cancer through SV 40 and suppress our ability to fight cancer. The speaker acknowledges that cancer rates are increasing, but the extent to which vaccines contribute to this is still uncertain.

Research has shown that COVID vaccines are contaminated with DNA, including a cancer virus promoter sequence. The DNA can enter the human genome, potentially activating carcinogenic genes and increasing cancer risk. Vaccines suppress immunity, further raising cancer risk. The presence of DNA in vaccines can lead to long-lasting spike production, causing health issues. Vaccines inducing IgG4 antibodies are considered defective. DNA impurities in vaccines can intensify side effects. DNA should not be introduced into the body's cells.

There are concerns that the COVID-19 vaccines may have a potential link to cancer. The spike protein in the vaccines could inhibit tumor suppressor systems in the body. Additionally, the vaccines may impair natural DNA repair mechanisms, increasing the risk of DNA damage. Contamination has also been found in Pfizer vials, which could lead to a direct DNA injection and activation of cancer-related genes. This multi-hit hypothesis suggests that repeated vaccination could promote cancer development. There have been clinical observations of rapid cancer progression and reactivation of cancers in remission after vaccination. However, no agency has confirmed a direct link between vaccines and cancer.

Alden and colleagues found that Pfizer's genetic code can be integrated into the human genome within an hour in a cancerous cell line. This suggests that Pfizer and Moderna's genetic material might become a permanent part of human DNA. There is no study confirming or denying this possibility. The concern is that if eggs or sperm incorporate this genetic code, it could be passed on to future generations. This lack of research is seen as reckless and worrisome.

The Pfizer vaccine contains not only mRNA but also plasma DNA from the vector used in its production. I sequenced samples from two batches of the vaccine in Colombia and found this DNA, which raises concerns about potential health risks. This DNA could integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, leading to permanent changes. Such integration poses theoretical risks, including autoimmune responses and cancer, depending on where the DNA inserts itself in the genome. While these risks may be rare, they warrant investigation to understand their implications better.

The panel discusses replication (replicon) vaccines and their potential dangers, focusing on how they differ from conventional messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines and what new risks might emerge as this technology develops. Key points and concerns raised - Replicon vaccines concept and fundamental differences - Replicon vaccines use replication-capable genetic material, so the embedded genetic information not only makes antigen proteins but also multiplies inside the cell. They are described as having both constitutive function (the ability to make proteins) and, crucially, the capacity to replicate, which distinguishes them from traditional, non-replicating mRNA vaccines. - It is explained that replication introduces additional mutation and recombination opportunities, because the RNA genome is copied more than once, and the process can produce variants that differ from the original design. - Central dogma exceptions and viral biology - The speakers explain that while the central dogma (DNA → RNA → protein) generally governs biology, some viruses violate this, with RNA viruses that replicate via RNA-dependent replication and even some reverse-transcribing retroviruses that convert RNA to DNA and integrate into genomes. This context is used to frame why replicon vaccines could behave unpredictably. - Potential risks of replication and spread - A core concern is that the replicon approach might allow the vaccine genome to spread beyond the initial target cells, potentially reaching other cells and tissues, or even spreading to other people via exosomes or other means. Exosomes can transport DNA, RNA, and proteins between cells; thus, the replicon genome could in theory be disseminated. - The possibility of homologous or heterologous recombination between replicon genomes and wild-type viruses could yield new variants. The panel emphasizes the difficulty of controlling such recombination in a living system. - Specific material and design considerations - The use of viral components like spike protein genes in replicon vaccines raises concerns about how these proteins might mutate or recombine during replication, potentially altering antigen presentation or safety. - A concern is raised about the lack of repair mechanisms in RNA replication (as opposed to DNA replication), which could make error rates higher and lead to unpredictable changes. - The panel notes that current replicon vaccine designs (including those using alphavirus backbones) inherently carry high mutation and recombination risk, and that the replicating systems may encounter unpredictable evolutionary dynamics inside the human body. - Safety signals and clinical anecdotes - The speakers cite cases of adverse events temporally associated with vaccines, including vascular inflammation and thrombosis, stroke-like events, and myocarditis, to illustrate that immune responses to vaccines can be complex and occasionally severe. They emphasize that such observations do not establish causality, but argue they warrant careful scrutiny. - There are references to cases of acute vascular and neural complications following repeated vaccination, and to broader immune dysregulation phenomena, including IGG4-related disease and immune dysregulation syndromes that can involve multiple organs. - One example concerns a patient who developed sudden limb problems after the third dose, requiring surgery; another describes myocardial involvement after multiple doses and subsequent inflammatory sequelae. - DNA contamination and analytical findings - Kevin McKernan’s analysis of certain Japanese CoronaVac vaccines is cited: both DNA contamination and the presence of SV40 promoter elements were detected in some vaccine lots, with DNA amounts exceeding some regulatory benchmarks in at least one case. The concern is that DNA contamination, or the presence of promoter sequences, could influence integration or expression in unintended ways. - It is noted that vaccines using lipid nanoparticles can potentially deliver nucleic acids into cells; in the presence of exons or promoter sequences, there could be unintended cellular uptake and expression. - Implications for public health and policy - The panel underscores the need for caution, thorough investigation, and long-term observation of any replication-based vaccine platform before broad deployment. There is a call to evaluate risks, monitor long-term outcomes, and consider the possibility that replication-competent constructs could drive unforeseen evolutionary dynamics within hosts or communities. - There is contention about how information is communicated to the public, with particular emphasis on avoiding misinformation while ensuring that scientific uncertainties are transparently discussed. - Broader scientific context and forward-looking stance - The speakers discuss how the field’s approach to gene-based vaccines is evolving rapidly, and they stress that the compatibility of replicon systems with human biology is not yet fully understood. - They frame their discussion as not merely about current vaccines but about the trajectory of vaccine platforms: if replication-based or self-dispersing systems prove too risky or unpredictable, the prudent path might be to favor conventional, non-replicating strategies until safety, efficacy, and containment of unintended spread are more firmly established. Closing and takeaways - The session closes with emphasis on careful evaluation of replicon vaccines, awareness that viral genetics can behave differently in humans than in theory, and a call for continued discussion, independent verification, and transparent communication as the technology develops. - Throughout, speakers acknowledge the complexity of immune responses to vaccines, the potential for unexpected adverse events, and the importance of safeguarding public health while advancing vaccine science.

Speaker 1 explains cancer is usually a mutation, and the immune system surveils with 30,000,000 T cells. After vaccination there is suppression of many cell lines. The mRNA shot uses pseudouridine in a lipid nanoparticle to evade the immune system, and it can "hijack your cells, and makes your cells the spike factory." The spike "breaks off of the surface of your cell and goes into circulation." Pseudouridine can cause decrease in certain protein kinase pathways and certain retinoic acid receptor pathways, many things that are responsible for normal cell function and then can lead to mutagenesis as well. Stanford study by Doctor Woltkin et al shows "up to sixty days later, the synthetic mRNA is still in lymph nodes and spike is still circulating." Toll-like receptors downregulated: seven, eight, three, four; Dr. Fossa notes downregulation linked to multiple cancers. Micro RNA array disruption and G protein disruptions are mentioned.

The video discusses the presence of SV40 (simian virus 40) in COVID genetic vaccines and its potential link to cancer. The speaker clarifies that while the vaccines do not contain the entire virus, they do contain the promoter and enhancer from SV40, which could increase the risk of DNA integration and potential oncogenesis. The speaker also mentions the role of lipid nanoparticles in vaccine delivery and the need for further research on their toxicity. Additionally, concerns are raised about the biodistribution of the vaccines and their potential impact on the germline. The speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding these risks and considering alternative approaches to respiratory virus vaccination.

Lipid nanoparticles, not intended for human or veterinary use, were administered to billions of people worldwide. Synthetic RNA and spike proteins from the vaccines were found to persist in the body for months, accumulating in the brain, peripheral nerves, liver, and other organs. Autoimmune diseases, myocarditis, renal gland damage, and reproductive harms were also observed. The spike protein affected the immune system, weakened the body's response to other infections, and caused damage to blood vessels, including the coronary vessels. It also led to the accumulation of abnormal proteins in the blood and impaired tumor surveillance. The potential impact on cancer was highlighted as a significant concern.

The speaker explains that the messenger RNA in the shots is contaminated with cDNA, including a cancer-promoting segment called s v 40. They mention that s v 40 turns on cancer genes in the human body and that the spike protein in the shots impairs tumor suppressor systems. The speaker suggests that the shots promote cancer through s v 40 and inhibit our ability to fight cancer. They also mention that cancer rates are increasing. The speaker raises the question of how much of this is due to the vaccines.