TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Australians were shocked by Professor Angus Dalglish's segment on Sky News, where he discussed the controversial mRNA vaccines. As a prominent oncologist, he criticized the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, including lockdowns and vaccine mandates, and highlighted Sweden's better approach. Dalglish expressed serious concerns about the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, labeling them as harmful gene therapies rather than traditional vaccines. He warned of potential long-term effects, including a rise in cancers, particularly affecting children. He called for an immediate halt to these vaccines and accountability from health authorities, likening the situation to historical medical negligence. The urgency for public health oversight was emphasized, with a reference to the need for accountability in the future.

Every childhood vaccine will be mRNA, becoming gene therapies that alter genetics without re-approval. COVID vaccines were profitable data and experimentation tools, but the real danger is the continued genetic tinkering via mRNA integration into all vaccines. The speaker is now anti-vaxx and will not get any more vaccines for themselves or their family because all vaccines are being redesigned to include gene therapies, driven by profit.

Health authorities and the media have been accused of misleading the public about the safety of COVID injections, with evidence suggesting they concealed adverse event data. Recent emails from Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) reveal that officials acknowledged the potential for DNA fragments from mRNA vaccines to integrate into human genomes, contradicting their public statements. Despite this, the TGA focused on dispelling public fears rather than investigating risks. Concerns have been raised about the lack of testing for DNA integration and the overall safety of the vaccines. Senator Gerard Renick criticized the TGA for its poor quality assurance and lack of accountability, highlighting the need for greater scrutiny of vaccine safety and the political failures that allowed these issues to persist. The situation reflects broader frustrations with government transparency and public health decisions in Australia.

The speaker questions the government's decision to continue with mRNA vaccines despite evidence suggesting they may not be effective for respiratory diseases. They mention the partnership with Moderna to build a manufacturing plant in the UK, capable of producing 250 million vaccines annually. The speaker also highlights Moderna's pipeline of 48 products, including ongoing trials for cytomegalovirus, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus. They raise concerns about the contradiction between the vaccines' effectiveness and the push for more mRNA vaccines. The speaker wonders if this is a result of deception by big pharma.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines, specifically the Pfizer and Moderna ones, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these vaccines. They argue that when the body is instructed to make a piece of foreign non-human protein, every cell that expresses it is seen as an invasion, leading the immune system to attack and potentially harm the body's own cells. The speaker also points out that all four companies producing COVID-19 vaccines chose the same part of the virus, the spike protein, which they believe is biologically active and potentially toxic. They suggest that this choice was intentional and not a coincidence.

Australia's healthcare system, supported by dedicated workers, is facing unprecedented challenges, including rising sickness levels among healthcare professionals. Concerns have been raised regarding synthetic DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, with findings indicating contamination levels far exceeding safety limits. A report co-authored by 52 scientists highlights the potential risks, including cancer mutations from minimal contamination. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has been criticized for dismissing these concerns without proper investigation, using inadequate testing methods. The Port Hedland Council has called for a suspension of these vaccines following alarming cancer trends in their community. Urgent action is needed to ensure the safety of all Australians, invoking the precautionary principle until independent testing can confirm or dispel these contamination claims. Transparency and accountability are essential to protect public health.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna, claiming that they contain deliberate toxicities. They argue that when the body is instructed to produce a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode, potentially harming the body's own cells. The speaker believes that this mechanism of toxicity is intentional and points out that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines chose the spike protein as a target, which they claim is biologically active and potentially harmful. They find it unlikely that multiple companies would independently choose the same solution, suggesting a deliberate decision.

Monash University has just received a grant from Moderna to produce 100,000,000 doses of messenger RNA vaccine. The speaker questions what arms they are going to go into, and what they are going to have tagged, and what message they will have. They note that Monash has just come out with the RSV data. The speaker recalls a lesson from the 1970s: you steer away from trying to produce an RSV vaccine because you get immune enhanced disease. Many should have told them this; they didn’t cancel things, they put it on pause. So they paused, putting RSV messenger RNA into the arms of infants. The speaker states that twelve point five percent, one in eight, of these kids nearly died from overwhelming RSV infection. Twelve point five percent. The speaker suggests it’s a bit like they can’t control the dose and they shouldn’t have been doing it in the first place.

The speaker questions the independence of regulatory agencies like the TGA, suggesting that they may be influenced by pharmaceutical companies that fund them. They criticize the quick adoption of COVID vaccines and the authorization for their use in young Australians, even before approval in the US and Europe. They argue that a Royal Commission is needed to investigate these issues and hold those responsible accountable. The speaker also mentions the Pfizer trials, claiming that there were more deaths in the vaccinated group than in the placebo group. They highlight the large amount of money spent on vaccines and the lack of transparency regarding contracts and terms. They believe that mandating vaccines violates international human rights.

I recently heard stories of people losing their children to Pfizer injections, some experiencing immediate or gruesome deaths. The FDA knew about potential risks like cancer from as far back as 2013, but suddenly in 2020, these concerns were ignored. This seems like a premeditated crime, with regulators aware of the dangers. Military involvement in pushing these products is suspicious.

A significant debate took place in Port Hedland on November 29, 2024, addressing concerns over the Australian government's handling of COVID-19 vaccine safety. Key speaker Professor Ian Breithope highlighted alarming findings of synthetic DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, which he claimed could lead to serious health issues, including cancers and autoimmune diseases. He criticized health authorities for not monitoring cancer trends post-vaccination and proposed a five-point plan to address the crisis, including monitoring cancer trends and halting contaminated vaccine distribution. Breithope emphasized the need for transparency and accountability in public health, urging that the health of future generations depends on today's actions. He concluded with a call for prioritizing human life over profits and politics.

An Australian woman has chronicled the money trail showing universities receiving millions to create messenger RNA factories. Messenger RNA vaccines are not needed, will never be better than existing vaccines, and bring huge, unsorted adverse events. However, they are patented and allow for creating new vaccines yearly, like the latest RSV vaccine. The speaker hopes to see a proper assessment of its value. Pfizer's messenger RNA flu vaccine failed, which the speaker sees as a good thing because messenger RNA vaccines for flu are frightening.

I recently met someone whose 18-year-old daughter developed cancer after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. I've heard from many parents who lost children to these injections, some experiencing immediate and horrific deaths. They repeatedly share their stories with lawmakers, highlighting a significant crime that must end. The FDA was aware of the potential cancer risks associated with these vaccines, as outlined in guidance documents from 2013 and 2015. These documents instructed manufacturers to study risks like cancer, fertility issues, and cardiovascular problems, and deemed it unethical to test on healthy volunteers. Yet, by 2020, these concerns were seemingly overlooked. This raises serious suspicions about the intentions behind the vaccine rollout, suggesting a premeditated crime where regulators and the military may have colluded with pharmaceutical companies.

The speaker alleges that after receiving FDA Emergency Use Authorization for a vaccine produced via "process one," manufacturers switched to "process two." This new process allegedly introduced contaminants, including foreign DNA and SV40, a cancer-causing substance. The speaker connects this alleged change to a reported increase in aggressive cancers, particularly among young people. Referencing an NIH paper, the speaker claims SV40 is a known oncogenic DNA virus that induces cancers in laboratory animals. The speaker asserts Pfizer knew they were putting a carcinogen in process two. They speculate that this is the reason Pfizer redacted 800 pages of the manufacturing process, citing trade secrets.

During the COVID pandemic, the Australian government granted Pfizer blanket immunity, allowing them to develop and distribute COVID injections without accountability. However, Pfizer has a history of criminal acts, including bribery and suppressing adverse trial results. The manufacturing process of the injections was also questionable, with evidence of live DNA derived from e coli found in the Pfizer product. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) did not conduct thorough testing on each batch of injections, relying instead on the US FDA's word. The lack of long-term safety testing is concerning, especially considering Pfizer's record-breaking profits. The Australian taxpayers are left with an unknown liability, while those who question the injections are labeled as "anti-vaxxers." The speaker opposes the forced administration of untested experimental injections and calls for accountability.

The speaker raises concerns about the contamination of current vaccines with DNA and the unknown consequences of this contamination. They argue that efforts should be made to eliminate DNA contamination, even if it increases production costs. The speaker mentions a researcher from MIT who accidentally discovered that mRNA vaccines were contaminated with DNA. They criticize Pfizer for testing vaccines from one process and then vaccinating billions of people with vaccines from another process, which were contaminated with DNA. The presence of DNA in the vaccines raises risks, including potential cancer development. The speaker believes it is misleading to claim that the vaccines have undergone clinical trials when they have not been properly studied. They call for more rigorous research before commercializing vaccines.

The speakers discuss the vaccination landscape around human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, focusing on a controversial issue they claim has been known and disseminated since early on: contamination with DNA (DNA residuals) from Deinococcus or related genetic material in vaccines and the implications of aluminum adjuvants used in Gardasil/Gardasil 9. - They begin by asserting that HPV vaccines, including Gardasil/Sil, have been the subject of remarkable legal actions worldwide, including four major lawsuits in Japan. They note that historically, in Japan, many young women and girls stood as plaintiffs, and that the core problem they highlight is the DNA contamination issue (referred to as “ディー エ ヌ エー 混 入 汚 染 問 題”). - The claim is that from early on, the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and others acknowledged this contamination as central. They reference a 2012 paper that reportedly made the DNA contamination problem very clear, naming pathogens such as Human Papillomavirus, HPV, and DEIN? They describe that vaccine particles (HBV? HPBL DNA fragments) were found to be directly bound to aluminum adjuvant particles in Gardasil, implying a mechanism by which residual DNA could be involved in adverse effects. - The speakers say that the 2012 study, and subsequent work, led to attention from doctors worldwide who listened to the voices of women and girls and wondered what was happening with the vaccine recipients. They claim that samples showed that residual HPV DNA fragments were consistently present and directly linked to aluminum adjuvant particles, and that “PCR” detection indicated the same DNA sequences across samples. They mention that the 2012 paper’s findings were followed by reporting that, by 2014, vaccination had been suspended in Japan earlier than many would have expected. - They recount a process in which major scientists from various countries (France, the UK, and others) were involved in investigating adenoviral or genetic components (they reference Shihan? and others) and that the Japan-based researchers, including Ishii Ken, were central figures. They describe meetings, PowerPoint presentations at a hotel, and a sequence of visits to the UK and the US (including HR-related planning with U.S. FDA and the UK authorities) that were interrupted by closures in the Obama era, leading to documentation and discussions about the safety concerns. - The speakers claim that by the 2012 report and again by 2014, all vaccine samples from multiple countries contained residual DNA, and that Japan became a hub for disseminating awareness of these issues globally. They state that the issue was present not only in the early Gardasil (Gardasil-4) but also in later forms, with references to Gardasil-9 and the idea that the DNA contamination and adjuvant interactions could contribute to immune and neurological symptoms in recipients, particularly in women and girls. - They discuss changes to WHO and FDA guidelines on residual DNA limits, noting a progression from 10 picograms to higher thresholds over time, implying corporate interests in allowing higher residual DNA quantities in vaccines. They emphasize that the shift in limits is tied to pharmaceutical companies’ needs, not human biology changes, and argue that Japan highlighted the problem of Deinance-DNA contamination during the cervical cancer vaccine era, signaling that researchers, journalists, and victims were aware long before others. - Finally, Speaker 1 adds that two points became clear a year earlier: the disruption of messenger RNA–type vaccines as a response to safety concerns, and the subsequent rise in adverse outcomes after widespread vaccination, including deaths, which they claim intensified opposition to these vaccines. Note: The summary presents the speakers' claims and sequencing of events as described in the transcript without evaluation or endorsement.

Synthetic DNA contamination in Biogen and Moderna's COVID-19 vaccines poses a national crisis for Australia. Research confirms excessive levels of synthetic DNA, with findings indicating potential integration into human DNA and self-replication, raising concerns about long-term health risks. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) dismissed these findings as misinformation, but this has been challenged by experts. Mortality rates have risen post-vaccination, correlating with booster shots, and there is a disturbing trend of aggressive cancers emerging after vaccination. Despite over 60 million doses administered, health authorities have not monitored cancer trends, creating a critical oversight. Immediate action is needed to halt the distribution of contaminated products and prioritize public health over profit. The truth must prevail for the sake of future generations.

Australian lawmakers and officials are admitting they were misled into enforcing coercive vaccine mandates, citing rising deaths and evidence of harm. They are calling for an urgent inquiry and the suspension of mRNA vaccines globally. A New South Wales health minister admitted a link between COVID-19 vaccines and a surge in hospitalizations and heart problems. A lawmaker highlighted synthetic DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, up to 145 times higher than safety limits, potentially causing cancer and other health risks. Each vaccine shot tested contained trillions of synthetic DNA fragments, including SV40, known to cause cancer. It is claimed that using biological weapons to harm people violates the Geneva Convention. An Australian judge, Helen Rife QC, who dismissed a lawsuit against Pfizer, allegedly failed to disclose her ties to the company. Senator Malcolm Roberts is pursuing those responsible for what he calls the "greatest crime" of the 21st century.

Pfizer allegedly knew their trial data indicated future issues and acquired cancer companies, investing $43 billion in C Gen and $2.26 billion in Trillium Therapeutics, which focused on blood cancers with the CD147 marker, also linked to COVID. The speaker claims the Pfizer vaccines on the market differ from the clinical trial formulation, constituting a "bait and switch" and fraud, invalidating claims about vaccine efficacy. Significant DNA contamination is allegedly found in most studies, including peer-reviewed ones, even those not initially investigating it. The speaker asserts cancer rates are rising, with some papers reporting neoplasms at the injection site post-vaccination. The speaker concludes that these liability-free, often mandated vaccines may represent the largest carcinogenic event in human history, especially concerning childhood schedules and pregnant women.

Health Canada has confirmed that Pfizer disclosed the presence of the SV40 simian virus in its COVID vaccine. This virus was previously associated with the old polio vaccine and is believed to have contributed to over 100 million cancer cases in the United States. Pfizer's admission raises concerns about the potential cancer risk linked to the COVID vaccines.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these vaccines. They explain that when the body is instructed to produce a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode, potentially harming the body's own cells. The speaker also points out that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines chose the spike protein as their target, which they find unusual and potentially dangerous. They question why these companies would select a biologically active and potentially toxic part of the virus. Overall, the speaker believes there are significant concerns about the safety of these vaccines.

Australia has administered over 60 million vaccine doses to over 20 million people. Despite this, governmental health authorities have chosen not to monitor new or emerging cancer trends, and have failed to make post-vaccination cancer trend data publicly available, which is a critical oversight. Given the massive contamination levels of rogue residual DNA in the Australian vials, we must expect an ongoing rise in cancers and other genetic disorders in Australia. This is a potential long-term health crisis. This matter must be taken seriously. We must advocate for immediate public health responses and monitoring of these trends. Without action, Australians are vulnerable to preventable diseases that may devastate families and strain our healthcare system. These gene-based vaccines should never have been considered. The technology had never been proven to be effective in preventing coronavirus infections and was unsafe long before 2021.

The safety of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines, such as Pfizer and Moderna, is being questioned. Studies have shown that mRNA can be toxic to heart muscle cells and can remain in the human heart, bloodstream, lymph nodes, and injection site for extended periods. This raises concerns about the safety of mRNA technology for vaccines, as it may make flu shots and other vaccines more dangerous. Some argue for a ban on mRNA development due to the COVID-19 vaccine controversy.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna, stating that they contain deliberate toxicities. They explain that when the body is instructed to produce a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode, potentially harming the body's own cells. The speaker also highlights that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines chose the same spike protein, which they claim is biologically active and toxic. They find it unlikely that multiple companies would independently choose the same solution, suggesting intentionality.