reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Former President Donald Trump is facing charges in a New York courtroom, but it remains unclear what exact crime he is being accused of. The prosecution claims that Trump falsified business records by recording legal expenses as legal expenses, which they argue is a felony. However, this theory fails on multiple levels. Even if it were a crime, it would only be a misdemeanor and falls outside the statute of limitations. Furthermore, the prosecution's argument that these payments should have been recorded as campaign contributions is flawed, as using campaign funds for personal expenses is also illegal. The entire case appears to be a politicized prosecution based on false premises.

The administration hired tens of thousands of IRS workers to pursue back taxes, yet from 2021 to 2023, nearly 6,000 IRS employees owe about $50 million in back taxes. Despite having the authority to fire these individuals, only 20 have been terminated. Additionally, some of these employees have faced misconduct issues, including sexual misconduct, and 282 have been rehired. It's absurd that the IRS targets citizens while failing to manage its own employees effectively. The situation highlights a significant double standard.

Speaker 0 discusses suing the federal government over taxes and questions whether it is fair to ask the American people to pay for that. He says, “Anything I win, I’m gonna give a 100% to charity,” but adds that it still takes money from the American people. He argues that Americans already give money to charity, stating, “They give away $40,000,000,000 a year to charity, our government.” He emphasizes that anything he wins from that would go to charity, while claiming that the release of one’s tax returns is “totally illegal,” noting that people go to jail for that and that a person has already been found who did it. He mentions that “based upon that and other things we did, and we did sue.” He reiterates that any winnings would be given “100% to charity,” describing the charities as “really good, very, very good and respected charities,” and ends with asking whether the listener will decide if he wins.

The speaker initially believed that there was a law requiring people to file tax returns, but after researching for three and a half months, they couldn't find a clear statute that made a person liable. They realized that the government collects taxes to generate revenue, but they were unaware of the complexities involved. The speaker attended a meeting where someone argued that the IRS lacks authority, but they initially dismissed it as taking things out of context. However, after a conversation with the person, the speaker agreed to research the matter further. They delved into the Internal Revenue Code and found sections that seemed relevant but didn't provide a clear answer. The speaker's research led them to question their own authority to enforce tax laws, ultimately leading to their resignation. They discovered that the Internal Revenue Manual restricts enforcement due to constitutional issues. The speaker believes that if more people knew about the government's methods, they would stop filing tax returns.

The speaker interviews former IRS commissioner Sheldon Cohn about the tax code and voluntary compliance. They discuss the definition of income, Supreme Court decisions, and challenges the IRS to show a statute allowing a direct tax on wages. Cohn asserts that the law requires filing tax returns, despite objections. The speaker questions the IRS's legal authority and highlights inconsistencies in tax enforcement. Ultimately, the speaker challenges the IRS to prove the legality of income tax laws. Translation: The speaker interviews former IRS commissioner Sheldon Cohn about the tax code and voluntary compliance. They discuss the definition of income, Supreme Court decisions, and challenges the IRS to show a statute allowing a direct tax on wages. Cohn asserts that the law requires filing tax returns, despite objections. The speaker questions the IRS's legal authority and highlights inconsistencies in tax enforcement. Ultimately, the speaker challenges the IRS to prove the legality of income tax laws.

A former IRS commissioner is interviewed about the tax code and income tax laws. He argues that the IRS code is voluntary compliance, not mandatory, and defends the IRS's actions. The interviewer challenges the legality of income tax on labor, citing Supreme Court decisions. The former commissioner dismisses the arguments and asserts the IRS's authority. The interview ends with a confrontation, revealing a lack of transparency in tax laws and enforcement. The interviewer questions the legality of income tax on wages and calls for the IRS to show the law to the public.

The speakers in the video discuss their experiences and research regarding the requirement to file a tax return and pay income tax. Speaker 0 initially couldn't find a specific law mandating tax returns, leading to their resignation. Speaker 1 left the IRS after raising concerns about the agency's violation of the law and people's rights. Speaker 2 conducted research to win a $50,000 challenge, but couldn't find the law either. They believe that if the truth is revealed, it would expose a fraudulent system. Speaker 3 was surprised to hear IRS agents say there was no law requiring tax filing or payment. Both Speaker 0 and Speaker 2 admit to not filing tax returns, and they mention that millions of others also don't file.

Speaker 0: There is no law. And to date, nobody has been able to show that there is a law for the average American citizen working day in and day out to pay an income tax. Speaker 1: But We, The People Foundation for Constitutional Education put a full page ad in The USA Today on 07/07/2000. And within the body of that ad was a $50,000 challenge for anyone that could show the law. And to me, $50,000 is a lot of money. So I went after that and did the research based on the fact that I thought, let's put this baby to bed. I'm hearing all these rumors. You know, I'm gonna kill two birds with one stone. I'll answer these people's questions they're asking me, and then I win this $50,000. And, you know, based on the research that I did throughout the year 2000 and that I'm still doing, I have not found that law. I've asked congress. We've asked a lot of people in the IRS, IRS commissioners, helpers. They can't answer because if they answer, the American people are gonna know that this whole thing is a fraud. Speaker 2: There is no law. There is no law that requires the average American worker in the private sector to pay a direct unapportioned tax on their labor and compensation for services. There is no law. Speaker 3: I really expected that, of course, there's a law that you can point to in the law book, the code, that requires you to file a tax return. Of course, there is. I mean, I don't know what it is right then as we as he was speaking to me, but sure. So, naively, I agreed to go off and research it and get back to him. Three and a half months later, I was at that point where I couldn't find the statute that clearly made a person liable, at least not me and, most people I know. And I had no no choice in my mind except to to resign. Speaker 4: I had to leave the IRS because I presented, evidence that I had accumulated indicating that the agency was violating the law and violating people's rights. And I asked the agency for a response to my sincere concerns, and the answer I got was that they would not respond to my concerns and that they would, provide me with the paperwork necessary to tender my resignation. Speaker 5: You can look through the statutes and look for the law that requires you to pay. And when you do that, you can't identify a law that requires the average person in America who earns a wage and works in private business to pay an income tax. Speaker 2: American citizens, along with the foundation, have been asking the IRS to specifically provide them with the the underlying legal foundation upon which they administer and enforce the personal income tax laws in our country. Speaker 3: At the national level, when people would attempt to contact somebody of a much higher authority, say the cons the commissioner, same kind of thing. They wouldn't get they would get answers that were in effect non answers. Speaker 6: You have to understand that an agency which will unlawfully impose a tax that doesn't exist it's not gonna care. If we, the people, don't know what our rights are, they're not gonna tell us. Speaker 4: If Americans just learned that the IRS was actually knowingly deceiving them, that that enough that would be enough for them to rise up and put a stop to it. Speaker 7: 100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt. All individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from government. People have been told, you know, that you need this income tax system to fund government, is absolutely ridiculous. I mean, my question is, well, if that's true, how did we fund government from 1776 to 1913? Speaker 8: The main purpose of the income tax is not to raise revenue, but to redistribute wealth and to control society. And a lot Speaker 9: of people might say, well, gee, if there wasn't an income tax, what would happen to education? They don't understand that education is paid for, for the most part, out of state and local taxes, your property tax. People might say, well, how are we going to build and maintain our highways if there's no money coming into the government? We need our highways. There is a tax on every gallon of gasoline that people buy. Proceeds from the income tax do not pay for highway construction. Speaker 10: I believe that in both spirit and substance, our tax system has come to be un American. Death and taxes may be inevitable, but unjust taxes

I couldn't find a law requiring me to file taxes, so I resigned. The IRS wouldn't address my concerns and asked me to resign. I searched for the law to win $50,000 but couldn't find it. Trained IRS agents said there's no law for Americans to file taxes. I haven't filed taxes since leaving, and many others don't file either.

A man was being tried for not filing his income tax. The defense questioned whether he could be innocent while still not filing. It was revealed that not filing taxes is not a felony at the federal level. The case was then moved to the state level. The defense questioned an IRS agent who claimed he didn't write anything down, but video evidence showed otherwise. The prosecutor attacked the defendant's character. The jury asked for a copy of the law but didn't receive it. They realized that if the defendant wasn't required to file federal taxes, then the Illinois law requiring tax filing would be nullified. The jury found the defendant not guilty, surprising the judge. Other individuals who claimed there was no law requiring income tax filing also won their cases.

Income taxes were nonexistent in America until 1913, yet the government functioned well. They are seen as a significant fraud against the public. Although the Constitution initially forbade income taxes, an amendment allowed them. This system shifts the burden of revenue collection onto citizens, who must complete extensive paperwork annually. Essentially, individuals do the work of providing documentation while the government simply collects the money. This situation is viewed as a clever deception on the unsuspecting public.

The speaker asserts that you cannot legally pay your taxes. They state: “tax dollars have been spent in a global crime syndicate,” and “you now know this and it’s provable,” which means “if you willingly pay your taxes you now are a willing participant and co conspirator.” The guidance given is for when you file an exemption: “This is what you’re gonna say when you file an exemption. Owe back taxes? This is what you’re gonna tell your agent.” The agent will threaten you, and you should respond with, “I said that I will not be a willing participant in a global crime syndicate.” The speaker says you should repeat it, “and you repeat it again.” They advise to “play the congress game” and claim that “you legally cannot pay your taxes now that you know this. It is against the law.”

A security guard, who was protecting a doctor, is facing sentencing for his actions during the January 6th incident. Marjorie Taylor Greene wants the U.S. Attorney prosecuting the case impeached. The guard claims that he has not engaged in any violence or destruction. He finds it ironic that the government is withholding 45,000 hours of video footage, which he believes would exonerate him. Despite his requests, the footage has not been released. He questions who the real criminal is when the alleged criminal is asking for evidence to be revealed, but the government is hiding it.

"We got them. We finally got them. We caught the IRS red handed." "They're frauds, fabricated, phantom tax returns the IRS claims that you filed but can't produce because they never existed." "Here's the crime. An IRS agent falsified the records." "A supervisor covered it up." "The DOJ marched into court and used those fake records against Americans and then admitted under oath they have no signed returns to back it up." "That's not sloppy paperwork. That's a RICO fraud, a criminal enterprise operating under color of law." "And it doesn't stop there. Judges look the other way." "Multilayered fraud, IRS, DOJ, and the judicial system." "It's time to shut down this rogue agency once and for all." "Chew on this, America."

Four counts of not filing his income tax prompted a question: could someone be innocent and still not file? "In the federal government, it is not a felony not to file taxes." After moving the case to the state, they called IRS Agent Kraner. The defense noted, "I never wrote anything down," even as video showed him taking notes. Mr. Harrell asked, "You show me the law that requires me to file a tax return and I'll be glad to do it," and, "what is the section... what act are we discussing here when I am liable to do these things that you claim I'm liable to do?" Jurors concluded "there is no law" and asked, "Where is the law? Show me the law." The judge promised the law but there was none. Bannister and Kuglund cases followed with acquittals: "24 people were criminally charged by the IRS because they claimed there was no law requiring them to file an income tax return." The jury acquitted all.

In 1894, Congress attempted to implement an income tax but it was deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. In 1913, they tried again, but the Supreme Court stated that the 16th Amendment did not grant new taxation powers. Therefore, there is no constitutional basis for taxing the wages of American citizens in the 50 states. A letter from Daniel Inouye's office confirms that there is no specific law requiring individuals to pay income tax, and no one has been able to prove otherwise.

The biggest misconception about the Hunter Biden case is that he committed felony tax offenses while under the influence of drugs. This is false; he filed false tax returns during a period when he claimed to be newly sober in his book. A comparison of his statements in the book and the information on the tax returns reveals inconsistencies.

There is a law requiring tax returns, but many struggle to find it. After extensive research, some individuals, including former IRS agents, concluded there is no clear statute making citizens liable to file or pay income tax. They resigned from the IRS after presenting evidence of legal violations and received no satisfactory responses. A challenge was issued for anyone to prove the law exists, but no one has succeeded. Despite widespread belief in the legality of income tax, many question its legitimacy. A class action lawsuit was initiated against the IRS, highlighting the agency's refusal to clarify the legal basis for income tax enforcement. Some citizens maintain that paying taxes is a civic duty to support government services, while others argue for transparency regarding tax laws.

The speaker, a former IRS agent, shares her experience working for the IRS and her realization that the income tax system is fraudulent. She explains how the IRS uses tactics to make people believe they owe more money than they actually do. After leaving the IRS, she researched and discovered evidence that the income tax is not necessary for running the country. She also discusses the Federal Reserve and its non-federal nature, as well as the media's influence in suppressing this information. The speaker encourages people to do their own research and make informed decisions about paying taxes. She emphasizes the importance of understanding the system and taking action to bring the country back on track.

There is no law requiring payment of taxes in the US. The IRS manual states they have no jurisdiction over US workers, only those abroad. Share this info and challenge the IRS to prove tax obligations.

I told the judge I wasn't practicing law and that I lived by common law, not participating in corporate schemes. I argued that Michigan had wrongly turned my right to work into a privilege requiring a license, which is unconstitutional. I referenced key legal cases to support my claim that I should not be punished for ignoring the license. The judge found my argument compelling and turned to the prosecution, suggesting they honor my motion to dismiss. The courtroom erupted in laughter, and an experienced attorney praised my argument, acknowledging the constraints imposed by the Bar Association. The case was dismissed, and I've since helped others facing similar issues.

The speaker interviews Sheldon Cohn, a former IRS commissioner, about the belief that there is no law requiring Americans to pay income tax. Cohn argues that voluntary compliance is used as a term for traffic laws, but it does not apply to income tax. The speaker questions the definition of income and cites Supreme Court rulings that state income is not wages. They also discuss the lack of a law making individuals liable to file a tax return. Cohn dismisses the Supreme Court's relevance to the IRS and the speaker concludes that the IRS operates through intimidation and fear. They challenge the IRS to show a statute allowing a direct tax on wages.

Sherry Peel Jackson, a former IRS agent and CPA, discovered that there is no law and that the IRS is the biggest fraud. She researched and found that no one could identify the section of the Internal Revenue Code that makes a typical worker liable for income tax. She also learned about the non-enforcement pocket commission she had as an administrative clerk. Sherry realized that the Federal Reserve is not federal and that income tax does not go towards running the country. She exposed these truths and educated people about the system. She emphasized the need to unite and understand what is happening with our money.

"Would you allow these cities to ignore the federal law regarding the reporting of illegal immigrants and in fact provide sanctuary to these immigrants?" "The reason the cities ignore the federal law is the fact that there is no funding at the federal level to provide for the kind of enforcement at the federal level you need." "Pick up the New York Times today. There's a city not far across the river from my state that imposed a similar sanctions." "And what they found out is, as a consequence of that, their city went in the dumps in in the dumpster. Stores started closing." "Everything started to happen, and they changed the policy."