reSee.it - Related Video Feed

According to Speaker 1, the intelligence agencies hid the fact that Bin Laden was in Iran, not Afghanistan or Pakistan, to justify military action in the Middle East. This manipulation started under Clinton and continued under Bush Jr. Speaker 1 claims that intelligence agencies have tentacles around the world and don't answer to anyone, which is a problem for Trump. Speaker 1 alleges that they were targeted after questioning 9/11, resulting in an FBI raid on their daughter's house weeks before an election, which they believe was politically motivated to remove them from office. No charges were ever filed against the daughter, and boxes taken were returned unopened months later. Speaker 1 claims that the person who ran the campaign against them was managed by the staff director of Sandy Berger's company. Speaker 1 asserts that some individuals within intelligence agencies are making money from conflicts and vows to expose them.

The speaker warns that a war with Arabs and the Muslim world is imminent, but claims that the 9/11 attacks were not carried out by Muslims, but rather by the Israeli Mossad. They refer to a US army report published the day before 9/11, which allegedly warned about Israel's ability to carry out such attacks. The speaker emphasizes that this is not their conspiracy theory, but information from the US army report.

The program features host Mark and guest Dr. Alan Szabrowski (PhD, University of Michigan; former director of studies at the U.S. Army War College; a ten-year U.S. Marine Corps veteran). The conversation centers on loyalty, Zionism, and alleged foreign influence in U.S. policy, particularly regarding Israel. - Szabrowski argues that loyalty should be to country, people, and the Constitution, and critiques what he calls “dual loyalty” or political bigamy, particularly among American Jews who, in his view, feel allegiance to Israel over the United States. He states, “this is a form of political bigamy that is every bit as dishonest as marital bigamy.” He emphasizes that “loyalty to America is the only nonnegotiable part of American citizenship.” - Mark foregrounds Szabrowski’s credentials and then proceeds to read from Szabrowski’s article, “The Dark Face of Jewish Nationalism,” dated 03/12/2010. The article’s thesis, as presented in the discussion, is that Zionism combines xenophobia, racism, ultranationalism, and militarism, placing it outside the usual nationalist context. - Szabrowski asserts that Zionism undermines civic loyalty among adherents in other countries, describing dual loyalty to Israel and the U.S. as “every bit as dishonest as marital bigamy.” He discusses figures such as Rahm Emanuel as examples of individuals with Israeli military service and U.S. citizenship who influence U.S. policy, arguing this creates a problem of allegiance. - The discussion contrasts Zionism with other nationalist movements: Szabrowski contends Zionism maintains a list of enemies and treats ordinary nationalist concerns differently, and he notes that “the occupying power and perhaps its allies” are central to Zionist conflicts, with Israel’s perceived enemy list being unusually long. He also claims that Zionism involves wholesale displacement of populations in ways that he contrasts with other historic nationalist movements. - The hosts and Szabrowski discuss the implications for Middle East peace and U.S. policy, arguing that Zionism’s domestic influence can constrain American political decisions. Szabrowski contends that if the American public understood the events, “Israel will flat ass disappear from this Earth” if Americans fully grasp what occurred. He asserts that 9/11 was a Mossad operation and ties it to broader assertions about Israeli influence and U.S. policy. - The conversation turns to 9/11 and U.S. military engagement. Szabrowski claims there is clear evidence that 9/11 was an Israeli operation and says, “It is 100% certain that nine eleven was a Mossad operation.” He contends that the attack has led to enormous American casualties and ongoing wars, arguing that the situation would provoke strong public backlash against Israel if fully understood. - Mark challenges Szabrowski’s views and notes that some in the U.S. military may be unaware of such theories, while Szabrowski reports that colleagues at the Army War College and the Marine Corps Headquarters have reacted with “astonishment” and “rage” upon hearing these claims, admitting they did not know. - Towards the end, Szabrowski posits that if the American people understand their own history, they would act to alter or abolish a government he views as oppressive. He states his lifelong loyalty to the United States, but insists that this loyalty requires honorable government conduct; otherwise, he says, reform is necessary. The program ends with mutual expressions of Semper Fi and respect for service. - Throughout, the dialogue emphasizes that the article being discussed exposes a perceived problem of foreign influence, dual loyalty, and a call for accountability and re-evaluation of U.S. policy toward Israel in light of loyalty to the United States.

The transcript weaves together a compilation of statements and reporting surrounding the 9/11 attacks, Israeli involvement rumors, and related investigations. - Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly said September has been good for Israel, claiming, “we're benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon and the American struggle in Iraq.” - CNN reported (and later acknowledged as false) a tape in which Osama bin Laden told his mother that something big was about to happen; bin Laden had consistently denied involvement in 9/11 and claimed Zionists were behind the attacks. Reports from Japanese, Chinese, and Indian outlets claimed bin Laden was killed in Afghanistan in 2001 and buried in an unmarked grave by his own men. There are claims from the Muslim world and some European figures that Zionist extremists staged the 9/11 attacks to ignite terrorism. - A commentator asserted that the war has targeted Israel’s Muslim enemies and is being fought and paid for with American blood, lives, and tax dollars. - A speaker argued that bin Laden, regardless of who committed the attacks, comes back to the Middle East, and urged the United States to dismantle the entire “evil empire of terrorism,” warning that without doing so, the terror network could develop nuclear capabilities and threaten the United States and its allies. - Observers described a lack of apparent shock among certain people in connection with the events, noting unusual behavior or reactions. - Five men arrested in a van were later identified as Israeli, with some connections to Israeli intelligence; they were turned over to the FBI. National security databases showed some of the men had prior Israeli intelligence or counterterrorism experience, and one admitted serving in an Israeli army anti-terrorist unit and refused a lie detector test for an extended period. A speaker emphasized loyalty to country when discussing military service. - Fox News and others reported that up to 140 Israelis had been detained prior to September 11 in an ongoing, broad investigation into suspected espionage by Israelis in the United States. Government documents described hundreds of incidents across U.S. cities that investigators said could indicate organized intelligence gathering. The “country A” in a General Accounting Office document was said to be Israel, described as conducting aggressive espionage against the U.S. despite being an ally, with Israel possessing substantial resources to achieve its collection objectives. - Investigators questioned the possibility that some Israeli agents had advanced knowledge of the attacks, suggesting there is explosive but not necessarily conclusive evidence when aggregated. A recurring theme was the question of how such agents could have known, given the events. - Allegations of foreknowledge included claims that Israeli agents were forewarned and filmed the event on Israeli television. Some individuals detained or questioned described their presence in Israel as journalists or documenters. The broader question centered on whether Israelis gathered intelligence in advance and whether it was shared or withheld. - The transcript also recounts the failure to account for certain details (e.g., passport survivals, disappearance of voice recorders) as well as assertions that anthrax letters, later linked to a U.S. Army lab, were used to deflect blame toward Muslims. - Two accounts describe a white Chevy van linked to Urban Moving Systems, a moving company whose employees were alleged to have connections to Israeli intelligence. The FBI issued a nationwide alert about the van, and two suspects were reported in custody after explosives were found in a vehicle near the George Washington Bridge. CBS reported that two suspects were in FBI custody and that the truck contained enough explosives to damage the bridge, with some accounts noting a prior alert about a van on the way to destroy the bridge. - Overall, the material presents a network of claims and investigations involving alleged Israeli espionage, foreknowledge of 9/11, intelligence operations in the United States, and specific incidents surrounding the George Washington Bridge and related arrests.

Speaker 0 believes Israel was deeply involved in JFK's assassination, suggesting Jack Ruby was a Mossad agent and the Jewish mob played a role. The payoff for the assassination was allegedly LBJ providing Israel with uranium for their nuclear program after JFK refused. This is linked to the "Apollo affair," where uranium went missing in Pennsylvania. Speaker 0 also claims the Mossad trained Arabs for 9/11 to pass the Patriot Act. They connect this to current events with Jeffrey Epstein and Diddy. Speaker 0 claims Generals Lemitzer and Taylor wanted nuclear war, influenced by Groves, who Eisenhower stopped. Speaker 0 criticizes JFK researchers, claiming they miss key pieces. They assert Oswald was a CIA operative set up as a patsy. Speaker 0 believes the JFK assassination's root cause is Groves and the deep state. They distrust journalists, alleging many are "scammers" working for the "other team," and that their incentives differ, as they profit from JFK's death while Speaker 0 focuses on the Republic.

Speaker 0 asserts that 9/11 was a MacLeod operation and emphasizes that the third World Trade Center building (WTC 7) went down as evidence; he argues that if one building was wired for demolition, all of them were. He states that after showing this to contacts at the Army War College and the headquarters Marine Corps, it became clear to him that 9/11 was a controlled demolition scenario. He claims that 09/11 led directly to sixty thousand Americans dead and wounded, and suggests hundreds of thousands more in other countries were killed, wounded, or made homeless. He warns that if Americans ever understand that Israel did this, they will “scrub them off the earth” and will not care about the cost, implying that Zionists are conducting an all-or-nothing strategy because losing this would end them. He contends that it will be a “bloody brutal war” and that the Zionists are “gone” if Americans realize what happened. He reiterates that three buildings went down, with the third not being hit by a plane, and that it was wired for controlled demolition, implying all of them were. He describes presenting a picture and asking others to simply look at it without argument, and states that, without exception, they concluded that they did it on 9/11. Speaker 1 recalls that at the time of the event, he did not know who did it, but based on his experience in the Marine Corps and in demolition, it was definitely a controlled blast, a controlled drop, and that this could not be denied.

The speaker alleges a Zionist conspiracy involving Israel and the CIA to control the US government and instigate wars for Israeli benefit. Claims include Israeli involvement in 9/11 to incite anti-Arab sentiment and justify Middle East wars, with the goal of creating a "Greater Israel." JFK is portrayed as opposing Israel's nuclear ambitions and expansionist plans, leading to his assassination orchestrated by the CIA and Zionists. LBJ is presented as pro-Israel and complicit in JFK's death. The USS Liberty incident is described as a false flag operation intended to trigger a US attack on Egypt. RFK's assassination is also attributed to the CIA and Zionists to suppress investigations into JFK's death. The speaker claims AIPAC controls US foreign policy and that aid to Israel is illegal. They cite the Yenon Plan as evidence of a Zionist agenda to destabilize the Middle East. The speaker urges listeners to expose Israeli involvement in 9/11 to break a "satanic curse" and free America from Zionism.

The speaker discusses various conspiracy theories surrounding major events like the moon landings, 9/11, and the assassination of Osama Bin Laden. They claim that these events were all orchestrated by the CIA, Mossad, and MI6 to further their own agendas. They argue that there is no evidence of Arab involvement in 9/11 and that the planes were flown to a disused airbase in Massachusetts. They also suggest that there is no evidence of planes hitting the Twin Towers or the Pentagon, and that nanothermite was used to bring down the buildings. The speaker criticizes the media for manipulating what people see and believes that the wars in the Middle East were started to benefit Israel. They also discuss Russia's role in global politics and the rise of China as a superpower.

Speaker argues that 9/11 and the war on terror are Israeli-driven. "The war on terror is an Israeli stratagem, a ploy pushed by Benjamin Netanyahu since 1979 to trick The United States into waging war against Israel's enemies." He says the operation involved "15 of the 19 Arabs lived here" with "multiple identities," and cites Wesley Clark’s claim: "seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off Iran." He asserts "Israel created the Islamic foe" and that "terrorism is theater." He notes "ICTS" controlled security at US airports on 9/11 and mentions "five dancing Israelis." He references the Yenon plan: "the Yenon plan, named after Oded Yenon" to Balkanize the Middle East, and implicates the Rothschilds and Rupert Murdoch in shaping the narrative. He calls the 9/11 Commission report a "myth" and cites "destruction of the evidence."

The speaker discusses the Israeli involvement in the war on terror and the 9/11 attacks. They claim that Israel has bombed Syria multiple times and supported rebel groups fighting against the Syrian government. They also accuse Israeli nationals of being involved in the non-investigation of 9/11 and the destruction of evidence. The speaker suggests that Zionists control law enforcement, the media, litigation, security, government, and the military. They argue that the media has pushed a false narrative about 9/11 and that the truth will bring peace.

Nine eleven started as commercial insurance fraud. It was known in 1988 that the Twin Towers were condemned because they didn't wanna pay the $2,000,000,000 to dismantle the buildings the hard way. Controlled demolitions was forbidden. When that was briefed to Dick Cheney as secretary of defense, I believe he said, praise the lord. This is going to be a terrorism event that will give us a reason for invading Iraq and Afghanistan. And at that point, the nine eleven, which was planned and executed by the Zionists, which is not the Jews. When I say Zionists, I'm talking about what's called the red mafia. That's the Russians, Israelis, and Americans who are a criminal network that happens to control Benjamin Netanyahu. It does not control Donald Trump. People don't understand that Trump is biding his time. The NSA is not about solving problems or making America safe. It's about keeping the money moving. The second reason that the program was canceled was because it was starting to reveal all of the Americans who were complicit in nine eleven. The problem we have in The United States is that the intelligence community is all about spending a great deal of money doing very bad things. So let's say overall, there's about 300 things that the intelligence community should be reporting on. They don't. They report on two things, war and terrorism. And in both cases, they're the ones starting the wars and funding the terrorists.

- The speaker claims that John Ratcliffe, the CIA, and Mossad are all the same, asserting that CIA and Mossad were involved with the assassination of Charlie Kirk and questioning where Steve Bannon stands on that issue. The speaker lambasts Ratcliffe as a “gosh damn fraud” and accuses intelligence agencies of destroying the country, urging removal, arrest, and charging of these figures. - The speaker recounts past involvement with Steve Bannon’s network, saying they used to be on frequently to discuss border and child trafficking topics, but after shifting to child trafficking, Bannon became unavailable. The speaker asks viewers to comment on whether they should appear on Bannon’s show again when a new documentary on child trafficking is released in November, and claims to have sent many texts to Bannon’s daughter, suggesting a sense of personal outreach that went unanswered. - A request is made for Bannon to show up on the speaker’s channel, with the speaker implying a personal connection and asking viewers to indicate if they think the speaker should appear on Bannon’s show as the new documentary drops. - The speaker urges viewers to watch their video and claims that Ratcliffe is a “gosh damn fraud” and a traitor, arguing that the two-tier justice system exists because intelligence agencies are “destroying our gosh damn country.” - Speaker 1 adds, supporting a broader conspiracy narrative: Witkoff is briefed three times a day by the CIA, and they lie to him. The speaker asserts this is not a marginal intelligence mistake but a deliberate pattern. - The discussion moves to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with claims that Hamas “doesn’t wanna do the deal” and that this comes from the Mossad and Netanyahu. There are calls for Ratcliffe to resign or for a congressional hearing on national television to reveal what Ratcliffe told negotiators. - The speaker references the beginning of a twelve-day war and says what Ratcliffe told the president about it was a lie, supported by a claim from the Times of Israel that cabinet minutes show Netanyahu’s cabinet was two years away from any emergency, not two days or two weeks. The speaker contends there was an emergency to kill negotiators so Witkoff could not meet in Muscat, Oman, on a Sunday, alleging that Mossad controls the CIA. - The closing remark credits Tulsi Gabbard and claims she was targeted or run out of the city, reinforcing the theme of institutional control by Mossad over American intelligence agencies.

The discussion revolves around the Mossad, Israel's intelligence agency, and how it identifies itself in English. After inquiries, it was clarified that they refer to themselves as the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service (ISIS). The conversation then shifts to the historical context of U.S. involvement in Afghanistan, highlighting that the fighters being faced today were once supported by the U.S. during the Cold War to counter the Soviet Union. This strategy, backed by President Reagan and Congress, involved recruiting Mujahideen with the help of the Pakistani military, which ultimately contributed to the Soviet Union's collapse. The dialogue also touches on the controversial claim that Hillary Clinton and Obama played roles in the creation of ISIS, while emphasizing the importance of American influence in these geopolitical matters.

- "One reason foreign governments may have had superior information is that the NSA frequently shared signals intelligence details with them details it withheld from our own CIA." - "under the 1947 act that created NSA, we don't have to share that" - "It's striking to see operatives from a supposedly allied country celebrating the mass murder of Americans." - "On the morning of nineeleleven, a group of five Israeli nationals purported to have witnessed the initial explosion of the World Trade Center and were seen to be celebrating the event." - "The Israelis caught celebrating the nine eleven attacks had videotaped the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and may have possessed foreknowledge of the same."

John Loftus explains his career: an army officer, a federal prosecutor at the Justice Department, then with the Office of Special Investigations—the Nazi war crimes unit under Carter and Reagan. He reveals discovering that many Nazis assigned to prosecute were already on the government payroll, which led him to become a whistleblower. In 1982 he appeared on an Emmy-winning segment of 60 Minutes with Mike Wallace; his family received death threats, and he later started a private law practice in Boston, focusing on whistleblowers, charging his clients a dollar apiece. He held a Q clearance for nuclear weapons secrets, an SI clearance for wiretapping, and a cosmic clearance for NATO-level top secrets, enabling him to read British, Dutch, and American intelligence files. He was the first person in half a century to access classified vaults in Suitland, Maryland, described as 20 underground security vaults, each one acre, reminiscent of Raiders of the Lost Ark but less organized. He sought evidence not only about Nazi war criminals but also about possible obstruction or fixing of the Nuremberg Trials. His first boss was a prosecutor of the Nuremberg Bankers Trial and suggested that resources were taken from investigations, implying the trials had been fixed. Loftus balanced two roles: investigating Belarusian Nazis who might have immigrated to America and looking for evidence of fixings in the Nuremberg Trials. Speaker 1 asks what Loftus discovered and why he dedicated forty years to exposing these secrets. Loftus responds that a small corrupt group of American officials collaborated with the British Secret Service to relocate Nazi war criminals to the United States. The British believed these individuals were not real Nazis but anticommunist freedom fighters due to anti-Russian sentiment, and some state department officials accepted this view. Loftus asserts that the British did not realize the Nazis were being moved to the U.S.; the Americans ended up using British networks after World War II, not understanding they were sending ex-Nazi terrorists from Arab states and Eastern Europe to fight in the Cold War. He claims the motive was financial: Alan Dulles was a Wall Street corrupt corporate lawyer who, with others, pursued bankers’ security and profit rather than national security, assisting in arming and supporting a rebel tribe led by Ibn Saud, which formed the House of Sa’ud, and helped install them in power in the 1930s. He states the Wahhabism/Salafism ideology gained legitimacy through oil wealth, with the Dulles-managed arrangements masking Nazi and Bolshevik connections as a matter of business. Loftus contends that the Dulles brothers hid Nazi, Saudi, and Bolshevik links, with the aim of creating new cartels and monopolies. He asserts that the Muslim Brotherhood, led by Hassan al-Banna since 1928, became the Abwehr’s arm in the Middle East, and that the Brotherhood’s expansion to half a million members included Nazi influence; after Nasser's rise in Egypt, the Saudis accepted ex-Nazi educators to teach in madrasas, leading to figures like Osama bin Laden being educated by first-generation Nazis. Loftus maintains that the Brotherhood’s offspring—Al-Qaeda and Hamas—share a philosophy opposing democracy, Western civilization, and Jews, continuing into contemporary conflicts. He concludes that Philby helped the Dulles brothers by introducing the Muslim Brotherhood as a proxy force against communism, leading to ongoing involvement in the Middle East. Speaker 1 asks for clarity on the Dulles brothers in the twenties, thirties, and forties. Loftus describes the Dulles brothers aiding Wall Street robber barons in moving money abroad to friendly fascists, including the Bolsheviks and German fascists, to restore monopolies. They used Swiss companies and banks to own German bank stock, circumventing Hitler’s ban on foreign ownership of German companies, with Hallmark Schacht as a business associate; he notes that about 70% of money used to rebuild the Third Reich came from Wall Street and the City of London.

The speaker criticizes the FBI for not being able to find Osama bin Laden despite a reporter with no budget managing to interview him in his hideout. The speaker questions whether the intelligence community is incompetent or lying about their search for bin Laden. They claim that the CIA created bin Laden, trained him, and funded him to fight the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. Now, bin Laden is being used as a scapegoat to further the agenda of world government. The speaker urges viewers not to believe anything that will be blamed on bin Laden in the future.

"this is a good thing because it brings The United States into a conflict that we've been involved in on an existential level for decades." "There was an Israeli spy ring in The United States, and they clearly knew nine eleven was coming." "They aired it." "They're real people." "They're not crazy." "Those are factually true statements." "How many Shiite terror attacks have there been in The United States in my lifetime? Let me do the math." "Zero." "Don't tell me that the greatest threat we face is Iran. That's a lie." "You're telling it on behalf of a foreign power." "Iran is not even in the top 10 list." "Our problems would include tens of millions of foreign nationals living illegally in my country." "Nobody knows their identities." "A drug crisis that's killed millions of Americans over the past twenty years." "My family was attacked." "It's true." "And everyone kind of knows it's true."

Clayton discusses with Kevin Ship, a former CIA officer and author of Twilight of the Shadow Government, how false flags allegedly unfold and why they persist in public discourse. Key points: - False flags are planned for months in advance. Kevin suggests that covert operations typically identify a single boogeyman to avoid implying a broader conspiracy, arguing that a lone perpetrator allows authorities to claim “we got him” and deny wider conspiracy. - The pattern cited includes one individual who previously showed no criminal tendencies, who then commits a violent act, followed by quick attribution to a designated boogeyman, with the implication that the operation is over and left without further inquiry. - Specific incidents discussed include the Bondi Beach attack in Australia, with references to Mossad’s involvement and claims that Iran is behind the attack to push for war with Iran. The exchange questions the Australian government’s role and the relevance of Mossad’s presence in investigating the incident. - The conversation links these operations to broader intelligence ecosystem dynamics, noting a close collaboration and “frenemies” relationship between the CIA and Mossad. They describe Mossad as having a pervasive role in Middle East intelligence and describe a history of interactions where Mossad and the CIA share high-level information and sometimes operate in tandem, though at times Mossad may target the CIA as well. - The discussion points to prior examples of disinformation, such as the 9/11 events, where perceptions of evidence (e.g., a passport found near the World Trade Center) are presented as straightforward proof, while being described as an example of ineffective or misused disinformation to shape public belief. - In addressing media influence, Kevin references the CIA’s media liaison office and programs designed to influence how news is presented in the United States. He contends that “Mockingbird”-like media consolidation and complicit outlets help propagate these narratives, especially to audiences that rely primarily on television news. - The conversation notes a perceived pattern of actors or individuals appearing at multiple, unrelated events (e.g., a person claiming responsibility or being present at various incidents) as part of the alleged orchestration of false flag narratives. - They discuss the effectiveness of false flags: despite growing scrutiny and critical reporting, they argue that false flags continue to influence public perception, aided by psychological studies within intelligence communities and the reliance of many viewers on mainstream media for information. - Kevin reiterates his belief that the shadow government—particularly the CIA’s control of elected government and media propaganda programs—remains powerful, with ongoing operations designed to manipulate thinking and push narratives that serve certain geopolitical aims. He emphasizes that false flags are a recurring tactic and predict more of them in the future. - The conversation closes with Kevin urging readers to consider his book Twilight of the Shadow Government and to engage with his perspective on the CIA’s influence over media, politics, and public belief.

The transcript presents a sequence of claims about Israeli individuals in relation to the September 11 attacks, drawn from different sources and presented without evaluation. It links eyewitness claims, alleged spying concerns, attitudes toward the attacks, documentary evidence, and a provocative arrest scene, attributing each element to specific sources. - "On the morning of 09:11, a group of five Israeli nationals purported to have witnessed the initial explosion of the World Trade Center and were seen to be celebrating the event." This statement asserts immediate eyewitness activity at the World Trade Center collapse and describes celebratory behavior by the group. - "Fox News has learned some US investigators believe that there are Israelis again very much engaged in spying in and on The US, who may have known things they didn't tell us before September 11." This claim presents the assertion of renewed Israeli espionage involvement in the United States and suggests foreknowledge not disclosed before the attacks. - "It is true that some in Israel saw the attack as a good thing for them." This line conveys an evaluative stance attributed to segments within Israel regarding the attacks. - "A 09/12/2001 article in the New York Times quotes now Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu responding to the nine eleven attacks. Quote, it is very good, before adding, well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy." This portion provides a cited reaction from Israeli leadership, including the quoted phrase about the attack being “very good” and the caveat about generating immediate sympathy. - "According to FBI documents, the Israelis caught celebrating the nine eleven attacks had videotaped the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and may have possessed foreknowledge of the same." This claim attributes specific documentary evidence to the celebrants, alleging videotaping of the attack and possible foreknowledge. - "When the Israelis were arrested in New Jersey, they were carrying photos of themselves smiling with the World Trade Center burning in the background." This final detail describes the physical evidence found with the arrested individuals, illustrating the asserted celebratory conduct. The sources cited in the transcript include Fox News, The New York Times, and FBI documents, each contributing a separate facet: eyewitness celebration, alleged espionage implications, public sentiment within Israel, leadership reaction, documentary evidence, and incriminating photographs carried at arrest.

I'm a former Zionist and Jew, here to explore the truth. Many Americans understand the dynamics at play. On 9/11, the collapse of World Trade Center 7 raised questions of controlled demolition, linked to Israeli financier Larry Silverstein. Netanyahu reportedly stated that the 9/11 attacks shifted American public opinion in favor of Israel. The narrative suggests Israel aimed to incite fear and justify wars in the Middle East. Claims are made that Al Qaeda and ISIS were created by Israel's Mossad and the CIA to manipulate public perception. Recent events, including the October 7, 2023 incident, are framed as justifications for ongoing violence against Palestinians. Historical context reveals tensions between JFK and LBJ regarding Israel, with JFK advocating for disarmament and Palestinian rights, while LBJ supported Israeli expansionism. The narrative critiques U.S. complicity in Israeli actions and the broader implications for peace.

The speaker, a former Zionist and Jew, claims Israel orchestrated 9/11 to incite hatred against Arabs/Muslims and instigate Middle East wars for its benefit. They allege World Trade Center 7's collapse was a controlled demolition by the Israeli Mossad, with Larry Silverstein profiting from an insurance scam. Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly said the 9/11 attacks swung American public opinion in Israel's favor. Al-Qaeda and ISIS were allegedly created by the Mossad and CIA to justify US wars for Israel's Middle East empire. The speaker accuses Israel of planning a genocide against Palestinians, referencing the "decisive plan." They claim the October 7th incident was Israel's "9/11," used to implement this plan. The speaker states JFK supported Palestinian refugee rights, opposed Israel's nuclear program, and wanted APAC to register as a foreign agent. His vice president, Lyndon Johnson, was allegedly loyal to Israel and shipped weapons to Zionist militias in the 1940s. JFK was reportedly furious at Israel for lying about its nuclear weapons program and threatened to withdraw support. President Eisenhower used sanctions to force Israel out of Egypt during the Suez Crisis, which LBJ opposed.

Nine eleven started as commercial insurance fraud. It was known in 1988 that the Twin Towers were condemned because they didn't wanna pay the $2,000,000,000 to dismantle the buildings the hard way. Controlled demolitions was forbidden. When that was briefed to Dick Cheney as secretary of defense, I believe he said, praise the lord. This is going to be a terrorism event that will give us a reason for invading Iraq Afghanistan. And at that point, the nine eleven, which was planned and executed by the Zionists, which is not the Jews. When I say Zionists, I'm talking about what's called the red mafia. That's the Russians, Israelis, and Americans who are a criminal network that happens to control Benjamin Netanyahu. It does not control Donald Trump. People don't understand that Trump is biding his time. The NSA is not about solving problems or making America safe. It's about keeping the money moving. The second reason that the program was canceled was because it was starting to reveal all of the Americans who were complicit in nine eleven. The problem we have in The United States is that the intelligence community is all about spending a great deal of money doing very bad things. So let's say overall, there's about 300 things that the intelligence community should be reporting on. They don't. They report on two things, war and terrorism. And in both cases, they're the ones starting the wars and funding the terrorists.

Speaker 0 claims that ISIS is a CIA creation, equating it with other groups like those in Islamberg and Fethullah Gulen. He states that John McCain was “over there with the ISIS officials.” He asserts that ISIS originated from the Al Nusra Front and the Syrian Liberation Front, which combined to morph into ISIS, and that “We created them. We still direct them.” He asserts that injured ISIS warriors are transported to Israel, treated at Israeli hospitals, and brought back to battle. Regarding motives, he says the ultimate goal is money and wealth, noting that real wealth comes from natural resources. He contrasts this with currency, saying money is fabricated and not backed by anything. He lists natural resources—gold, oil, and heroin—as wealth, claiming heroin is “the third most valuable commodity in the world right now,” and cites this as another reason for being in Afghanistan. He describes the endgame as a game being played to win, not an endless play. He states that the money cartel from the United States, referring to an Anglo-American establishment (British and US), controls the endgame. He argues that by depriving Russia of natural resources, its power is depleted, and the same logic applies to China. The overarching objective, according to the speaker, is total economic control of the world.

The speaker, a former Zionist and Jew, claims the 9/11 attacks were engineered by the Israeli Mossad, with Larry Silverstein profiting via an insurance scam facilitated by Elliot Spitzer. Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly said the attacks swung American public opinion in Israel's favor, and Israel's strategic goal was to incite hatred against Arabs and Muslims to justify Middle East wars. Al Qaeda and ISIS were allegedly created by the Mossad and CIA to fabricate justifications for these wars, advancing Israel's aim to create a Middle East empire. The speaker alleges Israel has planned the genocide of Palestinians for years, referencing General Matan Vilneh's threat of a "bigger holocaust" in 2008 and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich's "decisive plan" for genocide. The 10/07/2023 incident was supposedly used to implement this plan. JFK supported Palestinian refugee rights, opposed Israel's nuclear program, and tried to force AIPAC to register as a foreign agent. His vice president, Lyndon Johnson, was primarily loyal to Israel and shipped weapons to Zionist militias in the 1948 Nakba. JFK was furious at Israel for lying about its nuclear weapons program and threatened to withdraw support unless inspections were allowed. Ben Gurion aimed to abolish partition and expand to the whole of Palestine. President Eisenhower sanctioned Israel during the Suez Crisis, a move opposed by LBJ.

Speaker 0 claims Netanyahu was responsible for 9/11, which helped him get into Iraq and Afghanistan. Speaker 0 repeatedly asks who bought the World Trade Center two months before the attack, accusing Speaker 1, Brian, of being paid off and a Mossad agent for not answering. Speaker 1 denies Israel was behind 9/11 and denies being Mossad. Speaker 0 calls Brian a fed and refuses to speak to him. Speaker 2 asks Brian why he won't answer the simple question and accuses him of dodging. Speaker 2 suggests Brian is inflating the situation and acting like a toddler. Speaker 0 calls Brian a shill for not answering. Speaker 0 gives Brian three seconds to answer who bought the building or be considered a paid-off shill. Speaker 1 refuses to answer.