reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker believes that there is a plan to prevent Trump from becoming president again. They claim that the plan involves someone within their own party who will be propped up as a candidate to keep the war machine and censorship agenda going. The speaker is determined to prevent this from happening. They express gratitude for the opportunity to ask a question and appreciate the honesty of the conversation.

There is a discussion about Jews in the Biden administration, with one person suggesting that Jews are always to blame. Another person claims that Jews have been successful in infiltrating governments through methods like blackmail and bribery. They believe that these individuals are easily controlled and will be disposed of when no longer needed. The conversation concludes by stating that there is no point in discussing Joe Biden.

The speakers discuss a perceived “concerted effort” and a “politics of personal destruction.” Speaker 0 insults John Podesta with, “Fuck you, John Podesta.” Speaker 1 responds, “Well, you see where I'm coming from.” Speaker 0 continues with, “Okay.” Speaker 1 adds, “When I talk, that's because I'm interested in this ongoing whatever the hell,” and Speaker 0 asks, “they're doing. What's in your closet, John Podesta? Big Podesta? Big Soros? Do you want us to play these games?” concluding, “Because we're playing to win.”

The conversation hinges on distrust of powerful benefactors and the way money influences politics, alongside reflections on recent political events. - Speaker 0 asserts that connections to the Rockefellers are “super sus,” arguing they have provided direct funding to an individual named Scott, which raises questions about influence and motives. They contend the Rockefellers are “nefarious” in American history and criticize the notion of “selling out” to such interests, suggesting that backing from these families would align with the interests they claim to oppose. - Speaker 2 summarizes a broader concern: the idea that the path to defeating the system is to imitate or intensify the same tactics used to entrench the system. They quote Charlie Kirk, noting that those in power “have no desire to reform the system,” only to “control the system and control you through it.” This is presented as evidence that the supposed challengers are actually reinforcing the very structure they claim to fight. - The discussion shifts to strategy and perception, with Speaker 1 urging a course of voting effort as a form of action, and Speaker 0 agreeing that the approach being discussed is aligned with the organization’s stance. There is a sense of skepticism about those who advocate for “voting harder” as a solution while appearing to operate within the existing power structures. - There is a separate thread about state politics: Speaker 0 mentions Wisconsin, noting a fascination that Democrats would elect a certain Supreme Court justice while the state would pass voter ID by a wide margin, which Speaker 0 sees as inconsistent with “a Democrat issue.” Speaker 1 acknowledges the point, and Speaker 0 indicates they would review the situation further by watching past coverage. - Another thread involves a personal and investigatory concern: Speaker 3 describes involvement in a case (referenced as “mother out to the case” and speaking with someone who was “clearly killed by somebody”). They recount contacting a California congressman, Ro Con (likely a misspelling of Ro Khanna), to raise the concern, but state that nothing happened. Speaker 2 dismisses the suggestion that political action followed, and there is a back-and-forth about whether the discussion is a debate or a plea for sympathy, with Speaker 2 accusing Speaker 3 of trying to build sympathy. Overall, the dialogue centers on alleged manipulation by powerful funders, the tension between reform and control within the political system, inconsistent political outcomes in Wisconsin, and frustration with inaction on a troubling case that involved a potential kill and calls to congressional attention that did not lead to results.

The speakers discuss the speaker's potential candidacy and the pressure they face from powerful individuals who want to keep them out of politics. They mention that the speaker is not for sale and that money is not the motivation for their involvement. They express frustration with corrupt individuals and their desire for control. The conversation touches on the possibility of election interference and the speaker's determination to fight against it. They emphasize their commitment to representing the people and their refusal to make deals with questionable individuals. The speaker declares their intention to run and be a thorn in the side of those who oppose them, even if it means facing extreme consequences.

A speaker discusses various topics with another person, expressing concern about a senior reporter who was arrested for child pornography. They praise the other person for their efforts in unifying people against globalism. The conversation touches on the current state of the world, the "great awakening," and the belief that they are winning the war. They mention the importance of paying attention to potential divisions and distractions, particularly during the upcoming election. The speaker also expresses concerns about possible racial attacks and an assassination attempt on Trump.

The speaker discusses the existence of a shadow government that controls and manipulates world governments, including the United States. They claim that this shadow government is made up of influential individuals, some of whom are billionaires, and that they have more power than elected governments. The speaker also alleges that the shadow government was responsible for stealing the 2020 election from Donald Trump and that they control the current Biden administration. They mention the role of military interventions in funding the shadow government and express their belief that Donald Trump will never be president again unless he aligns with the shadow government. The speaker also touches on their involvement with the Gates Foundation and their possession of databanks with sensitive information. They urge listeners to consider their message for the sake of peace, justice, and the well-being of humanity.

Speaker 1 was approached with an offer to pause their political activity, but Speaker 1 is offended, viewing it as an attempt to buy them out of running and a reflection of others' lack of concern for the country. Speaker 1 believes this is about preventing them from winning and defeating Trump, which they see as bad for the country. Speaker 0 suggests it may not be about Trump, but about Speaker 1. Speaker 1 refuses to be bought at any price, stating they are not going to let people who hate the country tell them not to run. Speaker 1 intends to be a "pain" to those trying to stop them and is willing to fight, even if it means risking their life. Speaker 1 urges Speaker 0 to tell them to get behind their campaign. Speaker 1 believes the "swamp" doesn't pre-approve of them because they would root out corruption.

Two individuals, Mark and James, engage in a conversation where they discuss a video that was edited. James denies editing the video and accuses Mark of misrepresenting his words. They argue about whether the public should know the truth about COVID mutations and vaccine development. Mark asks James to apologize publicly, but James claims he already apologized privately. The conversation becomes heated, with Mark demanding an apology on camera. They discuss deleted videos and hidden cameras, and Mark threatens to mess with James. The conversation ends with Mark expressing disbelief that James recorded their interaction.

The speakers discuss the speaker's potential candidacy and the pressure they are facing from powerful individuals who want to keep them out of the race. The speaker expresses frustration with being controlled and owned by others and their refusal to work with people who don't align with their agenda. They also mention the possibility of election theft and their determination to fight against it. The speaker declares their intention to run and be a thorn in the side of those who oppose them, even if it means facing extreme consequences.

There is a hidden enemy, a vast transgenerational criminal mafia that has corrupted our world. They have infiltrated the highest levels of power, controlling the media, banking system, and governments. They have caused poverty, division, and war, all for personal gain. But there is hope. Good people in positions of power are working to expose and eradicate this criminal cabal. They are using the internet and the NSA to gather evidence and plan a takedown. The battle is ongoing, but the good guys are winning. High-profile arrests are coming, and the criminals will be held accountable. It's time to wake up, unite, and reclaim our freedom. The best is yet to come.

The speakers discuss the legitimacy of the 2016 election and claim it was stolen. They emphasize that Russia hacked the election and question the validity of President Trump's victory. They mention protests and violence that occurred after the election. The speakers express their anger and frustration, calling Trump an illegitimate president. They also mention efforts to overturn the election results. Overall, they believe the election was not fair and express concerns about the future.

The speakers discuss their fear of those who oppose them and their determination to stop them. They believe that the opposition will go to great lengths to prevent their cause. They express concern for the state of the United States and the need for people to support their mission. They emphasize the importance of doing the right thing for the country and ask for support. The conversation ends with gratitude and a plea to make the right decision.

The speaker discusses the existence of a shadow government that controls and manipulates world governments, including the United States. They claim that this shadow government is made up of wealthy and influential individuals who work behind the scenes to shape geopolitical agreements and military interventions. The speaker asserts that the shadow government is more powerful than any elected government and that it determines the agenda of each new government. They also mention that the shadow government is responsible for the decision to steal the 2020 election from Donald Trump. The speaker emphasizes the importance of transparency and urges listeners to consider the information they have shared.

The speakers discuss powerful individuals who want to keep Speaker 0 out. Speaker 0 believes they should want him because he is a great candidate, but Speaker 1 suggests it's about control and being on their team. Speaker 0 refuses to make a deal with these people and sees it as a battle worth fighting. Speaker 1 mentions the importance of raising money to win and suggests pausing rather than going away. Speaker 0 disagrees and vows to be the biggest pain for these people, even if it means they might try to kill him. Speaker 1 understands but advises caution.

The dialogue centers on accusations and revelations about political operatives and influence campaigns. Key points include: - A list of individuals named as problematic figures: Jack Kosobiak, Gabe Hoffman, Mike Cernovich, and Laura Loomer. Gabe Hoffman is described as “running hops on people” and as “a bad guy,” with a claim that these people are “evil” and unregistered foreign agents that the speaker will be watching closely. - A claim of infiltration and surveillance: one speaker asserts that someone close to them was likely there to infiltrate, and that “these people” attempted to set up someone they know and love, with the speaker vowing to monitor everything they do. - Allegations of role in broader disruptive actions: one speaker says, “We conduct riots and color revolutions and, you know, steal elections, and we overthrow governments we don't like. And I was part of that.” - The origin of operational concepts: one speaker mentions IIA, describing it as social media psychological warfare that began in 2007. - A sense of punitive consequence and manipulation: another speaker states that “they’re all being punished because they thought that what those important people told them was gonna happen,” and recalls being present during a plan to trash the capital, noting a lack of preparedness and security knowledge. - Reactions to claims about being controlled: one speaker says it pisses them off that others claim they’re being handled, with another agreeing that such claims have been heard before. - A warning tone about danger and preparation: one speaker warns that it is “very dangerous” that people are out there giving others hope, describing “a storm coming like nothing you have ever seen,” and asserting that not a single person is prepared for it. - Personal and on-site context: there are mentions of returning to a site to get a burner phone and use ghost accounts, and of attempting to coordinate around Breva, indicating ongoing, weaponized online activity and counter-movement tactics. Overall, the speakers blend accusations of manipulation and clandestine influence with admissions of involvement in disruptive actions, interspersed with warnings of impending upheaval and calls for vigilance.

The speakers discuss the legitimacy of the 2016 election and claim that it was stolen. They mention Russia hacking the election and the belief that Trump is an illegitimate president. They also talk about protests and violence that occurred after the election. Overall, they express anger and disbelief towards the election results.

Steve Bannon is riling up a violent base with phrases like "victory or death." Another person argues it means "die trying" instead of killing opponents. The first person sees this as fascism and is scared for the upcoming election, focusing on Bannon and Trump's destructive intentions.

This is a video where the speaker expresses their strong opinions and accuses John Podesta and George Soros of being involved in some kind of negative activity. The speaker is determined to win and challenges them to reveal what they are hiding.

Both speakers were members of the secret society Skull and Bones, but they cannot discuss it. This secrecy will fuel conspiracy theories. Speaker 0 mentions a web number 322, but they haven't seen it. Speaker 0 is determined not to lose and has a clear vision for leading the country.

They discuss their determination to stop someone and not let them succeed. They express their belief that this person will stop at nothing and the need to prevent them from achieving their goals. They mention feeling worried and fearful about the state of the United States and express a desire for support. They argue that voting for them would save the person they are referring to, while voting for someone else would lead to their downfall. They emphasize the importance of doing the right thing for the country and ask for support in the Iowa caucus. The other person agrees to consider their request.

The speakers discuss a potential offer to buy Speaker 1 out of the governor's race. Speaker 1 is offended by the offer and expresses his commitment to running for the betterment of Arizona and the country. Speaker 0 suggests that the offer is a recognition of Speaker 1's power and offers a counter proposal. Speaker 1 refuses to be bought and emphasizes his dedication to the people and his refusal to let those who dislike the country dictate his actions. The conversation ends with Speaker 1 expressing hope for his case and his intention to fight against corruption.

The conversation centers on whether political opponents or powerful interests would buy off or influence a candidate, and what that would mean for a political race and the country. Speaker 0 questions if a price exists to “be bought,” and both eventually reject money as the primary issue, insisting the matter is about the country itself. They discuss the idea that fresh faces are needed because no one in a federal race has ever lost and then won, though Speaker 0 contests that notion as a possibility. They reference powerful people in the East who want to keep the candidate out and are willing to spend heavily, making the conversation forbidden and not to be repeated. A fear is expressed that someone might be offered financial incentives, such as being placed on a payroll to be kept out of the race. They acknowledge the presence of entities willing to “put their money where their mouth is” and the risk that they would “murder” or eliminate opponents to stop certain candidates, describing a dangerous political landscape. The dialogue shifts to the cartel and corruption, with mentions that “the cartel is operating in 50 states,” though details about who knows what are avoided. They discuss the strategy of staying on “the team” of those who want to influence the race, suggesting creditors or backers aim to control the candidate’s actions and align them with a globalist agenda. There is insistence that the person should not “scratch their back” for others in Washington, viewing DC as a “back scratching club.” Speaker 1 argues that defeating Trump is a central aim, claiming that DeSantis is not America first and that removing Trump would be a dangerous outcome for the country. Speaker 0 expresses support for Trump but questions whether he can win again, suggesting the real issue is money and the ability to raise funds to win. They note that consultants benefit from a continuing cycle of money and that those consultants do not want their payday to end. A key sentiment is resistance to being controlled or owned, with Speaker 1 declaring he will not accept backroom deals and will be “the biggest pain” to those trying to control him. They discuss public support and the importance of defending their movement and the people of Arizona, stressing a commitment to carry their torch and voice. The dialogue ends with a defiant vow to continue, even if it risks dangerous retaliation, and a readiness to persevere rather than pause on the battlefield.

The speakers discuss the possibility of running for office and the need to stop Donald Trump's influence on the political process. They mention the importance of having discussions and forming coalitions to bridge the divide between different beliefs. They express a desire to heal the divisions in the country and bring about positive change. The speakers plan to have further discussions and meetings to explore the potential for running for office. They also mention other individuals who could potentially contribute to creating change in the country. The conversation ends with a plan to talk again after the speakers have spoken to someone else.

The speakers discuss the speaker's potential candidacy and the opposition they face. They mention that money is not the issue, but rather the desire to serve the country. The speaker expresses frustration with powerful people who want to keep them out of the race. They also mention concerns about the cartel and a globalist agenda. The speakers discuss offers to put the speaker on a company's payroll and their refusal to make deals with certain individuals. The speaker emphasizes their commitment to fighting for the people and not allowing the election to be stolen. They declare their intention to run and be a thorn in the side of their opponents, even if it means facing threats.