reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In this video, the speaker discusses the National Security Act and the CIA Act passed in 1947 and 1949, which allowed for non-transparent funding of big projects. They mention the government losing control of technology after World War II and the presence of powerful black technology, including some from the Nazis. The speaker also talks about the creation of the CIA and its alleged crimes against citizens. They express concerns about the control of technology by corporations like Apple, Microsoft, and Tesla, and the monitoring of personal data. The video briefly mentions the existence of neural weapons and concludes by stating that these technologies are incompatible with life.

Google's relationship with the CIA is explored in this video. The CIA was involved in the founding of Google, with co-founder Sergey Brin reporting to US intelligence representatives. The CIA also invested in the application that became Google Earth. The video highlights the CIA's history of controversial actions, including human rights violations and drug trafficking. It discusses the CIA's involvement in mind control experiments and failed assassination attempts on Fidel Castro. The video reveals the close ties between Google and the intelligence community, with former NSA staff working at Google and information sharing between Google and the NSA. It raises concerns about the integration of tech giants into the intelligence community and the potential implications for society.

The speakers discuss the Defense Department's interest in patenting software that can manipulate elections. They question which division within the Department of Defense is involved, specifically mentioning intelligence divisions. One of the speakers mentions two key patents, one from 2005 that enables real-time monitoring of elections through dynamic auditing. This patent was developed in collaboration with the National Institute of Help, although its purpose is not fully understood.

Directed EMP weapons have been developed, and the founder of Palantir, an AI platform used by the military, has played a significant role in revolutionizing warfare. The capability to neutralize drones was available at any moment.

"AI was not invented. It was resurrected." "The timeline proves this, where in 1943 the paper was written explaining AI to a t without having any computer science background at all, where their paper comes thirteen years before neural networks became usable in computing." "Sage system took in real time radar data from over a 100 radar stations across North America, analyzed it with massive central computers, made automated decisions about whether a target was friendly or hostile and gave suggested responses." "Sage also network across multiple regions connected by long range telephone data lines, or the Internet." "Sage Systems online with screen interaction." "The official narrative says nothing about this." "RAND was invested in predictive modeling, logic networks, and game theory." "Sage had Internet. They had AI. They had iPads." "Patents are admission points to the public eye."

We found an incredible video from Lockheed Martin showing satellites scanning the world in infrared. There are geostationary satellites, relay satellites, and low earth orbit satellites. The furthest satellites are 40,000 kilometers away, while the closest are only 1,000 kilometers. The military likely uses this technology for real-time video playback and recording. Lockheed Martin's quote at the end is ominous.

In this video, we explore a future where brainwaves are used to fight crime, increase productivity, and find love. The speaker describes a scenario where brainwave activity is monitored and analyzed. They mention how pleasure and stress levels can be detected through brainwaves, and how this information can be used to improve performance and give bonuses. However, the video takes a darker turn when the government subpoenas employees' brainwave data to investigate a coworker's involvement in wire fraud. The speaker questions if this is a future we are ready for, but reveals that it is already happening.

In this video, the speaker discusses the National Security Act and the CIA Act passed in 1947 and 1949, which allowed for non-transparent funding of big projects. They mention the government losing control of technology after World War II and the presence of powerful black technology, including some from the Nazis. The speaker also talks about the creation of the CIA and its alleged crimes against citizens. They express concerns about the control of technology by corporations like Apple, Microsoft, and Tesla, and the monitoring of personal data. The video briefly mentions the existence of neural weapons and concludes by stating that the system Tammy and Satan are incompatible with life.

Directed EMP weapons were discussed, highlighting their potential to disable drones at any moment. The conversation also touched on the founder of Palantir, a significant AI platform utilized by the military, which has transformed modern warfare.

In this video, the speaker discusses the National Security Act and the CIA Act passed in 1947 and 1949, which allowed for non-transparent funding of big projects. They mention the government losing control of technology after World War II and the presence of powerful black technology, including some from the Nazis. The speaker also talks about the creation of the CIA and its alleged crimes against citizens. They express concerns about the control of technology by corporations like Apple, Microsoft, and Tesla, and the monitoring of personal data. The video briefly mentions the existence of neural weapons and concludes by stating that the system Tammy and Satan are incompatible with life.

In this video, the speakers discuss the idea of incorporating sensors into everyday devices to read brain states. They mention that this technology could determine if someone is tired, paying attention, or experiencing certain emotions. The speakers also mention the possibility of using these sensors for interaction purposes. They humorously suggest that by wearing sensors on our foreheads, we could control our emotions towards Davos by moving our heads in different directions. Despite concerns about privacy, they believe that these advancements are well-intentioned.

The transcript outlines a rapid advance of neuroscience and neurotechnology as potential weapons and the accompanying privacy, security, and societal risks. Key points include: - The novelty and viability of neuroscience as a weapon: nanoparticulate agents and aerosolizable nanomaterials could be breathed in to disrupt blood flow or neural networks, and nanomaterials could enable electrodes to enter the head, creating vast arrays of implants that can read from and write to the brain remotely in real time. DARPA’s N3D program (next generation non-invasive neuromodulation) is cited as a path toward implantable electrodes that need not require brain surgery. - Advances in AI-driven brain technologies: developments in artificial intelligence are enabling devices that can read minds and alter brains to treat conditions, while also raising privacy concerns about who has access to this technology and what it can reveal or affect. - Privacy and data protection: Colorado enacted a first-of-its-kind law to protect private thoughts, but the discussion notes that ear pods and other devices can decode brainwave activity and determine attention, even if they cannot specify exactly what a person is paying attention to. The claim is made that brain data can be decoded to identify individuals and be used to discriminate, interrogate, or manipulate, with data often stored and shared without disclosure of storage, access, or breach procedures. The Neuro Rights Foundation reports two-thirds of brain-data–collecting companies share or sell data with third parties, and privacy protections are seen as a necessary but incomplete step. - Brain data as an identifiable, sensitive trait: brain data are described as resembling fingerprints for identification, with privacy protections argued to be a no-brainer given their capacity to reveal thoughts, emotions, and memories. There is mention of private companies and countries racing to access, analyze, and alter brain data and the potential for government misuse to alter thoughts and memories as technology advances. - Neuroscience in everyday devices and surveillance: devices like EarPods and wearables are discussed as capable of picking up brainwave activity and distinguishing not only attention but the nature of tasks (central tasks like programming vs. peripheral tasks like social media use). The combination of brainwave data with software and surveillance is described as enabling highly precise monitoring of attention and intent, raising questions about how such technologies should be used. - At-home use and real-world applications: examples include brainwave-reading EarPods launching soon, and demonstrations of decoding attention and even memories or imagined content. The discussion notes ubiquitous monitoring for productivity, including the pandemic-era rise of “bossware” and the potential for these technologies to be used in workplaces or by advertisers or law enforcement. - Security and misuse concerns: there are warnings about the security risks of Bluetooth-driven headsets, potential hacking, and the possibility of neuromodulation technologies being misused to influence or degrade mental states. There is emphasis on the need for proactive measures and a “jump on it” approach to develop safeguards. - Public safety and political context: references to Havana syndrome and the fear of direct energy weapons targeting brains reflect concerns about deliberate, covert manipulation or disruption of brain function. Testimonies discuss the potential for covert weapons, the lack of visible entry/exit points like bullets, and the risk of labeling manipulated individuals as crazy. - Ongoing questions and policy needs: discussions include why some information remains classified, the need to implement protective acts (like Havana Act), and the concern that AI integration with neuroweaponry could create new, uncharted risks, including the possibility of torture or targeting of civilians.

Google's relationship with the CIA is explored in this video. The CIA was involved in the founding of Google, with cofounder Sergei Brin reporting to US intelligence representatives. While the CIA denies directly funding Google, their research funding helped the company and Silicon Valley as a whole. The Highlands forum connects the Department of Defense and intelligence community with tech startups, ensuring they stay at the cutting edge. Google Federal, launched in 2006, serves federal contracts and has hired many former NSA staff. In 2010, Google and the NSA struck a deal to exchange information about foreign hackers. Google Jigsaw, a division combating global threats, has had missteps, including brainstorming ways to push for a change of government in Syria. The video raises concerns about the blurring line between corporate and government intelligence.

In this video, the speaker talks about the criticism they receive online for sharing conspiracy theories. They mention reading patents and provide examples such as a patent from 2000 about manipulating the central nervous system and a patent from 2013 that controls brain state through electromagnetic patterns. They also mention a patent from 2014 that induces desired brain states through music files and a patent from 2002 that remotely transmits sound into targeted consciousness. The speaker highlights that the United States Air Force is the original assignee of one of these patents and questions whether the government would use such patents on its people.

In this video, the speaker talks about how people often get called conspiracy theorists when they share things online. They mention reading US patents and provide examples of patents related to directed energy weapons, brain manipulation, and remote transmission of sound. The speaker highlights that one of the patents is assigned to the United States Air Force. They question whether the US government would use these patents on its own citizens.

Man's quest to control the weather and use it as a weapon is explored in this video. The HARP project in Gekona, Alaska, uses ELF waves to manipulate the ionosphere and potentially alter the weather worldwide. Chemtrails, sprayed by high-flying US Air Force tankers, are combined with HAARP to heat metal oxides in the atmosphere, preventing cloud formation and rainfall. This technology can also weaponize rain, causing destructive floods. The video highlights the potential dangers and consequences of these weather manipulation techniques.

The video discusses the merging of infotech and biotech revolutions, which enables the hacking of human beings. To hack a human, two things are needed: computing power and biometric data. Biometric sensors play a crucial role in translating biochemical processes into electronic signals for analysis. The video mentions DARPA's contracts on electronic telepathy, monitoring brain activity remotely, and transmitting messages to another person's brain. Data is emphasized as the most valuable asset, with those who control it having control over the future of humanity and life itself. The next phase of surveillance is predicted to involve collecting data from within our bodies.

DARPA announces a new initiative called next generation non-surgical neurotechnology, aiming to create direct brain interfaces. DARPA has a history of developing influential technologies like the Internet and self-driving cars. The new technology could involve sensors on the head or implanted in the brain, allowing direct interaction with communication, processing, and weapon systems. This could enable remote control of robots and drones by simply thinking. These machine interfaces have potential applications in both civilian and military settings. However, some people worry that DARPA could potentially use this technology for mind control, similar to the concerns surrounding the CIA.

The video discusses the merging of infotech and biotech revolutions, which allows for the hacking of human beings. To hack a human, two things are needed: computing power and biometric data. Biometric sensors are crucial in translating biochemical processes into electronic signals for analysis. The video also mentions DARPA's contracts on electronic telepathy, monitoring brain activity remotely and transmitting messages to another person's brain. Data is emphasized as the most valuable asset, with those controlling it having control over the future of humanity and life itself. The next phase of surveillance is predicted to involve collecting data from within our bodies.

Trevor Coppola and Deborah Tavares discuss a NASA war document they found publicly accessible on the NASA website, presenting it as a crucial revelation about planned technologies and strategies for future warfare. Key details about the NASA document - The document is a PowerPoint presentation by Dennis Bushnell, described as the chief NASA scientist at the Langley Center, titled future strategic issues, future warfare circa 2025, presented in July 2001, a few months before 09/11. - Deborah Tavares notes the document states on page four that the presentation is “based in all cases upon existing data, trends, analysis, technologies, no pixie dust,” and emphasizes a premise about robots, cyborgs, and humans. - The discussion highlights page 93 as particularly shocking, including statements about “capture torture Americans in living color on prime time,” “terror attacks within the Continental United States using binary biologicals,” the use of an EMP, radiation frequencies against brains, and other forms of serious warfare and collateral damage; the document also references “exploit CNN syndrome.” - On page 66, the document asserts that humans have increasing limitations and downsides—“Humans are too large. Humans are too heavy, too tender. Humans are too slow, both physically and mentally”—and argues that huge logistical trains are required because humans are of decreasing value. - The document lists involvement by a range of agencies and entities such as the US Air Force, DARPA, the CIA, the FBI, Southern Command, Atlantic Command, the Australian Department of Defense, and other corporate/government bodies, portraying a global corporate-influenced framework in which “USA Inc.” operates beyond a constitutional structure. - Other asserted topics in the document include beam weapons, microdust as a new type of warfare, and the claim that the use of frequencies will be central to future conflict. It is alleged to mention technologies like brain mapping and direct manipulation or intervention in human evolution, with references to transferring a human brain into machinery and the existence of micron-sized mechanized dust distributed as an aerosol. - The discussion connects these ideas to smart meters and energy infrastructure, stating that frequencies and metering systems would affect people and that campaigns and technologies could target populations via communication networks and energy grids. Overall narrative and context - The interview frames the NASA document as evidence of a planned, multi-faceted assault on populations using frequencies, beam weapons, bioweapons, and surveillance, culminating in social control and depopulation goals, with mass media playing a propaganda role. - Deborah Tavares links the document to broader conspiratorial literature and documents, including the Iron Mountain report and the Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars (41 pages), describing them as war plans to control humanity and restructure society through surveillance, economics, education, and engineered fear. - The speakers argue that the document reveals a program of mind control, depopulation, and technocratic domination, with specific references to chemtrails, nanofibers, fluoridation, and a global strategy to reduce population and dependence on traditional governance. Path to action and resources - The recommended response is rapid public education about these documents and their implications, with emphasis on reading and understanding sources such as the Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, the Iron Mountain document, and the New World Order exposes (all linked from stopthecrime.net). - They advocate for awakening a grassroots movement rather than revolution, warning that revolution could trigger martial law and enable more severe weaponization. Public access and where to learn more - The primary site is stopthecrime.net, with links to smartmetersmurder.com and related YouTube content, including a series by Barry Trower on the weaponization of frequencies in relation to wireless infrastructure and cell towers.

In this video, the speaker discusses the National Security Act and the CIA Act passed in 1947 and 1949, which allowed for non-transparent funding of big projects. They mention the government losing control of technology after World War II and the presence of powerful black technology, including some from the Nazis. The speaker also talks about the creation of the CIA and its alleged crimes against citizens. They express concerns about the control of technology by corporations like Apple, Microsoft, and Tesla, and the monitoring of personal data. The video briefly mentions the existence of neural weapons and concludes by stating that these technologies are incompatible with life.

In this video, the speaker discusses how the National Security Act and the CIA Act allowed for non-transparent funding of big projects. They mention the government losing control of technology after World War II and the influence of black technology, including some brought over from the Nazis. The speaker also talks about the creation of the CIA and their alleged crimes against citizens. They express concerns about the power of companies like Apple, Microsoft, and Tesla, stating that everything done online is monitored and recorded. The video briefly mentions the use of neural weapons and concludes by stating that the system Tammy and Satan are incompatible with life.

In this video, the speaker discusses the National Security Act and the CIA Act passed in 1947 and 1949, which allowed for non-transparent funding of big projects. They mention the government losing control of technology after World War II and the presence of powerful black technology, including some from the Nazis. The speaker also talks about the creation of the CIA and its alleged crimes against citizens. They express concerns about the control of technology by corporations like Apple, Microsoft, and Tesla, and the monitoring of personal data. The video briefly mentions the existence of neural weapons and concludes by stating that these technologies are incompatible with life.