reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker was asked what office they were elected to and if they needed support. The speaker responded that they are not the one to ask and that the person should speak with a man. The speaker then stated that they speak to over a million people.

Freeland, a politician with ties to the World Economic Forum and AIIB, holds high-ranking positions surpassing Trudeau. She is accused of being controlled by the Communist Party and is believed to be pulling the strings behind the scenes.

Tanya Plibersek, the deputy leader of the Labour Party, was asked about carbon dioxide as a big issue in climate change. She didn't know the percentage of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The speaker argued that only a small percentage of carbon dioxide is created by humans, with Australia contributing a fraction of that. The speaker criticized the idea of drastic economic measures for a small percentage of carbon dioxide emissions.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if he is a PVV Member of Parliament, and Speaker 1 confirms. Speaker 0 says he recognizes them all, to which Speaker 1 agrees. The interviewer then asks about Speaker 1’s ambitions for the next four years, but Speaker 1 says he will answer later. Speaker 0 notes that Speaker 1 is high on the list and again says he will be told later. The interviewer mentions that Speaker 1 was described as “the new talent shaved,” and Speaker 1 responds that that will go well. Speaker 0 remarks that he hasn’t noticed it yet.

Speaker 0: I feel elated. I feel, my goodness, two and a half hours. It's over, and and it's gone quickly. And and I was concentrating for most of the time. Once or twice, I slipped up because it just completely went. But, otherwise, I enjoyed it. Speaker 1: BBC should know in about ten days or so whether its early morning programs are receiving the 2,000,000 or so viewers they're expected to receive. In the meantime, director general Alastair Milne and BBC chairman George Howard declared themselves well pleased with the first program. And as for TVAM, the BBC's breakfast competitors who go on air in two weeks' time Speaker 2: Says they make no apology for that. Speaker 3: Looking at a political party that has values, principles, beliefs that that it will not compromise just for electoral success. And the great thing about last night is we haven't moved to the climate. The climate is moving towards us. Speaker 2: After a decade and a half on the sidelines, the Greens emerged this morning as a political force to be reckoned with. So much so, they're now setting their sights on Westminster. Speaker 4: But with increased public Brother is massive. It's global. It has multiple aspects, and they have not been discussed at this election apart from discussion by me. Speaker 3: What's his abacus for? Speaker 4: For children, very young children at four years of age. It's simple. We have But Speaker 3: the only numbers that are meant to count in this ballot Speaker 5: enough no more because everything this man has said Thank you. I bloody love you. This is what they mean by the beautiful people. And we and alike around the world are going to go down in history. As the people that brought freedom back from the brink just as the light was going out. A way, way into what we call the future. There will be children living in a world of freedom, fairness, justice, joy, and love. And they will sit in enraptured attention as the storytellers recall those special people way back in the ancient twenty twenties who secured freedom on this planet. Impact on the track. Yeah. Speaker 2: This is that CBIZ shit, that ER shit that you already fucking know. Speaker 6: That straight gas. Get that sauce, spill that Speaker 2: motherfucking joint. You feel me? CBIZ, truck. Speaker 6: I tell your man I fucked this girl. I hit the streets, I played the game. I build the shit, I made the name. I hit the note, I changed the game. I made some change, I changed my lane. I a change and broke the chain. I caught a case to change my name. I made the lane and showed the way. ER and so we ate. C biz best know it. E r, we done showed it. A nigga put me in the grave. Work. 40 counts best blow it. Boo. I hit the rave and shot it down. What? I moved the base and smoked the loud. Work. You broke the joke or just a clown. Work. You ain't the road, you're just about. See, there's the name sick. But flows hard, I take the piss. I pay the price, I get the brick. I break it down to feed the strip. It's 44 for protection. Who who go to my section? ER to the world. That's the team that I'm Speaker 2: six feet in the seat. Speaker 6: That's how we get down. Impact Speaker 5: on the tracks.

We'll skip Trump's speech and move directly to RFK Jr.'s swearing-in. Following that, Dr. Drew Updike, a practicing physician with expertise in health systems management and hospital revenue cycles, will join us. He'll provide insights into RFK Jr.'s role, responsibilities, and overall scope within the administration. So, we're going to watch RFK Jr. get sworn in now, and then we'll get Dr. Updike's expert analysis.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they expect Democrats to support them. Speaker 1 responds that they personally do not. Speaker 0 then asks if Speaker 1 needs the Democrats' help to stay in a leadership position. Speaker 1 answers no, stating that if five Republicans side with the Democrats, they will be out. Speaker 1 acknowledges that this situation is complex.

A socialist Marxist mayor of New York City is about to be elected as the new party leader. Half the Democrats want to meet him and take selfies with him, but they are unsure if they will endorse him. The speaker claims this reflects the Democratic party's shift in Washington and New York, but asserts it does not represent America as a whole. Republicans are delivering for hardworking families across the political spectrum, which is why the economy is starting to move in the right direction.

I was talking about the people who will get appointed to some of these jobs. Look at the top one, we can talk about Marco Rubio, little sympatic, and Michael Waltz. Wants to review about something in a gun. They

Speaker 0 asks, “Mean, where's your party's name? Right here.” He adds, “I'm grab that. I can make a few more.” He then states, “That was it.” Finally, he says, “I'm gonna go home. I”

Hey, it's your ranking grizzler on appropriations from Connecticut's Third District. Get ready for your dark academia congress era because House appropriation is where the money is at. We're not chasing the bag; we *are* the bag. Democrats are funding to make life easier through government funding. Republicans' 2025 plan is suspect. They want to eliminate the Department of Education, which is bad. It's a huge tax on the environment, your education, and your rights, a big loss. Democrats get it, though. See how I keep you informed?

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the possibility of forming a government. Speaker 1 mentions that Mrs. Jesus said they will not be ruling, but Speaker 0 clarifies that she meant they will not rule under a Wilders-led government. Speaker 1 adds that they may consider supporting but not participating in a cabinet. Speaker 0 questions if Mrs. Jesus was clear on this, but Speaker 1 believes she was. Speaker 0 suggests that they should have a serious conversation with Timmerman, potentially leading to a coalition with the VVD. Speaker 1 thinks Speaker 0 is jumping ahead and clarifies that they should at least have a conversation with Timmerman. Speaker 0 emphasizes the importance of not excluding any party, except for a coalition with the PvdA. They discuss the differences between parties and Speaker 0 rejects the notion that they are comparable to the PVV. Speaker 1 agrees and clarifies that they did not make that comparison.

Last year, an inquiry recommended a Royal Commission into the government's COVID-19 response after hearing testimony from highly qualified witnesses. The government responded by stating it does not support a Royal Commission, working with State Governments on an inquiry, the proposed terms of reference, or further public involvement. Instead, the government will continue with its own inquiry comprising bureaucrats and a university academic closely involved in the COVID response. The speaker suggests this is a cover-up and questions if pharmaceutical industry donations to the Labor Party influenced this decision. The speaker lists donations from pharmaceutical companies to the Australian Labor Party in 2022-2023, totaling almost $1,000,000. Donations include AbbVie Pharmaceuticals ($14,000), Alexion Pharmaceuticals ($33,000), Amgen Biopharmaceuticals ($27,500), Aspen Medical ($83,000), AstraZeneca ($33,000), Bayer ($33,000), Bristol Myers ($52,000), H. A. Technical Pharmaceuticals ($54,000), Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceuticals ($36,000), Merck Sharp Dome ($66,000), Novartis ($33,000), Pfizer ($25,000), Roche ($66,000), Sanofi Aventis ($42,000), Pharmacy Guild of Australia ($154,000), Medicines Australia ($112,000), and Bunnings owners Wesfarmers ($110,000). The speaker states that 1 Nation received no donations from these industries because it is "not for sale."

There have been discussions about former Labour Party members who were involved in past campaigns and have since left the party. Some staff members are taking time off to volunteer in various capacities, including door knocking across America. These connections are not new; for instance, Yvette Cooper assisted the Clinton campaign in 1992.

The speaker discusses the appointment of a new minister and the potential changes they may bring. They mention the possibility of implementing new policies and regulations. The speaker also mentions the involvement of certain individuals in the decision-making process. The transcript repeats the same phrases multiple times. The content is not clear due to the repetition and lack of context.

We're about to witness RFK Jr. being sworn in. Following this, Dr. Drew Updike, a practicing physician and expert in health systems management and hospital revenue cycles, will join us. Dr. Updike will provide insights into the role, purview, and remit of RFK Jr. after the swearing-in ceremony. So, let's watch the swearing in now and we will hear from Dr. Updike shortly.

Speaker 0 is asked if they will be running for reelection in 2026. They apologize for not hearing the question properly and ask for someone else to speak up with a different question.

The prime minister, ministers, and MPs are present for an important discussion. The speaker emphasizes the importance of dialogue over yelling. They express gratitude for the opportunity to speak and work together during this challenging time.

Hello, I'm from the Australian government and we have a two-party system. If you're unsure about voting in this election, it means you don't understand our voting system. We have preferential voting, which allows you to vote for your preferred candidate. Even if your first choice doesn't win, your vote will flow to your second choice and so on. So, you can vote for a candidate who fights for climate action and put the major parties last. This way, your vote still benefits them and they can influence decisions on issues like coal mining. Don't believe the scare tactics, voting for not shit candidates can make a difference. Most people don't know this, so they waste their vote. Remember, the two-party system controls the government. Authorized by the department for not teaching this in school.

I'm a platform services manager for the Department of Homeland Security. I'm not thrilled about Kristi Noem's appointment. The truth is, we don't let political appointees get in our way. It's my job to filter things. By the time marching orders get to me and below, we can steady the ship. I feel bad for the GS fifteens because they have to deal with the crazy stuff. They have to kiss ass and re-word ideas. DHS could fall on Noem's head, and she wouldn't even know it. The secretaries can set priorities, but they can't tell us what to do. If we don't agree with the priorities, there's a lot of room for interpretation. We can filter the marching orders, like a septic tank. Also, my trans colleagues are freaking out because this administration is super anti-trans.

We are at a busy Fine Gael convention where Regina Doherty was chosen as our candidate for the European elections. I am excited to follow in Frances Fitzgerald's footsteps and keep Fine Gael strong in Europe.

It's been a year since the Albert Park incident with Posie Parker, marked by violence and chaos. I was asked about having Chanel Lal, who was involved in inflaming the crowd there, working for the Labour Party. I don't recall saying I wished I'd been at Albert Park, but conceptually, I'd have been proud to support our rainbow community. Looking back, some people on both sides were peacefully expressing their free speech, while others aggravated the situation, which is regrettable. Over the weekend, many New Zealanders respectfully exercised their free speech to support fellow citizens, which we should celebrate. Regarding Chanel Lal, he is working for one of our MPs. I won't discuss past actions, but if Chanel does something as a staff member that reflects poorly on their position, I would address it then.

The speaker proposes bringing someone up for a couple of minutes. The speaker states that the world will see a vibrant Republican.

The speaker expresses gratitude for the support that has propelled the Conservative Party in British Columbia. He acknowledges the party was at 2% in the polls when he considered leadership, with no elected members in 50 years and no government formed in almost 100 years. He says he saw a hunger for common-sense change across the province. He states the party now stands as the strongest conservative party in a century due to a grassroots movement. He says they are neck and neck with the NDP and haven't given up the fight. He believes the NDP will not keep its promises if it forms a minority government and the Conservative Party will resist further destruction of the province. He thanks the candidates and volunteers. He credits Azim Jawani, Angelo Isadora, and Conor Gibson for their work. He thanks his wife, Kim, for her support and encouragement. He says the election isn't over and they still have a chance to form government and bring common-sense change. He hopes the Conservative Party will become the next dynasty to provide good government for British Columbia.

Speaker 0 asks what you are here to talk about, says “Thank you very much,” and asks, “Any votes in the prime minister?”