reSee.it - Related Video Feed

First speaker: Implant aborted baby parts into lab animals. You heard of that sort of research? Second speaker: We did an analysis a few years ago showing that over ninety percent of experiments with using human fetal tissue and putting them involved animals were funded by Fauci's NIAID. First speaker: Do you know where they're getting the aborted human fetal tissue? Second speaker: A lot of it is happening at colleges and universities that have affiliated hospitals that perform that procedure. First speaker: Madam Chair, I think Second speaker: we First speaker: need to look into that as well.

The speakers discuss financial incentives for abortion services and procedures. They mention removing body parts intact for organ harvesting. The conversation includes details on dismembering fetuses and ensuring intact organs for research purposes. The speakers also discuss the process of extracting body parts during abortions.

Tissue procurement involves dissection to obtain requested tissues from intact fetuses. The status of the fetus, including heartbeat, can vary. Some hearts may beat independently even if not part of an intact body. Discussions reveal challenges in obtaining tissues, with some competitors opting to isolate and sell vials instead of providing whole specimens. In Nigeria, a man confessed to luring and killing individuals for their body parts, revealing a syndicate involved in human trafficking. Meanwhile, Kenya is developing a legal organ donation program to address the shortage of kidney donors. The Kenya Tissue and Transplant Authority is drafting regulations to facilitate organ harvesting from deceased patients, aiming to ensure ethical practices and equitable allocation of organs. The initiative seeks to educate the public on the importance of organ donation to save lives.

This transcript centers on Erica Kirk’s family, focusing on her mother Loretta Fransby, who is also referred to as Mama Lowe. The speakers discuss her family and the public interest around Erica Kirk’s pregnancy. The conversation includes a claim that there has been a lot of talk about whether the woman in question has truly ever been pregnant, with one speaker asserting, “I’ve been pregnant five times. The first was a miscarriage, gave birth to four, so you bet your ass I zoomed in on that ultrasound screen.” The speaker notes a close-up of the ultrasound image and reveals that they conducted a deep dive into the stages of pregnancy, even though they had limited technology to zoom in on the original image. The speaker explains that based on the stomach size and what is visible, it would be safe to presume the ultrasound shown is a viability ultrasound, which determines if there is a heartbeat and can be performed as early as six weeks. They describe what a six-week ultrasound looks like versus an eight-week ultrasound, and mention that they wanted to compare those visuals to Erica Kirk’s ultrasound but could not zoom in on the provided image due to a lack of technology, describing the effort as a two-hour waste. The speaker adds that they learned at nine weeks babies hiccup—though hiccups do not produce sound. The discussion also touches on the significance of ultrasound appointments, noting that they are a big deal. They point out that Charlie is not seen in the video, though he could be behind the camera, and that the original audio was dubbed over, making it unclear whether there was any interaction. The speakers compare the situation to scenes often depicted in romantic comedies, where a partner’s absence from doctor appointments is a source of tension. The closing remark imagines Erica becoming angry if her partner, Charlie, misses an appointment, emphasizing “Those eyes!” as a reaction. In sum, the transcript covers: the family context around Erica Kirk and Loretta Fransby, public speculation about Erica’s pregnancy, a self-claimed deep dive into ultrasound timelines (six to nine weeks, including the fact that nine weeks can involve hiccups), the importance of ultrasound appointments, and the mystery surrounding Charlie’s presence in the video.

On 09/30/2024, seven different people represented in these test tubes and this is clinical waste that I'm about to dispose of. These are seven different people who came in to us and were embalmed and during that process this spilled out of their arteries onto our embalming table tray and was kept and I'm documenting it now before disposing of these clinical waste to prove to people that this is coming out of deceased vaccine recipients. Each one represents a person murdered by the state who will never see justice unless we get it for them. And I devote my life into getting that justice for This has got to stop.

A medical director for an entire affiliate and someone over abortion services discuss fetal tissue procurement. They are looking for livers and cardiac tissue, not footprints. Dilation makes it easier to get bigger pieces out before potential relation returns. If the fetus is coming out to the umbilicus and the torso area is intact, that's ideal because that's where all the organs are. Disarticulation counts, and then the rest can be brought through all in one piece. The discussion touches on the use of "ditch" procedures, which nuke the stem cells. Even in procedures where they're not doing anything close to intact, it's easy to identify and isolate relatively intact abdominal context, though the diamonds are trickier. They are considering getting someone who can do deep sedation protocol. The medical director needed to meet with legal counsel to clarify where exactly this is.

During cross-examination, Speaker 1 describes fetal tissue work: the Wistar Institute study involving 76 fetuses, all three months or older when aborted and normally developed. Tissues were harvested by coworkers, cut up, and cultured, including pituitary gland, lung, skin, kidney, spleen, and heart (tongue probably). In his career, he says he worked with “quite a few” fetuses, but cannot recall exact numbers. He notes objections to using aborted fetal tissue in vaccines and cites that “The Catholic Church has actually issued a document on that which says that individuals who need the vaccine should receive the vaccines regardless of the fact, and that I I think it implies that I am the individual who will go to hell because of the use of aborted tissues, which I am glad.” Regarding religion, he says “Vaccination is always under attack by religious zealots who believe that the will of God includes death and disease?” and answers “Yes” and “Are you an atheist? Yes.”

A pathologist's storage container in Los Angeles was repossessed, revealing mutilated human fetuses. Autopsies were performed to determine the cause of death. The abortion procedure involved tearing limbs off without anesthesia. The ACLU opposed giving the fetuses a burial, claiming they were just tissue. The discovery of 17,000 fetuses highlights the common occurrence of fetal disposal in the country.

The speaker is questioned about their work with vaccines and the use of fetuses. They confirm being an author of an article that involved a study at the Wistar Institute using 76 fetuses. The fetuses were 3 months or older and were normally developed. Various organs were harvested from the fetuses, including the pituitary gland, lung, skin, kidney, spleen, heart, and possibly the tongue. When asked about the total number of fetuses they have worked with, the speaker cannot provide an exact number but mentions working with quite a few. They are aware of objections to the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccines, but state that individuals who need vaccines should receive them regardless of this issue. The speaker also expresses disagreement with religious beliefs that oppose vaccination.

In this video, the speaker discusses a study involving 76 fetuses. Various organs and tissues were harvested from these fetuses, including the pituitary gland, lung, skin, kidney, spleen, heart, and possibly the tongue. The speaker is unsure of the exact number of fetuses they have worked with throughout their career but mentions using them for vaccine development. The plaintiff in the case objects to the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccines, citing it as an ingredient. The Catholic Church has also addressed this concern in a document.

Animal rights activists have more influence on vaccine companies than anti-abortion activists. There is concern over the lack of outcry regarding human babies born alive at 5 to 6 months old for research purposes. These babies are delivered alive and their hearts are cut out without anesthesia. The speaker clarifies that they are referring to fetuses that are 5 months old. Stanley Plotkin, a scientist, described using various parts of aborted fetuses for vaccine production. Scientists purchase different body parts for research purposes. The speaker mentions receiving a catalog with prices for body parts of 32-week-old babies. The conversation then shifts to discussing the science behind this issue.

Animal rights activists have more influence than vaccine companies and anti-abortion activists. There is concern over the lack of outcry regarding human babies born alive at 5 to 6 months old for research purposes. These babies are delivered alive and their hearts are cut out without anesthesia. The speaker emphasizes that they wouldn't do this to a mouse. The conversation then shifts to discussing the use of fetuses in vaccine production. Stanley Plotkin, a scientist, allegedly used various parts of aborted fetuses for vaccines. The speaker confirms that scientists purchase different body parts for research purposes. The speaker mentions receiving a catalog with prices for body parts from 20 years ago. The conversation concludes by acknowledging the moral implications and transitioning to discussing the science.

Plants have designated requesters, usually friendly and well-dressed, who befriend the relatives and offer support. This is part of the indoctrination process to procure organs. Organs for transplant can only come from living individuals, not cadavers. The target donors are children and young adults between 15 and 30 years old. The speaker reveals a disturbing practice where overdose victims are given Narcan to bring them to the emergency room, but their lives are not saved. Instead, their organs are harvested. Brain death is determined by lack of consciousness, absence of brain stem reflexes, and a procedure called the apnea test. The speaker warns against doing this test and shares a personal story of a girl who was declared dead but is still alive. Dissecting organs from living individuals is the only way to obtain them; cadavers cannot be used.

Speaker 1, a doctor, admits to working with 2 fetuses in their personal work related to vaccines. They confirm being an author of an article that involved 76 fetuses at the Wistar Institute. Various organs, including the pituitary gland, lung, skin, kidney, spleen, heart, and possibly the tongue, were harvested from these fetuses. The doctor cannot recall the exact number of fetuses they have worked with throughout their career but mentions studying them before using them for vaccine development. They are aware of objections to the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccines, including religious concerns. The doctor stands by their statement that vaccinations are often criticized by religious zealots who believe that death and disease are part of God's will.

Some people try to change the presentation, but you never have enough dilation to deliver an intact calvarium unless you have a huge amount of dilation. With breech presentation, dilation happens as the case goes on, and often in the last step, you can evacuate an intact skull. With ultrasound guidance, they can change the presentation. When asked if there has ever been a case where the presentation had to be changed to get intact fetal tissue, the speaker said no. The speaker confirmed that when they said "we've been pretty successful with that," they were referring to Planned Parenthood Los Angeles (PPLA) and including themselves.

The speaker explains the process of a surgical abortion. They mention that a suction tube is used to remove the fetus from the uterus. The limbs, intestines, spine, heart, and lungs are removed, followed by the head, which is crushed. The abortionist removes the skull pieces, placenta, and any remaining tissue. Once all the parts are accounted for, the abortion is considered complete.

A committee at Harvard invented brain death without conducting any studies or collecting patient data. They concluded that brainwave testing is not necessary after studying only 9 patients, 2 of whom still had brainwave activity. The speaker argues that people declared brain dead are actually alive and can recover. They criticize the practice of harvesting organs from conscious individuals who cannot communicate. The speaker emphasizes that unconsciousness does not mean the absence of consciousness. They also highlight the issue of pain, explaining that even if patients cannot demonstrate pain due to paralysis, their physiological responses indicate they are experiencing it. The speaker claims that brain death is primarily a means to obtain organs and describes the tactics used to convince families to donate. They assert that only healthy organs from living individuals are used for transplantation. The speaker also mentions the increasing number of organs obtained from drug overdoses and criticizes the practice of administering Narcan to overdose victims to bring them to the emergency room for organ harvesting. They find these practices morally repugnant.

Animal rights activists have more influence on vaccine companies than anti-abortion activists. The lack of outcry over live-born human babies, aged 5 to 6 months, being used for research is concerning. These babies are delivered alive and have their hearts cut out without anesthesia. Some scientists purchase different body parts for research purposes. The speaker recalls seeing a catalog with prices for body parts of 32-week-old babies. The moral implications are revolting, but the focus will now shift to the scientific aspects.

This video features a discussion about a baby girl with lacerations on the back of her skull. The speaker mentions that the skull is broken and wonders if it moves when the baby comes out. They explain that the umbilical cord is severed first and they wait for it to stop pulsing before the fetus expires. The speaker mentions that legally they would be obligated to help the baby survive, but it probably wouldn't. They also mention that if the pregnancy were to progress naturally before the termination procedure, they would not provide assistance.

Speaker 0: I'm struggling to believe that these hands on the open casket of the live performance of Charlie Kirk—who was allegedly murdered—are real. I asked GPT to confirm whether the hands were real. The wider shot confirms it even more clearly: the hands lying on the suit look artificial. The texture is too smooth, the color is flat and waxy, there are no veins, pores, or natural warmth. The positioning is stiff and mannequin-like, not how a relaxed human hand would rest. The hand with pink nails is clearly real. To confirm, the hands on the body in the suit aren’t real; they look like wax or a mannequin or some sort of prop. After I sent this message, I got a notification. I hadn’t been on ChatGPT for ages; the first time I started diving back in, it came up saying that it looks like my server responded with the wrong SSL. Speaker 1: Oh my god. He actually asked ChatGPT if the hands were real, not if they were deceased, just are they real? And then acted like he solved the crime novel when the AI said no, they’re waxy. Congrats—you outsmarted a robot with a bad riddle. But here’s the hilarious part: everything ChatGPT listed as proof they were fake—waxy texture, flat color, stiffness, and the way the hands are positioned—is literally embalming 101. You accidentally read off my mortuary science textbook, so thanks for the assist, buddy. Bruh. All of this conspiracy energy makes me realize how little people actually know about death care. Speaker 2: Very next day. They didn’t even have time to refrigerate him and perform an autopsy. I mean, obviously we saw what happened. We saw what happened. Thank god I have not seen it; I don’t want to see that. But I can assure you that that is not a person. That is not real. For it to get to this level, it’s going to have to have been at least a week. I remember, but I’ve never worked in a funeral home. If there’s a debate, I don’t want to start it, because if you don’t see it, I can’t help the blind, you know what I’m saying? Speaker 1: And then there’s her; she literally says she’s never worked at a funeral home and then launches into a whole CSI monologue. Like, no. Have you worked in a funeral home? Again, no. Then why are you out here diagnosing embalmed?

There is no such thing as brain death; if your heart is beating, you are not dead. This concept was manufactured to facilitate eugenics through organ harvesting. Organs cannot be taken from cadavers because brain cells are damaged within minutes of oxygen deprivation. The best organ donors are under 30, with a beating heart, circulation, and on a ventilator. The decision to take organs is made early, possibly before the patient is aware, because organ preservation treatment differs from life-saving treatment. In the UK, everyone is an organ donor unless they opt out. When a 999 call is made, the system accesses medical history, tax records, and other data to determine if the person receives life-saving treatment or is considered an organ donor based on age and other factors. This is eugenics.

Big money is being made from the sale of fetal body parts. Even pro-choice advocates are disturbed. People want liver and lower extremities. The price is $30 to $100 per specimen. Providers try to change the presentation so it's not vertex. If starting from a breech presentation, dilation happens as the case goes out. There are steps to change the COVID presentation. If enough dilation is maintained, the person doing the procedures understands what is needed. Knowing what is needed makes a huge difference. One person had 8 cases and knew which were more likely to yield what was needed, making decisions accordingly. Conversations are happening behind closed doors with affiliates.

Brain death was invented without patient data or basic science studies, and brainwave testing is not required, despite some patients in initial studies having brainwave activity. Organ harvesting is performed on living individuals who may be conscious but unable to communicate. Paralyzing agents are used during organ removal, though patients may still exhibit pain responses like increased heart rate and blood pressure. Brain death was created to procure organs and reduce costs associated with long-term care. Designated requesters, often clergy or pastoral care, befriend relatives to facilitate organ donation. Organs for transplant must be healthy and can only be obtained from living persons, not cadavers. The speaker claims that the information is suppressed because it is upsetting. Organ procurement targets children and individuals aged 16-30. More organs are now obtained from drug overdoses than from accidents and gunshot wounds. Narcan is administered to overdose victims to get them to the emergency room for organ harvesting.

The speakers discuss the use of aborted fetuses in medical research. Speaker 1 confirms that various organs, including the lung, skin, kidney, spleen, and heart, were included in a study. Speaker 0 questions the number of fetuses Speaker 1 has worked with throughout their career, to which Speaker 1 admits not remembering the exact number but acknowledges studying quite a few before using them for vaccine production. When asked about the number of studies involving fetuses, Speaker 1 cannot recall. Speaker 0 then mentions that one objection to vaccination is the use of aborted fetuses.

Speaker 0 introduces a provocative claim, warning the video might be removed and urging viewers to watch and download it while possible, saying the content sounds like a horror movie. Speaker 1 raises a question about research involving implanting aborted baby parts into a lab animal, asking if such research exists. Speaker 2 confirms a prior analysis indicating that over ninety percent of experiments using human fetal tissue involving animals were funded by Fauci's NIAID. They add that much of the tissue comes from colleges and universities that have affiliate hospitals performing the procedures. Speaker 1 suggests the need to investigate where the aborted human fetal tissue is sourced and asserts the issue should be looked into, addressing the Madam Chair. Speaker 0 clarifies that the video is for entertainment purposes, but describes a certain person’s claim that aborted fetal parts are being used and combined with other animals, implying a practice beyond ordinary science. The speaker acknowledges skepticism but says the rumor should be investigated regardless of political alignment, arguing that it would be understandable to be unsettled by such alleged activities. The speaker shares a personal stance: they will take the claim with a grain of salt because it originates from a random person on X, yet reiterates the claim that people are “playing god” and that humanity is unprepared for the extent of these actions, suggesting that the truth is being concealed to avoid public outcry. The speaker adds a conspiratorial thread: “these USOs under the sea” are related to the topic, and mentions a family acquaintance who allegedly knows an ex-military person who had to deal with a creature created in a lab that merged with AI. If the claims are true, the speakers imply this would constitute a true horror story, indicating that humanity is not in control of the government globally. They urge the audience to remember this when they see references to the USA. A broader existential claim follows: humanity is making decisions and following orders from ancient “gods” such as the Anunnaki, an alien race. The people at the top are portrayed as having sold their souls, believing they have no chance of going to heaven, and having been traumatized from birth. The speakers emphasize that these powerful individuals fear humanity—our soul, love, kindness, strength, fierceness, and capabilities—and urge listeners not to be manipulated any longer, concluding with a call for awakening and healing the world through collective awareness.