reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Megyn Kelly hosts a discussion on transitioning and de-transitioning, featuring Walt Heyer and Grace Ladinsky-Smith, both of whom regret their transitions. Walt transitioned to Laura Jensen in his forties but de-transitioned after realizing he needed therapy for childhood trauma rather than surgery. He recounts how adverse childhood experiences, including emotional and sexual abuse, influenced his decision to transition. He emphasizes that many individuals who transition may be dealing with unresolved trauma rather than genuine gender dysphoria. Grace, who began questioning her gender in her twenties, underwent a double mastectomy and hormone therapy but later recognized her mistake. She describes her experience as being influenced by social media and a mental health crisis, leading her to believe that transitioning would resolve her issues. Both Walt and Grace face backlash from trans activists for sharing their stories, highlighting the societal pressure to affirm transitions without exploring underlying psychological issues. The conversation shifts to the medical perspective, with Dr. Julia Mason and Dr. Erica Anderson discussing the implications of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. They outline significant risks associated with these treatments, including bone density issues, cognitive effects, and irreversible changes to sexual function. They express concern over the lack of thorough evaluations before medical interventions are prescribed, noting that many young people may be seeking transition as a solution to broader psychological problems. The discussion also touches on the increasing number of young girls identifying as trans and the potential societal factors influencing this trend. Both doctors advocate for a more cautious approach, emphasizing the need for individualized assessments and addressing underlying mental health issues rather than rushing into medical treatments. They call for a systematic review of the scientific evidence surrounding these practices, similar to actions taken in countries like Sweden and Finland, which have begun to reassess their approaches to gender-affirming care for minors.

Megyn Kelly welcomes Matt Walsh to discuss his new documentary, "What is a Woman," which premiered recently. The conversation begins with a recap of the Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard defamation trial, where Depp emerged victorious, receiving $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages, later reduced to $350,000 due to Virginia's cap on punitive damages. The jury found Heard to be a malicious liar, rejecting her claims of abuse and deeming her a fake victim. Kelly emphasizes that Heard's credibility was undermined by her numerous lies, and her post-verdict statements about the implications for future abuse claims are misguided. She argues that her dishonesty has only made it harder for genuine victims to be believed. Mark Geragos joins the discussion, expressing surprise at Heard's partial victory on a counterclaim but agreeing with Kelly that the jury's overall decision was justified. They discuss the media's portrayal of the trial and the implications for the #MeToo movement, asserting that the courts functioned correctly by prioritizing evidence over social justice narratives. The conversation shifts to Walsh's documentary, which addresses the confusion surrounding gender identity. Walsh shares his experiences interviewing individuals about the definition of a woman, revealing widespread uncertainty even among self-identified experts. He highlights the absurdity of the current discourse on gender, where individuals struggle to define basic terms. The documentary features interviews with gender-affirming doctors and critiques the medical community's approach to treating children with gender dysphoria, particularly the use of puberty blockers like Lupron, which can lead to chemical castration. Walsh emphasizes the dangers of affirming children's gender identities without proper evaluation and the alarming trend of schools facilitating access to gender-affirming treatments without parental consent. He shares the story of a father who lost custody of his child for refusing to affirm the child's gender identity, illustrating the extreme measures being taken against parents who oppose the prevailing ideology. The documentary also features Scott Nugent, a transgender man who regrets his transition and warns against the medical establishment's practices. Nugent's testimony underscores the potential harm of surgeries and treatments being marketed to children. Walsh concludes by urging viewers to recognize the seriousness of the issue and the need for open dialogue about gender identity, emphasizing that the documentary sheds light on a pervasive problem affecting society at large.

Dr. Miriam Grossman, a psychiatrist, discusses the dangers of gender ideology and its impact on children and families. She emphasizes the importance of self-acceptance while advocating for personal responsibility and growth. Grossman warns that children are misled into believing they can transition genders without significant consequences, which can include severe medical risks and lifelong regrets. She highlights the trauma experienced by parents of children who identify as transgender, noting that their concerns are often dismissed by the medical community. Grossman reflects on her early observations of problematic sex education and the rise of gender ideology, which she believes creates confusion about identity. She critiques the notion that gender is separate from biological sex, arguing that this ideology undermines stable identities and contributes to mental health crises among youth. She recounts the tragic case of David Reimer, whose life was altered by John Money's controversial theories on gender identity, illustrating the potential harm of misguided medical practices. Grossman calls for parents to be proactive in understanding these issues and to seek support, as many feel isolated and demonized for questioning the prevailing narrative. She stresses the necessity of acknowledging the trauma faced by families and advocates for a return to evidence-based practices in mental health and medicine. Her upcoming book, *Lost in Transnation*, aims to provide guidance for parents navigating these challenges.

Dax and Monica host a candid conversation with a string of twin stories, exploring how being a twin shapes identity, memory, and daily life. The episode opens with twins Casey and Sarah, who describe a mother’s effort to give them independent personalities by splitting them into different classes and clothing choices, setting up a lifelong conversation about how much of who we are comes from nature versus nurture. Casey recounts a near-tragic 2011 incident involving her sister’s accident, the distress it caused, and the eerie sense of twin telepathy that she believes kept them connected during the crisis. The tale transitions into questions about how strong the bond between twins can feel when one sister experiences danger, while the other navigates the same family dynamics with curiosity and caution. The hosts and guests reflect on the weight of intuition, the fear a twin can carry for the other, and how shared experiences can both illuminate and complicate individuality. Another segment features Scott and his brother David, identical twins who grew up in California, attended the same university, and pursued parallel careers in chemistry. They unfold a lighter but pointed story about being mistaken for one another in everyday life, the humor and friction of being constantly confused, and the occasional consequences of that confusion in a competitive setting. A dramatic moment in their story—a mid-game head collision that lands Scott in the ER—highlights the vulnerability that can accompany twin closeness when identity is almost indistinguishable to others. The dialogue leans into the comic tension of people narrating twin traits, while also acknowledging serious questions about how closely two people with shared biology can still diverge in temperament, life choices, and even health history. The conversation meanders through accents learned abroad, parental influence, and the sense that twinhood can feel like living with a mirror that mutates as you grow. The episode closes with reflections on whether twins truly share a single life path, or whether nurture, life choices, and personal choices carve out distinct roads, leaving twins with both a unique connection and a distinct independence.