TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker asks if the audience had access to a document called form 10/23, which alleges that Joe Biden and Hunter Biden were involved in a bribery scheme with Ukraine. They mention that this allegation is consistent with similar situations in Romania and other countries where shell companies are used to launder money. Another speaker responds, stating that they provided a supplement to their original transcript after seeing open source information from former Attorney General Bill Barr, who mentioned the document and sent it for further investigation. However, the team in charge of investigating the Biden family for tax crimes claims they never received this FBI document. This raises questions about why such information would be withheld from investigators. Another speaker adds that the document could potentially corroborate other information and suggests turning it over to the House Ways and Means Committee.

A whistleblower claimed that a foreign individual gave $5 million to then Vice President Biden, and mentioned money being sent to LLCs. Congress subpoenaed the document, as they have oversight of the FBI. Director Ray refused to provide it initially, but after being threatened with contempt charges, he agreed to show it to the chairman and ranking member only. However, according to the speaker, all members of the committee should have the right to see the unclassified document. If Director Ray doesn't allow this, they plan to move forward with contempt charges on Thursday.

Prior to the election, the FBI was aware of the Burisma scandals and the Hunter Biden laptop, which implicated them in a bribery scheme. Instead of properly investigating, the FBI attempted to hide the information, punish the senators involved, and censor American citizens by pressuring Twitter and other platforms to block reporting on the laptop.

A presidential memorandum requires the immediate declassification of all FBI files related to the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, which is considered an instance of weaponization of law enforcement. The aim is for the American people to have a full understanding of the files' contents. The declassification gives the media the right to examine the files. All FBI files will be declassified, except for a classified annex, and made public. The FBI and Department of Justice should be ashamed, as should Biden.

Senator Grassley sent a letter to Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray, asking about whistleblower disclosures on political bias in the FBI and DOJ. The letter revealed that the FBI had 40 confidential human sources with derogatory information on the Bidens, but they shut them down and labeled it Russian disinformation. This exposes corruption within federal law enforcement and the media's complicity in covering up Democratic corruption. The corruption extends from the exoneration of Hillary Clinton to the crossfire hurricane investigation and the obstruction of the Hunter Biden investigation. There needs to be a thorough investigation, but the biased media is a hindrance.

A presidential memorandum requires immediate declassification of all FBI files related to the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, which is considered an instance of weaponization of law enforcement. The aim is to give the American people a full understanding of the files. The declassification gives the media the right to examine the files. All will be declassified except for a classified annex. The speaker suggests the FBI and Department of Justice should be ashamed, as should Biden.

The speaker expresses frustration over the leaking of a classified document to The New York Times while a nonclassified document cannot be made public. They argue that the document should be released without unnecessary redactions for transparency. The speaker mentions that a foreign national allegedly has audio recordings of conversations with Joe and Hunter Biden, which were kept as an insurance policy. They criticize the Justice Department and FBI for not focusing on the Biden family and call for the release of the full document to hold them accountable. The speaker emphasizes the importance of congressional oversight and transparency, stating that they have read the unredacted version of the document.

Joe Biden is accused of violating federal law by not using his official government email. It is claimed that he was aware of his son and brother's activities, as evidenced by emails with fake names. The purpose of using aliases is to have plausible deniability. The National Archives should release these emails. Interestingly, the same National Archives previously made a big deal about Donald Trump having classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. It is now revealed that Biden had similar emails as vice president, and the National Archives is only now disclosing this information. This situation highlights the bureaucratic issues in Washington DC. The release of these emails is crucial, and further investigation is needed.

Thanks to whistleblowers within the FBI and Department of Justice, I can now share an FBI document, labeled 10/23, with the American people. This document sheds light on potential misconduct involving Vice President Biden and Hunter Biden. The FBI needs to clarify their actions regarding this matter. It's important for the American people to have access to the same information I read three months ago. It's worth noting that this document was unclassified, so there was no valid reason for it to take a year to become available to the public.

Senator Grassley wrote a letter to the speaker, discussing the FBI's use of confidential human sources to provide criminal information on Joe Biden and his family. The letter questions whether the FBI tried to shut down the investigation. It alleges that an assessment by an FBI analyst was used to discredit negative information on Hunter Biden and halt the investigation. The letter suggests that there is political bias within the Justice Department and FBI, impacting decision-making at all levels. Senator Grassley urges the speaker to address this issue for the sake of our democracy.

A credible whistleblower claims that the Department of Justice has evidence of President Joe Biden's involvement in a criminal scheme with a foreign national. The whistleblower alleges that Biden exchanged money for policy decisions while he was vice president. Senator Chuck Grassley supports these allegations and is issuing a subpoena to the FBI and Chris Wray to release the document. The White House denies the claims, calling them unfounded and politically motivated. Former White House staffers and IRS whistleblowers provide additional evidence of Biden's involvement in corrupt activities. Hunter Biden's finances are also under scrutiny, with potential tax and gun charges being considered. Joe Biden has been absent from the public eye recently.

Senator Hawley questions Mr. Abadi about the existence of a document that alleges the President has received bribes from a foreign nation. Initially, the FBI director denied its existence, but later acknowledged it after Senator Grassley mentioned reading it. Senator Hawley asks why the document is not being released and if it is classified. Mr. Abadi confirms that the document is unclassified but does not commit to releasing it. Senator Hawley insists that the American people have the right to see it, suggesting that the source's name can be redacted.

The speaker claims predecessors intentionally failed the American public by deceiving them about the FBI to rig a presidential election. They allegedly lied to a federal court, misused taxpayer dollars, and withheld exculpatory information. The speaker asserts that when caught, they lied about it. According to the speaker, Congress is working to release unredacted Crossfire Hurricane documents for full accountability. While acknowledging criticisms about the lack of accountability for figures like Comey and Strach, the speaker states that many statutes of limitations have expired. The speaker says the current FBI leadership is releasing documents that were hidden, revealing new information weekly and promising a wave of transparency in the next couple of weeks.

Thanks to whistleblowers within the FBI and Department of Justice, I can now release an FBI document, labeled 10/23, that sheds light on potential misconduct involving Vice President Biden and Hunter Biden. It's important for the American people to have access to this information, which I read three months ago. This document is unclassified, so there was no valid reason for it to take a year to become public. Now, it's up to the FBI to disclose their actions regarding this matter.

I will be heading back to Washington soon to update you on the Joe Biden investigation. Representative Mace pointed out that on the same day the House Oversight Committee received access to special activity reports, Alvin Bragg indicted President Trump in New York. On that day, we also obtained a form from the FBI stating that Joe Biden received a $5,000,000 bribery transaction while he was vice president. This shows an exploitation and abuse of the justice system. To conduct a thorough investigation without interference from the DOJ and FBI, we may need to impeach President Biden. The evidence we have makes this a likely course of action.

Senator Grassley and Representative Comer are calling for an investigation into a document that allegedly describes a criminal scheme involving former Vice President Biden and a foreign national. They want to know if the Justice Department and FBI properly vetted the document and followed standard investigative procedures. The FBI has received a letter and subpoena regarding this matter but has not commented. Grassley emphasizes the importance of getting answers and ensuring that the executive branch enforces the law as required by the Constitution, regardless of political affiliation.

We received a couple hundred pages of documents from the FBI, but a source indicated more evidence was in the Southern District of New York. I gave them a deadline, and thousands of pages of documents arrived. The FBI and Director Patel's team are reviewing them to determine why these documents were initially withheld. While redacting to protect victims is crucial, we aim for maximum transparency, believing Americans deserve to know the truth. The Biden administration claimed no one acted on these documents, but why were they hidden? This same principle of transparency applies to the JFK files and other cases. When we redact, we will clearly mark the specific lines and explain the reason, such as protecting a victim's identity or national security.

The revelation shows that 51 intelligence officials, who claimed Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation, were actually coordinated by the Biden campaign. This corruption involved Biden, Secretary of State Blinken, and partisan intelligence officials, aiming to hide the truth about the Biden family's influence peddling and corruption. During the debate, Joe Biden lied about this scandal, which is considered the biggest in American history. This cheating and election interference is a disgrace to our country, causing us to be mocked worldwide. The American people will not tolerate this any longer.

The speaker discusses a letter written by Senator Chuck Grassley regarding alleged corruption within the Justice Department and FBI related to the Biden family. The letter highlights the FBI's knowledge of the Burisma scandal and Hunter Biden's involvement in a bribery scheme before the election, and their attempts to bury the information. Grassley requests information and records related to the investigation, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability. The speaker expresses concern about the potential compromise of the President and the urgency to address the corruption.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) made a secret deal to protect Joe Biden, according to the speaker. They didn't follow the usual procedure of listing all components of the plea agreement, instead putting the important part in a separate confidential document. During a hearing, the judge became uncomfortable and asked if the DOJ had ever given immunity for unrelated crimes, to which the prosecutor said no. This led to the unraveling of the deal, as it was revealed that there was an open investigation. The DOJ wanted to keep this information away from Congress, arguing that it didn't have to be disclosed under FOIA. The speaker suggests that both sides were working together to protect Joe Biden.

The speaker asks about a House Oversight Committee subpoena regarding an FBI document from 2020. The document allegedly describes a criminal scheme involving then Vice President Biden and a foreign national exchanging money for policy decisions. The speaker asks for the White House's response, but they refer to the Justice Department and have no information. The speaker also asks about the country and policy decision, but the response remains the same.

We received a couple hundred pages of documents from the FBI, but a source told me there were more at the Southern District of New York. I gave them a deadline, and we got thousands of pages. The FBI is reviewing them, and Director Patel is preparing a detailed report on why the FBI withheld these documents. These documents include flight logs, names, and victim names, but we believe there's more. The FBI just received these thousands of pages, and protecting victims is a priority. We believe in transparency, and America has the right to know. The Biden administration claimed no one did anything with these documents, but why were they in the Southern District of New York? I want a full report. We will redact national security information and grand jury information, but the public will know why.

My team found evidence that former Vice President Biden kept classified materials after leaving office. In an audio recording, Biden told his ghostwriter he found classified documents in his home as a private citizen in Virginia.

The speaker mentions that a foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden has audio recordings of his conversations with them. There are 17 recordings in total, with 15 being phone calls between the foreign national and Hunter Biden, and 2 being phone calls between the foreign national and then vice president Joe Biden. These recordings were kept as an insurance policy by the foreign national. It is suggested that Joe Biden may have been involved in employing Hunter Biden. The speaker questions why the Justice Department and FBI haven't focused on the Biden family like they did with former president Trump. The relevance of these recordings to a bribery scheme is highlighted.

A senator questions Deputy Director Abadi about allegations of a $5 million bribery scheme involving President Biden and his family. Abadi refuses to comment on the existence of a report or 17 voice recordings related to the allegations. The senator accuses the FBI of stonewalling and damaging its reputation. Abadi maintains that they operate within established parameters and will work with the committee to provide information. The senator criticizes the FBI for not being accountable and demands the release of the report and recordings. Abadi avoids directly answering questions about the investigation and the informant's reliability. The senator expresses concern that the evidence is being covered up by Democrats and the media. The exchange becomes heated and ends with the senator calling Abadi's behavior disgraceful.