reSee.it - Related Video Feed

- It was more likely executed by very sophisticated, highly intelligent international agents who meant the attack as a cover up for financial crimes being investigated by the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), whose offices in the Pentagon were destroyed on that same day. - The attacks were intended to cover up the clearing of $240,000,000,000 in securities covertly created in September 1991 to fund a covert economic war against the Soviet Union, during which unknown western investors bought up much of the Soviet industry with a focus on oil and gas. - The nine eleven attacks also served to derail multiple federal investigations of crimes associated with the 1991 covert operation. - Hundreds of billions of dollars of government securities had to be destroyed. - A critical mass of brokers from the major government security brokerages in the Twin Towers had to be eliminated to create chaos in the government securities market. - A situation needed to be created wherein $240,000,000,000 of covert securities could be electronically cleared without anyone asking questions, which actually happened when the Federal Reserve declared an emergency and invoked its emergency powers that very afternoon. - There were three major securities brokers in the World: Cantor Fitzgerald, Eurobrokers, and Garvin Intercapital. Cantor Fitzgerald was the largest securities dealer in the United States and arguably the primary target. - Forty one percent of the fatalities in the Twin Towers came from Cantor Fitzgerald and Eurobrokers. - Twenty four percent of the one hundred and twenty five fatalities in the Pentagon were from the naval command center that housed the Office of Naval Intelligence. - 29 of 30 Office of Naval Intelligence employees died. - The naval command center had been moved into the newly opened section of the Pentagon only months earlier. - In the vaults between the World Trade Center Towers, any certificates for bonds were destroyed. - On that fateful day, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared a national emergency for the first time in US history, invoking its emergency powers under Securities Exchange Act section 12 k, easing regulatory restrictions for clearing and settling security trades for the next fifteen days. - These changes would allow an estimated $240,000,000,000 in covert government securities to be cleared upon maturity without the standard regulatory controls around identification of ownership. - Emboldened by the lack of consequences for subverting the US constitution and breaking international law during the Iran Contra scandal of the nineteen eighties, a Bush administration group known as the Vulcans planned a bigger drive to crush communism once and for all. - They waged war against the Soviet Union in Iraq under George H. W. Bush and against Iraq and Afghanistan under George W. Bush. - Belonging to this group were Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Armitage, and Condoleezza Rice. - The Vulcan's drive to bring an end to the Cold War was fueled by a covert war chest invisible to congressional oversight. This war chest would be known by several names: Black Eagle Trust, the Marcos Gold, Yamashita's Gold, the Golden Lily Treasure, the Durham Trust, or Project Hammer. - The program also seems to have lined the pockets of the individuals that executed this policy. This was done to the tune of a staggering $240,000,000,000 in covert and allegedly illegal bonds, which appear to have been replaced with treasury notes backed by the US taxpayer in the aftermath of September 11. - The covert securities used to accomplish the national security objective of ending the Cold War ended up in the vaults of the brokers in the World Trade Center and were destroyed on 09/11/2001. They came due for settlement and clearing on September 12. The federal agency investigating these bonds, the Office of Naval Intelligence, was in the very section of the Pentagon that was destroyed on 09/11. - To this key group of senior national security officials called the Vulcans, who had participated in the victory of the economic cold war in 1991, the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, the four airliners, and their occupants would become collateral damage in the ending of the Cold War. Their debts were required to hide the existence of the Black Eagle Trust and the covert activities it funded for over fifty years. - The destruction of all these lives and buildings constituted a cover up of continued lawlessness by a fraternity or brotherhood of businessmen and criminals, often referred to as the enterprise in the nineteen eighties, though it has remained in the shadows ever since.

Preliminary research by law professors at Columbia and New York University suggests that some traders may have had advanced knowledge of the October 7th terror attack and profited from it. They found a significant spike in short selling activity against Israeli companies in the days leading up to the attack, which was unusual and not seen in previous events like the 2020 COVID crisis or the 2014 Israel Gaza war. The researchers believe that informed traders anticipated and profited from the attack, although they do not know who made these trades or the basis for their actions. This research is preliminary and raises more questions than answers, but regulators are likely to investigate further.

On September 11, 2001, 19 hijackers armed with box cutters carried out the devastating attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The hijackers were religious fundamentalists who managed to overpower passengers and pilots, causing the planes to crash into buildings. The attacks were quickly attributed to Osama bin Laden, and an investigation was launched. However, many conspiracy theories emerged, questioning the official narrative and suggesting a cover-up. Despite the 9/11 Commission's efforts to answer questions, doubts remained. The media played a role in shaping public perception and discouraging skepticism. This summary highlights the main points of the video, which explores the controversies surrounding the 9/11 attacks.

A recently discovered video allegedly shows that the object that hit the World Trade Center on 9/11 was not a plane, but a Scud missile. The video was confiscated by the FBI, who concealed this information. The speaker accuses the government of being part of a cabal and claims that this video is the final piece of evidence contradicting the official 9/11 report. They mention a Swedish satellite that detected a different target, suggesting a cover-up. The speaker expresses frustration and accuses others of believing the lie.

Speaker 0 argues that there is insider information at play, noting that people inside the administration are making huge stock bets ahead of President Trump’s announcements on oil, with tens of millions of dollars in Brent crude futures short bets placed twenty minutes before the news breaks, and questions why there is no investigation. They assert that somebody has insider information and imply it should be illegal. Speaker 1 discusses potential legal and regulatory issues surrounding prediction markets, distinguishing them from traditional gambling. They explain that in Texas they cannot gamble on sports via apps, but in Missouri those apps work, and prediction markets are not considered gambling. They reference a Trump administration stance that effectively signaled insiders within the administration should stop gambling in prediction markets, suggesting awareness that people inside the administration were making plays on these markets. Speaker 1 notes uncertainty about whether the big players are inside or outside the administration, but emphasizes that the insider trading angle during the administration hasn’t received much attention. They recount following the topic sinceTrump’s election, noting early claims that Trump would crash the stock market, which Speaker 1 says did not happen and, in fact, the market rose for those who invested then. They describe the market as fluctuating with corrections, and remark that Pam Bondi stated the market was hovering around 49,000–50,000, implying continued manipulation. Speaker 1 asserts that Trump often makes declarations on Fridays right before the stock market closes, attributing this pattern to market manipulation. They claim to have bet against the narrative that the stock market would collapse under Trump, and that those bets performed well. The speaker says they feel a bit guilty about profiting, noting that friends who run stock brokerages look at them as if from the future, and claims that the White House is effectively running an insider trading operation. They state that knowing someone is coming to the White House or that a person from a big tech company is arriving allows one to get ahead of the news and secure about a 5% stock bump, or a 5% gain by investing before the news becomes public. Speaker 0 adds that with a Trump tweet, markets swing drastically—either ending civilization or extending a ceasefire—implying that market movement is driven by Trump’s statements.

James Tisch and Andrew Tisch are influential figures at Loews Corporation and the UJA Federation. Alvin Krongard, who served as a senior adviser to the CIA and later became its executive director, played a significant role during this period. Notably, just days before 9/11, his former firm, Alex Brown, purchased 95% of put options on American Airlines stock, allowing them to profit from the tragedy. Additionally, Larry Silverstein acquired the World Trade Center lease shortly before the attacks, making a minimal initial payment and later claiming billions in insurance, arguing for separate attacks on the two towers. This situation raises serious questions about the events surrounding 9/11 and the financial maneuvers involved.

I mean, if you're shorting American Airlines a week before nine eleven when no one knows it's coming, I think you should have to explain why you did that. And if you're shorting Barclays and and banks that were affected by nine eleven, why can't we know who you are? These are public markets, by the way. This is not private equity. This is publicly traded equities. So clearly, yes, there was foreknowledge. By the way, there was a team. This is according to the FBI. This is the FBI saying there was a team of clearly Intel connected foreigners who were arrested after nine eleven, as you well know, videotaping the terror attacks. I'm almost verbatim quoting from the FBI assessment of this. And the FBI determined that they apparently had foreknowledge of the attacks. So why can't we know more about that exactly? This is my country.

The central question is, 'was there foreknowledge?' The speaker notes 'there were huge bets put in the public financial markets against shorting the airlines involved in nine eleven and the banks and the buildings that were collapsed.' The FBI 'found out who made those trades and has hidden the names for twenty four years.' He argues the investigation should be real: 'The first one by Philip Zellico was fake, and he was basically just a cutout for Condie Rice, the former National Security Advisor.' He advocates 'a new commission, a real one,' because 'America was changed completely by that day.' He calls for action: 'we're gonna actually chain ourselves to the gates of the FBI until you tell us this.' He says it's 'the most second most important thing that happened' after 'killing president Kennedy,' noting a cover-up and possible foreign involvement, though not conclusive.

The speaker reflects on their past actions, realizing that they have been exploiting resources that belong to everyone. They anticipate a future where such actions will be illegal and they may face consequences. Another speaker discusses the September 11th attacks, acknowledging the severity of the situation. However, they mention that from a financial perspective, those who had invested in gold benefited greatly. They also recall a similar situation during the US bombing of Iraq in 1991, where brokers were excited about the potential increase in oil prices. Despite the devastation caused by these events, the speaker highlights the opportunity that can arise in such circumstances.

The video discusses the possibility of 9/11 being an inside job, pointing to evidence from think tanks like PNAC and IASPS advocating regime change in the Middle East. It mentions key figures like Donald Rumsfeld and John Bolton, as well as Israeli spying allegations. The speaker urges viewers to explore further and remember the lives lost on that tragic day.

Was there foreknowledge? There were huge bets put in the public financial markets against shorting the airlines involved in nine eleven and the banks and the buildings that were collapsed. The FBI found out who made those trades and has hidden the names for twenty four years. The first one by Philip Zellico was fake, and he was basically just a cutout for Condie Rice, the former National Security Advisor. We wanted to force a reexamination of nine eleven, a new commission, a real one. Like, we're gonna actually chain ourselves to the gates of the FBI until you tell us this. It's the most second most important thing that happened, in my opinion, in American history first was killing president Kennedy. There may have been foreign involvement, very likely foreign involvement in that. I can't say conclusively, but I think that's true.

The speakers in the video discuss various conspiracy theories and predictions related to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. They question the official narrative and suggest that there may have been ulterior motives behind the events. They mention examples of predictive programming in movies, TV shows, and other media that seemingly foreshadowed the attacks. The speakers also criticize the government's response and the media's coverage of the events. Overall, they argue that there is a hidden agenda at play and that the truth about 9/11 has been obscured.

Speaker argues that all theories about 9/11 hinge on foreknowledge. "huge bets put in the public financial markets against shorting the airlines involved in nine eleven and the banks and the buildings that were collapsed." The "FBI found out who made those trades and has hidden the names for twenty four years." They sought a real investigation, noting "the first one by Philip Zellico was fake, and he was basically just a cutout for Condie Rice, the former National Security Advisor." He advocates action: "we're gonna actually chain ourselves to the gates of the FBI until you tell us this." He calls 9/11 "the second most important thing that happened, in my opinion, in American history first was killing president Kennedy." He adds, "there may have been foreign involvement, very likely foreign involvement in that. I can't say conclusively, but I think that's true." "America was changed completely by that day."

Questions are raised about the events of 9/11. Why did the World Trade Center owner obtain maximum terrorist attack insurance six weeks prior and skip his daily breakfast there on 9/11? Why did Rumsfeld discuss trillions of dollars missing the day before? The inability to track $2.3 trillion in transactions is mentioned. Other questions include: Why was CNN on site before the attacks? Why were short sales purchased against airline companies beforehand? Why were all passengers incinerated, but a terrorist's passport survived? Why did George W. Bush's administration publish a report a year prior stating the need to aggressively expand military power worldwide, requiring a "Pearl Harbor level event" for public support?

In 1994, the New York Fed and the Federal Reserve bought shares in the Bank of International Settlements (BIS). The BIS is described as the central bank of central banks in Sweden/Switzerland, said to operate above the law, with sovereign immunity, the ability to receive and hold money secretly, and to keep money on its balance sheet secretly. The Fed’s purchase allegedly made their relationship with the BIS closer. In 1995, a budget deal “crashed and burned,” and in October there was a claim from the president of the largest pension fund that “they, whoever they are, have given up on the country and moving all the money out starting in the fall.” It was around October 1997 that money purportedly began to go missing from HUD and the Department of Defense. The speaker asserts that from 1998 to 2015, $20,000,000,000,000 was missing from COD and $1,000,000,000,000 missing from HUD. With money going missing, the speaker describes the onset of the “great poisoning.” The argument continues that the next month after the budget deal collapse, OxyContin was approved, HUD predatory lending began, pill mills started, and targeting of low-income neighborhoods intensified, with roundups from the private prison movement. The speaker notes undocumentable adjustments rising sharply. By 09:11, the speaker claims, a reporter had been covering missing money and a large spread was planned for Insight magazine about $3,300,000,000,000 missing, demanding accountability and identifying which private corporations and banks ran the payment systems. The story was expected to run on 09/15/2001. On 09/10/2001, Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference at the Department of Defense stating that the DoD was missing $2.3 trillion (or $3 trillion, depending on version). The next day, 9/11 occurred. James Corbett later released a video, “Nine Eleven Trillions,” describing how offices blown up at the Pentagon and World Trade Center related to securities and financial operations connected to the missing money. The speaker asserts that the Pentagon office blown up housed the Office of Naval Intelligence Research Group investigating the missing money. The Patriot Act followed, DoD received large appropriations, and attention to missing money diminished. Fast forward to 2015, the financials allegedly showed the greatest missing money in one year: the DoD was missing $6.5 trillion in that year. Dr. Mark Skidmore, a budgeting expert at Michigan State University, investigated, and, after reviewing DoD financials, confirmed substantial undocumentable adjustments. He contacted the speaker to help conduct a complete survey of all financial statements from fiscal 1997 to 2015. The survey yielded figures increasing from $12 trillion to $21 trillion missing. When Skidmore published his 2017 report (at missingmoney.solari.com), it was found that the amount missing from the U.S. Treasury matched the total outstanding debt of the United States on the books—$21 trillion. Authorities reportedly pressed the DoD to produce audited financial statements; DoD refused. The Kavanaugh hearings are cited as the moment when the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASB) Statement 56 was issued, allowing the government to keep books secret as a matter of administrative policy, extending to private companies and banks doing business with the government. The result, according to the speaker, is that much of the disclosure in the U.S. securities market is meaningless due to government secrecy. The speaker notes that COVID-19 operations could not have happened without FASB 56, claiming it enabled access to unlimited secret money. A quoted anecdote is that one month after FASB 56 passed, Moderna reportedly raised $500,000,000.

The video discusses various aspects of the 9/11 attacks, including the involvement of Al Qaeda, the insurance claims made by Larry Silverstein, suspicious trading activities before the attacks, and the Pentagon's accounting issues. It questions the official narrative and highlights the need to investigate the money trail of 9/11. The 9/11 Commission report is criticized for not thoroughly examining the financial aspects of the attacks. The video suggests that following the money is crucial to understanding the truth behind 9/11.

In this video, the speaker discusses the power of the Bilderberg group and other secret organizations. They claim to provide evidence of these manipulations through media coverage of a terrorist plot in the United States. The FBI reportedly foiled the attack, and the media used fear and emotion to present the facts. The speaker questions how one can doubt this information when there is proof in the form of images captured during the surveillance operation. The video ends with mention of the images being presented during the trial.

This video analyzes amateur footage from 9/11, suggesting CGI planes were added to the official narrative. The video highlights that witnesses in the amateur footage describe hearing explosions, not seeing planes. One witness recalls saying it was a bomb after seeing smoke and something falling. The video emphasizes that no one in the amateur footage mentions seeing a plane hit the towers. One person on the roof stated that it just blew up, and there's no way it was a plane. The amateur videographer is quoted saying the second tower "flat out blew up." The video also includes a clip of George H.W. Bush discussing how operatives were instructed to ensure that explosives went off at a high point to prevent people trapped above from escaping. The video concludes with footage of the aftermath of the tower collapses.

The video discusses the issue of cell phone calls made by passengers on the hijacked airplanes during the 9/11 attacks. It questions the feasibility of making cell phone calls from cruising altitudes and high speeds. The video presents evidence that suggests the calls were not made from the airplanes, including discrepancies in the timing of the calls and the lack of background noise. The possibility is raised that the passengers were forced to make the calls under duress, pretending to be on the plane while already being landed in another location. The video concludes by stating that someone needs to explain where these calls actually came from.

Speaker 1 claims a legitimate investigation into 9/11 never occurred and questions how the perpetrators were identified so quickly. Speaker 1 alleges the Bush administration ignored intelligence, suggesting they wanted the attacks to happen, citing Condoleezza Rice's memo from August 6, which stated Bin Laden planned to use steel planes to attack buildings. Speaker 1 states that every war starts with a false flag operation. Speaker 1 references a BBC report that allegedly broadcast the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 before it actually happened, claiming the reporter spoke of the collapse 27 minutes before it occurred.

Questions are raised about the events of 9/11. Why did the World Trade Center owner obtain maximum terrorist attack insurance six weeks prior and skip his daily breakfast there on 9/11? Why did Rumsfeld discuss untraceable trillions the day before? Why was CNN present before the attacks? Inquiries include the unidentified group shorting airline stocks pre-attack, the survival of a terrorist's passport amidst complete incineration of passengers, and a Bush administration report a year prior stating the need for a "Pearl Harbor level event" to justify military expansion.

The speakers in the video are reacting to the events of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. They witness the planes crashing into the World Trade Center towers and express shock and confusion. They discuss the evacuation of buildings, the closure of airports and bridges, and the collapse of the towers. They mention the Pentagon being hit as well. The speakers express concern for loved ones and discuss the ongoing fire and rescue efforts. The video ends with a sense of disbelief and sadness over the destruction caused by the attacks.

A recent court filing reveals that at least two 9/11 hijackers, Khaled Almidhar and Nawaf Al Hazmi, were part of a CIA-Saudi intelligence operation. The CIA monitored them during a major Al Qaeda summit in Malaysia in January 2000 but failed to inform the FBI of their presence in the U.S. After the summit, they entered the U.S. without screening and were assisted by Omar Albayumi, a Saudi intelligence officer posing as a civil aviation employee. The CIA's Alex Station, which operated outside the FBI's oversight, aimed to recruit these hijackers. This raises serious questions about the CIA's role in the 9/11 attacks, suggesting that they may have knowingly allowed the operation to proceed without intervention.

Israel's involvement in the war in Gaza is discussed in this video. The speaker mentions an interview where they questioned the intelligence agencies' knowledge of the attack on October 7th. They highlight that Israel had a stand down period of at least 7 hours, with attack helicopters nearby, but they did not intervene. The speaker also mentions insider trading and questions whether Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu was aware of the attack beforehand. They suggest that there may be larger global destabilization at play, with Iran financing Hamas through Hezbollah. The speaker concludes by stating that Israel stood down, but the exact reasons and individuals involved remain unknown.

A major investigation is underway to determine if anyone financially benefited from the 9/11 attacks. Suspicious stock market transactions suggest foreknowledge of the attack. Terrorists allegedly made bets on stocks to plummet, purchasing puts. For instance, over 2,000 contracts betting on United Airlines' stock decline were bought the Thursday before the attack, resulting in significant profits. American Airlines saw a similar pattern. Additionally, there were numerous bets against Morgan Stanley and Marsh and McLennan, both tenants of the World Trade Center. This widespread insider trading is unprecedented and spans across the globe. The Chicago Board of Options Exchange has launched an investigation, potentially leading to the terrorists.