reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There are concerns about the security of electronic voting machines, as they can potentially be hacked without detection. While there is no evidence of this happening, it cannot be proven that it hasn't or won't happen in the future. Instances of machine errors have been reported, such as recording extra votes for a candidate or subtracting votes instead of adding them. It is unknown how many instances went unnoticed and what impact they had on elections. Legislation is being proposed to require a paper trail for every electronic machine, similar to ATM receipts, to ensure transparency and allow for verification. An investigation is also being requested to assess the effectiveness of voting machines and improve election systems.

Virginia has stopped using touchscreen computer voting due to vulnerability, and it's important to assess all voting machines for security. Researchers have shown that voting systems can be tampered with, even by hackers with limited resources. In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted or switched votes. The biggest seller of voting machines violates cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software. These machines are easily hackable, and three companies control most of them. Many states have outdated and vulnerable machines. Over 40% of American voters use machines with serious security flaws. Aging systems rely on unsupported software and are susceptible to cyber attacks. The risk of foreign interference in elections is high. It is crucial to upgrade election systems and ensure integrity.

Virginia has stopped using touchscreen computer voting due to vulnerabilities, and there is concern about the security of voting machines across the country. Researchers have shown that voting systems can be tampered with, and hackers with limited resources can breach machines in minutes. Instances of electronic voting machines deleting or switching votes have been reported. The biggest seller of voting machines has violated cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making the machines susceptible to hacking. Three companies control the majority of voting machines in the US. Many states have outdated and vulnerable machines, and some lack backup paper ballots. The machines often run on unsupported software, making them more vulnerable to cyber attacks. The use of modems in voting machines also poses a risk, as they can be connected to the internet. The lack of forensic evidence and audit trails further undermines the security of the machines. The vulnerabilities in the voting system could lead to a compromised election and a loss of faith in the democratic process.

Virginia has stopped using touchscreen computer voting due to vulnerabilities, and there is concern about the security of voting machines across the country. Researchers have demonstrated that these machines can be easily tampered with and hacked. In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted or switched votes. The biggest seller of voting machines has violated cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making the machines susceptible to fraud and hacking. There are concerns about the use of modems in voting machines, as they can be connected to the internet and pose a risk. Outdated software and lack of paper trails also contribute to the vulnerability of the voting systems. The potential for hacking and interference in elections is a significant concern, and the need for secure and updated voting systems is crucial.

Voting machines remain highly vulnerable to tampering, as researchers have shown. Even those with limited skills can breach these systems quickly. In 2018, machines in Georgia and Texas were reported to have deleted or switched votes. Major manufacturers are compromising security by recommending remote access software, making machines targets for hackers. Many states still use outdated machines that are easy to hack, with 43% of American voters relying on systems known to have serious security flaws. Demonstrations have shown how easily these machines can be compromised. Additionally, aging systems often run unsupported software, increasing their susceptibility to cyber attacks. A successful hack could significantly impact close elections by targeting key swing states or counties. Concerns about potential breaches are growing.

Virginia has stopped using touchscreen computer voting due to vulnerabilities, and there is concern about the security of voting machines across the country. Researchers have demonstrated that these machines can be easily tampered with, and hackers with limited resources can breach them in minutes. Instances of electronic voting machines deleting or switching votes have been reported. The biggest seller of voting machines has violated cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making the machines susceptible to fraud and hacking. Additionally, many states have outdated and vulnerable machines, and some lack backup paper ballots. The use of modems in voting machines also poses a risk, as they can be connected to the internet and hacked. The overall consensus is that the current voting systems are insecure and vulnerable to manipulation.

Voting machines have been proven to be vulnerable to tampering and hacking. In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted or switched votes. The biggest seller of voting machines even violated cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making them attractive to fraudsters and hackers. Three companies control the majority of voting machines in the US. Antiquated machines in many states are particularly vulnerable. Demonstrations have shown how easily these machines can be hacked, with workers switching votes. Approximately 43% of American voters use machines with serious security flaws. Aging systems rely on unsupported software, making them even more susceptible to cyberattacks. A hack in just one swing state or a few counties could significantly impact a close presidential election.

Votes in Georgia were counted three times using paper and machines. Concerns were raised about the lack of transparency and oversight in the vote review process, especially during adjudication. The speakers emphasized the importance of open-source voting programs to ensure transparency and prevent manipulation. They highlighted the need for concrete evidence and clear processes to build trust in the election system. Open-source systems were seen as a way to increase transparency and accountability in elections.

Virginia stopped using touchscreen voting machines due to vulnerabilities. Voting machines across the US are at risk of being hacked. In Georgia and Texas, votes were deleted or switched in 2018. The biggest voting machine seller violated cybersecurity practices. Many states have outdated, vulnerable machines. Hackers can easily breach voting machines, potentially altering election results. The lack of paper trails in some states raises concerns about election legitimacy. Aging systems rely on unsupported software, making them susceptible to cyber attacks. The vulnerability of voting machines poses a threat to the integrity of elections. Stalin emphasized the importance of who counts votes. It is crucial to secure the future of elections and upgrade outdated systems to prevent interference.

Voting machines in the United States are vulnerable to hacking and tampering, according to experts. These machines, including touchscreen and ballot recording machines, have been found to have serious security flaws that can be exploited by hackers. In some cases, electronic voting machines have deleted or switched votes. The use of remote access software on voting machines also poses a significant cybersecurity risk. Outdated software and unsupported systems further increase the vulnerability of these machines. Modems in voting machines, which are used to transmit results, can also be hacked. The lack of proper audit trails and forensic evidence makes it difficult to detect and prove hacking incidents. Overall, the current state of voting machine security in the US is a cause for concern and poses a threat to the integrity of elections.

100% of votes in Georgia will be cast on security paper with the state seal. Nationwide, over 96% of all voting will be on paper ballots. President Trump implied that delayed vote tabulation indicates something nefarious, citing France's move to paper ballots due to the US system's alleged failure. Georgia's SB 189 mandates that all early votes and early accepted ballots must have their results reported by 8 PM, potentially accounting for 70-75% of the total vote count on election night. The remaining votes to be counted after that time will be overseas ballots that come in no later than Friday. The goal is to have fast, accurate, and secure elections.

A vulnerability in Dominion Voting Systems was highlighted in a federal court case, raising concerns about election security. Experts found potential vulnerabilities in Georgia's Dominion system, with claims of critical vulnerabilities to hacking. The alleged vulnerability involves an encryption key being easily accessible, allowing total control over an election. A cybersecurity expert recreated the process, showing how election files could be decrypted. Despite the seriousness of the issue, Georgia officials deemed upgrading the system unrealistic until after the 2024 elections. The need for addressing vulnerabilities in election systems is emphasized for ensuring secure elections.

There are concerns about fraud with Dominion Voting Machines due to security vulnerabilities. In Georgia, people are fighting to remove them from elections. A computer scientist showed how easy it is to manipulate the machines in court. There are worries about internet connectivity and foreign access to the machines. Dominion is suing those who accused them of cheating in the 2020 election, but facing challenges in court. Emails suggest foreign nationals accessed US voting machines. Questions remain about the security and integrity of Dominion Voting Machines.

The Georgia state election board voted to require hand-counting ballots in November, potentially lengthening the time to tally results. This decision raises concerns about the intention behind it, especially with the election a month and a half away. It is questioned whether the state has the capacity to hand-count nearly 10 million votes. Concerns are raised about staffing at the county level and security for volunteers, who have been threatened in the past. The decision could create chaos and make it easier for Donald Trump to call election officials and ask them to find votes, similar to what allegedly happened after 2020. The speaker hopes the decision is challenged in court, fearing a return to the chaos of the 2000 Florida election.

The report claims Georgia’s 2020 election should not have been certified, arguing that election data entered by counties and the Secretary of State was never proved or verified as accurate, and that Georgia counties and the Secretary of State blocked open records requests for paper ballots. The report says Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s office, “through Ryan Germany,” instructed counties to refuse requests. It asserts the voting system was intended to provide an auditable paper trail via paper ballots and that state wording about making scanned ballot images available for public ballot counts was copied from Dominion marketing materials. It also claims Georgia counties deleted ballot images and references “a Franken count” in which a hand recount was required because “one million seven hundred thousand ballot images” were deleted. It reports open records request results from all 159 counties, stating 1.7 million missing ballots, and says a voter image tool and “Voter GA” reinforce that 74 counties could not produce original ballot images. It further claims that 48% of counties destroyed ballot images or refused to comply, six admitted having none, 22 admitted to having only recount images, and 28 admitted to partial originals (some mail-in, some in-person) with shortages. It claims Raffensperger counted 300,000 too many votes statewide and cites a Today Show appearance where Raffensperger said 4.7 million votes had been cast with “about two percent left to go.” The report says the video feed cut out as those numbers were being discussed. It also claims that at the time Raffensperger said 4.7 million ballots, 158 of 159 counties had reported, with Fulton County the only one still incomplete, and that official certification later showed roughly 4,998,482 votes (about 5 million). It argues this implies additional votes came in from Fulton County precincts, and raises a question about where “three hundred thousand extra ballots” came from, asserting that the paper ballots cannot be checked without access. The report focuses on Fulton County missing ballot images and authentication files. It claims Fulton County is missing 374,000 ballot images from the November 3 ballot count and 315,000 ballot images from advance voting, confirmed by county attorney Steven Rosenberg. It describes scanning outputs: a TIFF image, a results page attached to the TIFF, and a SHA authentication file meant to prove the image was not altered. It states Fulton County is missing 59,000 election-day ballot images and alleges ballot imaging was not required for the November 2020 election, though it claims Dominion’s contract required ballot images and SHA creation. It further claims Fulton County is missing nearly all SHA files: of 527,000 ballots, it alleges Fulton County provided only 16,000 SHA files to authenticate 527,000 ballots, and that it had 148,000 absentee-by-mail ballot images but far fewer SHA files. It also claims the December 9 final recount still lacked 18,000 ballot images. Next, the report alleges “unsigned tabulator tapes” for 315,000 votes certified by Fulton County. It presents claims that tabulator tapes printed without signatures and witnesses’ sign-offs were used to certify votes affecting 315,000 ballots, including duplicated serial numbers supposedly “impossible.” It references rules requiring tabulator tape verification, printing at least three tapes per scanner, and witness signatures or written reasons for non-signing. The report then alleges problems in Georgia’s “risk-limiting audit” process, calling it a “Franken count.” It cites a Secretary of State document stating that from November 11 to November 19 officials conducted a risk-limiting audit requiring a full manual count. The report quotes Philip Stark describing Georgia’s decision as a “Frankencount,” and it cites Carter Jones, a Fulton County consultant, alleging errors in the audit spreadsheet and claiming duplicates and miscounts. It states the report’s work found duplicate ballot counts and vote totals that resulted in “too many” votes for Biden and too many for Trump within a sample of absentee-by-mail ballots, and it argues that multiple counted batches did not match. The report says it also found recount problems and missing images in Fulton County after a December 9 recount, alleging 17,724 missing ballot images and that 3,125 ballot images were counted twice, while another statewide tool purportedly shows duplication across other counties. It further claims an “election day lie” about turnout in Fulton County. It contrasts the county’s reported 59,143 election-day votes with Carter Jones’s screenshot claiming about 21,843 election-day votes as of a specific timestamp (November 5 12:49 AM) and with meeting testimony from Dwight Brouwer asserting around 14,152 votes cast by about 5 PM, plus 598 provisional ballots. The report claims the math implies tens of thousands of additional votes were added quickly and contrasts that with purportedly low crowding and claims about the absence of long lines. It alleges precinct-level vote count mismatches between the initial count (November 3) and the December 9 recount by comparing ballot images for specific precincts and races, claiming ballots were removed and inserted. It lists examples of precincts where it claims large proportions of ballots differed between counts. The report also alleges that in the statewide recount Georgia still lacked over 500,000 ballot images, arguing this makes the vote count unverifiable without paper ballots. Additional claims include: - Logic and accuracy testing allegedly completed after early voting ended (it states testing should have been completed by October 5 but was completed October 31). - Allegations of ballot trafficking shown in videos and requests to view specific clips. - Claims that ballots can be changed or votes ignored via machine vulnerabilities, including a reference to “unclear ballot” demonstrations and an example of QR code signature mismatch affecting scanner handling (leading to misreads as provisional and missing subsequent ballots). - A quoted audit expert (Philip Stark) asserting the lack of basic accounting controls makes it impossible to determine who really won and that this is not limited to Fulton County. The report ends by asserting Georgia’s 2020 results are “totally unverifiable,” referencing archived official counts for late certification moments, and concludes with calls for Raffensperger and Brian Kemp to step down.

Cybersecurity experts agree that electronic voting machines are dangerous and obsolete. These machines can be easily hacked, as demonstrated by a computer scientist who has hacked multiple machines and even turned one into a video game console. The vulnerability of these machines puts our election infrastructure at risk of sabotage and cyberattacks. In the 2016 election, millions of Americans voted on paperless electronic machines. The speaker reveals a step-by-step process for hacking these machines and stealing votes. The solution proposed is to use paper ballots, which can be quickly scanned and verified by humans. It is emphasized that all elections should be run with paper ballots and audits. The importance of having a paper backup system is highlighted. The concise transcript emphasizes the need to replace electronic voting machines with paper ballots for secure and reliable elections.

Voting machines have been proven to be vulnerable to tampering and hacking. Even with limited knowledge and resources, hackers can breach these machines within minutes. In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted or switched votes. The biggest seller of voting machines violates basic cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making them attractive to fraudsters and hackers. Three companies control the majority of voting machines, posing significant risks. Many states still use outdated and hackable machines. Researchers have found serious security flaws in 43% of American voting machines. Aging systems rely on unsupported software, making them more vulnerable to cyber attacks. A hack in just one swing state or a few counties could impact a close presidential election. Concerns about the possibility of a successful hack are high.

Georgia's recount is being questioned due to the use of allegedly flawed auditing software. The program requires county elections directors to input their information into the secretary of state's system, allowing the state to dictate the results instead of the counties reporting to the state. Election monitor Garland Favorito expressed concern over this compromised audit process. He observed a significant increase in Joe Biden's vote count while Donald Trump's count appeared to decrease. Favorito found this discrepancy to be unrealistic and fundamentally flawed. The secretary of state's office has not yet responded to these concerns.

Virginia has stopped using touchscreen computer voting due to vulnerability, highlighting the need to assess all voting machines for potential hacking. Researchers have shown that ballot recording machines and other systems are susceptible to tampering, even by hackers with limited resources. Instances of electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleting or switching votes have been reported. The leading seller of voting machines has violated cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making them attractive to fraudsters and hackers. The control of voting machines by just three companies poses significant risks. Many states still use outdated and hackable machines, leaving the election system vulnerable to interference. The lack of backup paper ballots and reliance on unsupported software further exacerbate the security flaws.

Virginia has stopped using touchscreen computer voting due to vulnerability, highlighting the need to assess all voting machines for security. Researchers have shown that voting systems are easily tampered with, even by hackers with limited resources. Instances of electronic voting machines deleting or switching votes have been reported in Georgia and Texas. The biggest seller of voting machines has violated cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making them attractive to fraudsters. The control of voting machines lies with three companies, posing significant risks. Many states still use outdated and hackable machines, and unsupported software further increases vulnerability. The potential consequences include compromised election results and a loss of faith in the democratic system.

Georgia officials, including Governor Kemp and Secretary Rassenberger, are criticized for their involvement with Dominion Voting Systems. The speaker claims that Kemp's chief of staff now works for Dominion. Despite pre-election challenges and allegations of a cover-up, the goal is to implement a new voting system by 2020. Dominion's experience and history in the state are discussed, with Georgia being praised for its secure election by Christopher Krebs. However, others blame Kemp, Rassenberger, and Carr for the destruction in the country. Overall, the systems used in the 2020 election performed as expected.

In the upcoming election, 100% of votes in Georgia will be recorded on security paper with the state seal. President Trump implied that delayed vote tabulation indicates potential wrongdoing, citing a lack of paper ballots as a problem and claiming results could take 7 days. However, over 96% of voting nationwide will be on paper ballots. In Georgia, a new law (SB 189) mandates that results for all early votes and early accepted ballots, potentially 70-75% of the total, be reported by 8 PM on election night. The remaining delay involves overseas ballots, with final numbers expected by Friday. Georgia aims to ensure fast, accurate, and secure elections.

We counted Georgia's election ballots three times, confirming no consequential fraud. Despite issues with ballot images and scanning errors, the recount showed similar results to the original count. Doubts remain about double scanning and counting of votes, suggesting potential fraud. The Secretary of State's office conducted an exhaustive investigation, but concerns persist about the accuracy of the results. The Georgia State Election Board is commended for their diligence and transparency in addressing election issues.

Brian Kemp's victory over Trump-endorsed candidates suggests a dynamic shift in the state. Georgia purchased new voting machines under a reform bill, with Dominion Voting Systems winning the contract. Kemp's primary win should signal to those claiming election theft that voters want to move on. Truth and integrity matter. Georgia's machines tabulate votes, proving no manipulation or foreign interference. The more likely explanation is that there was no algorithm or domestic actor flipping votes. The systems performed as intended.

Voting machines have been proven to be vulnerable to tampering and hacking. Even with limited knowledge and resources, hackers can breach these machines in minutes. In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted or switched votes. The biggest seller of voting machines violates cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making them attractive to fraudsters. Three companies control the majority of voting machines in different states, posing significant risks. Many states still use outdated and hackable machines. Researchers have found serious security flaws in 43% of voting machines used by American voters. Aging systems rely on unsupported software, making them more vulnerable to cyber attacks. A hack in just one swing state or a few counties could impact a close election.