TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

A FEMA agent asked the speaker's facility to cooperate with local government, despite the presence of law enforcement, firefighters, state senators, congressmen, and Fox News on site. The speaker feels mainstream media isn't doing its job, so he's using his phone to spread the word. The group has been reported to authorities for domestic terrorism, even though they are special operation veterans. The speaker believes their work is patriotic and aimed at helping people.

Hazmat operations are being set up all over, indicating preparations for something big. The New York City Fire Department is present. Military personnel are also observed in the area.

In Scotch Creek, British Columbia, wildfires have destroyed the entire town. Reports suggest that UN blue helmet groups have been seen setting up checkpoints and isolating towns from each other. Around 40 to 50 people are stuck in the area, even if their properties have been burnt down. This is a serious situation as these wildfires are believed to be intentionally started by people. The blue helmet troops, possibly known as Canada task force 1, have been confirmed to be present. Pictures of these troops will be shared. An SOS is being sent out to warn other towns that they may face a similar situation soon.

Mitch Snow, Fort Huachuca whistleblower, joined a Diligent Spaces edition hosted on X with his cohosts and guests, describing a two-day sequence centered on his attempt to obtain prosecutorial records and the extraordinary presence he observed at Fort Huachuca. Context and purpose for Fort Huachuca visit - Mitch explained that for years he has been trying to obtain records related to his military service, alleged targeting, and a custody fight involving his son. He has been collecting records across the country (Florida, East Coast, Washington DC) to reinforce a prosecutorial case and defend his reputation. - The last records he needed, he said, were at Fort Huachuca, where there had been prosecutions connected to a tunnel associated with a drug trafficking operation involving the Sinaloa cartel. Mitch described laying sensors (seismic and acoustic) as part of a Joint Task Force Six mission in May 1990, discovering an underground tunnel near Douglas, Arizona, with evidence implicating U.S. members. He testified in an army CID deposition related to that case, and described being flown back to Fort Drum after the deposition. - He stated that the tunnel raid led to the tunnel’s partial shutdown, but that it also caused the cartel to redesign distribution methods (submarines, various ports) and that evidence included photographs showing U.S. members with cartel figures. He asserted that he was targeted and harassed for reporting these findings over the years, including attempts to access his clearance information and threats linked to debt-tracking techniques used by cartels. First day at Fort Huachuca (evening of September 8) - Mitch traveled to Fort Huachuca for the records he needed, planning to stay at Candlewood Suites on base. He arrived around 5:00–6:00 PM Mountain Time, checked in with his girlfriend (Amy) via video call, and went to the lobby to speak with staff about access and the building layout. - In the lobby, he noticed a man who seemed like a professional, possibly a special forces contractor, wearing a distinctive watch; he did not approach or engage with the man. - A woman joined the man on a corner couch; Mitch described the woman as having a “sheen” of being well put together, blonde with a ponytail, and noted the eyes as particularly striking. He observed them leave in a green GMC SUV with the woman entering the passenger seat and the man driving, while he headed off to find a place to eat. - Mitch and Amy had dinner off base at a place described as a Mexican sushi restaurant (Takimaki-like name) and returned to the Candlewood Suites. He reported that the base was navigable but had a lot of speed traps; he did not report being stopped or harassed by MPs on arrival, and he described the gate staff as helpful. - A key moment from this first day was Mitch’s observation in the lobby: the woman sitting with the contractor appeared to be a high-profile figure; he was unsure of her identity but described her as distinct from the military guests, not in uniform. - Later, a panel of listeners asked about the exact appearance and actions of the people Mitch observed, including whether the two individuals were romantic or simply meeting, and whether the female wore rings. Mitch answered with limited detail, saying he did not want to discuss some specifics at that time. Observations at the base and the private meeting later that night - On the first night, Mitch described witnessing the duo in the Candlewood lobby, then later seeing the woman with the contractor in the same lobby as he returned. - He described a potential private discussion between the woman and the contractor, with the two leaving together in the vehicle; the following morning, Mitch provided a rough timeline (5:30–6:00 PM for the lobby sighting, with departure around 7:00–7:30 PM MT). - The Host participants, including Sam, Noxie, Destiny, and Lemair, pressed for precise details and identifiers (make of the vehicle, exact times, and the identity of the people), while Mitch occasionally deferred to not reveal certain details yet, citing comfort and safety concerns. - The host and guests discussed Mitch’s prior experiences, his memory, and the fact that a militarized environment often accompanies high-profile investigations. Several speakers affirmed Mitch’s credibility, noting that his level of detail resembled trained observation (salute reports: size, activity, location, unit, time, and equipment). Second day and the escalation - On the morning of September 9, Mitch woke early (around 05:30) to try to catch the sunrise and continued documenting with Amy via video calls; he described continuing to record selfies, videos, and notes to share with Amy. - Mitch retraced his attempts to locate the CID (Criminal Investigation Division) building to retrieve the records, describing a lack of clear visitor information and multiple detours across post as he sought the proper location. - He encountered a series of baselined rooms, offices, and signs; at one point, an officer suggested a different building and a different path to obtain the records. Mitch found a room with a podium and two soldiers at a desk; he identified it as a near-time, transitional office with a sign-in log. - Mitch reported the appearance of an entourage of high-ranking officers (captains, majors, lieutenant colonels) and a congressman as the group passed by him while he waited. Detainment, questioning, and consequences - Mitch described being escorted outside the building with his belongings, including his bag of documents and passports, while a security/escort team questioned him about his purpose there. He provided his documents and explained his purpose: to obtain the records and file a report. - The officers suggested bringing in a sergeant major, but he did not return; instead, a group of officers and soldiers surrounded him, including a captain, and a bomb-threat-like scenario unfolded: a vehicle investigation was initiated, and a bomb threat was insinuated as part of the unrelated escalation. - Mitch recounted being driven off post to CID for interrogation; he described the interrogation room with one-way glass and the presence of Captain Neff. He provided his detailed life history and his case history, including the NDA he believed had expired and his request to produce a report number for the encounter. - The post commander reportedly trespassed him from the installation for 24 hours, a decision made after the interrogation; Mitch insisted he would not return if trespassed further and stated he would proceed with his records via other channels. He described a variety of law enforcement vehicles at the scene (marked and unmarked police vehicles, federal agents, and a Park Ranger-type officer) and an elaborate, sometimes surreal, sequence of questioning. He documented his own records, including the OIG number (277 episode) and other documentation, and later traveled back to Tucson to regroup with Amy. - Mitch described that he believed the bomb-threat and the post lockdown were part of an overreaction to his attempt to obtain records, noting that such reactions had occurred in the past when his records were sought. He claimed not to have been charged with any crime, but was escorted off the base and told not to return for 24 hours. Aftermath and ongoing implications - Mitch and Amy returned to Tucson and then continued the process, continuing to seek congressional inquiry and prosecutorial review; they also contemplated FOIA requests. They discussed the reality that Candlewood Suites’ ownership was privately operated, complicating direct FOIA access to hotel footage. They mentioned a separate FOIA attempt by a lawyer (Slickdog) to obtain records about sightings of named individuals on Fort Huachuca, with a focus on gate logs and signage. - The pair connected their experiences to broader political events, including the Charlie Kirk incident, Candace Owens’ involvement, and the allegations around Erica Kirk, Brian Harpole, and Mark Amaday, noting the difficulty in obtaining corroborating evidence. Mitch spoke about Candace Owens’ role in amplifying the story, and his own preference to keep certain details private until appropriate. - Throughout the conversation, Mitch’s credibility was repeatedly supported by the other participants who emphasized his memory and attention to detail as evidence of his lived experience. Several speakers stressed the importance of cross-checking facts against the timeline and urged caution against disinformation and attempts to discredit credible testimony. Closing notes - The space concluded with expressions of support for Mitch and Amy, praise for their courage, and a plan to publish and share Mitch’s full story beyond the space. The host highlighted ongoing efforts to verify details, to preserve the record, and to bring attention to Mitch’s experience as part of a broader pursuit of truth. The event was described as a significant, if contested, documentation of a whistleblower’s eyewitness account at a sensitive military installation, with calls to action for audience members to share the narrative and support Mitch and Amy as they continue their efforts.

The Canadian Armed Forces are conducting a door-to-door wellness check exercise called Trillium Ventures in Northern Ontario. They are asking about emergency preparedness and giving out brochures. The exercise includes a simulated extreme heat scenario in Huron County. Some are questioning the purpose of the exercise and whether it is an annual event. Video footage shows military personnel conducting the wellness checks. There are concerns about the government's intentions behind these visits.

Speaker announces intrusion with, "Open the door. They're coming in." and "Loving citizen." They describe the scene as "It's weird working here" and state, "I think they're trying to get them out in the pen, but they're feeding them." They warn, "This is a stain on Canadian history if this goes forth" and ask, "What has this country come to now?" They emphasize care, noting, "These are animals that have lived for two hundred and fifty one days without illness, have been taken care of." They add, "We've been out here since January 22, our first convoy out here." They question, "Don't you let them test the animals? Why don't you let them test the animals?" and assert, "You're not even a government organization." They close with a call: "Please share this out and make people aware of what is going on."

An individual questions the presence of the army at a public hotel. They ask if the army has taken over the hotel and inquire about the reason for their presence. An individual states the army is there at the request of the state of New York. The questioner expresses disbelief that the state of New York would place the army in hotels. They attempt to record the interaction but are told they cannot. The individual then questions whether the army's presence is beneficial to the public.

Following post-Desert Storm, many agencies actively recruit veterans and former military personnel. Some officers shown likely have military experience. Some may be National Guard members performing both military and law enforcement duties. There are veterans and likely current guard members involved in the law enforcement aspect. Police in the middle appear to be stepping back and moving vehicles to prevent damage.

An individual questions the presence of the army at a public hotel in New York City, asking why they are there and if they have taken over the hotel. The army's presence is reportedly at the request of the state of New York. The individual expresses disbelief that the state of New York has put the army in hotels. They are told that recording is not allowed. The individual questions whether the army is there to help the public.

After being elected governor, I was interviewed by 23 CIA members who wouldn't reveal their purpose. They refused to share their names or roles, which was unsettling. They questioned me about my election, and I was struck by the diverse group present, resembling everyday people. We need to engage with those in this field to understand their activities and who they are monitoring. It's important to uncover the extent of surveillance happening.

Speaker 0: Military assistance in illegal border crossings? Chris, come back up. We're in a public area. Immigrants are entering our country through the Texas border, Eagle Pass. The military is willingly aiding them. This includes men, women, and children. Let's approach them and ask why.

In Scotch Creek, British Columbia, wildfires have destroyed the entire town. Reports suggest that UN blue helmet troops have been spotted setting up checkpoints and isolating towns from each other. Around 40 to 50 people are stuck in the area, with limited supplies and restricted movement even if their properties have been burnt down. It is believed that these wildfires are intentionally started by people. While the presence of the troops, referred to as Canada task force 1, is unconfirmed, pictures have been found. This is a serious situation and an SOS is being sent out to raise awareness. Similar incidents may occur in other towns.

The speaker discusses a significant increase in military spending and changes in the National Defense Act. They mention potential use of the military against Canadian citizens in case of emergencies like a trucker convoy. The document also hints at Canadian Armed Forces assisting domestic law enforcement, which raises concerns. Minister Blair explains the role of the military in supporting civil authority. This raises questions and prompts viewers to share their thoughts in the comments.

There is a highly fortified military camp where single young adult males are being brought. It is difficult to access and resembles a checkpoint. As a journalist, I have been threatened for trying to expose these operations, as they don't want the American people to know. Thankfully, some brave men and women in uniform have shared these locations with us off the record. They believe it is important for the truth to be known. I have been threatened two days in a row for sharing this information. Please share this message to spread awareness.

Hey, how's it going? I'm just curious about the facilities back here. Are they being used? I noticed there aren't many workers coming in or out. We can't allow recording on-site, but we can answer questions. This area is for rapid response in emergencies, mainly for first responders. They stay here to rest between their duties. People think it's for housing illegals, but it's not. The workers are out doing their jobs during the day, which is why you might not see them. Thanks for the clarification. It's important to get accurate information instead of assumptions. Have a great day!

I'm at my sister's cottage in Tiny Ontario, Georgian Bay Area. We spotted what seemed like fire in the sky and went to the beach to investigate. There was an airplane circling and dropping big fireballs, resembling flares. Concerned, we called 911, but they informed us that it was the military conducting their activities. We're curious about what exactly they are doing. Any thoughts?

He just drove from way down there. Now he's over here. Load not bins and shitter, it looks like. All of this will just be taken out of here and driven straight out of here onto the highway. No decontamination protocol, no scraping of the kill pen hay before they leave. Nobody's wearing hazmat stuff anymore or PPE. Just loading up bins driving through kill hay weird stuff with sprayers in bathrooms And the destruction of the garlic property. At least the drones and the warming tent and most of the RCMP surrounding this property have left. Such a skeleton crew, I would say now.

There is a belief that the 2020 election was rigged, and task forces are working to educate the public about the military's potential involvement. The speaker is part of a task force monitoring public sentiment and barriers to acceptance. They aim to provide information to the Strategic Information Operations team. The goal is to understand why people support Biden and to predict the response if action is taken. The military's involvement is seen as a way to clean up corruption, but they want to avoid civil unrest. The speaker believes that more truths need to come out before the military can publicly intervene. They speculate on potential catalysts for military action.

Speaker 0 calls Speaker 1 to confirm that three excavators were disabled to prevent illegal activity. Speaker 0 asks about the expectation of how the excavators would be used, but Speaker 1 doesn't have an answer. Speaker 0 thanks Speaker 1 and ends the call. Speaker 0 then calls Corporal Southern Cobb to confirm the damage caused by the RCMP. Speaker 1 doesn't know the specific steps taken to disable the vehicles. Speaker 0 thanks Speaker 1 and ends the call.

Speaker 0: Good morning. It's going to be a nice day. I'll keep this short. This message is for the police of Ottawa. You should resign. You are an embarrassment to law enforcement. Treating truckers like terrorists is wrong. I've witnessed people shoveling sidewalks, roads, and helping the homeless. The convoy has done more for the homeless than the mayor. They offer blankets, food, and friendship. They care about their country and are tired of the prime minister and premier. So, with respect, step down and make way for change.

The speaker expresses concern about the low number of guardsmen deployed and the lack of active duty personnel in Afghanistan and Iraq. They mention voting absentee in the past and not trusting the postal service. The speaker questions the significance of the 9,800 guardsmen currently deployed compared to the 16,600 in 2016. They emphasize the need to investigate these issues. Additionally, they raise doubts about the authenticity and chain of custody of the ballots. The other speaker agrees with their point.

Speaker 0: Our strategy is to avoid actions that could do more harm than good. Councilor Mead doesn't have a specific motion. The solicitor has heard the concerns. Speaker 1: Minister Maynard supports Councilor Kavanaugh's motion. They want to know if we have the authority to assess the risk to children in the convoys. They are concerned about the noise and diesel fumes. They ask who engages Children's Aid, and it is the police services. They want to ensure the workers asking questions are protected. Speaker 2: The police services would work with Children's Aid if there are concerns about children in their care. The appropriate person to engage with Children's Aid would be the police services.

The speaker questions the army's presence at a New York hotel. They ask if the army is turning the hotel into a migrant shelter and why they are there. The speaker states the army is there at the request of the state of New York. The speaker expresses disbelief that the state of New York has put the army in hotels. They ask if the army has taken over the hotel, and state that they are not in court and can record. The speaker questions why the army is taking over civilian hotels in New York City, and whether the army is there to help the people.

I’m really upset. We came to Western North Carolina to help hurricane victims, volunteering on private land. After a day, three people arrived claiming to be in charge. They were from FEMA but didn’t reveal it. They took medical supplies and tried to control our actions, even telling us we couldn’t go on search and rescue missions. Meanwhile, the local community is struggling, with many still missing and in need. FEMA's presence has been more about taking than helping, while local volunteers and organizations are the ones truly assisting. We’re ensuring that any donations we raised go directly to those in need, not to these organizations. Just a heads up: be cautious of how government agencies operate during disasters.

An individual questions the army's presence at a New York hotel, asking why they are there. The response indicates the army is present at the request of the state of New York. The individual expresses disbelief that the state is using the army in hotels and questions if the army has taken over the civilian hotel. They are told they cannot record. The individual questions the army's purpose and implies they are not there to help the public.