TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims scalps of five-month-old aborted babies were grafted onto lab rats and mice in a University of Pittsburgh study funded by NIAID, which is run by Dr. Anthony Fauci. According to the speaker, photos of baby scalps with hair growing on the backs of lab rats exist in the published study. The speaker alleges Planned Parenthood abortion providers supplied the aborted baby body parts for the experiments. The speaker asserts Dr. Fauci is responsible for the study because, as head of NIAID, he oversees how grants are spent. The speaker suggests obtaining whole scalps from fetuses indicates partial-birth abortions or live births. The speaker believes Dr. Fauci should be questioned by Congress about what his office did to ensure the grants and experiments complied with federal laws and regulations.

Henry Kissinger, world famous as US Secretary of State and National Security Advisor under Nixon and Ford. NSSM 200, the Kissinger Report, was a top secret 1973 memorandum about the planet’s resources. Kissinger proposed a plan to consolidate the smooth flow of valuable resources from various countries to the US. He stated that taking other countries’ resources was easy when countries were stable, but unstable countries were difficult to access. The question, he posed, was how to stabilize less developed countries. He argued that the world’s most valuable resources such as oil, natural gas, gold and minerals were in less developed countries. In his report he wrote: Wherever a lessening of population pressures through reduced birth rates can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interest of The United States. This was presented as a rationale for population policy, including abortion and birth-control measures, to create stability and access to resources. Kissinger advised that in order to create stability one needs population policy, including legalizing abortion, giving families money if they use contraception, and if necessary, accepting sterilization and abortion. If that wasn’t sufficient, population policy could entail forced birth control, forced sterilization and forced abortions. Furthermore, he advised withholding aid, disaster aid and food aid if a less developed country refused to implement US population control programs. The content claimed that this was a method to pillage a country’s resources, create stability by reducing the population, and remove anti-imperialist youth. The result, it is claimed, was a massacre worldwide documented in research papers ignored by mainstream media and the UN. Two examples cited are China and Peru. China: It is claimed that China’s one-child policy started in 1979 and changed in 2015 to a two-child policy if the first child is a girl. With the financial help of the United Nations Population Fund, UNFPA, China developed state-of-the-art tracking systems to monitor women’s monthly cycles. It is claimed that if a fetus was not allowed by the government, the woman would be arrested and forced to have an abortion. The speaker states that the UN supported, funded, and facilitated China’s population control program, including a $100,000,000 donation to UNFPA and a $12,000,000 computer complex to monitor the program, along with technical expertise and personnel. It is claimed that abortions were used as a weapon of mass destruction and that hundreds of millions of lives were exterminated. The UNFPA allegedly defended China’s actions and was awarded by the UN for China’s population control program. The policy is described as preventing hundreds of millions of births and conducting hundreds of millions of abortions under the one-child policy, with reports of high female suicide rates and a skewed sex ratio. Peru: Between 1995 and 1997, over a quarter of a million Peruvian women were sterilized as part of President Fujimori’s family planning goals financed by the US, described as the Voluntary Surgical Contraception Campaign, with reports of coerced sterilizations and threats to withhold food for refusing sterilization. It is claimed that many women were traumatized, with poor hygiene in hospitals causing deaths or severe harm. The transcript argues that in every less developed country, UN concern was not development, health or women’s empowerment, but reversing unchecked population growth. Kissinger is described as laying out protocols for modern times, and various allegations are presented about his background and alleged roots, including claims about his family name and ethnicity. NGOs: The transcript discusses NGOs connected to the UN, noting that NGOs are tax-exempt and 501c organizations, with examples including the Population Council, funded by John D. Rockefeller III and associated with eugenics and depopulation aims. It claims the Population Council supported et al. projects such as intrauterine devices in several countries, and published material advocating measures like adding fertility-control agents to water and compulsory sterilization. It argues that there are 37 NGOs worldwide advocating negative population growth under the banner of sustainability and overpopulation concerns. Planned Parenthood: The transcript asserts that Planned Parenthood, founded by Margaret Sanger, has internationally scaled activities with abortions, and claims about tissue procurement and compensation. It cites statements about compensation for tissue specimens and mentions editing to discuss tissue donation, with a claim that Planned Parenthood profits or receives funding from major foundations and governments. It states that the Trump administration ended US funding for Planned Parenthood in 2019. Ending note: The transcript mentions Kissinger’s removal from the Pentagon Defense Policy Board and promises to continue discussing the UN, its NGOs, and alleged threefold purposes: pillaging resources, money laundering, and population control, with the aim to expose the alleged depopulation program.

An undercover journalist filmed a National Abortion Federation trade show at a major Planned Parenthood in Texas, revealing discussions about selling fetal tissue. Dr. Anne, the chief medical officer, mentioned the profitability of obtaining 5 to 6 samples weekly. Tram, the vice president of abortion access, shared details about preserving conjoined twins as specimens, expressing excitement over their intactness. The conversation hinted at illegal practices surrounding partial birth abortions, where a fetus is partially delivered before being terminated. Following the convention, the journalist proposed a contract to Tram for fetal organs, which she forwarded to her superiors. This investigation was led by the Center for Medical Progress, founded by David Daleiden, who faced legal repercussions after the footage was released. Despite the controversy, Planned Parenthood continues to receive significant taxpayer funding.

The speaker discusses concerns about late-term abortions and the alleged practice of keeping babies alive after birth to harvest their organs. They mention the governor of Virginia's comments, but the speaker claims they didn't see it. They suggest that these babies are kept alive for a short period, and their organs are registered and sold for profit. The speaker also mentions that California has passed a law related to this issue, and Virginia, New York, and three other states are trying to pass similar laws.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton discussed newly obtained documents from the Obama-era FDA that purportedly show the Food and Drug Administration purchased fetal body parts from a fetal-tissue provider. The key items cited include purchases of “intact calvarium baby skulls, eighteen to twenty four weeks” for $515 per skull. Fitton told One America’s John Hines that taxpayers’ money was used “to purchase, basically, the dead bodies of unborn human beings,” noting that the bodies were divided up, with heads, livers, and other parts sold. During the interview, it was highlighted that government records indicate the federal government demanded that purchased fetal organs be “fresh, never frozen,” with documents stating they were to be shipped on dry ice. Fitton described this as horrifying and insisted that these were organs, not just cells, and included skulls up to twenty-four weeks gestation. He asserted there was no doubt these were human beings and claimed organs were being sold, chopped up, and sold. Fitton referenced additional documents from a separate lawsuit filed on behalf of the Center for Medical Progress, pointing to a large operation at the University of Pittsburgh funded with tax dollars and involving Fauci’s agency. He suggested Fauci’s agency should be asked about involvement in both the NIH and NIAID, as well as about alleged support for gain-of-function research and dismemberment of fetal organs, describing it as a “fetal organ chop shop.” The interview noted that a Freedom of Information Act request had been filed with the FDA to uncover whether the agency was buying or selling body parts, and that officials did not initially respond. A judge granted discovery, allowing redactions to be removed, and the released information allegedly showed the FDA was purchasing fetal tissue, including human heads, for $515 per skull. Fitton recalled that the government had sought to withhold price details, but the court ruled against this secrecy. Fitton also mentioned a separate case involving NIH and NIAID, highlighting an alleged “one stop shop operation” at the University of Pittsburgh, and raising questions about whether aborted fetuses were still alive when organs were taken. He claimed the Obama administration was involved, the Trump administration halted the activity, and the Biden administration was reportedly preparing to resume funding of similar activities. When asked what a new learner should think, Fitton described the documents as among the worst he has seen in his twenty-three years of work and called for a thorough investigation into how this was done, why it occurred, whether it violated the law, and how to stop it. He concluded by thanking John Hines for the interview.

The speaker presents a list of companies that allegedly use aborted fetuses in their products, claiming it as the real reason for the abortion ban. They express disgust and emphasize that the information is verified by the companies themselves, providing a website with sources. The speaker urges viewers to throw away any products from these companies immediately. The list includes baby food and pet food, with sources available on the companies' websites.

David Deliden, founder of the Center For Medical Progress, exposes Planned Parenthood's involvement in selling aborted baby body parts. He highlights disturbing practices, including experiments on aborted baby parts and a contract with the University of California for profit. Deliden calls for investigations to prevent the exploitation of human life.

Animal rights activists have more influence on vaccine companies than anti-abortion activists. There is concern over the lack of outcry regarding human babies born alive at 5 to 6 months old for research purposes. These babies are delivered alive and their hearts are cut out without anesthesia. The speaker clarifies that they are referring to fetuses that are 5 months old. Stanley Plotkin, a scientist, described using various parts of aborted fetuses for vaccine production. Scientists purchase different body parts for research purposes. The speaker mentions receiving a catalog with prices for body parts of 32-week-old babies. The conversation then shifts to discussing the science behind this issue.

Animal rights activists have more influence than vaccine companies and anti-abortion activists. There is concern over the lack of outcry regarding human babies born alive at 5 to 6 months old for research purposes. These babies are delivered alive and their hearts are cut out without anesthesia. The speaker emphasizes that they wouldn't do this to a mouse. The conversation then shifts to discussing the use of fetuses in vaccine production. Stanley Plotkin, a scientist, allegedly used various parts of aborted fetuses for vaccines. The speaker confirms that scientists purchase different body parts for research purposes. The speaker mentions receiving a catalog with prices for body parts from 20 years ago. The conversation concludes by acknowledging the moral implications and transitioning to discussing the science.

The transcript depicts an undercover-style interview with individuals involved in a global child trafficking and organ harvesting operation. The speakers discuss how the network operates, the profits, and the brutal methods used to procure children and organs, often exploiting vulnerable mothers. Key points: - Donor kit and adoption timing: The trafficker (Speaker 1) explains the cost structure and process, saying he “gets €15,000 for abroad with a kid” and that delivering a child takes about two weeks if there are no special requests for gender. The plan requires several meetings, a party, and testing of the girl, with multiple people involved to ensure the girl’s compliance. - Recruitment and manipulation: The group uses persuasion and “positive thinking” techniques, aiming to see the girl’s reaction and exploiting mothers who are vulnerable or indebted. If a girl has a child, she is pressured or reassured before being persuaded to hand the child over. - Transfer options and appetite for either a child or organs: Depending on demand, the organization may pull a child from a brothel to satisfy clients seeking a child or spare parts. They advertise themselves as a sponsor or businessman abroad, receiving many replies from girls who think they are applying for companionship or work. - Targeted profiles and grooming: An “ideal” girl is described as selfish and easily pliable, with tactics including bribing experiences (a trip to Mazari), monitoring reactions to a child’s calls, and testing loyalty in ways that reveal vulnerability to manipulation. - After acquisition: If a girl agrees, discussions cover the child’s fate, with the implication that the child may be taken away and replaced with forged documents later. There is mention of marriages to Arab men and Muslim legal processes to adopt the child and move it abroad, often with easy, illegitimate name changes that erase traces. - Documentation and traceability: The process often involves swapping papers or creating new identities for the child in Poland or abroad, so that traceability is lost. This includes using new papers for Ukrainian-made children, or other methods to render the child effectively invisible to authorities. - Kidnapping and urgent transplants: Kidnapping is described as rare but possible in emergencies when a transplant is urgently needed. The organization uses coordinated efforts to manage the client’s access while avoiding exposure. - Violent and dehumanizing practices: The dialogue describes infants being tortured and dismembered for organs in a sterile room at a villa, with phrases indicating that infants “suffer” and are used as “spare parts.” Older children are drugged and exploited over time; infants are deemed “useless” for long-term exploitation. - Global network and sophistication: The brokers, medical teams, and logistics are likened to a corporation, with branches worldwide, high-security operations, and organized procurement of both children and organs. The demand is described as immense and ongoing. - Emotional detachment: One speaker notes the mother’s collapse into depression and a desire to kill herself and the baby; another reflects a chilling detachment about the mother’s suffering and the ultimate objective of profit. The dialogue reveals a highly organized, international criminal market for exploiting women and children, with both adoption fraud and organ trafficking tightly interwoven, including identity manipulation, forced payments, and extreme violence.

The speaker, Bernard Nathanson, a physician, discusses the advancements in fetology and ultrasound technology that have allowed us to see the unborn child in the womb. He describes the process of a 12-week abortion, showing the graphic details of the procedure. He emphasizes that the unborn child is a human being and calls for a better solution to the issue of abortion, one that prioritizes love, compassion, and the preservation of human life. Nathanson accuses organizations like NARAL and Planned Parenthood of keeping women in the dark about the true nature of abortion. He urges for an end to the killing.

Planned Parenthood is under investigation for allegedly selling body parts from abortions, as shown in an undercover video. The video was secretly recorded by an anti-abortion group, where two members posed as employees of a biotech firm to gain access to a top doctor at Planned Parenthood. During a lunch conversation, the senior director of medical services discussed preserving fetal tissue and providing it to researchers for a fee. The backlash was immediate, with Republican presidential candidates condemning the organization. Congress has announced an investigation. Planned Parenthood claims to follow the law, providing tissue legally with patient consent and no financial benefit. They argue that any fees charged are to cover costs, not for profit.

An undercover journalist filmed at the National Abortion Federation's trade show in Texas, revealing disturbing conversations about the sale of fetal tissue. Dr. Anne, a chief medical officer, discussed the profitability of obtaining fetal samples, while Tram, the vice president of abortion access, mentioned storing conjoined twins in a freezer. They acknowledged the legality issues surrounding their practices and hinted at methods to circumvent regulations. Tram described a partial birth abortion procedure, raising ethical concerns. The journalist later proposed a contract to Tram for fetal organs, which she forwarded to her superiors. Following the release of these videos, the journalist's home was raided, and Planned Parenthood continues to receive substantial taxpayer funding. The call to defund Planned Parenthood is emphasized.

A whistleblower from Stem Express revealed that a liver from a 5-month-old aborted baby was sold for $17,000 to a taxpayer-funded lab. Planned Parenthood claims that 75% of abortions are due to financial issues, suggesting that this amount could have covered someone's rent for a year. This situation highlights a troubling reality where the financial transactions surrounding abortion may prioritize profit over the value of life.

The speaker discusses concerns about late-term abortions and the alleged practice of keeping babies alive after birth to harvest their organs. They mention the governor of Virginia's comments, but the speaker claims they didn't see it. They suggest that these babies are kept alive for a short period, and their organs are registered for bidding, potentially making large sums of money. The speaker also mentions that California has passed a law related to this, and Virginia, New York, and three other states are trying to pass similar legislation.

Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch, discusses newly obtained documents revealing that the FDA under the Obama administration purchased fetal body parts. The documents show that the FDA bought intact baby skulls for $515 each, along with other organs. The organs were required to be fresh and not frozen. Fitton expresses moral and legal outrage, stating that taxpayers' money is being used to buy the dead bodies of unborn human beings. He also mentions another lawsuit involving the University of Pittsburgh, funded by taxpayers, which involved the chopping up and selling of fetal organs. Fitton emphasizes the need for investigation and to ensure that such practices are stopped.

Planned Parenthood investigation dismissed as based on false premises. Witnesses include Dr. Anthony Levatino, a former abortion provider who describes a second trimester D&E abortion procedure. He recounts the graphic details of dismembering the fetus and admits to performing over 1200 abortions before a personal tragedy made him reconsider. After seeing the body parts on the table, he stopped performing late-term abortions and eventually quit all abortions.

According to the Center For Medical Progress, Planned Parenthood sells baby parts, potentially for more money than previously known. Documents obtained through a California public records request allegedly show that Planned Parenthood has supplied aborted fetal body parts to UC San Diego for the past 15 years, describing them as its proprietary fetal material being exchanged for valuable consideration. The contract allegedly states that Planned Parenthood retains all rights to intellectual property relating to the aborted fetal body parts. UC San Diego has registered numerous patents developed using aborted fetal body parts from Planned Parenthood. Some professors listed on the patents harvested hundreds of body parts from late-term healthy babies aborted at Planned Parenthood. Emails show discussions between Planned Parenthood and UC San Diego about research collaboration and payments to Planned Parenthood's abortion training program at UCSD. UC San Diego also made a $10,000 contribution to a Planned Parenthood fundraising event in 2021. Planned Parenthood classifies its work with university scientists as part of its research program, with activities registered with and approved by Planned Parenthood Federation of America's National Research Department and funded by the NIH.

Animal rights activists have more influence on vaccine companies than anti-abortion activists. The lack of outcry over live-born human babies, aged 5 to 6 months, being used for research is concerning. These babies are delivered alive and have their hearts cut out without anesthesia. Some scientists purchase different body parts for research purposes. The speaker recalls seeing a catalog with prices for body parts of 32-week-old babies. The moral implications are revolting, but the focus will now shift to the scientific aspects.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton discusses documents obtained from the Obama-era FDA regarding the purchase of fetal body parts. The documents show the FDA bought intact baby skulls, aged eighteen to twenty-four weeks, for $515 each. Fitton says this should cause moral and legal outrage, as taxpayer dollars were used to purchase the dead bodies of unborn human beings. The documents also revealed the government demanded the fetal organs be fresh, never frozen, and shipped on dry ice. Fitton alleges these are not just clumps of cells, but organs and baby skulls. He also references documents from another lawsuit showing a massive operation at the University of Pittsburgh, funded with tax dollars and involving Fauci's agency. Fitton says the FDA initially didn't respond to a Freedom of Information request about buying body parts, but a judge granted discovery. He says the Trump administration shut down the practice, but the Biden administration is reportedly preparing to fund it again. Fitton calls the documents the worst he's ever seen regarding government conduct and says it should be a priority to investigate and stop it.

Planned Parenthood is under investigation for allegedly selling body parts from abortions, as shown in an undercover video. The video was recorded by an anti-abortion group who posed as employees of a biotech firm. During a lunch conversation, Planned Parenthood's senior director of medical services discussed preserving fetal tissue and providing it to researchers for a fee. The backlash was immediate, with Republican presidential candidates condemning the organization. Congress has announced an investigation. Planned Parenthood claims to follow the law, providing tissue legally with patient consent and no financial benefit. They argue that any fees charged are to cover costs. The video has been criticized as heavily edited by anti-abortion activists.

David Deliden went undercover to expose Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation's illegal sale of fetal remains. He recorded them offering price lists for fetal body parts at abortion trade shows. This led to state investigations and defunding of some clinics. According to the speaker, Kamala Harris, a recipient of campaign contributions from "big abortion," then prosecuted Deliden for violating California's wiretapping law, despite First Amendment protections for journalists and the recordings being made in public places. The speaker claims this was the first time California's wiretapping law was used against a journalist. Deliden was indicted seven years ago and faces years in prison if convicted. The speaker asserts that Harris did not prosecute anyone for illegally selling fetal parts, only the person who exposed the practice.

A study grafted scalps from five-month-old aborted babies onto lab rats and mice to observe their growth, with photographs documenting baby hairs growing on the rats' backs. According to the speaker, Planned Parenthood provided the aborted baby body parts for these experiments at the University of Pittsburgh. The speaker claims the study was funded by grants from the NIAID office, headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, who is therefore responsible for ensuring ethical and legal compliance in the use of these grants. The speaker suggests that obtaining intact scalps from five-month-old aborted babies implies partial-birth abortions or live births. The speaker believes Dr. Fauci should be questioned by Congress regarding his office's oversight of these experiments and their compliance with federal laws and regulations.

This chilling and disturbing video sheds light on the dark world of child trafficking and organ harvesting. The speakers discuss the process of finding and selling children, the conditions in brothels, and the use of drugs to control them. They also reveal the profit-driven nature of the industry and the demand for specific body parts. The video shares personal experiences and emotions, including the desire to save a child from being sold. It also highlights the challenges faced by a mother searching for her kidnapped son. Despite the darkness of the topic, the speaker remains determined to save as many children as possible.

Speaker 0 introduces a provocative claim, warning the video might be removed and urging viewers to watch and download it while possible, saying the content sounds like a horror movie. Speaker 1 raises a question about research involving implanting aborted baby parts into a lab animal, asking if such research exists. Speaker 2 confirms a prior analysis indicating that over ninety percent of experiments using human fetal tissue involving animals were funded by Fauci's NIAID. They add that much of the tissue comes from colleges and universities that have affiliate hospitals performing the procedures. Speaker 1 suggests the need to investigate where the aborted human fetal tissue is sourced and asserts the issue should be looked into, addressing the Madam Chair. Speaker 0 clarifies that the video is for entertainment purposes, but describes a certain person’s claim that aborted fetal parts are being used and combined with other animals, implying a practice beyond ordinary science. The speaker acknowledges skepticism but says the rumor should be investigated regardless of political alignment, arguing that it would be understandable to be unsettled by such alleged activities. The speaker shares a personal stance: they will take the claim with a grain of salt because it originates from a random person on X, yet reiterates the claim that people are “playing god” and that humanity is unprepared for the extent of these actions, suggesting that the truth is being concealed to avoid public outcry. The speaker adds a conspiratorial thread: “these USOs under the sea” are related to the topic, and mentions a family acquaintance who allegedly knows an ex-military person who had to deal with a creature created in a lab that merged with AI. If the claims are true, the speakers imply this would constitute a true horror story, indicating that humanity is not in control of the government globally. They urge the audience to remember this when they see references to the USA. A broader existential claim follows: humanity is making decisions and following orders from ancient “gods” such as the Anunnaki, an alien race. The people at the top are portrayed as having sold their souls, believing they have no chance of going to heaven, and having been traumatized from birth. The speakers emphasize that these powerful individuals fear humanity—our soul, love, kindness, strength, fierceness, and capabilities—and urge listeners not to be manipulated any longer, concluding with a call for awakening and healing the world through collective awareness.