TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The US Supreme Court is hearing arguments on whether former President Trump can be barred from reelection under the 14th Amendment. Trump's attorney contends that he is not an elected official or an officer of the United States, arguing that Section 3 applies only to those in office, not candidates. He warned that affirming the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to remove Trump from the ballot could disenfranchise millions of voters. Conversely, the plaintiff's attorney claims Trump disqualified himself by attempting to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power through insurrection. The court's decision will ultimately address Trump's eligibility in light of these allegations.

The speaker claims that on January 6th, there was violence against the constitution, Congress, and the U.S. Capitol. They allege that they begged the President of the United States to send in the National Guard, but he refused. The speaker further claims that the president would not send in the National Guard when law enforcement people were being harmed, some of whom later died. They assert this inaction occurred during an insurrection that the president incited, which caused damage to those assigned to protect the capital and the constitution and to accept the results of the electoral college.

We gather to demand Congress uphold the 14th Amendment, specifically that insurrectionists cannot hold the presidency. If you doubt this, look at the evidence available. Democrats need to stop blaming each other for electoral losses. The election was influenced by foreign adversaries spending millions on disinformation campaigns, which misled many Americans. Instead of pointing fingers at fellow citizens, focus on Russia and those in our government collaborating with them. The message to Congress is clear: deny fascism, defend democracy, and remove oligarchs. Uphold the 14th Amendment.

The speaker accuses the Democrats of being part of a "deep state" coup against the US republic. They claim that the Secretary of State in Maine has removed Trump from the ballot without a court case, accusing him of insurrection. The speaker argues that Trump has never been charged or convicted of insurrection, and that this move is illegal. They believe that this is an attempt to manipulate the election by preventing people from voting for Trump. The speaker also mentions similar actions taken against Bolsonaro in Brazil. They claim that the Democrats are creating a constitutional crisis and hyping civil war, while accusing conservatives, Christians, whites, and Catholics of being evil. The speaker concludes by expressing confidence in winning back the country peacefully.

This is about the accusation of election rigging against Donald Trump. The decision to remove him from the ballot is likely to be overturned by the US Supreme Court. The insurrection clause in the 14th Amendment does not apply to Trump's situation, as it was meant to prevent confederates from holding office after the Civil War. Trump has not been charged with insurrection, and removing him from the ballot violates his right to due process. Colorado officials have manipulated the clause for political reasons, interfering with the election process. This is seen as anti-democratic and equivalent to rigging the ballot box, potentially increasing support for Trump.

The court supports the freedoms and equality of the American people, but it won't be our savior. True change requires people actively amending the constitution. However, constitutional protections can quickly erode, as seen with Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which is being disregarded. It will be up to us on January 6, 2025, to inform the Trump supporters that he is disqualified. This situation creates a need for protection and raises tensions, all because some justices refuse to interpret the 14th Amendment properly. Cherilyn's new center aims to revive this important discussion while we continue to push for constitutional amendments.

The speaker expresses concern about the erosion of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, urging action on January 6, 2025 to prevent Trump's disqualification. They criticize Supreme Court justices for not interpreting the amendment properly, leading to potential civil unrest. The speaker praises Sherlyn for establishing a new center to address these issues.

On January 6, 2025, it will be up to the people to tell "rampaging Trump mobs" that Trump is disqualified, necessitating bodyguards and creating "civil war conditions." This is because the Supreme Court justices "simply do not want to do their job and interpret what the great 14th amendment means." The speaker is glad Sherlyn is creating a new center to bring the amendment back to life, even as they continue to amend the constitution.

In the decision, it was argued that Donald Trump participated in an insurrection. The consideration of whether he should be allowed on the ballot before being found guilty of the crime of insurrection was discussed. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment was carefully reviewed, which states "engage" rather than "conviction." The events of January 6, 2021, were described as unprecedented and tragic, constituting an attack on the capital, government officials, and the rule of law. The weight of evidence reviewed indicated that it was indeed an insurrection, and Donald Trump was involved according to Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

The Colorado Supreme Court has disqualified former President Donald Trump from the 2024 primary ballot, claiming his alleged involvement in the January 6th events violated the 14th Amendment's insurrectionist ban. This decision reflects the left's hypocrisy and their willingness to suppress dissenting voices. It draws parallels to Abraham Lincoln's exclusion from southern state ballots in 1860 due to his anti-slavery stance. Both Lincoln and Trump faced political exclusion, revealing the left's duplicity. The selective application of the law and unequal treatment raise concerns about political bias. These events highlight the erosion of democratic principles and the need to uphold fairness and justice in our electoral process. The disqualification of Trump is a threat to our republic and a reminder of the battle for the integrity of our democracy.

The speaker claims Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is being ignored. They suggest it will be up to the public on January 6, 2025, to tell "rampaging Trump mobs" that Trump is disqualified, potentially leading to civil war conditions. This is because the justices, who have few cases and ample resources, are allegedly unwilling to interpret the 14th Amendment. The speaker expresses support for Cherilyn's new center, presumably related to this issue.

In Denver, Colorado, a trial begins to determine if President Trump can be banned from the upcoming presidential election ballot. The trial is based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which states that individuals engaged in insurrection or rebellion can be barred. However, there is no legal basis for this case, and both sides acknowledge that. The trial is seen as a way to interfere with the election and is criticized as a frivolous lawsuit. It is argued that instead of pursuing these lawsuits, the focus should be on winning over the people to beat Trump. The claim is made that the establishment is unfairly going after Trump.

On January 6th, there was no Trump-led insurrection as claimed by some. The crowd had no weapons or plan to overthrow the government. Trump himself was at the White House, calling for calm. However, a Colorado Supreme Court ruling cited the 14th Amendment to bar Trump from appearing on the state's ballot, despite no conviction of insurrection. This decision was seen as lunacy, especially when compared to the loss of the US's moral authority abroad. The left celebrated this ruling, with some expressing gratitude to unelected judges for overriding voters' desires. The Colorado Secretary of State, Jenna Griswold, stated on MSNBC that accusations on television are now enough to remove a presidential candidate. This erosion of due process and the rule of law raises concerns about the state of democracy.

The speaker emphasizes the need to ignore critics and doubters who downplay the dangers of Donald Trump's presidency. They argue that Trump is not a normal candidate and is running to end American democracy. They mention a recent court ruling in Colorado that accused Trump of leading an insurrection against the US government. The speaker believes that Joe Biden supports American democracy while Trump supports an authoritarian form of government. They caution against underestimating Trump's potential to create a constitutional crisis if given the chance. The speaker concludes by highlighting the importance of the federal judiciary in protecting American democracy.

This situation is unprecedented. The president of the United States is accused of trying to steal the election. He claims it is election interference, but his scheme to use fake electors and steal the presidency is the real interference. There are doubts about the lawsuit, but it exists because of Trump's actions. He is disqualified because he attempted to steal the presidency from the American people.

Kamala was chosen by elites to run for president, despite receiving zero votes in 2020. The speaker criticizes the Democratic Party for hijacking democracy to defeat Trump, calling it the lowest point in their lifetime. They challenge critics to explain their stance but are met with silence. The speaker demands honesty about sacrificing democracy to win.

The speaker discusses the disappearing importance of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, urging action on January 6, 2025 to disqualify Trump. They criticize the Supreme Court justices for not interpreting the amendment, leading to potential civil war. They express gratitude for Sherilyn's new center to address these issues.

The speaker claims that someone received 14,000,000 votes but was thrown out of office. The speaker states this action is a threat to democracy. The speaker also claims that this person hates the woman who ran instead of him and cannot stand her.

The speaker discusses a recent ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court declaring Trump ineligible to be on the primary ballot. They criticize the decision as partisan and claim it is designed to enrage the public and provoke a response. The speaker believes the ruling is a political move and that the media will use it to create sensational headlines. They warn against falling for the manipulation and urge people not to engage in any violent or illegal actions. The speaker concludes by expressing their faith in the United States and the resilience of its democracy.

The Constitution can be easily undermined, as seen with Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which is being overlooked despite its clarity. The responsibility now falls on us to address this on January 6, 2025, and inform the Trump supporters that he is disqualified. This situation creates a tense atmosphere, requiring protection for everyone involved. The justices, who have limited cases and resources, seem unwilling to interpret the 14th Amendment's significance properly. It's encouraging that Sherlyn is establishing a new center to address these issues.

The speaker criticizes an attempt to remove President Trump from the Colorado ballot, calling it unconstitutional and a departure from the principles of American democracy. They pledge to withdraw from the GOP primary unless Trump's name is restored, and urge other Republican candidates like Ron DeSantis, Chris Christie, and Nikki Haley to do the same. The speaker believes that all GOP candidates should stand up for the people's right to choose their leaders and not allow the unelected judges to sideline Trump. They emphasize the importance of doing the right thing for the country's future.

The speaker explains that they made a detailed decision based on the law and evidence, determining that the events on January 6, 2021, were an insurrection and disqualifying Mr. Trump under the 14th amendment. Speaker 1 praises the decision but mentions that the Trump campaign has criticized it. The speaker emphasizes their commitment to the constitution and the rule of law, stating that they couldn't wait for the Supreme Court's decision and had to issue their own ruling. They also mention their state's strong election laws that promote voter participation and citizen engagement.

I understand the speaker's point that they are aware of the uniqueness of their decision. They mention that no previous secretary of state has ever used Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to prevent a presidential candidate from accessing the ballot. However, they also note that no presidential candidate has ever participated in an insurrection and been disqualified under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

The speaker discusses the possibility of removing Donald Trump from the ballot using the 14th Amendment. They mention that the mugshot of Trump has generated significant support and raised concerns among those who want to remove him. Legal scholars argue that the 14th Amendment can be used independently of criminal proceedings, impeachment, or congressional legislation. Examples are given of individuals in New Mexico and New Hampshire who are working to remove Trump from the ballot. Lawsuits in Florida also aim to remove him. The speaker suggests that the Democrats may be trying to incite anger and unrest to delay the election and maintain power. They urge people to pressure their state election officials to keep Trump on the ballot.

The speaker discusses how the justice department's goal is to go after President Trump by using convictions from the January 6th cases to invoke section 3 of the 14th amendment. However, there are several reasons why this is not applicable. Firstly, the 14th amendment was written for Confederates in the Civil War and does not apply to modern-day situations. Secondly, the text of the 14th amendment explicitly states that it can only be enforced by Congress, not state courts. Additionally, the amendment does not apply to the presidency itself. It would also create practical issues if local courts were able to enforce it. Furthermore, there is no evidence of an insurrection on January 6th, and this has already been litigated in Congress during the second impeachment trial. Finally, there are First Amendment concerns as the conduct in question relates to political speech.