TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims the Zionists in London cabled Justice Brandeis to influence President Wilson to get the U.S. into World War I, despite the U.S. having no reason to be involved. The speaker asserts the U.S. was "railroaded" into the war so Zionists could obtain Palestine, a fact allegedly hidden from the American people. After the U.S. entered the war, Zionists allegedly sought written confirmation from Great Britain regarding Palestine, resulting in the Balfour Declaration. The speaker characterizes the Balfour Declaration as a "receipt" and a promise to pay the Zionists for getting the U.S. into the war, labeling it as "phony as a $3 bill." The speaker concludes that this is where all the trouble started.

In 1914, President Woodrow Wilson pledged neutrality for the US during World War One. However, Germany's U Boats posed a threat, and something caused America to join the war. British Prime Minister Lloyd George made a deal with the Jewish Zionists, promising them Palestine in exchange for bringing the US into the war. President Wilson declared war on Germany in 1917, and the British government wrote the Balfour Declaration, promising Palestine to the Rothschild Zionists. The Balfour Declaration, a 1917 letter from the UK foreign secretary, pledged Britain's support for a Jewish home in Palestine. The declaration has faced criticism, and the Palestinian Authority plans to sue Britain's government. The Rothschild family, a powerful banking dynasty, played a significant role in these events.

All the world's problems stem from the British Empire, including those in Gaza, China, Pakistan, India, and the Middle East. As the most powerful empire for 200 years, the British created conflicts worldwide. The current disaster in Palestine is partially due to British promises made between 1915 and 1917. The British promised the same territory to three different groups. First, in the McMahon communications, they promised it to the Arabs in exchange for fighting the Turks. Then, through the Sykes-Picot Treaty, they promised it to the French. Finally, in the Balfour Declaration of 1917, they declared it a Jewish homeland, despite the land not belonging to them.

Jenny Jerome, Churchill's mother, may have had Jewish ancestry. Churchill was supported financially by a group called the Focus, primarily Jewish, during his wilderness years. He was influenced by this group in his political decisions. In 1941, Chaim Weizmann, leader of the Zionist movement, offered Churchill support in exchange for creating a Jewish army. This offer was made to help bring the United States into the war. This information challenges traditional views on Churchill's decisions during World War II.

The Arab-Jewish conflict's roots lie in British double-dealing during World War I. Britain, France, and Russia secretly planned to divide the Ottoman Empire, disregarding Arab and Turkish interests. The British promised Arabs independence and Jews a homeland, an irreconcilable contradiction born out of wartime exigency and imperial ambition. Britain sought to secure the Suez Canal for access to India. They annexed Egypt and saw the Ottoman Empire, allied with Germany, as a threat. To undermine the Ottomans, Britain used bribery and subversion, exploiting Arab nationalism. They courted Sharif Hussein, offering support for Arab independence in exchange for revolt against the Ottomans, while simultaneously negotiating with France to carve up the Middle East via the Sykes-Picot Agreement.

In 1829, the Rothschilds purchased Jerusalem, a key step in establishing Israel. The First Zionist Congress in 1897, led by Theodor Herzl, aimed to secure Palestine for Jews. Herzl predicted a world body would grant Palestine to Jews, manipulating European powers to take it from the Ottomans. He believed wealthy Jews controlled governments, starting wars and making peace at will. In 1907, Doctor Wolfson echoed this sentiment in the New York Times.

World War I was intentionally started by the British, with the Rothschilds acting as the Bank of England. The British Empire wanted to take land in the Middle East, so Israel was set up as an intelligence outpost. Saudi Arabia and Israel are used by Western intelligence agencies to carry out their operations. The CIA and MI6 merged during World War II, with the British controlling media. Jews were elevated in media through this merger, creating a psyop that conflates Jewish people with the state of Israel. Arab countries opposed Israel because they saw it as a beachhead for a hostile foreign empire. The intelligence apparatus that set up Israel also funded Hitler and the Holocaust. The Rothschilds are aligned with the monarchy and use Jews as cannon fodder. Israel is used as an attack dog by the British Empire.

You know what they told me? Exactly. They said, when the Holocaust happened, we allowed them to come because they were facing pain, and we wanted to make sure they had a safe place where they were safe. In nineteen o five, the Jews went to Russia to try to kill the czar. They weren't fleeing persecution. They were fearing justice. The Germans let them in in nineteen o five in mass numbers fleeing Russia. The Jews financed by Wall Street, go in and try to kill the Russian head. We'll bring America into the war. It's the Balfour Declaration. Right? They had won the war. It was really over. The Jews took over. It wasn't about getting Palestine. That wasn't it. Yeah. And it wasn't theirs to give.

During World War I, the US and Germany had war economies overseen by their central banks. The German central bank, the Reichsbank, was headed by Max Warburg. The key person and a founder of the Federal Reserve in the US was Paul Warburg. Max and Paul Warburg were brothers. Therefore, the heads of the German and American central banks were brothers during a war between the US and Germany.

Zionism gained appeal as it aligned with Jewish aspirations for a return to their promised land. Chaim Weitzman lobbied for Jewish emigration to Palestine, and Lloyd George saw Zionism as a nationalist movement to co-opt. The Balfour Declaration of November 1917, favored a Jewish national home in Palestine, but it was also designed to serve British interests during a deteriorating war. The declaration stated that the rights of non-Jewish communities should not be prejudiced. However, it contradicted promises made to Arabs regarding independence. Britain's strategy, based on inaccurate intelligence, backfired when Bolsheviks revealed secret treaties. Despite Arab contributions to the Allied victory, the Sykes-Picot Agreement shaped the Middle East's new boundaries, undermining Arab unity and independence.

During World War I, the US and Germany had war economies, with central banks at the top. The head of the German central bank, the Reichsbank, was Max Warburg. The key person and a founder of the Federal Reserve in the US was Paul Warburg. Max and Paul Warburg were brothers. Therefore, the heads of the American and German central banks were brothers during a war between the US and Germany.

The transcript argues that a global cabal, financed by the Rothschilds, orchestrated major upheavals to destabilize nations and expand their power. Key claims include: - The Russian Revolution was a cabal revenge on Russia, financed by the Rothschilds, with Lenin (Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov) as their frontman. Lenin, though Russian, was described as westernized after years in exile, and heavily influenced by Karl Marx, who was German. The text claims Marx’s Jesuit background and Jesuit influence on Lenin, citing various sources: Marx trained in a Jesuit school, tutored by Jesuits at the British Museum on the Tenets of Communism (as asserted by ex-Jesuit Alberto Rivera); Otto von Bismarck’s reference to Marx being under Jesuit control via Peter Bex; and that Lenin’s right-hand man, Felix Jorzynski, admired the Jesuits. It states Lenin formally readmitted the Jesuits into Russia in 1922, despite religion being prohibited in communism, and asserts the Jesuits’ origin of communism through Paraguay’s 17th–18th century reductions as a model of communist governance. The New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia is cited to describe Jesuit-inspired communal land and property arrangements, and the text claims the term “social justice” was invented by the Jesuit Luigi Taparelli Dazellio. Lenin is labeled a Jesuit puppet intended to destabilize Russia, with quotes attributed to Lenin about Russia and freedom that embody hostility toward the state. The transcript asserts the Russian Revolution was a Jesuit attack driven by revenge, with the Bolshevists as the tool, comparing them to the Jacobins and noting millions died in 1917–1923. - A parallel narrative about events in the United States describes the Federal Reserve (founded in 1913 and controlled by cabal families including the Rothschilds) as central to global control. It claims the wealthiest opponents of the Fed died in the Titanic sinking; the Fed’s expansion of the money supply 1914–1919 led to bank failures and consolidations, and 1929’s Wall Street crash caused massive bank bankruptcies and a further contraction of credit, described as the “greatest robbery in history.” The text asserts a planned and ongoing manipulation of money supply by the Rothschilds and that Congressman McFadden was poisoned when he began impeachment proceedings against Fed bankers. It claims the 1933 gold seizure (Executive Order 6102) enabled further monetary manipulation, and asserts the income tax (established 1913) is illegal. - The rise of Adolf Hitler is presented as a Rothschild-backed manipulation: his alleged parentage is linked to Unsung Salomon von Rothschild via a possible liaison with Maria Anna Schigelkruber (and Alois Hitler’s name change). The Munich Post pamphlet alleging Jewish blood in Hitler’s veins is cited, and investigations into Hitler’s parentage are described as attempts to erase evidence of Rothschild involvement. Hitler’s alignment with Jesuit influence is emphasized, including praise for Ignatius of Loyola and the imitation of Jesuit hierarchical discipline in the SS under Himmler, with absolute obedience as a theme. The narrative claims the Nazis’ suppression of opposition and the genocide of Jews, Gypsies, and others were supported by a propagandistic machine led by Goebbels. - Postwar claims about Palestine and Israel are included: the 1917 Balfour Declaration granting a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine is described as a strategic chess move by the cabal, with Lord Rothschild and the Rothschilds as beneficiaries, enabling a later conflict between Jews and Palestinians. The text asserts the migration to Israel was planned by the cabal in 1917, and that many wars (Vietnam, Cold War) were instigated and financed on both sides by the cabal to perpetuate fear and subservience. The concluding line emphasizes the cabal’s guiding principles—hatred, revenge, disdain—and cites The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion as a guiding document.

The conflict between Arabs and Jews in the Middle East has its roots in British double dealing during World War I. The British promised both the Arabs and the Jews conflicting things, leading to a legacy of bloodshed and suffering. The secret Sykes-Picot Agreement divided the region into French and British spheres of influence, disregarding the aspirations of the Arab people. The Balfour Declaration promised support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine, further fueling tensions. The British mandate in Palestine and restrictions on Jewish immigration led to violence and polarization. Ultimately, the British legacy of betrayal and division continues to impact the region today.

The conflict between Arabs and Jews in the Middle East has its roots in British double dealing during World War I. The British made conflicting promises to both the Arabs and the Jews, leading to a legacy of bloodshed and suffering. The secret Sykes-Picot Agreement divided the region into French and British spheres of influence, while the Balfour Declaration promised support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine. These actions, along with the imposition of mandates and restrictions on Arab immigration, fueled tensions and led to the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948. The consequences of British policy during the war continue to shape the Middle East today.

During World War I, Germany offered England a negotiated peace, but the Zionists in Germany went to the British war cabinet and promised to bring the United States into the war as an ally if they were given Palestine after the war. England agreed and made the Balfour Declaration, promising Palestine to the Zionists. After Germany's defeat, the Jews were blamed for their loss and faced discrimination. In 1933, the Jews declared a worldwide boycott against Germany, leading to tensions. The situation escalated, and Germany and the Jews ended up in a war to determine their survival. The Germans believed Europe had to be either Christian or communist.

During World War 1, the United States was supposedly forced into the war so that the Zionists could obtain Palestine. After the war, the Zionists asked Great Britain to fulfill their promise in a cryptic letter known as the Balfour Declaration. At the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, the Jews requested Palestine as their own territory. This made the Germans realize that they were defeated and suffered heavy reparations. The Jews had been prosperous in Germany before this, but the Germans felt betrayed. This betrayal is likened to the hypothetical scenario of the United States being at war with the Soviet Union and then being defeated because of the involvement of another country, like China. Germany was sold out for the sake of Jewish power.

When World War 1 began, President Wilson pledged neutrality, but the U Boat led America to join the war secretly promised by British Zionists in exchange for Palestine. Benjamin Friedman exposed this. Germany offered peace to Britain, but Zionists intervened, promising U.S. support for Palestine. The Balfour Declaration sealed this deal. The Rothschild family played a key role in this scheme. The war ended with Germany defeated, realizing the Zionists' true intentions. The Rothschilds' influence extended to the Knesset's design. The New World Order and Rothschilds' power are questioned, with calls for awakening and resistance.

During World War I, Germany had the upper hand and offered England a negotiated peace. However, the Zionists in Germany made a deal with the British war cabinet, promising to bring the United States into the war as an ally in exchange for Palestine. The United States, influenced by pro-German Jews, entered the war. After the war, the Balfour Declaration promised Palestine to the Zionists as a reward for their help. The Germans felt betrayed by the Jews, who they had treated well before. The Jews declared a boycott against Germany, leading to tensions. The speaker believes that the Jews were responsible for both World War I and II, and that Germany saw the war as a fight between Christianity and communism.

Rothschild began buying up land in Palestine in the late 1800s, funding infrastructure and funding schools. By 1917, the Rothschild banking cabal had strong influence over the British government and brokered a deal later known as the Balfour Declaration. Essentially, Rothschilds claimed the US would enter the war and aid the Allies, and in return, the British stated that a Jewish homeland would be established in Palestine. About thirty years later, the creation of the CIA emerged to control the region around Israel, followed by Israel becoming an official nation the next year, and in 1949 the Mossad was created to run the internal defense. Sir Ostralis funded it, the CIA protected global western interests, the Mossad protected national Zionist interests. This power triangle was strong. It propped up regimes, destroyed governments from within, and silenced anyone who questioned it, including presidents. John F. Kennedy was one of them. He tried to inspect Israel's nuclear site. He tried to shut down the CIA. And then a few months later, he was gone. So follow along before the same thing happens to me. And remember, it's not a conspiracy. It's a business model.

The transcript argues that Oxford University Press launched a deliberate attack on Christianity by publishing the Schofield Reference Bible in 1908, a Bible whose notes purportedly inject reinterpretations that connect the future state of Israel to access to God. It states the book’s importance led OUP to open its first American branch, publishing it and promoting it through key American seminaries and Bible schools, thereby shaping future pastors’ beliefs to align with a peacemaking tradition favorable to the state of Israel. The speakers claim many pastors were unaware of the danger at the time, and that the Schofield Bible would later be used by secular powers to steer Christians toward political and financial servitude to present-day Israel. They assert American Christianity became increasingly Zionized after 1948 with the appearance of the state of Israel, aided by Oxford University Press’s Zionist influence and its New York publishing branch, which published the Schofield Reference Bible as a foundational document for Christian Zionism and evangelicalism, contributing to its growth through deception. The narrative links the founders of world Zionism, especially Chaim Weizmann, to efforts to involve the United States in World War I and to gain land in Palestine, arguing that a small number of dominant American scientists influenced President Wilson to enter the war, resulting in substantial American casualties while enabling Zionist aims in Palestine after the Balfour Declaration. The Schofield Reference Bible is described as copyrighted in 1909, an old and new testament with many notes added originally in the Old Testament, with later additions in the New Testament and a radical 1967 revision. The cover features Cyrus I. Scofield and an editorial board including James M. Gray, president of Moody Bible Institute, and other seminary leaders. Distribution allegedly occurred through seminaries, influencing new pastors who returned to churches with the Schofield Bible in hand. A critical examination of a page from Genesis 12:3 is used to illustrate the alleged distortions: the verse, part of the Torah and quoted in the Koran, is presented as a basis for Christians and Zionists to claim that present-day Israel should own all land in the Middle East beginning with Palestine. The 1967 Scofield edition reportedly contains more footnotes than the 1909 version, with a footnote claiming an unconditional promise of land to Israel forever, which the speakers assert is not stated in the passage. They argue that the footnotes render Abraham’s promise as a perpetual land grant to Israel, and that the note uses the later term “Jew” unjustly to describe biblical figures from before the existence of Judah or the Jews. The transcript contends that Oxford’s notes imply blessings or curses based on support for Israel, and that a nation’s supposed sin for not aiding Israel would invite divine judgment, a claim the speakers label as a form of antisemitism manufactured by Christian Zionism. They argue that the concept of national sin is flawed, and that individuals alone sin, not nations. Historical figures like Philip Morrow and Doctor F. Furman Curley are cited as Orthodox Christian critics who warned against dispensationalism and Christian Zionism. Morrow warned in 1927 that Schofield Bible had usurped authority from Scripture, while Curley in 1983 linked premillennialist advocacy of Israel to wars in the Middle East and urged Christians to seek peace rather than war, criticizing figures like Hal Lindsey and Jerry Falwell. The final note emphasizes that Jesus’ simple New Testament teachings do not support Christians taking life abroad, urging a reconsideration of the doctrine behind Christian Zionism.

"I almost don't know these Jews." "Yeah. I saw what happened in Palestine." "In nineteen o five, the Jews went to Russia to try to kill the czar." "When the Russians found out what happened, they stopped them and put them out." "The Germans let them in in nineteen o five in mass numbers fleeing Russia." "They weren't fleeing persecution. They were fearing justice." "They tried to kill the czar." "The Germans let them get into banking." "Everything is made in Germany now." "The Jews took over." "Germans won World War one." "It's the Balfour Declaration." "America stepping into World War one made zero sense." "We want them at war with each other." "They told them, just give us Palestine as our homeland, and we get it." "Yeah. And it wasn't theirs to give."

All the world's problems can be traced back to the British Empire. The British created conflicts globally, including in Gaza, China, Pakistan, India, and throughout the Middle East, due to being the most powerful empire for 200 years. The current disaster in Palestine is one example. Between 1915 and 1917, the British promised the same territory to three different groups. First, they promised it to the Arabs in the McMahon communications in exchange for fighting against the Turks. Then, through the Sykes-Picot treaty, they promised it to the French. Finally, in the Balfour Declaration of 1917, they promised it as a Jewish homeland, despite the land not belonging to them.

In September 1941, Chaim Weitzman wrote to Winston Churchill stating that unless the Zionist movement's demands for a Jewish army in the Middle East with its own arsenal, weapons, uniform, and flag were met, they would not support Churchill. Weitzman claimed that the Zionist movement was the only powerful, unified bloc in the United States that solidly backed the British cause at that time. He reminded Churchill that they were the only group positioned to bring the United States into the war, asserting they had done it before and could do it again.

The conflict between Arabs and Jews in the Middle East has its roots in British double dealing during World War I. The British promised both the Arabs and the Jews conflicting things, leading to a legacy of bloodshed and suffering. The secret Sykes-Picot Agreement divided the region into French and British spheres of influence, disregarding the aspirations of the Arab people. The Balfour Declaration promised a Jewish homeland in Palestine, further fueling tensions. The British mandate in Palestine and restrictions on Jewish immigration led to violence and polarization. Ultimately, the state of Israel was established in 1948, leading to the displacement of thousands of Palestinian Arabs. The consequences of British policies during World War I continue to shape the Middle East today.

As a child in Hebrew school, I learned about the Holocaust and questioned why the Germans acted as they did. My father's explanation of anti-Semitism didn't resonate with me, as I believed there should be a motive for such actions. The truth is often obscured. Benjamin Friedman’s 1961 speech sheds light on this. During World War I, Zionist Jews convinced England not to surrender, promising support if they granted Palestine. This led to over 100,000 American casualties and Germany's defeat. The Treaty of Versailles crippled Germany, and when they discovered the Zionists' secret deal, they felt betrayed. Friedman compares this to a hypothetical situation where Americans would feel similarly if a group secretly aided an enemy during a war. This illustrates the resentment that grew in 1920s Germany, although it did not lead to immediate harm against Jews.