reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Joseph Sanson’s statement is based on the sworn statement of the late Professor Dr. Francis Boyle. Boyle is described as the greatest authority in bioweapons legislation, the author of the relevant field, and as having determined that the COVID-19 mRNA injection is a bioweapon. Sanson says Boyle passed away shortly after declaring himself willing to give testimony under oath in court. Sanson presents Boyle’s core argument: the COVID-19 mRNA injections contain derivatives of illegal military gene function research, and therefore qualify by definition as a military biological weapon system. Boyle’s argument is that a bioweapon consists of two integrated components: the pathogenic load and the delivery mechanism. Sanson states that the pathogenic load is the product of illegal gene or function research and refers to a Nature Medicine article linked in the plea note. Sanson says the article’s warning is that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus, and that the “new normal” is associated with “faith fanatics.” Sanson says the Nature Medicine article was published in 2015 and is titled “Translated, a cluster of circulating coronaviruses in bats similar to SARS shows potential for human infection.” Sanson summarizes the research included in the article as stating: “Based on these findings, we have synthetically created an infection.” Sanson then cites that a “Fully SHC zero fourteen recombinant virus” developed and demonstrated robust viral replication in vitro and in vivo, and adds that the researchers created a SARS-like coronavirus with a spike protein optimized for human infection. Sanson says the researchers affiliated with UNC Chapel Hill and the Wuhan Institute of Virology are among the authors, and connects this to the “official narrative” about people dropping dead on the street when COVID-19 broke out. Sanson asserts that the spike protein is the pathogenic payload of the bioweapon and is the result of illegally developed, synthetically made pathogen optimized for human infection. He states that the spike protein mRNA with instructions to human cells is one of the two crucial building blocks of the COVID-19 bioweapon. For the delivery mechanism, Sanson describes the nanolipid particles (NLPs) that encapsulate the mRNA payload and deliver it into the interior of cells, referring to them by the “propaganda term” “fat globules.” He states that Boyle declared the delivery platform is nanotechnology enhanced. Sanson says Boyle determined that this nanotechnology platform was developed, financed, and conceived by the Pentagon and DARPA, and that the virus was aerosolized and engineered with nanotechnology from the very beginning, indicating a long-term program aimed at applying advanced delivery systems. Sanson states that this technology has been used in the COVID-19 injections and is the result of a specific “teacher-sponsored” program for nanotechnological biological In the presentation, Sanson argues additional legal implications and states that Gates and Borla qualify as suspects of crimes against humanity under the Rome Statute concerning the International Criminal Court.

Speaker 0: It is based on the sworn statement of the late professor Doctor Francis Boyle, who has determined and concluded. Professor Boyle is the greatest authority in the field of bioweapons legislation. He is the author of it. So he knows what is legally meant by it. He knew. Like no other that the COVID-19 mRNA injection is a bioweapon. He has also made that loud and clear to the world known. After which despite being in good health, he passed away shortly after he had declared himself willing to give testimony under oath about this in court. The core of Professor Boyle's argument is that the COVID-19 mRNA injections contain derivatives of illegal military gene function research. As a result, the COVID-19 injections qualify by definition as a military biological weapon system, a bioweapon in other words. This bioweapon consists of two integrated components. The pathogenic load and the delivery mechanism. It is beyond doubt that the pathogenic load is the product of illegal gene or function research. Boyle refers to an article in the scientific journal Nature Medicine, of which I have included the link in this plea note. If you open that link, you will immediately read the warning that true scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus. You will also immediately know that what is called the new normal, true scientists, are not scientists but faith fanatics. These are the scientists behind whom the respondents hide. The article in Nature Medicine that Boyle reports on was published in 2015. And the title reads translated, a cluster of circulating coronaviruses in bats similar to SARS shows potential for human infection. I present to you. What the summary of this research included in the article reveals. It states based on these findings, we have synthetically created an infectious fully SHC zero fourteen recombinant virus developed and demonstrated robust viral replication. Both in vitro and in vivo. So it states, we researchers have created a SARS like coronavirus with a spike protein optimized for human infection. I cannot provide a better example of illegal gain of function research. And who wrote that article from 2015? Among others, researchers affiliated with UNC Chapel Hill and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Wuhan. Yes, Wuhan. You know, where according to the official narrative, people suddenly dropped dead on the street when COVID-19 broke out because there was a bat mutated. The spike protein, the pathogenic payload of the bioweapon is the result of this research. So it's not about a natural spike protein, but an illegally developed synthetically made pathogen that has been optimized for human infection. The spike protein mRNA with the instructions to human cells to produce this very pathogenic spike protein is one of the two crucial building blocks of the COVID-19 bioweapon. Now the delivery system, the NLPs, you know, the nanolipid particles that encapsulate the mRNA payload and deliver it into the interior of the cells. The propaganda term for this is fat globules. What did Boyle declare about it? Boyle declared that it is actually about a nanotechnology enhanced delivery platform. This technology is, as Boyle declared, paid for, developed, financed and conceived by the Pentagon and its research institute DARPA. This technology platform nanotechnology platform was not an afterthought. Doctor Boyle points out that the virus itself was aerosolized and engineered with nanotechnology from the very beginning. This indicates a long term program aimed at the application of advanced delivery systems. And this technology has been used in the COVID-19 injections. Boyle determined that the NLP delivery system in the injections is the result of a specific teacher sponsored program for nanotechnological biological weapons. In the presentation by Samsung you can read further about the legal implications of this. It is also argued that Gates and Borla qualify as suspects of crimes against humanity as defined in the Rome statute concerning the international criminal court.

I have an internal Pfizer document from a source who reverse-engineered the BioNTech Pfizer SARS COVID-2 vaccine. This document reveals the precise chemical and biological processes used to create an mRNA that contains graphene oxide, a dangerous toxin. Each vaccine contains 15 billion nanoparticles or lipid carrier particles within the mRNA sequence. Once injected, the spike protein binds to blood cells, and graphene oxide begins building a structure, leading to blood clots and heart failure. Patent databases and recovered, deleted Wuhan databases prove that COVID-19 and its vaccines are bioweapons.

The speaker says their role is to present context that, in their view, the past four years involved “orchestration to assault the liberties of people” by “pretending” the situation was a public health emergency while enabling “inconceivable threat to liberties” and “violation of human rights.” They frame this as “lip service to tyrants” and as “domestic and international terrorism.” They argue that evidence begins in the UK in 1966, saying the UK’s wealth and trust decided to fund “the coronavirus as the preferred form of human manipulation” in 1966. They then claim that one year later, the United States and the UK agreed to “modify and manipulate coronavirus” to see what could be done to infect a healthy population (described as 1967). They characterize “Operation Warp Speed” as arriving after 56 years. They cite an imaged 2011 document, described as stating “antitrust collusion” involving the Wellcome Trust, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates Foundation, NIAID, and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The speaker claims this group established a mandate that “by 2020, the world would accept… a universal vaccine” by the end of 2020, and they say the group identified coronavirus as the thing nature would need for the plan to happen. The speaker then quotes a 2015 public statement: “To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we needed to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine.” They say that at the time, the World Health Organization had officially declared coronavirus an eradicated disease, and they ask what world would need a vaccine for an eradicated disease. They argue that media hype drives economics: “A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype,” and that “We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues.” They add that investors respond if they see profit, and characterize this as treason or terrorism. They say that Peter Daszak will testify in Congress in “a few short days” that the emergence likely came from a random event in Wuhan, China, where a bat and pangolin “got together and voila” by December, calling it “conspiracy level language.” The speaker asserts this is an admission of conspiracy “to commit acts of terror.” They also cite 2016 language, claiming an announcement that the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 was “poised for human emergence,” and treat this as part of the same “conspiracy.” Next, the speaker claims evidence includes a 2002 patent filed on “synthetic primary coronavirus,” which they say was “patented to be infectious and replication protective,” calling it “weaponized.” They further claim that in 2005, a curriculum vitae indicates “synthetic coronaviruses, biohacking, biological warfare enabling technologies,” and they question the meaning of that phrase, linking it to biological weapons. They state they have U.S. credentials since 2002 as a “biological weapons inspector” and say they briefed the matter since then. Finally, they cite a WHO Global Preparedness Monitoring Board announcement in September 2019, saying that between 09/19/2019 and September 2020 there would be “our greatest… accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen,” emphasizing the word “release” as “not a leak” and suggesting no mention of accident likelihood.

The article “COVID World 10/09/2022” presents estimates of the global impact of SARS-CoV-2 and its vaccines over three years, claiming 31 million extra deaths and 1.9 billion serious adverse effects (SAEs), under the premise of three years of deployed virus and vaccine “bioweapons.” The main differences from the previous 10/01/2022 estimates are: (1) 11 additional countries (about 600,000,000 people) were added to the estimate base, yielding a current base of 47 countries for about 2.3 billion people, making the estimates more representative globally; (2) for estimating SAEs, the full extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are now used as input rather than half. Extra deaths (ED) for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are described as the difference between the factual total deaths and expected deaths, using official death data from countries listed in a table. Missing months in 2022 are extrapolated from the monthly average of known months since January 2021. A yearly correction factor of 0.75% is applied, derived from the evolution of total deaths from 2015–2019. For 2020 ED, this factor is applied three times to the five-year average; for 2021 ED, four times; for 2022 ED, five times. The resulting ED estimates are excess deaths after adjusting for expected yearly changes and the mass vaccination and bioweapons deployment. World ED figures: for 2020, after aggregating the per-country ED per 100k (ED100 ks) values, the world total is 112 extra deaths per 100k people, equating to nine million extra deaths in 2020. For 2021, the per-million-dose ED21M is 961 extra deaths per million doses; applying this to worldwide vaccine doses yields 12.1 million extra deaths in 2021. For 2022, the per-million-dose ED22M is 763 extra deaths per million doses; applying to global doses yields 9.6 million extra deaths in 2022. SAEs are estimated by multiplying the combined 2021 and 2022 extra deaths by a ratio of reported adverse effects to reported deaths after COVID vaccination, set at 87.6. This produces an estimated 1.1 billion SAEs for 2021 and 0.8 billion SAEs for 2022. The article states “the words bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo,” given the 31 million extra deaths and 1.9 billion SAEs over three years of deployed SARS-CoV-2 virus and vaccine bioweapons. It projects about ten million extra deaths yearly since 2020, implying 110 million extra deaths by the end of 2030 if trends continue. It notes that if data or assumptions change, estimates could be seriously unvalidated. The text asserts that SARS-CoV-2 is designed and made by humans in a biolab, claiming the genetic code contains lab-made inserts (PRRA, HIVGP120) that are not natural mutations. It cites a “substantial trail of documents and testimonies,” including Doctor Richard Fleming, alleging the virus comes from a lab and is a lab construct, and argues that Genentech vaccines cause human cells to produce large amounts of toxic spike protein, implying vaccines are bioweapons and more damaging than the virus itself, with additional concerns about vaccine components and contaminations. Author and sources: the article is credited to Pak Osmol (dated 10/09/2022). Appendix references include Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count, with data downloaded September 2022.

Pursuant to 28 USC seventeen forty six, I, Joseph Sanson, declare under penalty of perjury that the following statement is true to the best of my knowledge. I'm a psychotherapist with a bachelor's degree in psychology, a master's degree in clinical mental health counseling, and a PhD in psychology. I've been litigating here in Florida for over a year and a half to get the mRNA nanoparticle injections off the market because they're biological and technological weapons of mass destruction. In violation of Florida Statute 790.166, 18 USC 175 Chapter 10 Biological Weapons, as well as the Biological Weapons Convention, of course. I filed an affidavit in my case from Doctor. Francis Boyle, the law professor that wrote the Biological Weapons and Anti Terrorism Act of 1989. Doctor. Francis Boyle was arguably the world's leading legal authority on biological weapons. Doctor. Boyle clearly states in his affidavit that COVID injections and MRI nanoparticle injections are in violation of Florida Statute 790.166, Weapons of Mass Destruction, as well as 18 USC 175, Chapter 10, biological weapons. Keep in mind that the Biological Weapons and Anti Terrorism Act of 1989 was The US domestic implementation of the Biological Weapons Convention. I certify the authenticity of doctor Francis Boyle's affidavit as well as his intention to testify in this case that the COVID injections and and mRNA injections are biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction.

The speaker discusses the ideology of scientists who have questioned the origins of viruses like AIDS, hepatitis, and Ebola. They mention Dr. Duisburg from the University of California at Berkeley as one of these scientists. The speaker also mentions that the COVID vaccines contained varying percentages of bioweapon material, with the booster having the highest concentration. They note that over 13 billion COVID vaccines were administered to around 5 billion people, but not all individuals received the vaccines. The speaker suggests that the PCR swab was another method of inoculating people with nanotechnology, specifically Graphene Ferric Oxide. They mention facing pushback when trying to publish their research on this topic, but eventually succeeded. However, they were subsequently attacked.

The transcript argues that deflating a “parasitic system” is necessary because oversized states and corporations cause decay, corruption, and injustice to the people, including workers, creatives, and the maimed and dying under elite rule. It cites examples such as Tanks for Kidneys RT Documentary, Organ Harvesting, Black Market Transplants, and Crimes Against Humanity to illustrate this destruction. On the mortality and harm claims related to Covid-19, the speaker estimates thirty-six million excess deaths from 2022 to 2023 plus half of 2024, totaling forty-five million excess deaths for four point five years of Covid killing protocols. They add nine million deaths from Covid killing protocols in 2020, arguing these figures reflect the impact of what they term “SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bio weapons.” The speaker contends that terms like bio weaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced, and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo because of mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science, and censorship in mainstream media and on tech platforms. They claim that elites and many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus, while “Truthful science” supposedly proves beyond any doubt that SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a bio lab, pointing to the genetic code of SARS CoV-two as containing several lab-made inserts (PRRA, HIVGP120) that are described as too large and numerous and only appearing in other natural viruses that are genetically very different, making natural mutation or recombination “quasi zero.” They assert a substantial trail of documents and testimonies before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes, the existing biochemical technology to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, and patents. The speaker claims that GenTech Covid vaccines cause human cells to produce during months up to years huge amounts of the toxic spike protein of SARS CoV-two in all organs and tissues, implying greater production than typical mucosal infection in unvaccinated people, which they say would cause only cold-like illness. They describe these vaccines as “GenTech covid vaccines” and label them as bio weapons, allegedly worse than the virus itself. Finally, they claim that not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines cause serious health damage. The source is cited as Source2mia.org, with a request to like and follow.

The transcript argues that deflating the parasitic system is necessary because oversized states and corporations cause decay, corruption, and injustice, harming the people, workers, creators, and those harmed by elite interests. It cites examples such as Tanks for Kidney’s RT Documentary, Organ Harvesting, Black Market Transplants, and Crimes Against Humanity. It presents a quantified claim: extrapolating estimates for 2022 to 2023 plus half of 2024 yields total excess deaths of thirty-six million since the Covid Vax rollout, and adding nine million from Covid “killing protocols” in 2020 brings the total to forty-five million for four and a half years of Covid killing protocols. It describes SARS-CoV-2, the virus and vaccine bioweapons, as part of a narrative that depopulation and genocide are not taboo due to mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science, and censorship in mainstream media and on tech platforms. It asserts that elites and many people still think SARS-CoV-2 is naturally evolved, but truthful science allegedly proves beyond doubt that SARS-CoV-2 was designed and made by humans in a bio lab. The transcript claims the genetic code of SARS-CoV-2 contains several lab-made inserts, such as PRRA and HIVGP120, which are described as too large and too numerous and only appearing in other natural viruses that are genetically very different from SARS-CoV-2, making natural mutation or recombination quasi zero. It also references a substantial trail of documents and testimonies years before and after the release of SARS-CoV-2 about these genetic codes, the existing biochemical technology to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, and patents. It then asserts that GenTech Covid vaccines cause human cells to produce, for months up to years, huge amounts of the toxic spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 in all organs and tissues, much greater than the mucosal infection from the virus itself in healthy unvaccinated people, which supposedly causes mild illness. The claim continues that these GenTech Covid vaccines are, in fact, bioweapons and much worse than the virus itself. It adds that not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines cause serious health damage. The source cited for these claims is Source2mia.org, with a request to like and follow.

The speaker claims the DOD distributed COVID-19 vaccines and required absolute immunity, making it difficult to sue for damages without proving intentionality. They have a potential RICO claim, but litigation costs are prohibitive. They question why liability shields are needed if the vaccines are safe and effective. The speaker alleges EcoHealth Alliance and the CCP created SARS-CoV-2 in a Wuhan lab with the DOD or CIA's knowledge. They cite a study showing a 12 nucleotide sequence in a Moderna patent matching SARS-CoV-2, suggesting the disease was developed in the mid-2010s. The speaker presents military medical records showing a soldier receiving COVID-19 immunizations by Moderna in 2014, raising questions about the true history of COVID-19 and Operation Warp Speed. They claim the DOD and CIA were involved and asks to what extent and for how long. They also state they can show Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a study protocol based on oncolytic gene products for gene therapy shedding.

Speaker: Humanity was hit with dual biological weapons. When I say dual, I mean by the manufactured SARS CoV two virus that was manufactured in collaboration with UNC Chapel Hill and Wuhan. So we have that that has exposed basically the entire population to the spike protein. But then we also had the second biological weapon, was the mRNA injections, which installed about 7x more spike into people and those who received it per injection. And now we do understand that this can indeed shed onto others, particularly when you're freshly vaccinated and you're producing high levels of spike protein. We do believe this can shed via what's called exosomes, either through your breath or through your bodily fluids. So, yes, humanity has been hit by these weapons.

The speaker claims the DOD distributed COVID-19 vaccines and required absolute immunity, making the DOD the target for lawsuits, which would be difficult to win without the data they are hiding. They believe EcoHealth Alliance created SARS CoV-2 in the Wuhan lab with the DOD or CIA's approval, transferring the necessary technology to the CCP. A study showed a 12 nucleotide sequence in a Moderna patent from 2016 perfectly matched SARS CoV-2, suggesting the disease was developed in the mid-2010s. The speaker presents military medical records showing a soldier receiving COVID-19 immunizations by Moderna in 2014, suggesting the need to investigate the real history of COVID. They also claim to have Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a Komunardi approval agreeing to a study based on oncolytic gene products for gene therapy shedding.

I have an internal document from Pfizer Laboratories that reveals the manipulation of chemical and biological processes in the BioNTech Pfizer SARS CoV-2 vaccine. It contains Graphene Oxide, a dangerous toxin, with 15 billion nanoparticles in each 30mg shot. Graphene Oxide causes the spike protein to bind to blood cells, leading to blood clots and heart failure. The patent databases and a copy of the deleted Wuhan databases support the claim that COVID-19 and its vaccines are bioweapons.

I have an internal document from Pfizer Laboratories that reveals the manipulation of chemical and biological processes in the development of the Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The document states that the vaccine contains Graphene Oxide, a dangerous toxin, with 15 billion nanoparticles in a 30 milligram shot. When Graphene Oxide enters the body, it forms structures that lead to blood clots and heart failure. Additionally, we have accessed patent databases and a copy of the deleted Wuhan databases, which support the claim that COVID-19 and its vaccines are bioweapons.

COVID world 10/09/2022 reports estimated extra deaths of 31 million and estimated serious adverse effects of 1.9 billion for three years of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons. The two main differences with the previous estimates on 10/01/2022 are: First, 11 countries, for about 600,000,000 people, were added to the estimate base data. As such, the current estimate base data consists of 47 countries for about 2,300,000,000 people, making the current estimates more representative for the whole world. Second, for estimating the serious adverse effects the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are taken fully into account as input instead of half in the previous estimates. The extra deaths estimates for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported and factual deaths in the countries mentioned in the table below. For the source of all the used data see the Our World and Data links in the appendix. Extra deaths (see columns twenty twenty ED, twenty twenty one ED, and twenty twenty two ED in the table below) are calculated as the difference of the factual number of total deaths in the concerned year. The missing months of the incomplete 2022 year are estimated by extrapolation of the monthly average of all known months from January 2021 on. The for yearly evolution corrected average of the five preceding years 2015 to 2019. The yearly correction factor used is 0.75% and was calculated based on the evolution of the sum of deaths of all countries below in 2015 to 2019. For the 2020 ED estimate the correction factor 0.75 was three times (reference year twenty seventeen) applied on the five year average, for 2021 ED four times and for 2022 ED five times. In other words, the extra deaths estimates are in fact the excess deaths after correction for an expected yearly evolution and expected yearly without the mass vaccination and COVID bioweapons. Then to calculate the 2020 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED100 ks extra deaths per 100 ks people of the country is calculated. Then this column is aggregated which results in 112 extra deaths per 100 ks people. The latter value is applied on the world population which results into nine million extra deaths in 2020, the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. To calculate the 2021 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED21M doses, extra deaths per million doses given in the country, is calculated. This column is aggregated which results in nine sixty one extra deaths per million doses. The latter value is applied on the world doses which results into twelve point one million extra deaths in 2021, the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. To calculate the 2022 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED22M doses, extra deaths per million doses given in the country, is calculated. This column is aggregated which results in seven sixty three extra deaths per million doses. The latter value is applied on the world doses which results into nine point six million extra deaths in 2022, the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. Press CTRL plus four more image detail below. The estimate for people with serious adverse effects is calculated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by an estimated ratio reported adverse effects/reported deaths after COVID vaccination. The ratio used is 87.6 and was calculated from the table Estimated probabilities after COVID vaccination for all ages in the article below. This results in an estimated one point one billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and zero point eight billion for 2022. Considering the estimated thirty one million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for three years of deployed SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons the words bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo. Furthermore, there are about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020. If these extra deaths are continued this will result in one hundred and ten million extra deaths by the end of 2030 from these bioweapons since 2020. For the sake of estimating, certain assumptions about the domain were introduced. If one or some of those assumptions would be far off target, for example as more data becomes available and is integrated in the estimation or some data appears faulty, the current estimates and trends could be seriously unvalidated. Because of the mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science and censorship in the mainstream media and on tech platforms, thus the elites, many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus. Truthful science though proves beyond any doubt SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a biolab. After all and first of all, science shows the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains several lab made inserts, not natural mutations or recombinations of natural viruses. Because these inserted codes PRRA (HIVGP120) are much too large and too many, and because these genetic codes only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically much too different from SARS CoV-two, the probability that SARS CoV-two has naturally mutated or recombined from other natural viruses is quasi zero. Furthermore, there exists a substantial trail of documents and testimonies, years before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the existing biochemical technology needed to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, patents. See the links below for sources and science. Doctor. Richard M. Fleming, MD, sworn testimony that COVID-nineteen is a bioweapon. Doctor. Richard Fleming on Montanier's discovery of HIV and spiked protein. The virus comes from a lab, appears from the Veritas Revelation Project. Are our scientists lying to us? SARS CoV-two is likely a lab construct. The origin of SARS CoV-two. Since the Genentech COVID vaccines make the human body cells produced during months up to years huge amounts than the average, dominantly only mucosal, infection with SARS CoV-two itself which for the majority of healthy unvaccinated people causes hardly any illness, just cold like symptoms, these Genentech COVID vaccines are of course themselves bioweapons and much worse than the virus itself. Furthermore, not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines are cause of serious health damage. See the links below for information about the devastating effects of the COVID vaccine bioweapons. Images, press CTRL plus for more image detail. The article COVID World 10/09/2022, estimated extra deaths thirty one million and estimated serious adverse effects 1,900,000,000 for three years of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons was written by Pak Osmol, 10/09/2022. Appendix A Data Source. Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count. Click the Download tab below the graph on the displayed page. Downloaded CSV September 2022 from Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count. Right click the link and then Save Link As.

Speaker 0 argues that the world has been lied to for 110 years by a small group of criminal industrial conspirators who aim to subjugate humanity to enrich themselves, impoverish and kill others, and that the words “acceptable death rate” have become an industrial norm. They claim this is not just a political disagreement but a crime, asserting that the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies authorized to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. The speaker declares this is a criminal cartel and states they will show documents proving it, insisting this is not an allegation but something that is provable by their own words. The four-step process alleged for executing nefarious plans is: 1) they begin by planning an exercise, 2) they fund that exercise, 3) they create the rationale for what they will do, and 4) they deploy and profit from it. They claim this violates 15 U.S. code section 19 (and connect it to the Clayton Act and the early formation of WHO in 1947), and they claim violation of the TFEU (the treaty for the functioning of the European Union), asserting Article 101 sets out that this was never public health but racketeering to instill terror to adapt population behavior. Data from Zurich is used to argue there was no pandemic: the speaker notes that during the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance claims fell by $30,000,000,000, stating that the data is unambiguous and that there was genocide rather than a pandemic. They pivot to the 2011 WHO, Welcome Trust, PATH, and Gates Foundation malaria vaccine program for children under six months, highlighting that 66 children in the vaccine group were murdered and 28 in the control group were murdered, with the control described as a cocktail of pathogenic injections rather than saline. The speaker references Article five, section 13, claiming immunity from arrest or legal process was designed as permanent immunity for a criminal organization formed in 1947; they connect the first WHO director general, Renee Sand (sic) from the Dachau-era milieu, to Brock Chisholm, who allegedly advocated population control as a primary objective. The claim extends to funding and influence: Gates Foundation allegedly provides 88% of WHO’s foundation donations, which the speaker says constitutes a tax and competition law violation in Europe and the United States. The four-step process is illustrated again with sourcing: to sustain funding beyond the crisis, to increase public understanding for medical countermeasures like pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccines, and to use media hype to attract investors who see profit at the end of the process, as documented by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board and Peter Daszak’s partnerships. The 2014 Rand Paul–Anthony Fauci correspondence is cited, showing a letter from NIAID to UNC Chapel Hill stating that gain-of-function research would continue during a moratorium with a budget funded by DARPA and NIH. The speaker quotes that the Wuhan virus was anticipated, citing a 2016 publication stating SARS-like Wuhan Institute of Virology virus one is poised for human emergence, implying foreknowledge and manipulation of the virus in Wuhan and UNC Chapel Hill. The talk shifts to the characterization of the work as biological warfare enabling technologies, referencing Ralph Baric’s 2005 DARPA/MITRE presentation and subsequent NIAID and DARPA funding, concluding that the project was to produce biological warfare enabling technologies rather than public health measures. They highlight substantial profits for Pfizer and Moderna from public funds and accuse the WHO of laundering money via a budget expansion request of 11%. In closing, the speaker maintains this is not a public health crime or constitutional crime, but a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers. They call for ending the criminal organization itself and urge everyone to destroy the WHO.

There is no such thing as COVID-19 virus. COVID-19 is a list of symptoms similar to the flu and pneumonia. The spike protein in the virus makes people sick. The vaccine, or shot, contains this spike protein, which triggers the symptoms of COVID-19. It is important to understand this because there has been misinformation to confuse us and even doctors. The SARS-CoV-2 virus was created through gain of function research at the University of North Carolina in 2002. In 2005, Coronavirus was identified as a bioweapon. The goal was to create mass demand for vaccines. Anthony Fauci's NIAID funded this research, and the checks were cashed by Dr. Ralph Baric. Blaming China for the virus is dangerous, as it was a collaboration with China and traders within the US.

The speakers discuss a broad denial about vaccine injuries and the idea that, despite evidence, the medical establishment and political figures push the narrative that vaccines are safe and effective. They claim that many people who are vaccinated want to move on and avoid acknowledging serious side effects, including turbo cancers, undetected myocarditis, and neurological issues, and that autoimmune disease is being attributed to other causes. They argue that the medical establishment, federal health agencies, and some members of Congress who produce supportive content, such as segments like Steve Colbert’s, advocate for taking the shot. They question how many people were killed or died from the shot, asserting that Bayer’s data shows “close[ly]” to thirty-nine thousand worldwide, and that if only ten percent are reported, the true number would be in the hundreds of thousands. They claim there are millions of adverse events, but that this is denied and covered up. The speakers contend that the shot was not a real vaccine. They describe it as gene therapy rather than a traditional vaccine. They explain a sequence in which a vaccine is typically an attenuated or killed virus that requires adjuvants like aluminum or mercury to stimulate the immune system, because the attenuated or killed virus may not work well on its own. In contrast, they say this shot is mRNA, which is modified so it does not degrade. They describe how it is put into a lipid nanoparticle designed to permeate barriers like the blood-brain barrier, and they assert it would never stay in the arm, distributing all over the body. They claim the lipid nanoparticle allows the mRNA to enter cells, hijack cellular structures, and cause the cells to express spike protein, which the body then attacks as foreign. When asked who is responsible, they reference a “doctor Frankenstein” figure and name Francis Collins, head of the NIH, and Anthony Fauci as possible figures in question. The response indicates that while they consider all of them criminally liable, they would say it is primarily Fauci, with acknowledgment that people like Collins are implicated as well.

The document titled COVID world 10/09/2022 presents estimates alleging that over a three-year period the SARS-CoV-2 virus and vaccine bioweapons caused 31 million extra deaths and 1.9 billion serious adverse effects. Two main changes from the prior 10/01/2022 estimates are highlighted: (1) 11 additional countries (about 600,000,000 people) were added to the estimate base, bringing the total to 47 countries for roughly 2,300,000,000 people, making the estimates more representative globally; (2) for serious adverse effects, the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are fully included as input rather than half as in the previous estimates. Extra deaths for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are described as based on officially reported and factual deaths in the listed countries. Data sources are referenced to Our World in Data. Extra deaths (ED) for each year are calculated as the difference between the factual number of total deaths and the expected deaths. Missing months in 2022 are estimated by extrapolating the monthly average from January 2021 onward. The yearly evolution uses a corrected five-year average (2015–2019). A yearly correction factor of 0.75% is applied, with 2020 ED having the factor applied three times, 2021 ED four times, and 2022 ED five times, effectively representing excess deaths after adjusting for expected yearly evolution and for a year without mass vaccination or bioweapons. To compute the 2020 world ED, the ED per 100,000 people by country (ED100 ks) is calculated and aggregated to 112 extra deaths per 100,000 people, yielding nine million extra deaths worldwide in 2020—the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2021, the metric ED21M (extra deaths per million doses) is calculated and aggregated to 961 extra deaths per million doses, resulting in twelve point one million extra deaths globally in 2021—the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and the second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2022, ED22M yields 763 extra deaths per million doses, leading to nine point six million extra deaths worldwide in 2022—the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. The serious adverse effects are estimated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by a reported adverse effects-to-deaths ratio of 87.6, derived from an article on estimated probabilities after COVID vaccination. This results in an estimated 1.1 billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and 0.8 billion for 2022. The document asserts, in strong terms, that there are about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020, which would total about 110 million extra deaths by the end of 2030 if continued. It also claims that the mass propaganda, corrupted science, censorship, and elites lead many to think SARS-CoV-2 is a naturally evolved virus, while the document asserts truthful science shows the virus is designed and made by humans in a biolab, citing genetic insertions such as PRRA (HIVGP120) and arguing these inserts are not natural mutations. It references documents, testimonies, patents, and scientists (e.g., Doctor Richard M. Fleming, and Montanier) to support the claim that the virus and vaccines are lab-made bioweapons and contain harmful components, including the spike protein, with assertions about the vaccines’ toxicity and contamination. Sources and data are attributed to Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count, with a note to download the CSV from Our World in Data. The piece includes several prompts to view additional images and cites the article COVID World 10/09/2022 by Pak Osmol (10/09/2022) and Appendix A Data Source.

- Speaker 0 describes a doctrine where an agent or pathogen works best as a binary weapon if followed by mass exposure with vaccines, noting the insistence on gene transfection technologies to create a peptide with a prion-catalyzing epitope and pointing out that lipid nanoparticles are highly labile and inflammatory, constituting a combination of chemical and biological warfare. - Speaker 0 adds that if this was a weapon release, it may be done and now data will reveal its effects, and expresses doubt about how much trust can be placed in normal scientific methods and institutions to relay data to the public, inviting Speaker 1’s thoughts. - Speaker 1 (Stephanie) says the discussion has been an incredible and difficult ride since things began unfolding, with questions about natural versus lab-based origins, vaccine development versus biowarfare, and concerns about funding by China for bioweapons, acknowledging the impossibility of definitively answering many questions. - Speaker 0 agrees that ambiguity is the point and calls it the strength of the weapon. - Speaker 1 asks why someone would inject something to inflict a bioweapon on the entire population, suggesting population control as a possible motivation. - Speaker 0 notes the need to consider literature from top transnational power structures and corporations, asserting that it is not hidden. - Speaker 1 recalls prior concerns about population-control vaccines, referencing reports about vaccines used in Argentina and Africa that allegedly caused infertility, describing an example where a vaccine given to teenage girls could lead to antibody development to a fetus, making infertility less detectable over time. She mentions a memory of a “benign disease” vaccination program in Argentina that led people to suspect infertility, and notes that it could be a stealth method. - Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the idea that vaccines may have had effects on fertility and reference terms like human chorionic something, with Speaker 1 acknowledging possible occurrences in India as well as Africa and Argentina. - Speaker 0 refers to bioaccumulation seen in reproductive organs and cites pharmacokinetic studies beginning in Japan, noting the vaccine’s presence in the placenta and testes and recalling reports of harmful effects on male reproductive organs. - Speaker 0 mentions Anna Burkhart’s data as dark regarding spike protein expression in reproductive organs found in autopsies, while acknowledging uncertainty about how much weight to attribute to that data, but maintaining that biowarfare cannot be dismissed. - The discussion returns to the mechanism of biowarfare being distinct from a pathogen, describing a scenario where exposure leads to effects years later due to the disease mechanism being induced, rather than immediate pathogen-driven illness.

Joseph Sanson presents the statement based on the sworn statement of the late Professor Doctor Francis Boyle, who he says is the greatest authority in bioweapons legislation and the author of it. Sanson claims Boyle knew that the covert nineteen mRNA injection is a bio weapon and that Boyle declared this to the world before his death, which Sanson says occurred despite Boyle being in good health and willing to testify under oath in court. The core of Boyle’s argument, as Sanson relays, is that the COVID-19 mRNA injections contain derivatives of illegal military gene function research, and as a result, the injections qualify by definition as a military biological weapon system, a bioweapon. This bioweapon is said to have two integrated components: the pathogenic load and the delivery mechanism. Sanson asserts it is beyond doubt that the pathogenic load is the product of illegal gene or function research. He references an article in Nature Medicine cited by Boyle, noting that the article’s warning indicates true scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus, and that what is called the “new normal” are not scientists but faith fanatics behind whom the respondents hide. The Nature Medicine article, published in 2015, is described as stating that a cluster of circulating coronaviruses in bats similar to SARS shows potential for human infection, and that the researchers synthetic created an infectious fully SHC zero fourteen recombinant virus with robust viral replication in vitro and in vivo, with a SARS-like coronavirus having a spike protein optimized for human infection. Sanson names researchers affiliated with UNC Chapel Hill and the Wuhan Institute of Virology as authors of that article. According to Boyle, the spike protein mRNA, with instructions to human cells to produce the pathogenic spike protein, is one of the two crucial building blocks of the COVID-19 bioweapon. The other building block is the delivery system, the nanolipid particles (NLPs) that encapsulate the mRNA payload and deliver it into cells, referred to in propaganda as fat globules. Boyle is said to have declared that this delivery system is a nanotechnology enhanced platform paid for, developed, financed, and conceived by the Pentagon and its research institute DARPA. The technology platform is described as not an afterthought, with Boyle stating that the virus itself was aerosolized and engineered with nanotechnology from the beginning, indicating a long-term program applying advanced delivery systems, and that this technology has been used in the COVID-19 injections. Boyle’s presentation is also presented as arguing that Gates and Borla qualify as suspects of crimes against humanity as defined in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

Just 2 weeks ago, Professor Francis Boyle issued an affidavit stating that mRNA COVID vaccines are bioweapons. He claims Croatians have unknowingly delivered weapons of mass destruction to their people. Boyle, a respected lawyer who drafted bioweapons laws in 1989, urges action to investigate. Failure to do so is the people's own fault.

COVID-19 did happen, but it was caused by lipid nanoparticle technology, not a virus. These nanoparticles hijack the human immune and neurological systems, leading to mild to severe disease. The so-called spike proteins are actually lipid nanoparticles, not a virus. When a magnetic hydrogel infects a biological cell, it becomes covered in spikes, which are the spike proteins. This technology reprograms the cell to release synthetic toxins in the body, causing COVID-19. James Giordano, who advised the US military and intelligence community in 2008, discussed the use of lipid nanoparticle technology as neuro weapons.

Dr. Joseph Sanson, a Florida psychotherapist and licensed mental health counselor who litigates pro se, contends that the COVID-19 mRNA injections are biological and technological weapons of mass destruction and argues Florida should stop facilitating these injections and related products. He frames his effort as part of a broader effort to stop what he calls a bioweapon program tied to the pandemic. Background and filings - Sanson began in May 2021, working about 18 months to pass a band of jab resolution at the county level declaring mRNA COVID injections to be biological and technological weapons of mass destruction and urging action by the governor and attorney general. He claims that he got these resolutions passed in about 10 Florida counties, in Idaho, and in Arizona, and that they influenced the Florida Surgeon General to call for a halt to injections in early 2024. - He notes that the Florida Department of Health has said these mRNA injections are unsafe for humans and a potential threat to the human genome. - On 04/01/2023, while advancing these resolutions, Sanson says he suffered congestive heart failure and later underwent a triple bypass on 04/10/2023. He says he tried to rely on unvaccinated blood for surgery and consulted Dr. Francis Boyle, who helped endorse his band-and-jab resolution. Boyle is described as the author of the U.S. domestic implementation legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention; Boyle died about two months after Sanson filed his December 2024 case, which Sanson says prejudiced his case. - Sanson’s first mandamus filing claimed the governor and attorney general were violating Florida statute 797.166 (as he asserts). The court found the writ of mandamus improper (ministerial duty limit) and he lost the appeal. Second case and remedies sought - On 12/01/2024 Sanson filed a second case seeking an injunction and declaratory relief, arguing that his April 2023 medical events and exposures were the result of involuntary environmental exposure through shedding of the technology in the injections. - He characterizes his hospital stay, the decision to obtain unvaccinated blood, and Boyle’s involvement as part of this exposure theory. He says the case includes an 80-page complaint with 50–64 pages of affidavits, including nine affidavits up front and two more recently. - One key affidavit is from Francis Boyle, whose affidavit is described as not only expert legal opinion but legislative intent, given Boyle’s role in crafting the U.S. domestic implementation legislation for the biological weapons conventions. - The World Council for Health in Florida endorsed Sanson’s bill, and a 2025 paper titled COVID-19 Harms and Damages (COVID-19 harms and damages, non-exhaustive conclusion) is cited as stating that both the virus and the vaccine violated the Biological Weapons Convention; the paper has 11 coauthors, including doctors Villa, Zivjic, McCullough, and Maverkakis. Evidence and theory of harm - Sanson cites studies and affidavits suggesting shedding of the mRNA technology, transmission to unvaccinated individuals (including women), and possible environmental exposure from intimate contact or proximity. He references an Israeli study showing transmission of mRNA components to unvaccinated women and notes reports of menstrual-cycle interference and other immune effects. - He argues that involuntary environmental exposure through shedding constitutes a dangerous threat warranting injunctive relief under Florida Health Freedom Act and Civil Rights Act, as well as constitutional protections. He contends the Florida Surgeon General’s statements and the 2025 paper support these positions. - He also argues that the vaccines are illegal gain-of-function products, with derivatives of the spike protein present in injections, demonstrating specific intent; he cites Boyle’s arguments on gain-of-function, dual-use technology, and knowingness. He invokes malice of forethought (reckless disregard for human life) and informed consent issues, arguing there was zero informed consent for a bioweapon. Legal strategy and procedural posture - Sanson says his strongest immediate legal avenue is the Health Freedom Act, along with Civil Rights Act and constitutional provisions, rather than relying on the Weapons of Mass Destruction statute alone, which he dropped in an amended complaint. He argues the illness and exposure could violate civil and constitutional rights and that discovery is needed to develop evidence. - He claims the defense has not adequately addressed the merits, focusing on procedural arguments. He asserts there are procedural errors and seeks a new judge and evidentiary development, including testimony from multiple experts (Villa, Zeviets, Mihalchia) and the Surgeon General Ladapo under oath. - He has sought to reassign the case to a different judge due to perceived bias and past rulings; he notes the prior judge’s decision in a related whistleblower case against the Surgeon General. The Netherlands case and cross-border dimension - Sanson is involved as a witness in the Netherlands case against Bill Gates and Albert Borla of Pfizer, coordinated by Sasha Ladopova. The Netherlands appellate court limited live testimony, but Sanson has provided written statements and affidavits. A trial hearing in The Netherlands was set for October 22 in the cited case. Next steps - Sanson is pursuing an oral-argument motion for live, livestreamed proceedings; a decision is pending, potentially in September. He hopes for evidentiary development and more cases to challenge the PREP Act and related immunities. - He emphasizes public engagement and urges others to seek cases in other states or countries to push discovery and accountability. Overall, Sanson presents a narrative linking the mRNA vaccines to environmental shedding and alleged bioweapon characteristics, backed by affidavits, peer papers, and testimonies, and seeks injunctive relief in Florida and collaborative proceedings in Europe to halt the use and distribution of the injections.

The article COVID world 10/09/2022 presents estimates of extra deaths and serious adverse effects attributable to a three-year period of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons. The 10/09/2022 estimates report thirty-one million extra deaths and one point nine billion serious adverse effects over three years. Two main differences with the previous estimates (10/01/2022) are: first, eleven countries, for about 600,000,000 people, were added to the estimate base data, making the current estimate base data consist of 47 countries for about 2,300,000,000 people; second, for estimating serious adverse effects the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are taken fully into account as input instead of half in the previous estimates. The extra deaths estimates for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported and factual deaths in the countries listed in the table, with sources from Our World in Data (appendix references). Extra deaths (ED for 2020, ED21 for 2021, and ED22 for 2022) are calculated as the difference between the factual total deaths in the concerned year. Missing months of the incomplete 2022 year are estimated by extrapolating the monthly average of all known months from January 2021 onward. The yearly evolution uses a corrected average of the five preceding years (2015 to 2019). The yearly correction factor is 0.75%, calculated from the evolution of the sum of deaths of all countries from 2015 to 2019. For 2020 ED the correction factor 0.75% was applied three times (reference year 2017) to the five-year average; for 2021 ED, four times; for 2022 ED, five times. The extra deaths estimates thus reflect excess deaths after correcting for expected yearly evolution and expected yearly without the mass vaccination and COVID bioweapons. To compute the world totals: for 2020 ED, the ED100 ks extra deaths per 100k people by country are calculated and aggregated to 112 extra deaths per 100k people, applied to the world population to yield nine million extra deaths in 2020, the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2021 ED, the ED21M doses (extra deaths per million doses) are calculated and aggregated to 961 extra deaths per million doses, applied to global doses to yield twelve point one million extra deaths in 2021, the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2022 ED, the ED22M doses (extra deaths per million doses) are calculated and aggregated to 763 extra deaths per million doses, applied to global doses to yield nine point six million extra deaths in 2022, the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. The estimate for people with serious adverse effects is calculated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by an estimated ratio of reported adverse effects to reported deaths after COVID vaccination, which is 87.6, derived from a table of estimated probabilities after COVID vaccination for all ages. This results in an estimated one point one billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and zero point eight billion for 2022. Considering the estimated thirty-one million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for three years, the text asserts that terms such as bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo. It further posits about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020, projecting one hundred ten million extra deaths by the end of 2030 if these trends continue. The text acknowledges that if data are far off target or data are faulty, the current estimates and trends could be seriously unvalidated. It attributes censorship and a lack of truthful science in mainstream media and tech platforms to propounding that SARS CoV-two is naturally evolved, while claiming truthful science proves SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a biolab. It asserts that the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains lab-made inserts (PRRA, HIVGP120) that are too large and too numerous, and that these inserts only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically distant. It references a substantial trail of documents and testimonies before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the needed biochemical technology, including financing, scientific documents, and patents. Specific sources and figures are noted, including Doctor Richard Fleming, MD, sworn testimony that COVID-19 is a bioweapon; Doctor Fleming on Montanier's discovery of HIV and spiked protein; Veritas Revelation Project materials; and claims that the virus comes from a lab. It also mentions Genentech COVID vaccines causing human cells to produce large amounts of toxic spike protein in multiple organs and tissues, and asserts these vaccines are bioweapons with additional components and contaminations causing health damage. The article is attributed to Pak Osmol, dated 10/09/2022, with Appendix A citing Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count as the data source.